Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help
allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of
these approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry
if this is on topic! ; )
Bill
On 2/5/2014 8:08 PM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/5/2014 6:45 PM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/5/2014 12:55 PM, dpb wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2014 11:45 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>> On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
>>>>
>>>> Either leave or more commonly touch up by hand, obviously.
>>>
>>> Which is, of course, no different in principle than if use the block
>>> plane or other hand tool for the purpose ...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> FWIW I considered the original OP's comment to " knock down" the corners
>> so that the finish would adhere better to mean simply make the edge less
>> sharp, not to add any kind of profile to the edge. There was no mention
>> of adding a profile in the original post.
>>
>> And if that were the case you might as well sand everything, the edges,
>> lightly rather than use a tool for the same purpose and still have to
>> hand sand the corners.
>>
>> But if you are changing the profile then you would truly and obviously
>> have to touch up by hand.
>
> Well, the discussion at the point I entered centered on using a router
> for the job and I commented that instead of a roundover I more often use
> a chamfer with a very small cut instead. End result is about the same
> as a single stroke of a block plane which barely noticeable -- the
> disadvantage is it takes a little to set up, the advantage is that if
> there's any grain variation the router doesn't have to worry about the
> direction as may have to with the plane.
>
> --
>
>
Start a book in the middle and you miss a lot. ;~)
But, the beginning comment did mention a router to knock down the edges
but no mention of doing anything past knocking down the edges.
And concerning a router not having issue with grain direction, yours
must be magical. ;~)
On 2/8/2014 7:09 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:50:06 -0600, Leon wrote:
>
>>> I have yet to meet a cutter that leaves a finish-ready surface. You're
>>> sanding, anyway... just ease the edge during that process. Heck, it's
>>> difficult to sand a sharp edge *without* rounding it over. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> Exactly how I see it.
>
> To just break the edge, or to do a 1/16" roundover, I agree. For 1/4"
> I've been known to do it mostly with a plane and finish with sandpaper.
> For 3/8" and above, I break out the router :-).
>
The feel of a planed edge over a sanded edge is way different. I love
the feel of a planed edge. Just so nice and crisp, w/out being too sharp.
--
Jeff
On 2/4/2014 2:33 AM, Bill wrote:
> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help
> allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of
> these approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry
> if this is on topic! ; )
>
> Bill
Well knocking down the corners is SOP, with a router ??? well you don't
have to use a router. Many times I use a block plane, I like the edge
better. But I do have a 1/8 radius bit in my old 1/4 " Craftsman (45-50
year old router).
An edge is too sharp, it will wear off quickly since it does not hold a
lot of finish.
Relieving them allows them to survive longer, and decreases the pain
when one runs into a sharp edge.
--
Jeff
On 2/8/2014 1:41 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 2/8/14, 9:08 AM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/7/2014 6:00 PM, Leon wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>>> I just think it's faster and particularly more consistent overall than
>>>> trying to breakover an edge with paper when doing a whole set of
>>>> cabinets or the like...
>>
>> ...big snip...
>>>> imo, ymmv, $0.01, etc., etc., etc., ...
>>
>>> FWIW I used to use a router, and I do have a nice trim router too. The
>>> paper works faster for me.
>>
>> When given a choice between a cutting/scraping operation and sanding,
>> I'll take the cutting one virtually every time as a matter of personal
>> preference--I _hate_ paper...
>>
>> --
>>
>
> I have yet to meet a cutter that leaves a finish-ready surface.
> You're sanding, anyway... just ease the edge during that process.
> Heck, it's difficult to sand a sharp edge *without* rounding it over. :-)
>
>
Exactly how I see it.
Bill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
> well.
That's true -- mostly a question of surface tension. The finish will pull away from sharp edges.
There are other reasons for relieving edges as well: it provides a softer, more finished look; a
sharp edge will wear much faster than a slightly rounded edge; and a sharp edge is
uncomfortable to the touch.
I normally use sandpaper, but I've been known to use a table-mounted router with a 1/16"
radius roundover bit too.
On 2/4/2014 9:28 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
>> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
>> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help allow
>> for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of these
>> approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry if this
>> is on topic! ; )
>
> As others have commented, at least the minimum w/ a sanding block and/or
> block plane or scraper is quite common...on some pieces for a purpose
> finish I'll use the router (a laminate trimmer is far more convenient
> btw) but with a chamfer rather than roundover--you can make it anywhere
> from nearly invisible to a "feature".
>
> --
>
>
Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
On 2/4/2014 10:29 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Leon wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down"
>>> all corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to
>>> them very well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?)
>>> to help allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are
>>> both of these approaches SOP? Thank you for further
>>> clarification! I'm sorry if this is on topic! ; )
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
>>
>> Yes Bill finishes tend to not adhere to a sharp edge. The finish will
>> pull away from a sharp edge while applying. Using a router could be
>> very time consuming, don't get into corners well, and very well may
>> change the look of the project.
>>
>> I use my finish sander to very lightly go over the edge a pass or two
>> to ease the edge and often use a piece of foam backed 4.5"x 4.5" sand
>> paper and break the edge manually. Softening the edge so that it is
>> not likely to cut you if you run your finger against it is typically
>> enough.
>
> To chime in on Leon here - a basic fact is that any finish always wants some
> amount of tooth. Of course, the more liquid the finish, the less tooth you
> need to provide, but the principle remains. Hard edges provide little to no
> tooth, so they are more likely to fail in their ability to absorb a finish.
> Not to mention that on hard edges (in particular outside edges), the finish
> is at its thinest. A fraction of what it may be on a more flat surface of
> the piece. So - Leon's comment is spot on for a couple of reasons. He
> opens the pores by sanding and creates tooth. He also relieves - even if
> ever so slightly, that hard edge and enables a higher build of the finish.
>
>
>> Unless you are really wanting to change the profile of the edge vs.
>> making the sharp corner/edge not so sharp, a router is going to take
>> you 4 times longer.
>
> Agreed. That's where a good set of torches can't be beat...!
>
You and your friggin torches..... LOL
On 2/5/2014 12:55 PM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 11:45 AM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, Leon wrote:
> ...
>
>>> Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
>>
>> Either leave or more commonly touch up by hand, obviously.
>
> Which is, of course, no different in principle than if use the block
> plane or other hand tool for the purpose ...
>
> --
>
>
FWIW I considered the original OP's comment to " knock down" the corners
so that the finish would adhere better to mean simply make the edge less
sharp, not to add any kind of profile to the edge. There was no mention
of adding a profile in the original post.
And if that were the case you might as well sand everything, the edges,
lightly rather than use a tool for the same purpose and still have to
hand sand the corners.
But if you are changing the profile then you would truly and obviously
have to touch up by hand.
Sorry
On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
> well.
True, but 220 sandpaper works just as well to "break the edges", and it
allows the discerning craftsman an opportunity to go over the entire
project up close and personal.
He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help
> allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of
> these approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry
> if this is on topic! ; )
How on earth could that be off topic, and what does it matter anyway?? ;)
I wouldn't call it SOP, but it is not unheard of ... although I doubt
for the reason
On the outside of the doors (and drawer fronts?, the practice used to be
called "Hollywood" style, and Sam Maloof might have been the instigator,
although I seriously doubt that it was because of wood movement that he
did it ... more likely because it makes it easier to fit and inset door.
I did it on these doors a few years back, mainly because I liked the
look when the frame of a door is made out of contrasting material:
https://picasaweb.google.com/111355467778981859077/EWoodShopTexasTansu2005?noredirect=1#
http://e-woodshop.net/Projects8.htm
--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)
On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help allow
> for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of these
> approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry if this
> is on topic! ; )
As others have commented, at least the minimum w/ a sanding block and/or
block plane or scraper is quite common...on some pieces for a purpose
finish I'll use the router (a laminate trimmer is far more convenient
btw) but with a chamfer rather than roundover--you can make it anywhere
from nearly invisible to a "feature".
--
Leon wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down"
>> all corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to
>> them very well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?)
>> to help allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are
>> both of these approaches SOP? Thank you for further
>> clarification! I'm sorry if this is on topic! ; )
>>
>> Bill
>
>
> Yes Bill finishes tend to not adhere to a sharp edge. The finish will
> pull away from a sharp edge while applying. Using a router could be
> very time consuming, don't get into corners well, and very well may
> change the look of the project.
>
> I use my finish sander to very lightly go over the edge a pass or two
> to ease the edge and often use a piece of foam backed 4.5"x 4.5" sand
> paper and break the edge manually. Softening the edge so that it is
> not likely to cut you if you run your finger against it is typically
> enough.
To chime in on Leon here - a basic fact is that any finish always wants some
amount of tooth. Of course, the more liquid the finish, the less tooth you
need to provide, but the principle remains. Hard edges provide little to no
tooth, so they are more likely to fail in their ability to absorb a finish.
Not to mention that on hard edges (in particular outside edges), the finish
is at its thinest. A fraction of what it may be on a more flat surface of
the piece. So - Leon's comment is spot on for a couple of reasons. He
opens the pores by sanding and creates tooth. He also relieves - even if
ever so slightly, that hard edge and enables a higher build of the finish.
> Unless you are really wanting to change the profile of the edge vs.
> making the sharp corner/edge not so sharp, a router is going to take
> you 4 times longer.
Agreed. That's where a good set of torches can't be beat...!
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 9:28 AM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
>>> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
>>> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help allow
>>> for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of these
>>> approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry if this
>>> is on topic! ; )
>>
>> As others have commented, at least the minimum w/ a sanding block and/or
>> block plane or scraper is quite common...on some pieces for a purpose
>> finish I'll use the router (a laminate trimmer is far more convenient
>> btw) but with a chamfer rather than roundover--you can make it anywhere
>> from nearly invisible to a "feature".
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
>
> Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
Either leave or more commonly touch up by hand, obviously.
--
Leon wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
>> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
>> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help
>> allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of
>> these approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry
>> if this is on topic! ; )
>>
>> Bill
>
>
> Yes Bill finishes tend to not adhere to a sharp edge. The finish will
> pull away from a sharp edge while applying. Using a router could be
> very time consuming, don't get into corners well, and very well may
> change the look of the project.
>
> I use my finish sander to very lightly go over the edge a pass or two
> to ease the edge and often use a piece of foam backed 4.5"x 4.5" sand
> paper and break the edge manually. Softening the edge so that it is
> not likely to cut you if you run your finger against it is typically
> enough.
>
> Unless you are really wanting to change the profile of the edge vs.
> making the sharp corner/edge not so sharp, a router is going to take
> you 4 times longer.
Jim Heavey may have had a bias since he was giving a "router
workshop". Thanks for your reply!
Mike Marlow wrote:
> Leon wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
>>> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down"
>>> all corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to
>>> them very well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?)
>>> to help allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are
>>> both of these approaches SOP? Thank you for further
>>> clarification! I'm sorry if this is on topic! ; )
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
>> Yes Bill finishes tend to not adhere to a sharp edge. The finish will
>> pull away from a sharp edge while applying. Using a router could be
>> very time consuming, don't get into corners well, and very well may
>> change the look of the project.
>>
>> I use my finish sander to very lightly go over the edge a pass or two
>> to ease the edge and often use a piece of foam backed 4.5"x 4.5" sand
>> paper and break the edge manually. Softening the edge so that it is
>> not likely to cut you if you run your finger against it is typically
>> enough.
> To chime in on Leon here - a basic fact is that any finish always wants some
> amount of tooth. Of course, the more liquid the finish, the less tooth you
> need to provide, but the principle remains. Hard edges provide little to no
> tooth, so they are more likely to fail in their ability to absorb a finish.
> Not to mention that on hard edges (in particular outside edges), the finish
> is at its thinest. A fraction of what it may be on a more flat surface of
> the piece. So - Leon's comment is spot on for a couple of reasons. He
> opens the pores by sanding and creates tooth. He also relieves - even if
> ever so slightly, that hard edge and enables a higher build of the finish.
>
Mike, That explanation seems to have a lot of teeth to it (always a good
thing). Thanks!
Bill
>> Unless you are really wanting to change the profile of the edge vs.
>> making the sharp corner/edge not so sharp, a router is going to take
>> you 4 times longer.
> Agreed. That's where a good set of torches can't be beat...!
>
On 2/4/2014 11:45 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, Leon wrote:
...
>> Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
>
> Either leave or more commonly touch up by hand, obviously.
Which is, of course, no different in principle than if use the block
plane or other hand tool for the purpose ...
--
On 2/5/2014 6:45 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/5/2014 12:55 PM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/4/2014 11:45 AM, dpb wrote:
>>> On 2/4/2014 9:36 AM, Leon wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>>> Then how do you deal with the inside corners, if you use the router?
>>>
>>> Either leave or more commonly touch up by hand, obviously.
>>
>> Which is, of course, no different in principle than if use the block
>> plane or other hand tool for the purpose ...
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
>
> FWIW I considered the original OP's comment to " knock down" the corners
> so that the finish would adhere better to mean simply make the edge less
> sharp, not to add any kind of profile to the edge. There was no mention
> of adding a profile in the original post.
>
> And if that were the case you might as well sand everything, the edges,
> lightly rather than use a tool for the same purpose and still have to
> hand sand the corners.
>
> But if you are changing the profile then you would truly and obviously
> have to touch up by hand.
Well, the discussion at the point I entered centered on using a router
for the job and I commented that instead of a roundover I more often use
a chamfer with a very small cut instead. End result is about the same
as a single stroke of a block plane which barely noticeable -- the
disadvantage is it takes a little to set up, the advantage is that if
there's any grain variation the router doesn't have to worry about the
direction as may have to with the plane.
--
On 2/6/2014 8:17 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/5/2014 8:32 PM, Leon wrote:
> ...
>
>> And concerning a router not having issue with grain direction, yours
>> must be magical. ;~)
>
> With such a tiny cut of which we're talking and a sharp cutter it is...
To amplify just one last little bit, I like it because a) I have a very
nice, small laminate trimmer so it isn't futzing w/ the big router to
set it up, and b) it produces a crisp, consistently angle edge that is
virtually identical to that obtained by a block plane set to take a
minute shaving excepting the angle is automagically fixed without effort
to ensure don't switch your wrist angle a little during a pass and it
gets to within a hair of the corners that the block plane can't.
A scraper blade mounted at a 45 or other chosen angle in a 90-degree
guide block can be set to make the same cut at a fixed depth and while
it works well, it's more maintenance to sharpen/set than the trimmer so
unless it's really high-end, handwork-only kind of project I've
relegated it to the rarely used pile.
Veritas and others make roundover tools that work well; I've seen the
same idea with a flat edge instead of round but don't know of anybody
making them commercially at the moment...
<http://www.veritastools.com/Products/Page.aspx?p=195>
I just think it's faster and particularly more consistent overall than
trying to breakover an edge with paper when doing a whole set of
cabinets or the like...for a "one-off" I'd go back to the scraper or
plane unless it's already still set which since I do so little laminate
work itself any more is a fairly like case...it may have been two year
now since it's been touched given what I've been at recently--farm shop
clean up w/ the idea of getting enough area to be able to get to the
windows again before spring planting. Of course, this has been the
target winter's project for this being the third winter now and progress
is minimal given the interruptions of "real world" farm operation in
winter... :(
imo, ymmv, $0.01, etc., etc., etc., ...
--
On 2/7/2014 6:00 PM, Leon wrote:
...
>> I just think it's faster and particularly more consistent overall than
>> trying to breakover an edge with paper when doing a whole set of
>> cabinets or the like...
...big snip...
>> imo, ymmv, $0.01, etc., etc., etc., ...
> FWIW I used to use a router, and I do have a nice trim router too. The
> paper works faster for me.
When given a choice between a cutting/scraping operation and sanding,
I'll take the cutting one virtually every time as a matter of personal
preference--I _hate_ paper...
--
On 2/8/14, 9:08 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 6:00 PM, Leon wrote:
> ...
>
>>> I just think it's faster and particularly more consistent overall than
>>> trying to breakover an edge with paper when doing a whole set of
>>> cabinets or the like...
>
> ...big snip...
>>> imo, ymmv, $0.01, etc., etc., etc., ...
>
>> FWIW I used to use a router, and I do have a nice trim router too. The
>> paper works faster for me.
>
> When given a choice between a cutting/scraping operation and sanding,
> I'll take the cutting one virtually every time as a matter of personal
> preference--I _hate_ paper...
>
> --
>
I have yet to meet a cutter that leaves a finish-ready surface.
You're sanding, anyway... just ease the edge during that process.
Heck, it's difficult to sand a sharp edge *without* rounding it over. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:50:06 -0600, Leon wrote:
>> I have yet to meet a cutter that leaves a finish-ready surface. You're
>> sanding, anyway... just ease the edge during that process. Heck, it's
>> difficult to sand a sharp edge *without* rounding it over. :-)
>>
>>
> Exactly how I see it.
To just break the edge, or to do a 1/16" roundover, I agree. For 1/4"
I've been known to do it mostly with a plane and finish with sandpaper.
For 3/8" and above, I break out the router :-).
--
Where have all the flowers gone? Pete Seeger 1919-2014
On 2/8/2014 6:31 PM, woodchucker wrote:
> On 2/8/2014 7:09 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 15:50:06 -0600, Leon wrote:
>>
>>>> I have yet to meet a cutter that leaves a finish-ready surface. You're
>>>> sanding, anyway... just ease the edge during that process. Heck, it's
>>>> difficult to sand a sharp edge *without* rounding it over. :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Exactly how I see it.
>>
>> To just break the edge, or to do a 1/16" roundover, I agree. For 1/4"
>> I've been known to do it mostly with a plane and finish with sandpaper.
>> For 3/8" and above, I break out the router :-).
>>
> The feel of a planed edge over a sanded edge is way different. I love
> the feel of a planed edge. Just so nice and crisp, w/out being too sharp.
Again, w/ the size of the chamfer I'm talking of and a _sharp_ HSS bit,
the left edge is essentially undifferentiable from a planed or scraped
edge. So little material is removed there's not a tendency to tear and
the HSS edge is much sharper than carbide.
It seems most are confusing this with taking a large chamfer or a 1/8"
roundover--it's nothing near that large.
--
On 2/7/2014 2:10 PM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/6/2014 8:17 AM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/5/2014 8:32 PM, Leon wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> And concerning a router not having issue with grain direction, yours
>>> must be magical. ;~)
>>
>> With such a tiny cut of which we're talking and a sharp cutter it is...
>
> To amplify just one last little bit, I like it because a) I have a very
> nice, small laminate trimmer so it isn't futzing w/ the big router to
> set it up, and b) it produces a crisp, consistently angle edge that is
> virtually identical to that obtained by a block plane set to take a
> minute shaving excepting the angle is automagically fixed without effort
> to ensure don't switch your wrist angle a little during a pass and it
> gets to within a hair of the corners that the block plane can't.
>
> A scraper blade mounted at a 45 or other chosen angle in a 90-degree
> guide block can be set to make the same cut at a fixed depth and while
> it works well, it's more maintenance to sharpen/set than the trimmer so
> unless it's really high-end, handwork-only kind of project I've
> relegated it to the rarely used pile.
>
> Veritas and others make roundover tools that work well; I've seen the
> same idea with a flat edge instead of round but don't know of anybody
> making them commercially at the moment...
>
> <http://www.veritastools.com/Products/Page.aspx?p=195>
>
> I just think it's faster and particularly more consistent overall than
> trying to breakover an edge with paper when doing a whole set of
> cabinets or the like...for a "one-off" I'd go back to the scraper or
> plane unless it's already still set which since I do so little laminate
> work itself any more is a fairly like case...it may have been two year
> now since it's been touched given what I've been at recently--farm shop
> clean up w/ the idea of getting enough area to be able to get to the
> windows again before spring planting. Of course, this has been the
> target winter's project for this being the third winter now and progress
> is minimal given the interruptions of "real world" farm operation in
> winter... :(
>
> imo, ymmv, $0.01, etc., etc., etc., ...
>
> --
FWIW I used to use a router, and I do have a nice trim router too. The
paper works faster for me.
On 2/4/2014 1:33 AM, Bill wrote:
> Was listening to an Jim Heavey (WW-Shows) say that he "knocked down" all
> corners/edges with a router--because finishes don't adhere to them very
> well. He also routes around inset cabinet doors (frames?) to help
> allow for wood movement while preserving the appearence. Are both of
> these approaches SOP? Thank you for further clarification! I'm sorry
> if this is on topic! ; )
>
> Bill
Yes Bill finishes tend to not adhere to a sharp edge. The finish will
pull away from a sharp edge while applying. Using a router could be
very time consuming, don't get into corners well, and very well may
change the look of the project.
I use my finish sander to very lightly go over the edge a pass or two to
ease the edge and often use a piece of foam backed 4.5"x 4.5" sand paper
and break the edge manually. Softening the edge so that it is not
likely to cut you if you run your finger against it is typically enough.
Unless you are really wanting to change the profile of the edge vs.
making the sharp corner/edge not so sharp, a router is going to take you
4 times longer.