rR

22/10/2004 12:36 AM

Another tool ID needed XVI

Just posted some more photos this morning:

http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/



Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:

http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/


And answers to numbers 155-159:

http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/




Rob


This topic has 12 replies

Td

"TeamCasa"

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 1:23 PM

162 is a go-no-go gauge for machinists.



"R.H." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Just posted some more photos this morning:
>
> http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:
>
> http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/
>
>
> And answers to numbers 155-159:
>
> http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> Rob

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 5:53 PM


"Dwight" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] (R.H.) wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > Just posted some more photos this morning:
> >
> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:
> >
> > http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > And answers to numbers 155-159:
> >
> > http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Rob
>
> Howdy Rob. Is 161 for casting? Making lead fishing line weights or
bullets maybe?

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

23/10/2004 11:53 PM


"Mike Dworetsky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "R.H." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Just posted some more photos this morning:
> >
> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
> > ...
>
> 164 looks like ammunition, a small cannonball or very large iron shot for
an
> 18th/19th C. gun. Shot as large as 1.25 inches would usually be iron not
> lead. Might be fired from a naval swivel gun perhaps.


Yes, someone else advised that it is probably canister shot, not grape shot
as I had previously thought.

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 6:37 PM

"R.H." <[email protected]> writes:
>
>"Scott Lurndal" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> "R.H." <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> >> >
>> >> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
>>
>> #163 is a tooth for a mower, combine, binder,
>> or haybine.
>>
>> scott
>
>
>Correct, I wish I could be more specific but I don't know much about this
>one.
>
>Rob
>
>

at 7.5" it is pretty large. Probably a combine.

scott

sS

[email protected] (Scott Lurndal)

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 6:09 PM

"R.H." <[email protected]> writes:

>> >
>> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/

#163 is a tooth for a mower, combine, binder,
or haybine.

scott

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 6:13 PM


"Scott Lurndal" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "R.H." <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> >
> >> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
>
> #163 is a tooth for a mower, combine, binder,
> or haybine.
>
> scott


Correct, I wish I could be more specific but I don't know much about this
one.

Rob

MD

"Mike Dworetsky"

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

23/10/2004 11:04 AM

"R.H." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Just posted some more photos this morning:
>
> http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
> ...

164 looks like ammunition, a small cannonball or very large iron shot for an
18th/19th C. gun. Shot as large as 1.25 inches would usually be iron not
lead. Might be fired from a naval swivel gun perhaps.

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail)

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 5:54 PM


"Dwight" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] (R.H.) wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > Just posted some more photos this morning:
> >
> > http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:
> >
> > http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > And answers to numbers 155-159:
> >
> > http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Rob
>
> Howdy Rob. Is 161 for casting? Making lead fishing line weights or
bullets maybe?

Correct, it's a bullet mold.





WB

"Wood Butcher"

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 8:56 PM

164. Ball from a ball mill used for finely pulverizing ore or portland cement?

Art

"R.H." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Just posted some more photos this morning:
>
> http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:
>
> http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/
>
>
> And answers to numbers 155-159:
>
> http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> Rob

aD

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

22/10/2004 8:38 AM

[email protected] (R.H.) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Just posted some more photos this morning:
>
> http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> Also posted answers to numbers 150-154:
>
> http://pzphotosan30.blogspot.com/
>
>
> And answers to numbers 155-159:
>
> http://pzphotosan31.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
> Rob

Howdy Rob. Is 161 for casting? Making lead fishing line weights or bullets maybe?

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

23/10/2004 10:21 AM


"Wood Butcher" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:eueed.231639$wV.166176@attbi_s54...
> 164. Ball from a ball mill used for finely pulverizing ore or portland
cement?
>


I'm not familiar with the type of balls used in ball mills, I'll have to do
a search on that one. I'm not sure what this one is, it might be a piece of
grape shot.

Rr

"R.H."

in reply to [email protected] (R.H.) on 22/10/2004 12:36 AM

23/10/2004 10:17 AM


"TeamCasa" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> 162 is a go-no-go gauge for machinists.
>


Correct.


You’ve reached the end of replies