I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
reasonable offer?
--
Alex - newbie_neander in woodworking
cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com
not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/
AAvK wrote:
> I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
> years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
> from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
> reasonable offer?
>
I think it's a good mag. I get it. After awhile it gets a little
repetitive (as all hobby mags do), but I can usually find at least 1
interesting tip or project idea or enjoyable article per issue. I've
built a couple things where their plans served as inspiration over the
years. That's a great price, I think it's worthwhile to try it.
AAvK wrote:
> I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
> years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
> from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
> reasonable offer?
>
> --
> Alex - newbie_neander in woodworking
> cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com
> not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/
I am a subscriber & enjoy the articles & tips. They also have the
yearly special out in stores now titled "Best-Ever Workshops" that has
a photo tour of nine shops along with articles on wiring, lighting,
heating your shop and a lot of storage ideas. If only each issue was as
good as this special one.
Big John
I like it just fine. My 3 yr subscription is about to run out and I've
not decided if I'll renew or not. Seems most rags recycle plans and
articles (with small changes) about every 3 years, but hey, $28 ain't
bad for 3 years!
AAvK wrote:
> I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
> years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
> from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
> reasonable offer?
>
<[email protected]> wrote in message
> Now, there's two schools of thought here:
>
> 1. They *knew* it didn't hold up underwater and intentionally omitted
> it and posted the "it exists, and had you tested it, it would have
> kicked ass" note in the "letters" section of the next issue
> so it never had to get on the graph.
>
> 2. Perhaps the professional glue reviewer really didn't know about it
> (dispite having over-saturating everybody with 'III marketing
> materials) and are even more unbiased than Ralph Nader
> and Consumer Reports.
How about:
3. The article was written months ago, before TB3 was introduced and the
editor finally got around to using the article to fill space on that issue.
Or the more likely reason, the review was old and not published until
well after it was written, thus the exclusion of TB3.
John
[email protected] wrote:
> Not a bad magazine, but they do things that seem strange to me. I find it
> amusing. Here's an example...not too long ago, they did an article on
> how well glues hold up underwater. Guess what was missing? Titebond III.
>
> "That's weird" I says... "It's been out for some time now"
>
> Even weirder, on the back cover there's a full-page glossy
> Titebond III advertisement IN THAT VERY ISSUE!
>
> Now, there's two schools of thought here:
>
> 1. They *knew* it didn't hold up underwater and intentionally omitted
> it and posted the "it exists, and had you tested it, it would have
> kicked ass" note in the "letters" section of the next issue
> so it never had to get on the graph.
>
> 2. Perhaps the professional glue reviewer really didn't know about it
> (dispite having over-saturating everybody with 'III marketing
> materials) and are even more unbiased than Ralph Nader
> and Consumer Reports.
> I am a subscriber & enjoy the articles & tips. They also have the
> yearly special out in stores now titled "Best-Ever Workshops" that has
> a photo tour of nine shops along with articles on wiring, lighting,
> heating your shop and a lot of storage ideas. If only each issue was as
> good as this special one.
>
> Big John
>
Thanks John, it seems to be a viable enough mag for a newb such as myself,
so, I bought.
--
Alex - newbie_neander in woodworking
cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com
not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:43:07 -0500, Tom Banes
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:24:04 -0700, "AAvK" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
>>years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
>>from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
>>reasonable offer?
>
>Got the same offer. Bought a copy to look at it and signed up. Sounded
>like a pretty cheap deal to me too.
>
>Regards.
>
>Tom
what's the book? on their website they have the same offer, except
that the freebie is a downloadable set of plans.
I used to get it. For close to a buck an issue, it's a decent value. It has
about an equal mix of technique, projects and reviews. However, I
terminated the subscription because I felt that I had outgrown it. The
content is a bit slanted to the newbie.
That said, It's not a bad publication.
-Steve
"RayV" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I subscribe to Wood and think it is a good magazine.
>
> The projects are not impossible for an amatuer like myself and the tool
> reviews seem to be legit.
>
Sounds interesting, they are bhg controlled, and most magazine
publishing is add driven so maybe they didn't accept payment to
place tb-III "on top" or at least near the top in their critique...?
Who knows besides them. Or it could be that that is what they
want, money for the review, and it didn't fall through. I can
see it would be some info that anyone should want to know,
and it wasn't there.
--
Alex - newbie_neander in woodworking
cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com
not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:24:04 -0700, "AAvK" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
>years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
>from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
>reasonable offer?
Got the same offer. Bought a copy to look at it and signed up. Sounded
like a pretty cheap deal to me too.
Regards.
Tom
Not a bad magazine, but they do things that seem strange to me. I find it
amusing. Here's an example...not too long ago, they did an article on
how well glues hold up underwater. Guess what was missing? Titebond III.
"That's weird" I says... "It's been out for some time now"
Even weirder, on the back cover there's a full-page glossy
Titebond III advertisement IN THAT VERY ISSUE!
Now, there's two schools of thought here:
1. They *knew* it didn't hold up underwater and intentionally omitted
it and posted the "it exists, and had you tested it, it would have
kicked ass" note in the "letters" section of the next issue
so it never had to get on the graph.
2. Perhaps the professional glue reviewer really didn't know about it
(dispite having over-saturating everybody with 'III marketing
materials) and are even more unbiased than Ralph Nader
and Consumer Reports.
(and no, I've not tried it myself, so I have no first-hand knowledge
of how it actually performs. I, like most canadian woodworkers, use duct tape)
AAvK <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I just got this big brown and white envelope from them, offering three
> years plus a book for $28 which is $24 + $4 S/H. I have the impression
> from folks in this NG that wood mag is well liked, anyone think it's a
> reasonable offer?
>
Paul Kierstead <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> How about:
>> 3. The article was written months ago, before TB3 was introduced and the
>> editor finally got around to using the article to fill space on that issue.
>
> No no no!! There must be a conspiracy, dammit! This trend towards
> sensible explanations must stop.
Those theories were for the enjoyment of that guy that was being
shut-out of quality stuff by not being a contractor... I think that
might have been "bf" :-)
These new theories won't get high ratings :-)
"AAvK" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Thanks John, it seems to be a viable enough mag for a newb such as myself,
> so, I bought.
I think you'll like it. I've made a couple of projects from their plans
with good results. They were easy to follow straightforward, that my sill
level can handle.