mm

"maico"

07/11/2006 5:58 PM

Recommendation: Porter Cable or Dewalt biscuit joiner

After dragging you all through the coals regarding the best biscuits, I
am now working backwards to the best biscuit joiner! See the following
thread on biscuits:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.woodworking/browse_frm/thread/214335f61f72a106/#

As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW. Also,
there seems to be an issue of small wood components (to be joined)
falling into the fence of the BJ and that PC has addressed this with an
insert; is this true?

I am looking for your opinion(s) on these two tools.

I look forward to your responses.


This topic has 24 replies

BA

B A R R Y

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

09/11/2006 1:16 PM

maico wrote:
> Well, thank you all again for your input. I just returned the Dewalt
> and then purchased the PC 557 biscuit joiner and it is a Type 3. In
> total, it cost $92.00 more than the Dewalt

$92? 8^(

Coastal Tool sells the DW for $145 & the PC for $172.

mm

"maico"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

07/11/2006 6:56 PM

Tom, is your PC a Type I, II or III?

Tom Kendrick wrote:
> I bought the PC 557 and recommend it highly. In this price range, the
> PC is the better machine. I would return the DW.
>
> On 7 Nov 2006 17:58:20 -0800, "maico" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >After dragging you all through the coals regarding the best biscuits, I
> >am now working backwards to the best biscuit joiner! See the following
> >thread on biscuits:
> >
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rec.woodworking/browse_frm/thread/214335f61f72a106/#
> >
> >As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
> >Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
> >bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
> >yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
> >which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW. Also,
> >there seems to be an issue of small wood components (to be joined)
> >falling into the fence of the BJ and that PC has addressed this with an
> >insert; is this true?
> >
> >I am looking for your opinion(s) on these two tools.
> >
> >I look forward to your responses.

Rd

"Robatoy"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

07/11/2006 7:37 PM



On Nov 7, 8:58 pm, "maico" <[email protected]>
> I have already purchased the
> Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
> bought the Porter Cable 557. [snipped for brevity]
>
> I look forward to your responses.

I have a Lamello Classic...in a box. I now have a PC 557 (FF was one of
the reasons). The Lamello Classic is no Top, which was stolen and the
best yet....but for the money?
I have played with the DeWalt. A loooong time ago, I used an Elu on
quite a few projects and liked it. They look similar. I never liked
the thin base plate.
I borrowed a Freud one time also...so I have been around a few biscuit
joiners.
That Freud had too much slop in the action. Can't comment on them
today.

The feel, the option for FF biscuits and dust collection of the PC 557
are the reasons why I always reach for it. The insert for the fence
makes working with small pieces a lot nicer.

I prefer the Lamello biscuits and just love this thing:
http://www.csaw.com/lamello/gluebottles.html
Had mine for 20+ years now.

r

Sc

SB

in reply to "Robatoy" on 07/11/2006 7:37 PM

30/06/2017 3:14 PM

replying to Robatoy, SB wrote:
Are blades interchangeable on PC and Dewalt biscuit joiners?

--
for full context, visit https://www.homeownershub.com/woodworking/recommendation-porter-cable-or-dewalt-biscuit-joiner-346295-.htm

mm

"maico"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 7:10 AM

Don't beat up on yourself for this one Charlie; the reason I started
these two threads is that there is limited current information on the
topics (I Googled).

As for the deciding factors, pro PC, there are three that I am aware of
(many thanks to you all for your input): the fence insert for cutting
smaller pieces that may fall into the fence opening, more depth
adjustability and the FF biscuits.

I have read about shimming the fence for the Type II but Type III has
no issues. Do you all have a Type II and you shimmed and is someone
using the Type III?

Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
> Swingman wrote:
> > "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
> >
>
> >
> > There is absolutely nothing wrong with the DeWalt. The PC, with it's smaller
> > FF biscuit capability, is just a tad more versatile when/if you need that
> > capability.
> >
> > The smaller biscuits come in handy for me when to simulate joinery without
> > having to resort to a nail gun on a prototype which just may find some
> > actual use, or when reinforcing miter joints on small frames.
> >
> > If you don't need that capability, the DeWalt will certainly serve you well,
> > and you can buy some wood with the leftover $$
> >
>
> Thanks, Doug and Swing for the clarification. Next time I'll google
> FIRST before firing off the dumb question <blush>.

bb

"bf"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 10:42 AM


maico wrote:

> As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
> Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
> bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
> yet to use it.

In that case, return the Dewalt. I have the PC, it's a great machine.
The Dewalt is probably a good machine as well. If you think you might
use the face frame biscuits, then it's worth the extra $50 or whatever
to get the PC (It's been a long time, so I don't know). Plus, it seems
like you will be happier with the PC.

I just saw the PC on sale at Home Depot. I assume it's the same model.

I must say though, I haven't used the face frame biscuits that much. On
a few small things.
If you are going to make a lot of face frames, get a kreg jig, along
with this clamp.. http://www.hartvilletool.com/product/12282 .. Then
use a clamp like a Bessey K-body to clamp the the face frame "T" shape
(the wood) to the face frame clamp. That lines up the pieces in that
dimension (basically the alignment that a biscuit would give you).
Sorry if that is not clear, I can explain better if need be.

mm

"maico"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 2:20 PM

Well, thank you all again for your input. I just returned the Dewalt
and then purchased the PC 557 biscuit joiner and it is a Type 3. In
total, it cost $92.00 more than the Dewalt but I feel it is worth the
extra expense due to the three main upgraded features as I mentioned in
this thread.

Thanks again!


bf wrote:
> maico wrote:
>
> > As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
> > Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
> > bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
> > yet to use it.
>
> In that case, return the Dewalt. I have the PC, it's a great machine.
> The Dewalt is probably a good machine as well. If you think you might
> use the face frame biscuits, then it's worth the extra $50 or whatever
> to get the PC (It's been a long time, so I don't know). Plus, it seems
> like you will be happier with the PC.
>
> I just saw the PC on sale at Home Depot. I assume it's the same model.
>
> I must say though, I haven't used the face frame biscuits that much. On
> a few small things.
> If you are going to make a lot of face frames, get a kreg jig, along
> with this clamp.. http://www.hartvilletool.com/product/12282 .. Then
> use a clamp like a Bessey K-body to clamp the the face frame "T" shape
> (the wood) to the face frame clamp. That lines up the pieces in that
> dimension (basically the alignment that a biscuit would give you).
> Sorry if that is not clear, I can explain better if need be.

It

"IBM5081"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 2:56 PM


maico wrote:
> Tom, is your PC a Type I, II or III?

It must be a type III since it's fairly new (purchased within the last
year). Made after the litigation DW filed against PC for copying their
design.

mm

"maico"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

09/11/2006 5:42 AM


B A R R Y wrote:
> maico wrote:
> > Well, thank you all again for your input. I just returned the Dewalt
> > and then purchased the PC 557 biscuit joiner and it is a Type 3. In
> > total, it cost $92.00 more than the Dewalt
>
> $92? 8^(
>
> Coastal Tool sells the DW for $145 & the PC for $172.

Is that US or CAN dollars? I am talking CAN.

Br

"Bill"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 7:15 AM

On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:37:05 -0800, Robatoy wrote:

> On Nov 7, 8:58 pm, "maico" <[email protected]>

> I have a Lamello Classic...in a box. I now have a PC 557 (FF was one of
> the reasons). The Lamello Classic is no Top, which was stolen and the
> best yet....but for the money?

WOW ... 8 big ones for a Lamello plate joiner? For that I'd expect it to
look good in a short skirt and make a mean plate of scrambled eggs, too!

Bill

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 7:44 AM

maico wrote:
>
> As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
> Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
> bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
> yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
> which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW. Also,
> there seems to be an issue of small wood components (to be joined)
> falling into the fence of the BJ and that PC has addressed this with an
> insert; is this true?


I recently bought the Dewalt and am extremely pleased with it. But now
you have me curious about something... Can you or someone explain what
you mean about the PC doing face frame biscuits while the Dewalt cannot?

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 8:16 AM

Dave Hall wrote:

> To piggyback on this thread, I see that many recommend the PC 557 and
> most relate the choice to the FF capability. I already have a Ryobi
> detail biscuit joiner which works well for me for smaller jobs (like
> face frames, picture frames and thin boxes) but I have a real POS old
> full size joiner that I would like to replace. Which joiner would you
> choose if the FF capability had minimal value to you (yeah it would
> have some value, but I can certainly live without it and even if I had
> it would probably just pick up the detail joiner rather than fool
> around changing blades on the PC). Is the PC still the choice
> (assuming I want to stay out of debt for this purchase and so won't be
> looking at a Lamello)?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dave Hall

As I said in my reply to another post in this thread, I recently
purchased the Dewalt. Since it is my first biscuit joiner, my opinion
might not carry much weight, But I can tell you, from a rookie's
standpoint, I can't imagine it being any simpler to use or doing a
better job. In other words, I'm a fool and it appears relatively
foolproof. (And $100 cheaper than the PC)

Charlie

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 8:47 AM

Swingman wrote:
> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>

>
> There is absolutely nothing wrong with the DeWalt. The PC, with it's smaller
> FF biscuit capability, is just a tad more versatile when/if you need that
> capability.
>
> The smaller biscuits come in handy for me when to simulate joinery without
> having to resort to a nail gun on a prototype which just may find some
> actual use, or when reinforcing miter joints on small frames.
>
> If you don't need that capability, the DeWalt will certainly serve you well,
> and you can buy some wood with the leftover $$
>

Thanks, Doug and Swing for the clarification. Next time I'll google
FIRST before firing off the dumb question <blush>.

TK

Tom Kendrick

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 2:03 AM

I bought the PC 557 and recommend it highly. In this price range, the
PC is the better machine. I would return the DW.

On 7 Nov 2006 17:58:20 -0800, "maico" <[email protected]> wrote:

>After dragging you all through the coals regarding the best biscuits, I
>am now working backwards to the best biscuit joiner! See the following
>thread on biscuits:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.woodworking/browse_frm/thread/214335f61f72a106/#
>
>As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
>Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
>bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
>yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
>which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW. Also,
>there seems to be an issue of small wood components (to be joined)
>falling into the fence of the BJ and that PC has addressed this with an
>insert; is this true?
>
>I am looking for your opinion(s) on these two tools.
>
>I look forward to your responses.

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 1:24 PM

In article <[email protected]>, "maico" <[email protected]> wrote:

>As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
>Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
>bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
>yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
>which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW.

That would seem to be the deciding factor, then.

I've been using a PC 557 for a number of years now, and have yet to wish that
I'd bought something else instead.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 2:18 PM

In article <[email protected]>, "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I recently bought the Dewalt and am extremely pleased with it. But now
>you have me curious about something... Can you or someone explain what
>you mean about the PC doing face frame biscuits while the Dewalt cannot?

Porter-Cable markets a "face frame" (FF) biscuit that's about 5/8" shorter
than a standard #0 biscuit, and slightly narrower as well.

The PC 557 has four depth stops (20, 10, 0, and FF), and also comes with an
extra blade for cutting FF slots. This blade is about an inch smaller in
diameter than the standard biscuit blade. If you don't have that blade *and*
the proper depth stop, you won't be able to cut a slot that FF biscuits will
fit correctly.

That's not to say you can't use your DeWalt biscuit machine for making face
frames -- you can (with limitations) -- just that AFAIK you can't use it to
make slots for the Porter-Cable FF biscuits.

AFAIK, the smallest biscuit slot you can make with the DW machine is for a #0
biscuit. The biscuit is about 1-13/16" long, which means a slot about 2" long.
Obviously that's not going to work to make biscuit joints in 1-1/2" wide rails
and stiles, and may not work for 2" stock. If you don't mind building your
face frames with stock that's between 2" and 2-1/4" wide, #0 biscuits will
work fine. But if you want to use narrower material, that means some alternate
form of joinery. Those alternate forms could include:
- dowels
- pocket screws
- mortise and tenon
- lap joints
- PC 557 and a pile of FF biscuits :-)

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

sD

[email protected] (Doug Miller)

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 4:14 PM

In article <[email protected]>, A Lurker <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
> Since the PC
>requires that you change cutters to do the smaller FF biscuits, I'm not
>sure there is any difference in set up time.

It's not a real big deal, ten minutes at the most.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 8:30 AM

"Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message

> As I said in my reply to another post in this thread, I recently
> purchased the Dewalt. Since it is my first biscuit joiner, my opinion
> might not carry much weight, But I can tell you, from a rookie's
> standpoint, I can't imagine it being any simpler to use or doing a
> better job. In other words, I'm a fool and it appears relatively
> foolproof. (And $100 cheaper than the PC)

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the DeWalt. The PC, with it's smaller
FF biscuit capability, is just a tad more versatile when/if you need that
capability.

The smaller biscuits come in handy for me when to simulate joinery without
having to resort to a nail gun on a prototype which just may find some
actual use, or when reinforcing miter joints on small frames.

If you don't need that capability, the DeWalt will certainly serve you well,
and you can buy some wood with the leftover $$

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/29/06

Pg

Patriarch

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 12:30 PM

A Lurker <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> Only real downside to the Dewalt is the little dust bag clogs real
> easy. I just leave it off and try to aim the waste stream at a
> backstop to keep it from going all over the shop.
>
> Jerry

Crap goes all over the shop anyhow. So I do this in the driveway, so it
goes all over the neighborhood instead. You're all welcome for the mulch.

Patriarch

AL

A Lurker

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 3:49 PM

"Swingman" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>
>> As I said in my reply to another post in this thread, I recently
>> purchased the Dewalt. Since it is my first biscuit joiner, my opinion
>> might not carry much weight, But I can tell you, from a rookie's
>> standpoint, I can't imagine it being any simpler to use or doing a
>> better job. In other words, I'm a fool and it appears relatively
>> foolproof. (And $100 cheaper than the PC)
>
> There is absolutely nothing wrong with the DeWalt. The PC, with it's
> smaller FF biscuit capability, is just a tad more versatile when/if
> you need that capability.
<snip>
> If you don't need that capability, the DeWalt will certainly serve you
> well, and you can buy some wood with the leftover $$
>

I have the Dewalt and it is fine. If I had it to over again I'd probably
get the PC, but I solved the face frame biscuit issue another way, which
may be better. I bought a biscuit slot cutter set (either Infinity or
Whiteside - I buy which ever is an sale at the moment). Drop that in the
router table with a larger bearing on top and you have FF size slots for
the 2" face frames when you use them on smaller projects. Since the PC
requires that you change cutters to do the smaller FF biscuits, I'm not
sure there is any difference in set up time. The slot cutter set is about
$50 so you're still ahead $50 in the cost differential between Dewalt and
PC.

Only real downside to the Dewalt is the little dust bag clogs real easy.
I just leave it off and try to aim the waste stream at a backstop to keep
it from going all over the shop.

Jerry

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 6:06 AM

"maico" wrote in message

> I am looking for your opinion(s) on these two tools.

Hands down, PC 557 III ... the FF capability is the deciding factor.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/29/06

DH

Dave Hall

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 8:54 AM

On 7 Nov 2006 17:58:20 -0800, "maico" <[email protected]> wrote:

>After dragging you all through the coals regarding the best biscuits, I
>am now working backwards to the best biscuit joiner! See the following
>thread on biscuits:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/rec.woodworking/browse_frm/thread/214335f61f72a106/#
>
>As I had mentioned in the thread above, I have already purchased the
>Dewalt DW682K biscuit joiner but now I question whether I should have
>bought the Porter Cable 557. I can still return the Dewalt as I have
>yet to use it. The one feature I really need is face frame biscuits
>which can be readily accomplished with the PC but not the DW. Also,
>there seems to be an issue of small wood components (to be joined)
>falling into the fence of the BJ and that PC has addressed this with an
>insert; is this true?
>
>I am looking for your opinion(s) on these two tools.
>
>I look forward to your responses.

To piggyback on this thread, I see that many recommend the PC 557 and
most relate the choice to the FF capability. I already have a Ryobi
detail biscuit joiner which works well for me for smaller jobs (like
face frames, picture frames and thin boxes) but I have a real POS old
full size joiner that I would like to replace. Which joiner would you
choose if the FF capability had minimal value to you (yeah it would
have some value, but I can certainly live without it and even if I had
it would probably just pick up the detail joiner rather than fool
around changing blades on the PC). Is the PC still the choice
(assuming I want to stay out of debt for this purchase and so won't be
looking at a Lamello)?

Thanks.

Dave Hall

WS

Wes Stewart

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

08/11/2006 8:35 AM

On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:16:59 -0600, "Charlie M. 1958"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Dave Hall wrote:
>
>> To piggyback on this thread, I see that many recommend the PC 557 and
>> most relate the choice to the FF capability. I already have a Ryobi
>> detail biscuit joiner which works well for me for smaller jobs (like
>> face frames, picture frames and thin boxes) but I have a real POS old
>> full size joiner that I would like to replace. Which joiner would you
>> choose if the FF capability had minimal value to you (yeah it would
>> have some value, but I can certainly live without it and even if I had
>> it would probably just pick up the detail joiner rather than fool
>> around changing blades on the PC). Is the PC still the choice
>> (assuming I want to stay out of debt for this purchase and so won't be
>> looking at a Lamello)?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Dave Hall
>
>As I said in my reply to another post in this thread, I recently
>purchased the Dewalt. Since it is my first biscuit joiner, my opinion
>might not carry much weight, But I can tell you, from a rookie's
>standpoint, I can't imagine it being any simpler to use or doing a
>better job. In other words, I'm a fool and it appears relatively
>foolproof. (And $100 cheaper than the PC)

I've had the DeWalt for a long time, so I'm sure I'm prejudiced.

Buy the DeWalt and take the money saved and get a Kreg jig for pocket
screws for the FF work.

BA

B A R R Y

in reply to "maico" on 07/11/2006 5:58 PM

09/11/2006 2:03 PM

maico wrote:
> B A R R Y wrote:
>> maico wrote:
>>> Well, thank you all again for your input. I just returned the Dewalt
>>> and then purchased the PC 557 biscuit joiner and it is a Type 3. In
>>> total, it cost $92.00 more than the Dewalt
>> $92? 8^(
>>
>> Coastal Tool sells the DW for $145 & the PC for $172.
>
> Is that US or CAN dollars? I am talking CAN.
>

Sorry, USD.


You’ve reached the end of replies