It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
today?
TMT
Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
Writer
Thu Aug 3
The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
a distance.
He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
learn basic repair skills.
With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
"They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
manual."
Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
"The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
them.'"
Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
"We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
younger set," she says.
For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
try - and sometimes fail.
With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
kitchen.
In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
for a couple of other mishaps.
"The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
up."
Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
he means.
Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
the wall.
"There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
for know-how.
Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
dimmer switch.
"It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
- the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
among young adults.
While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
closer to home: her mom.
Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
Chicago condo.
But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
She'll leave that to a professional.
"I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
much."
___
On the Net:
Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
Lowe's clinics:
http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO
IMHO, TOTALLY incorrect.
New cars are easier to fix than the old stuff ever was (and need a lot less
of it) and the service garages are MUCH more expensive than they used to be.
Most of the dealer shops (and the franchise specialty garages) are staffed
with apprentice parts changers (not mechanics) who have no diagnostic skills
or inclination. They just keep on changing expensive parts till the
problem stops. The self serve scrap yards are a source of very cheap used
parts and the jobber parts stores sell parts of as good or far better
quality than the dealer for a fraction of the price, and often give parts
warranties that you can actually collect on. When a garage fails to fix a
problem usually YOU just keep paying them more and more until they (or
another shop) get it right.
When you buy ANY service,
- You are paying an inflated price (often for parts that are never installed
on your vehicle) + overhead + an excessive markup + lots of hidden taxes
plus added sales taxes AND you are paying in after income tax paid dollars.
When you DIY,
- You are paying wholesale, for only the parts you need, are saving ALL the
sales and other taxes on labor and overhead AND you do not pay any income or
sales tax on YOUR labor OR on the cash you save.
- You also do not need to have the work done at the shops convenience or
travel to (and from, TWICE) the shop for delivery and pickup, or to leave
the vehicle for several days. You do not need to wash grease off the
steering wheel and seats and fenders or clean out food scraps and garbage or
cigarette burns and smoke and butts and ashes.
- AND the chances are better that the job will be done right.
- And when you DIY you can watch for and keep track of the preventative
maintenance that will prevent the need for repairs (and towing) caused by
breakdown.
> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
> that's another matter<G>.
>
BOAT = break out another thousand.
just my .02 YMMV
Blew your credibility with that statement. Work at a desk, don't you?
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There just isn't the same demand for, say, a room full of
> machinists when they can be replaced by a CNC machine or two. There is
>
"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >I think you have a good point Robert.
> >
> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
> >"fragile" it becomes.
>
> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a society
options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess and remediate
problems.
Jeff
Gunner wrote:
> For those who are history challenged...go too Google, images..then
> type in London Blitz
Look at Liverpool, Manchester, and particularly Coventry - where a lot
of aircraft were built ( Jaguar's factory made Spitfires for example)
>
> Take a good look at the photos.
>
> One should note..British Civilizaton (such as it is <G>) didnt
> collapse despite even that.
Thank you.
We won after all. With a bit of help (We finish paying the bills to the
US any day now -seriously). People have accused our civilisation of
having become corrupt and effete compared to the people of the 1940s,
but the reaction of the people to the London bombings last year was
utterly magnificent, as was the US reaction to 9/11.
Steve
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:19:17 GMT, John Husvar <[email protected]>
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:25:15 GMT, John Husvar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
>> >> shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
>> >> them shut down for at least a month or longer
>> >>
>> >> Gunner
>> >>
>> >
>> >Always knew you were a closet incurable optimist. :)
>>
>> Im a long term survivalist. Such sceanarios have been gamed for many
>> years in the survival community. I have some that would make you run
>> straight out to Walmart and fill every vehicle you own with supplies 2
>> minutes after finishing reading them.
>
>Probably almost all of the possible scenarios have been gamed by
>somebody. Too damn bad the people who might have made the difference on
>9/11 maybe didn't take the game scenarios seriously enough. But, then,
>how can anyone know _which_ scenario may play out at any given time?
>
>> >
>> >With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple hundred
>> >feet of 1/4-inch link chain -- thrown across just the right busses. Some
>> >of the bigger substation transformers are virtually irreplaceable. Get
>> >some arcing started and the disconnects won't be able to break their
>> >circuits before the transformers are scrap.
>>
>> True enough. The explosives were not necessarily for the
>> substations/towers etc..but the bridges etc leading to them. And
>> mechanical ambushes IEDs..to take out the skilled labor who show up to
>> make the repairs. There are only a finite number of such crews. Get a
>> few of them claymored..and the rest will be far more hesitant to restore
>> power to various areas.
>
>Bank along a road, posthole digger, 2' capped one end, of 6" cast iron
>or steel tubing, 2# homemade fffg black powder sealed in a big Baggie
>along with 2 electric matches (redundancy), cheap radio control out of a
>RC kids' toy, batteries, pound or two of 6d finish nails, newspaper
>wadding. Result? One instant, remote detonated, claymore equivalent --
>adequate for from ordinary grunts marching along the road to police
>cruisers.
Be sure to bury a 55 gallon drum full of gasoline, with the drum top
pointed to where you expect the wreckage to stop. When EMS/LEOs show up
and you get maximum people density, command detonate the fougass and
you can have a real flambe catching quite a number of individuals. A
real "twofer".
The arab terrorists use secondary bombs to catch medical personel and
have been doing this for years.
>
>Primitive to an extreme, but possible, even practical with off-the-shelf
>materials.
>
>And Homeland Security doesn't offer to hire us why? :)
Because those folks have others far far nastier than us.
>
>>
>> Compressed air/black powder chain cannons on timers would be hard to
>> spot and deadly effective against substations, as would carbon fibre.
>> Carbon fibre dispensers btw..were used against Iraqi substations to good
>> effect.
>
>Gunner, get the Hell _outta_ my head! :)
>
>You have an evil, devious mind. I like that characteristic in a man --
>or woman for that matter.
Shrug..its a knack.
>
>>
>> 1 pound of high explosives, a 50lb box of nails and a bit of enginuity
>> can remove a trained repair crew from the pension roles in a very short
>> time. Then who fixes the subs and restores the power, not to mention the
>> wait time while new transformers are custom fabricated..years.
>
>Yep.
>
>>
>> Of course the best times to initiate such actions, particularly in the
>> Northwest and Northeast would be in December..at Christmas time, through
>> January. The death toll would be in the hundreds of thousands and
>> virtally all commerce in those areas would simply cease, after the
>> rioters dispersed or were shot, and the fires were out.
>
>Given sleeper cells, which it's fairly likely are already set up in many
>countries, such tricks could be pulled off in spurts of a few weeks
>between actions. Doing it in random locations would add to the effects.
>
>>
>> Another sceanario..a couple Jihadists in a plain jane automobile, stops
>> on any average overpass over a busy freeway just at the onset of rush
>> hour and unloads a few magazines full auto at the cars passing
>> underneith. As the giant crash occurse, perhaps a few blazing molotovs
>> tossed into the wreckage would brighten things up. Reenter the
>> vehicle..and drive a couple miles to the next overpass on a different
>> freeway..a connector to the first one would be more effective, and
>> repeat. Repeat a half dozen times..and that city is shut down for
>> weeks. Repeat a couple days later..and it gets worse. Mail some homebrew
>> video explaining that they are members of the Elbonian Underground and
>> will repeat the actions until such and such occurs.
>>
>> $50 worth of ammo and the economic havoc is untold.
>>
>> Look how well those two buffons in DC/maryland did in spreading fear and
>> panic knocking down a few citizens.
>>
>> We live in a VERY fragile civilization whose infrastructure was never
>> designed for such disruptions. Nor are most of our peoples prepared to
>> turtle down and wait it out, let alone take any sort of defensive
>> stance.
>
>Well, I don't know that it's _that_ fragile, but there'd surely be a lot
>of disruption. the Two above buffoons _did_ have effect far beyond their
>real lethality. If people don't feel it safe to go anywhere, things
>devolve down to two choices; hunker down, surrender, and maybe die or
>get used to it and figure it's like lightning and maybe die. Your odds
>are good, but there's no guarantee you won't lose.
>
>>
>> Shrug.
>>
>> Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:56:53 +0100, Steve Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Jeff McCann wrote:
>
>> It really is hard to say, but I do know quite alot from direct personal
>> observation about how people react when their lives are totally disrupted,
>> homes and jobs completely gone, communities devastated, loved ones missing,
>> hurt or killed, little or no news from outside, etc. I'm willing to rely
>> more than you appear to be on the basic resiliency of the American character
>> in the face of adversity, as well as in the basic robustness of our social,
>> economic and political systems.
>
>That's true for any people, look at the way we (I'm English) reacted to
>Germany's bombings of London and other major cities, or how we reacted
>when the IRA destroyed the centre of my city (Manchester), or when our
>home grown Islamists butchered people in the subways of London.
>
>Everyone adapts, and very quickly.
>
>Steve
For those who are history challenged...go too Google, images..then
type in London Blitz
Take a good look at the photos.
One should note..British Civilizaton (such as it is <G>) didnt
collapse despite even that.
Gunner
"If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third
hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're
around."
"Democrat. In the dictionary it's right after demobilize and right
before demode` (out of fashion).
-Buddy Jordan 2001
In article <[email protected]>, Robert
Sturgeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steve wrote, "No, its just the workshop has changed, it can
> live in a computer, for instance, workshops are alive and
> well, they are just different, today's workshop can involved
> hooking up a wireless router to a wired LAN that supports
> Appletalk, before your time it was thatching a roof"
>
> A wired LAN is an artifact of the symbolic economy. It is a
> Good Thing, right now. But if what you need is a new roof,
> and there is no longer much demand for wireless routers,
> LANs, Appletalk, etc., (as would be the case in a post-SHTF
> scenario) then being able to mess with LANs and such, but
> not roofs, leaves you out.
>
There are plenty of roofers and roofing companies in my area. When I
needed a roof replacement several years ago, they did it in a tiny
fraction of the time (and effort) it would have taken me to figure out
how to do it, how to order the materials, how to fix the mistakes I
would inevitably make, how to finish the job.
Should I learn roofing now? Not hardly, as my own roof will likely not
need patching in the decades ahead of me. And I have no desire to make
it a career.
Ditto for welding, horseshoeing, logging, midwifing, and all sorts of
other jobs which some/many think will be up-n-coming career options in
the Post-Industrial Economy. ("You, too, can become a farrier. Just
call 1-800-HOR-SHOE for information on our study at home course!")
I expect that the "symbolic economy," as you call it, will become even
more important after a Big Event (SHTF, TEOTWAWKI, whatever). Wireless
networks, even over radio (and satellites, which will remain largely
unaffected) will be used to trade options and access to things.
Consider the rise of cellphones in Mogadishu after the civil war.
E-Bay and services of that sort will become MORE important, not LESS
important. Think about it. Combine online barter and sales with
jitney-type delivery services and new payment approaches and one has a
vibrant sub-economy.
(And vehicles will still be running. This is separate subject, but
there are many, many options for fueling. NG will not vanish, biofuels
are readily made, and even all-electric vehicles are here....one of my
neighbors has a large photovoltaic installation sufficient to charge up
his fleet of vehicles....a few entrepreneurs like this, mediating
trades via satphones and Mobile WiMax, could do quite well trading the
already-extant supply of tools, materials, and forms of money.)
Look to Hong Kong for one example, to Mogadishu for the other extreme.
Both remain heavily "symbolic."
--Tim May
I was asked: COULD you butcher a hog, if you really needed to?
I answered: Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let
somebody else do it.
Some points of clarification.
Where I came from, you start early in the morning to butcher a hog.
I don't do early in the morning any more.
Where I came from, you wait for cold weather to butcher a hog.
I don't do cold weather any more.
Where I came from, it's a lot of hard work to butcher a hog.
I don't do hard work any more.
Lew
George E. Cawthon wrote:
> Retief wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>>>> really needed to?
>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>> do it.
>>
>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>
>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>
>> Retief
> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
I would assume if you intended to eat it. Pork is Unclean, read your
Old Testament. If things broke down to the point where most people had
to butcher their own meat, Pork would be last choice. Proper
refrigeration and parasite control would certainly be long gone.
I'll stick with being able to butcher deer, beef, rabbit, and fowl.
Very good post Ron....I wish I had written it.
TMT
Ron Moore wrote:
> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
> no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
> productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
> they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
> When I was young, a garage full of tools and such was like a beacon in
> the night. Had to look, ask questions, wanted to get to know the person and
> try to learn. Nowadays, kids couldn't care less.
> I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less garage
> creativity is visible.
> Respectfully,
> Ron Moore
>
> "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> > training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >
> > When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> > anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> > of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >
> > Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> > is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> > today?
> >
> > TMT
> >
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
Critical thinking is a lost art. It's loss gave rise to the democrat
party. Two chickens in every pot. Nobody asked where the chickens
would come from, who would pay for them. It's part of the Robin Hood
mentality. My young son liked the Robin Hood story until I told him
that Bill Clinton thought we were on the verge of becoming rich. I
asked him which of his posessions he would like to have confiscated so
that someone else could enjoy them.
> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
Another time my son came home from school and said we need to quit
cutting down trees and building houses. I said OK. Then I asked him
if he liked living in our house. He did. I told him that the building
material came from trees, and that the grounds we live on were once
forested. I asked if, when he left home, he wanted to live in an
apartment in the crime-ridden center part of the city. He didn't want
to do that.
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
I certainly hope so, but with the media constantly pumping our
children's heads with their thoughts, how will they cope? They'll
probably all turn out to be good little unthinking voters, speeding our
way to socialism
> TMT
>
>
> Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
> Writer
> Thu Aug 3
>
> The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
> a distance.
>
> He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
> no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
>
> The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
> bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
> they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
>
> For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
> parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
> learn basic repair skills.
>
> With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
> recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
> when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
> seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
>
> "They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
> investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
> pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
> who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
> and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
> manual."
>
> Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
> young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
>
> Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
>
> Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
> Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
> He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
> because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
>
> "The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
> trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
> they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
> them.'"
>
> Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
> in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
> tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
>
> "We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
> younger set," she says.
>
> For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
> try - and sometimes fail.
>
> With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
> hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
> kitchen.
>
> In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
> forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
> sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
> head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
> for a couple of other mishaps.
>
> "The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
> the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
> job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
> financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
> up."
>
> Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
> he means.
>
> Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
> bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
> the wall.
>
> "There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
> someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
>
> But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
> then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
>
> Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
> for know-how.
>
> Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
> classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
> dimmer switch.
>
> "It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
> they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
> who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
>
> Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
> - the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
>
> Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
> HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
> Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
> astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
> among young adults.
>
> While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
> shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
> closer to home: her mom.
>
> Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
> Chicago condo.
>
> But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
> She'll leave that to a professional.
>
> "I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
> much."
>
> ___
>
> On the Net:
>
> Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
>
> Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
>
> Lowe's clinics:
> http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:23:59 -0800, pipedope <[email protected]>
wrote:
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> So cutting trees is bad, and cutting trees expressly grown to be cut is
>> bad, too.
>
>I never said anything like that at all.
>I am pointing out that when comparing things it is important to define
>the terms and understand the time frame of the comparison.
>
>There is such a thing as sustainable forestry and logging but in the USA
>today it is really only being done by owners of small woodlots.
weyerhaeuser is a small woodlot?
>
>The reason clear cutting is popular is that it is cheap and can be done
>with much less skilled labor. Selectively harvesting only the mature
>trees and removing them with minimal damage to the rest of the forest
>requires more labor and people with more education and experience.
>Yes, that also would mean that I would pay more for my lumber but I
>already pay top dollar for quality lumber so it really wouldn't change
>things for me so much.
http://www.weyerhaeuser.com/ourbusinesses/forestry/timberlands/sustainableforestry/intheus/
"If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third
hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're
around."
"Democrat. In the dictionary it's right after demobilize and right
before demode` (out of fashion).
-Buddy Jordan 2001
I think you have a good point Robert.
In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
"fragile" it becomes.
TMT
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> >skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> >you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> >the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> >training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >
> >When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> >anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> >of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >
> >Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >today?
>
> By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
> concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
> real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
> icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
> world is the ability to manipulate symbols (known also as
> the Symbolic Economy -- spreadsheets, databases, web pages,
> data entry, reading and writing reports, politicking,
> entertainment, lawyering, etc.).
>
> A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
> about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
> post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
> meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
> to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
> people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
> society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
> more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
> real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
> to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
>
> Fun, huh???
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
I think you have a good point Robert.
In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
"fragile" it becomes.
TMT
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> >skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> >you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> >the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> >training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >
> >When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> >anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> >of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >
> >Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >today?
>
> By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
> concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
> real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
> icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
> world is the ability to manipulate symbols (known also as
> the Symbolic Economy -- spreadsheets, databases, web pages,
> data entry, reading and writing reports, politicking,
> entertainment, lawyering, etc.).
>
> A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
> about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
> post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
> meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
> to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
> people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
> society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
> more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
> real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
> to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
>
> Fun, huh???
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
In Message-ID:<[email protected]> posted on
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:03:21 -0700, Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>The economic shocks from 9/11 cost the U.S. economy hundreds
>of billions of dollars,
Especially the hit our economy has taken
as Bush finessed his 'trifecta' into an interminable sucking fiasco.
--
Bart
In article <[email protected]>,
Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:25:15 GMT, John Husvar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
> >> shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
> >> them shut down for at least a month or longer
> >>
> >> Gunner
> >>
> >
> >Always knew you were a closet incurable optimist. :)
>
> Im a long term survivalist. Such sceanarios have been gamed for many
> years in the survival community. I have some that would make you run
> straight out to Walmart and fill every vehicle you own with supplies 2
> minutes after finishing reading them.
Probably almost all of the possible scenarios have been gamed by
somebody. Too damn bad the people who might have made the difference on
9/11 maybe didn't take the game scenarios seriously enough. But, then,
how can anyone know _which_ scenario may play out at any given time?
> >
> >With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple hundred
> >feet of 1/4-inch link chain -- thrown across just the right busses. Some
> >of the bigger substation transformers are virtually irreplaceable. Get
> >some arcing started and the disconnects won't be able to break their
> >circuits before the transformers are scrap.
>
> True enough. The explosives were not necessarily for the
> substations/towers etc..but the bridges etc leading to them. And
> mechanical ambushes IEDs..to take out the skilled labor who show up to
> make the repairs. There are only a finite number of such crews. Get a
> few of them claymored..and the rest will be far more hesitant to restore
> power to various areas.
Bank along a road, posthole digger, 2' capped one end, of 6" cast iron
or steel tubing, 2# homemade fffg black powder sealed in a big Baggie
along with 2 electric matches (redundancy), cheap radio control out of a
RC kids' toy, batteries, pound or two of 6d finish nails, newspaper
wadding. Result? One instant, remote detonated, claymore equivalent --
adequate for from ordinary grunts marching along the road to police
cruisers.
Primitive to an extreme, but possible, even practical with off-the-shelf
materials.
And Homeland Security doesn't offer to hire us why? :)
>
> Compressed air/black powder chain cannons on timers would be hard to
> spot and deadly effective against substations, as would carbon fibre.
> Carbon fibre dispensers btw..were used against Iraqi substations to good
> effect.
Gunner, get the Hell _outta_ my head! :)
You have an evil, devious mind. I like that characteristic in a man --
or woman for that matter.
>
> 1 pound of high explosives, a 50lb box of nails and a bit of enginuity
> can remove a trained repair crew from the pension roles in a very short
> time. Then who fixes the subs and restores the power, not to mention the
> wait time while new transformers are custom fabricated..years.
Yep.
>
> Of course the best times to initiate such actions, particularly in the
> Northwest and Northeast would be in December..at Christmas time, through
> January. The death toll would be in the hundreds of thousands and
> virtally all commerce in those areas would simply cease, after the
> rioters dispersed or were shot, and the fires were out.
Given sleeper cells, which it's fairly likely are already set up in many
countries, such tricks could be pulled off in spurts of a few weeks
between actions. Doing it in random locations would add to the effects.
>
> Another sceanario..a couple Jihadists in a plain jane automobile, stops
> on any average overpass over a busy freeway just at the onset of rush
> hour and unloads a few magazines full auto at the cars passing
> underneith. As the giant crash occurse, perhaps a few blazing molotovs
> tossed into the wreckage would brighten things up. Reenter the
> vehicle..and drive a couple miles to the next overpass on a different
> freeway..a connector to the first one would be more effective, and
> repeat. Repeat a half dozen times..and that city is shut down for
> weeks. Repeat a couple days later..and it gets worse. Mail some homebrew
> video explaining that they are members of the Elbonian Underground and
> will repeat the actions until such and such occurs.
>
> $50 worth of ammo and the economic havoc is untold.
>
> Look how well those two buffons in DC/maryland did in spreading fear and
> panic knocking down a few citizens.
>
> We live in a VERY fragile civilization whose infrastructure was never
> designed for such disruptions. Nor are most of our peoples prepared to
> turtle down and wait it out, let alone take any sort of defensive
> stance.
Well, I don't know that it's _that_ fragile, but there'd surely be a lot
of disruption. the Two above buffoons _did_ have effect far beyond their
real lethality. If people don't feel it safe to go anywhere, things
devolve down to two choices; hunker down, surrender, and maybe die or
get used to it and figure it's like lightning and maybe die. Your odds
are good, but there's no guarantee you won't lose.
>
> Shrug.
>
> Gunner
>
>
>
> "Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
> Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
> off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
> them self determination under "play nice" rules.
>
> Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
> for torturing the cat." Gunner
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:25:15 GMT, John Husvar <[email protected]>
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> >
>>
>> a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
>> shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
>> them shut down for at least a month or longer
>>
>> Gunner
>>
>
>Always knew you were a closet incurable optimist. :)
Im a long term survivalist. Such sceanarios have been gamed for many
years in the survival community. I have some that would make you run
straight out to Walmart and fill every vehicle you own with supplies 2
minutes after finishing reading them.
>
>With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple hundred
>feet of 1/4-inch link chain -- thrown across just the right busses. Some
>of the bigger substation transformers are virtually irreplaceable. Get
>some arcing started and the disconnects won't be able to break their
>circuits before the transformers are scrap.
True enough. The explosives were not necessarily for the
substations/towers etc..but the bridges etc leading to them. And
mechanical ambushes IEDs..to take out the skilled labor who show up to
make the repairs. There are only a finite number of such crews. Get a
few of them claymored..and the rest will be far more hesitant to restore
power to various areas.
Compressed air/black powder chain cannons on timers would be hard to
spot and deadly effective against substations, as would carbon fibre.
Carbon fibre dispensers btw..were used against Iraqi substations to good
effect.
1 pound of high explosives, a 50lb box of nails and a bit of enginuity
can remove a trained repair crew from the pension roles in a very short
time. Then who fixes the subs and restores the power, not to mention the
wait time while new transformers are custom fabricated..years.
Of course the best times to initiate such actions, particularly in the
Northwest and Northeast would be in December..at Christmas time, through
January. The death toll would be in the hundreds of thousands and
virtally all commerce in those areas would simply cease, after the
rioters dispersed or were shot, and the fires were out.
Another sceanario..a couple Jihadists in a plain jane automobile, stops
on any average overpass over a busy freeway just at the onset of rush
hour and unloads a few magazines full auto at the cars passing
underneith. As the giant crash occurse, perhaps a few blazing molotovs
tossed into the wreckage would brighten things up. Reenter the
vehicle..and drive a couple miles to the next overpass on a different
freeway..a connector to the first one would be more effective, and
repeat. Repeat a half dozen times..and that city is shut down for
weeks. Repeat a couple days later..and it gets worse. Mail some homebrew
video explaining that they are members of the Elbonian Underground and
will repeat the actions until such and such occurs.
$50 worth of ammo and the economic havoc is untold.
Look how well those two buffons in DC/maryland did in spreading fear and
panic knocking down a few citizens.
We live in a VERY fragile civilization whose infrastructure was never
designed for such disruptions. Nor are most of our peoples prepared to
turtle down and wait it out, let alone take any sort of defensive
stance.
Shrug.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
F. George McDuffee wrote:
With the
> imposition of "Academic Trivial Pursuit" AKA "no child left
> behind," what was imposed was instruction in the skills necessary
> to score well on standardized objective tests [bingo cards] and
> short-term rote memorization and rapid recall of "factoids."
> This is yet another example, where a critical public asset or
> facility, in this case free compulsory education, has been
> hi-jacked by the elite so they can impose their ideology and skim
> the benefits (i.e. college preparatory education) while the vast
> majority is deprived of the benefits (i.e. preparation for life
> rather than for yet more education) although the majority is
> expected to keep paying [more] for it.
>
> The cure for this is local action, where the voters (parents)
> fire the existing school board, and where the new school board
> then fires the existing superintendents and principals, and so
> on.
>
>
> Unka George
> (George McDuffee)
>
I agree with most of what you said. I do think that we need some
method of measuring the effectiveness of schools. So we do need
standard objective tests. And we do need to teach a certain amount of
" factoids " as well as principles. Knowing a certain amount of facts
allows one to concentrate on the larger problem. I would hate to go
thru life having to look up the value of Pi when I need to know the
area of a circle or go find a calculator. But we also need to teach
understanding what accuracy is needed when using Pi.
The current tests may not be what is needed. But one needs to be able
to put numbers on things in order to optimize. Sure more teachers are
good, but what is the most cost effective number of kids in a class?
And does it vary by age. Does it vary by the subject being taught. In
high school the class size is about 30 to 35. But suddenly in college
the class size might be 300 to 400.
And I think we need more competition in schools. The existing school
board may or may not need to be fired. But there needs to be more
charter schools and vouchers for private schools so students have
choices. We need schools that prepare students for college as well as
schools that prepare students for living without a college degree.
Without competition the public schools are going to go for the one size
fits all. It is a lot easier to administrate.
Dan
>>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation
who
>>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>>today?
A lot of it is simply due to the large population. There are way more
people now, so there's going to be a higher number of younger people who
don't know a wrench from a socket, making the problem seem epidemic.
But the actual percentage of younger people today with basic skills
probably is not too much lower than previous eras of young people. Just
higher numners now, due to the increased population.
Statistics/mathematics 101. I am 33 and all of my friends and I grew up
helping our dads put additions onto the house, wrench on the family
wagon, etc.. There were girls in our shop and wood classes. Probably
30% were girls. Plus, I took sewing!
An early 20's female friend of mine called me recently, frustrated. She
couldn't get her bed apart. She was moving. I went over there. She
was literally beating, with a hammer, the nuts and bolts holding the bed
together! "These screws won't pop off!", she said. "Um, because those
aren't screws. Even if they were screws, the way to get them out would
be to use a screwdriver. But those are nuts and bolts." So I used a
screwdriver and a 10mm wrench to remove the bolts. I tried to keep from
making fun of her utter and complete lack of even the basic mechanical
skills.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Ron Moore wrote:
> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
> no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
> productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
> they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
> When I was young, a garage full of tools and such was like a beacon in
> the night. Had to look, ask questions, wanted to get to know the person and
> try to learn. Nowadays, kids couldn't care less.
> I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less garage
> creativity is visible.
> "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> > training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >
> > When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> > anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> > of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >
> > Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> > is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> > today?
No. I was raised completely without basic carpentry or mechanical
skills, completely without knowledge of how nature worked, of how food
got to the table. It wasn't taught at home or at school. The joke
about the VCR blinking "12:00" in perpetuity seems sad to me. READ THE
DIRECTIONS! Figure it out. Fix it. My parents seem to think that
things operate (or don't) because of some malevolent force that's out
to ruin their day. "Why isn't this stupid thing working again!!" Uhh,
because you tossed out the directions without reading them, never
maintained it and now you can't or won't investigate the problem. I
could really go on a jag, but I feel like there's a huge lack of
reality to a lot of what's taught these days. We weren't given
real-life examples of how geometry or trig could be useful - much less
calculus. It's frustrating to be learning basic skills this late in
life, and I'm still a fairly young guy.
JP
It came evident when the basic mom wanted a rocket scientist or Doctor / Lawyer as a son/daughter.
The schools were being and are still being hammered on numbers - those that
go to college are value, those that get trade jobs are nothing - just like dropouts.
So money and care to trade classes went to lit and social classes - every one needed to read....
Power base shift from life to socialism. As some of these children
moved into higher education and into jobs - they found being able to think, sit, walk, work,
learn-on-the-fly and under pressure - was getting harder - it was done for themselves.
Those with skills continued to thrive as they fed both business and now a larger base of need.
My wife has a tool box. I keep it stocked the tools and such that we need for the house - and
bought her a nice Dewalt screwdriver - that she drills and screws into the house at will. I introduced
the 60 and 100# wallboard hanger - so now she is doing her thing and using me as needed.
Now I have a willing and trained - yes I helped her do it at first - when I need help.
My object in this was simple. A friend of mine lost his dad. The mother didn't know how to
pay bills, ........fix anything... and lost most of here money in a money shuffle stock manager...
I decided to get my wife geared in such a way she could run the house and her life as needed.
I was flying all over the world and working 10 miles from a 'firing range' or cease fire line
as it is really called. Flying into 5 countries in two days and driving in foreign countries
trying to save some company or someones job. I almost didn't come back on one trip and another
it was an emergency recall from France to Switzerland to L.A. (non-stop) to San Jose - with 2 hours
between planes in Switzerland. Swiss Air did a wonderful thing by routing me on a special plane
they had going.
Martin
Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
NRA LOH & Endowment Member
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member
http://lufkinced.com/
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> I think you have a good point Robert.
>
> In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
> "fragile" it becomes.
>
> TMT
>
> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>
>>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>>>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>>
>>>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>>>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>>>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>>
>>>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>>>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>>>today?
>>
>>By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
>>concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
>>real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
>>icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
>>world is the ability to manipulate symbols (known also as
>>the Symbolic Economy -- spreadsheets, databases, web pages,
>>data entry, reading and writing reports, politicking,
>>entertainment, lawyering, etc.).
>>
>>A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
>>about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
>>post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
>>meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
>>to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
>>people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
>>society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
>>more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
>>real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
>>to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
>>
>>Fun, huh???
>>
>>--
>>Robert Sturgeon
>>Summum ius summa inuria.
>>http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
>
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...
caused some of those skills are rarely needed, I rarely get any flats
anymore, haven't had one in ten years, I used to get them at least once
a year 25 years ago.
TV's can't be repaired
now it's cheaper to buy a new lawnmower then to fix one (due to China
the price of a new one is less now then 25 years ago, and our income
has gone way up, the cost of parts, however, has stayed the same)
car's rarely break now, and they need very little mainteance (tune
ups), yes you still can and need to change your brakes, alternators,
starters but it simply doesn't justify the cost of a well appointed
home mechanics workshop, like it did before when the typical repair
list was twice as long and 5 times more frequent
there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
but think back to when you were a teenager, I can think of a large
percentage that lack basic skills back then, I don't think it's any
worse now
> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
No, its just the workshop has changed, it can live in a computer, for
instance, workshops are alive and well, they are just different,
today's workshop can involved hooking up a wireless router to a wired
LAN that supports Appletalk, before your time it was thatching a roof
>
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
>
yes, they will learn what is necessary
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
> about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
> post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
> meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
> to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
> people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
> society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
> more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
> real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
> to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
>
> Fun, huh???
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
One man's catastrophe is another's opportunity. Raise your kids to
understand both worlds and they'll come out alright. For sure my
eldest (7yo) is learning to pound nails, piano keys, and keyboards.
This is why we recently moved out of town onto a small farm -- the
shift is doing him good. We replaced the exhaust manifold on the
little Allis Chalmers we use for mowing and he learned a fair bit about
internal combustion engines. If dawned on him the other day that
checking the oil in the car would be a good idea -- though the "Dad,
where's the carbeurator?" question took a while to answer and I don't
think he really got it.
hex
-30-
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
etc etc.
Ok, started reading this at reply 70 (or something like that) , so,
firing up my Beta copy of MS RANT, here is my contribution.
RANT
ON..............................................................................
I am in agreement with everyone. Its all stuffed becasue the Youth of
Today are slack, cant drive a nail, butcher a hog, build their own 4
engine heavy bomber etc - all the stuff WE did as kids. (yeh, sure....)
And I bet they dont have to walk to school, barefoot, through the snow,
with only a pointy stick to protect themselves against wolves......
Get real, people. Its ALWAYS been like this - we are a bunch of Old
Farts who get the shits because our 10yo grandchildren can program our
cellphones, but we cant. I think Socrates or Aristotle wrote about this
a few thousand years ago. Nothings changed.
This group is devoted to people like us, it self-selects people who
like building things (with machine tools), who take great pride in hard
learned skills, and yet are slightly AMAZED that the rest of the world
doesnt find them at all interesting. Funny that. Wonder why?
So, dont take it too seriously - what will get us all in the end is
collapse of the basic infrastructure that allows us (among other
things) to sit in front of our PC's and have mad rants like this.
Loosen up, lighten up - just because we are not awash with competent
machinists or skilled artisans doesnt mean that society is ruined.
So........
RANT
OFF.................................................................................
>> That's not entirely true. The builder can build the house cheaper
>> with a plain two car garage. How many people actually only store
>> only their cars in their garages?
>>
> And he can sell it cheaper...The market is driven by the buyer.If more
> people are willing to pay for a shop more builders will build houses
> with a shop.If most people do not want to pay extra for a shop they
> are not built.Builders try to build what sells.
My neighbor has a 25' by 30' or so shed/mini barn. An Amish crew (we live
in Ohio) came out and built it in one day, a couple of years ago. $6500
for 750 square feet; that's only $8 per square foot. It's a real beautiful
structure with tons of overhead storage (it's a tall shed). He has a table
saw and a planer and all the other toys in it. Speakers in the corners
hooked to a stereo receiver. Wood burning stove. And if they ever sell
their house, the shed is a huge selling point. Now to talk my wife into us
getting one!
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
steve wrote:
>
> TV's can't be repaired
>
> now it's cheaper to buy a new lawnmower then to fix one (due to China
> the price of a new one is less now then 25 years ago, and our income
> has gone way up, the cost of parts, however, has stayed the same)
>
> car's rarely break now, and they need very little mainteance (tune
> ups), yes you still can and need to change your brakes, alternators,
> starters but it simply doesn't justify the cost of a well appointed
> home mechanics workshop, like it did before when the typical repair
> list was twice as long and 5 times more frequent
>
TV's can be repaired, but it probably not cost effective unless you
enjoy puzzles. My wife does crossword puzzles, I do different kinds of
puzzles. Yesterday I repaired the dishwasher. One of the hinges had
fatigued and failed. It was less work to remove the door and hinge,
weld the hinge, and reassemble than it would have been to go buy
another dishwasher and install it.
If you are looking for lawn mower parts, look on Ebay. Lots of places
that sell things as pistons and rings at reasonable prices.
Cars may not break as often, but they do still have problems. I need
to pull the gasolene tank on my truck and fix the fuel gauge sensor.
It won't take a well appointed home mechanic workshop to do most of it.
Fixing the sensor might. Have not seen what the problem is.
But are these basic skills in todays world. To me basic skills today
are more about how to determine who is a good dentist, auto mechanic,
plumber, etc. How to use Ebay and Craigslist, to find the things you
want and need. Figuring out what stocks to buy is more important than
being able to create you own well. Knowing how to find information
when you need it is a basic skill.
Dan
Problem with a sow that big is they will run you down if they want.
Mom once kicked a big sow and it charged here. Grandma had to come
and run it off. Since the sow grew from a piglet under the slop bucket
from Grandma.
So don't wish for the biggest.
Martin
Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
NRA LOH & Endowment Member
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member
http://lufkinced.com/
John Husvar wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Mark Trudgill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Those I used to butcher as beef and bone them out as if not you'd end up
>>with pork chops nearly 2" thick and weighing about 40oz each!!
>
>
> Ummmm.
>
> Pray tell: What is the downside here. :)
>
> John, lover of _thick_ pork chops; seared, then slow grilled.
>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in.
You can learn a lot about someone by handing them a simple tool like a
ratcheting socket wrench, especially to assemble something. The
inexperienced try to tighten the still loose bolt holding the end of
the ratchet handle and of course have it always falling off the nut...
the experienced finger tighten, palm the ratchet mechanism, and only
shift down to the end of the handle for the last little bit. Of course
we haven't thought about that since we were 8 or so... which is why
it's so shocking to see how a newbie treats the tool!
"And all they had to shock them was an inefficient social/economic
system, a
failed war in Afghanistan, and a nuclear power plant disaster."
Robert, you missed the BIG one.. the Cold War arms race caused them to
spend their society into the ground.
Now consider where the United States (Republican) budget deficit stands
at this moment and ask yourself how close we are to the same situation.
A heck of a lot closer than we were in 2000.
TMT
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (snips)
>
> >> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
> >> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
> >
> >Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
> >collapse mean to you?
> >
> >Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a bang,
> >over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent to
> >many who are living through it.
>
> That's possible, and most likely. But...
>
> I can give you another scenario: 5 or 6 120 kt nukes go off
> in NYC, LA, DC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. (Hezbollah, Al Qaida,
> etc. have "won".) The investment, banking, and fed gov
> systems go into paralysis. No banks open, no stock markets,
> no commodity markets. No way to maintain the electrical
> grids, because of no way to pay the workers and suppliers.
> No way to restart the financial markets, because most of the
> leadership and workers in NYC are dead, and the buildings
> are in ruins, and the financial infrastructure won't be
> rebuilt for years, if ever. Then what's left of the fed gov
> (most of the leadership already being dead) starts
> distributing the billions (or is it trillions?) of dollars
> in paper money they have stored up for just such an
> emergency. Then the worker bees in places like Denver and
> San Jose figure out that they aren't going to get paid, and
> if they do get paid, it will be in money that is losing its
> value faster than a 1923 German Mark. Then you go to your
> standard rioting, looting, killing, and general collapse of
> society. Millions of dead bodies start piling up, and the
> population of the U.S. is rapidly heading towards half or
> less of what it was a couple of months before. State and
> local governments start devolving from fed gov control and
> issue their own currencies, which don't hold their value
> either. Local warlords start... well, you get the idea.
>
> I'm not suggesting that is likely, or even the most likely
> result of that nuclear attack scenario. What I am saying is
> -- assuming that it can't possibly happen is a mistake. It
> has recently happened, to lesser extents, in societies which
> have suffered lesser shocks. A good example is the former
> USSR, which has gone through a monetary collapse, a severe
> population decline (the life expectancy is now only about
> 60), a social collapse, with alcoholism becoming even a
> bigger problem (contributing to that life expectancy
> decrease) and with millions of pensioners becoming
> impoverished as their state pensions' values evaporated
> along with the value of the ruble. And all they had to
> shock them was an inefficient social/economic system, a
> failed war in Afghanistan, and a nuclear power plant
> disaster. Extrapolate the results from my 5 or 6 nukes
> scenario, and you easily get to a near-total societal
> collapse. For fictional depictions, see: The Postman, Road
> Warrior, etc.
>
> It wouldn't be like the transition from buggy whips to Model
> Ts. It would be a transition from the complex, highly
> ordered Information Society to a chaotic world of scarcity,
> destruction, and death. Another poster summed it up
> succinctly in another thread -- no cops.
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> Trevor Jones wrote:
>
> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set of
> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
> > roadside.
>
> <snip>
>
> Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>
> If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
> car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
> unit.
>
> Want to change your oil?
>
> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>
BULL.
New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
Oil disposal fee? No place selling oil can charge you a fee legally. The
law states that ANY business selling new oil MUST accept used oil for
recycling, at NO CHARGE. Cost 0.00 Drop off the used oil from the
vehicle when you buy the new oil. You can even pour it back into the
empty bottles to save on container expense.
Benefits to the owner: YOU know the oil was changed, while under there
YOU can look over the engine and underside of the vehicle and look for
problems or leaks. While under the vehicle YOU can also grease any items
that can be greased, this has the side benefit of lowering wear on items
that should be lubed but usually are not.
> Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>
> Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>
> Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
> being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
And again you can return the used coolant to any store that does coolant
changes for free. And again you can return it when you buy the new coolant.
>
> The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
> tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
Not likely. Just a normal plug wrench for any plug on the market today.
You may need a torx bit or similar item if you need to remove a coil
pack or pull a cover but those are hardly special tools.
>
> Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
> even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
Nope because they have the same attitude you have, that it is easier to
trade them than to LEARN how to repair them.
>
> Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
> for the first 75,000 miles.
>
> Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
>
> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
> that's another matter<G>.
>
> Lew
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Gunner <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than
paying
>>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area
at
>>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>
>>
>>BULL.
>>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts.
>
> $12 per quart for Oil? Blink blink..are you buying extra pure sperm
> whale oil in silver flasks?
>
>
> Even Mobile 1 is less than $5
>
>
> Gunner
>
> "I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
> As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
> patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
> in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
>
A quart of Pennzoil 10w-30 down at the mom and pop service station here
in town is only $2/quart. I think it's $1.50/quart at kmart. I usually
buy it by the case.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Gunner wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>
>> BULL.
>> New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts.
>
> $12 per quart for Oil? Blink blink..are you buying extra pure sperm
> whale oil in silver flasks?
>
>
> Even Mobile 1 is less than $5
>
>
> Gunner
>
> "I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
> As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
> patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
> in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
Total price of 12 bucks in quart bottles@ 5 quarts. Buy the 5 quart
bottle and it is about 9 bucks.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:34:47 -0400, LiRM <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> >>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> >>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> >>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> >>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >>
> >>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> >>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> >>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >>
> >>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >>today?
> >>
> >>TMT
> >
> >I grew up around an uncle who literally rebuilt his entire house.
>
> My father literally built his house -- cement work,
> plumbing, framing, siding, wiring, roofing, everything. I
> am somewhat embarrassed that I will probably hire my roof
> replaced. It comes down to 2 factors: he HAD to (no money);
> and I don't want to. I'm sure I could redo the roof if I
> really needed to. I used to do stuff like that all the
> time. Now I'm lazy (and old) -- and I want it done right,
> not cheaply.
I've built 3 houses including one 3 storey one of 5400 sq ft. That
taught me not to build houses. Unfortunately I found a lovely piece of
land on waterfront. I could afford the land and some building
materials. I couldn't afford to pay for labour unless I sold one of my
other properties, which I wasn't going to do. So, I built another
house. At least I knew exactly what I was getting myself into. Finished
the house then started on the shop (I built a small temporary shop
first, of course).
I did contract out the slab for the big workshop, tho. There's 20 cubic
metres of concrete in the slab on top of the 16 cubic metres in the
footings. The rest I'm doing myself.
People like us *can* do it if we have to or want to. Others - can't.
I've gotten a great deal of amusement watching the architect g/f of a
friend of mine realise just how limited her knowledge base was when it
came to actually building a place. She & he have managed to build a 24'
x 20' shed in the same time I built a house. I had to lend them some
tools, teach them how to use others and explain why, sometimes, 'near
enough' is ok if 'perfect' is going to take 10X as long.
Also that hand sanding boards with 400 wet & dry isn't a real
productive activity :-) Better to go 80 grit, 120, 180 etc. And use a
power sander, or better still, paint it & forget it. It was only a
facia board after all....
My 3 kids have no real interest in the skills I have, and I've never
barred them from the workshop. Rather play computer games. Of my
siblings, I was the only one to have an interest in this sort of stuff.
Lots of tools about. Shrug. I forsee an interesting retirement fixing
stuff for my daughters in the years to come, assuming that their
eventual partners turn oout as useless as the majority these days.
If they can find me when they need me, that is.
PDW
Gunner wrote:
> And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
> garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
>
This is what I don't understand. When I was coming up, your house
looked *abandoned* of you didn't have the garage door open. Everyone
in my neighborhood had their garage open all day long...it signified
someone was home...someone actually lived there. Kids were always
playing hoops above the garage door, or girls were jumping rope with
friends in the driveway. Or if you looked up in the trees, there were
kids plotting all sorts of mischief.
Nowdays, I drive through a neighborhood, and all the doors are closed.
THAT is what looks ugliest to me.
Mark & Juanita wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT, Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> ... snip
> >
> >
> >Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
> >
> >Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
> >
>
> Only time I have a problem with that is when the nut is on the bottom of
> something and I'm reaching down and around a bunch of obstacles from the
> top. Then I have to remember that CCW for the nut is CW when viewed from
> the top. And that's after 15+ years working on a farm (first 8 years
> weren't that productive :-) ) as well as various machinery work after
> getting out of college.
hold your right hand in a fist with thumb extended.
twisting the nut in the same direction that your fingers are pointing
will move the nut in the direction that your thumb is pointed.
regards,
charlie
cave creek, az
Ron Moore wrote:
> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
> no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
> productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
> they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
I know -- what kind of person can actually park a car in their garage
without moving at least one piece of heavy equipment? It's just not
right, I tells ya'! It's important for me to have a shop, and I'm
looking forward to teaching my kids how to make stuff.
> > When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> > anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> > of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
I agree. I think it's sad that fewer people make stuff with thier own
hands. Not that it's required to get by anymore... you can buy a lot of
stuff so cheaply that there isn't a big reason to make your own stuff
any more. And a lot of stuff has gotten so complex that it's far
cheaper to replace it, or take it to a specialist if it breaks.
> > Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> > is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> > today?
> >
> > TMT
Well, I'd have to say that yes, they do. The world is changing. People
who can fix things are still needed, but not to the degree they were
before. There just isn't the same demand for, say, a room full of
machinists when they can be replaced by a CNC machine or two. There is
a demand for people who can do a good job designing things, though.
Most people can figure out how to make the stuff they deal with work
well enough to get by... Maybe it's not perfect, but it's good enough.
Personally, I wish they had more shop classes in school. I think the
most useful class I took in high school was metal shop. It was fun, and
I Learned a whole lot about how to make things work. But my personal
desires don't have much to do with the current economic reality of
off-shoring manufacturing and competition with China.
It's disapointing that in the four or so years that I've had a shop in
my garage, not one kid has asked me anything about it.
Jeff Polaski
> > hold your right hand in a fist with thumb extended.
> >
> > twisting the nut in the same direction that your fingers are pointing
> > will move the nut in the direction that your thumb is pointed.
> >
>
> Don't do this if you're replacing the clutch on a
> Hamilton Beach commercial blender. <VBG>
Or driver-side lug nuts on an old Dodge...
Jeff P.
[email protected] wrote:
> Critical thinking is a lost art. It's loss gave rise to the democrat
> party. Two chickens in every pot. Nobody asked where the chickens
> would come from, who would pay for them. It's part of the Robin Hood
> mentality. My young son liked the Robin Hood story until I told him
> that Bill Clinton thought we were on the verge of becoming rich. I
> asked him which of his posessions he would like to have confiscated so
> that someone else could enjoy them.
That's pure partisan rhetoric. Do you honestly think Republicans have
the corner on personal accountability? Everyone else is a welfare
recipient, eh?
> Another time my son came home from school and said we need to quit
> cutting down trees and building houses. I said OK. Then I asked him
> if he liked living in our house. He did. I told him that the building
> material came from trees, and that the grounds we live on were once
> forested. I asked if, when he left home, he wanted to live in an
> apartment in the crime-ridden center part of the city. He didn't want
> to do that.
That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves. Any idiot knows that
trees are cut to build houses, but "conservative" idiots treat nature
as a bottomless pit of materials. Their motivation is to grow the
population and economy forever, leaving no balance in the system.
R. Lander
Jay Pique wrote:
> No. I was raised completely without basic carpentry or mechanical
> skills, completely without knowledge of how nature worked, of how food
> got to the table...
Many people understand how to manipulate nature, but they're clueless
about nature's limits, and how Man is pushing those limits to the edge.
This IS a survival newsgroup, after all. Home repair can be learned
with common sense and instructions if one has the will. What's really
hard to teach is respect for the land and conservation values that can
prevent societal collapse. Greed is the norm but it won't fix anything
in the long run. Anyone who's a survivalist and a "conservative" had
better stop wasting and start conserving for a change.
R. Lander
J. Clarke wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
> > Gunner wrote:
> >> And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
> >> garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
> >>
> >
> > This is what I don't understand. When I was coming up, your house
> > looked *abandoned* of you didn't have the garage door open. Everyone
> > in my neighborhood had their garage open all day long...it signified
> > someone was home...someone actually lived there. Kids were always
> > playing hoops above the garage door, or girls were jumping rope with
> > friends in the driveway. Or if you looked up in the trees, there were
> > kids plotting all sorts of mischief.
> >
> > Nowdays, I drive through a neighborhood, and all the doors are closed.
> > THAT is what looks ugliest to me.
>
> These "homeowner's associations" need to be taken down a peg. They're
> starting to get too big for their britches. I would _not_ buy in a
> community where there was such a thing.
>
A friend of mine built his shop in such an area. It's a large shop for
a hobby woodworker (32' x 48' with a full basement), but to match the
other houses in the area, he had to add a brick front. I didn't ask how
much extra that added to the cost, but brick and the masons don't come
all that cheap, even around here. I live in the boonies, have a smaller
shop, and did it in rough, green wood, board and batten style. One
helluva lot cheaper, even if it is fairly ugly.
Private wrote:
> "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > Around $15.00 for oil and a filter and I have too provide the labor to
> > change as well as providing the labor to disposel of the used oil.
> >
> > From time to time, local gas station offers an oil change with filter for
> > $14.95, otherwise the going rate is about $20.00
> >
> > I have better things to do with my time than trying to save $0-$5 max by
> > playing grease monkey.
>
> You are correct that oil changes are inexpensive and frequently offered as
> loss leaders, however:
>
> A - I buy my premium oil by the (several) case when it is on sale, same for
> premium filters. The oil and filters used by cheap oil changers are not of
> equal quality.
> B - I can change the oil at home in MUCH less time than it takes to travel
> (more $ for gas) and wait for someone else to do the job, according to how
> busy they are this wait is often not insignificant.
> C - By doing the work myself, I can do it at my convenience and when it
> should be done at not when I have the time to schedule the chore into the
> time the oil changer has available. There is never a line up at home and I
> am open for business any time I want to be.
> D - I do not change my own oil because I am saving money (which I do, but
> not a substantial amount). I do it because it is easier, quicker and more
> convenient. It is usually combined with other preventative maintenance work
> which I do not trust an oil changer to perform. I did make the mistake of
> going to an oil changer (once) and because I thought it would be convenient
> (long story), had them check and change the manual transmission oil and top
> off the OD. I neglected to get a firm price quote for this service and
> ended up paying a huge amount for the trans service and the trans oil AND
> had to show the kid how to do the job as he did not have a clue.
>
> Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained to
> people who do not share similar feelings. Different strokes for different
> folks, as always YMMV
Well put, Private.
I change my own oil and do the maintenance because it generally saves
time and costs about the same. I know the quality of the stuff I use if
good, and I can change the oil faster than I can drive to the
quick-lube place and back. Plus all the other reasons you listed.
Doing maintenance might not be for everyone, but I think more people
should at least learn the basics. Also, if you know more about how your
car works, you're less likely to get ripped off when you need to take
it in.
Prometheus <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:15:26 -0400, "digitalmaster"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh
>>> > basic skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how
>>> > to...well you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs
>>> > to deal with the world we live in.
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
>>> specialized equipment.
>>Not true.specialized equipment helps troubleshoot some problems.You
>>can still change plugs,wires,air filter,brakes.oil,transmission
>>filter,etc. without "a lot of specialized tools."
>
> Well, there is a component here that hasn't been addressed in any way-
> I've been doing construction and steel work my whole life, and as a
> result, I'm a pretty big guy. When it comes to knowing *what* to do
> to fix the car, there isn't a problem- but when it comes down to
> trying to fish my arm down through an engine when every availible inch
> has been packed full of vacuum lines and plastic covers, the job
> becomes impossible. It's not a matter of complexity, it's a matter of
> space, and I'd much rather find a mechanic who needs some remodeling
> done in exchange for a repair job then spend 14 hours and half my skin
> on my day off trying to do something that someone else can do in 30
> minutes.
>
My last truck was an '87 Dodge Ram D150 with the 225 ci slant 6 engine
and was real durable and reliable. While doing maintenance on it, there
was tons of room in the engine compartment. You could climb into it if
you wanted. Everything was easy to get to. You didn't have to spend an
hour removing other stuff to get to the part you needed to get to.
Working on an older full size truck with a straight 6 spoils you, and
then you open up the hood on a modern FWD car! Wires, vacuum hoses, EFI
everywhere, no gaps! packed like sardines.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
R. Lander wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Critical thinking is a lost art. It's loss gave rise to the democrat
> > party. Two chickens in every pot. Nobody asked where the chickens
> > would come from, who would pay for them. It's part of the Robin Hood
> > mentality. My young son liked the Robin Hood story until I told him
> > that Bill Clinton thought we were on the verge of becoming rich. I
> > asked him which of his posessions he would like to have confiscated so
> > that someone else could enjoy them.
>
> That's pure partisan rhetoric. Do you honestly think Republicans have
> the corner on personal accountability? Everyone else is a welfare
> recipient, eh?
Of course not. Don't be so silly.
If not a welfare recipient, then a welfare advocate.
> > Another time my son came home from school and said we need to quit
> > cutting down trees and building houses. I said OK. Then I asked him
> > if he liked living in our house. He did. I told him that the building
> > material came from trees, and that the grounds we live on were once
> > forested. I asked if, when he left home, he wanted to live in an
> > apartment in the crime-ridden center part of the city. He didn't want
> > to do that.
>
> That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
> outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves. Any idiot knows that
> trees are cut to build houses,
Mmmm I don't know. Winston seemed to want to argue it.
> but "conservative" idiots treat nature
> as a bottomless pit of materials.
We do? Gosh, I guess I didn't need to put 160,000 miles on a Geo Metro
when I could have enjoyed driving Blazer? My home is 1600 sqft instead
of 2000 to 2200 that seems to be the "starter" home of today.
> Their motivation is to grow the
> population and economy forever, leaving no balance in the system.
>
> R. Lander
Yep, all those conservative hispanic, moslem, hindu, and chinese
"wingers" keep growing the population. No go back and do your homework
before you say something else as stupid.
pipedope wrote:
> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>
> > The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
> > land now than in 1900.
>
> But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
You tell us...
> On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
> tree farm land.
>
> michael
You have a problem with trees being replanted for future cuts?
Koz wrote:
> pipedope wrote:
>
> > Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> >
> >> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
> >> land now than in 1900.
> >
> >
> > But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
> >
> > On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
> > tree farm land.
> >
> > michael
>
> You can go on....comparing virgin forests of 1400 to what is there today
> by comparing acres in forest is apples to oranges in the worst sense.
> It's like saying the city park is a "forest" because there are trees in it.
If the canopy coverage is greater than 50%, it is forest.
> You have to compare board feet of harvestable timber as well as issues
> such as forest diversity and health, watershed necessities (can't cut it
> if your towns water is collected there) and whether that harvestable
> timber has any reasonable value (Lots of maple in Washington but mostly
> only good for fire wood), "green" load..as in how much a tree type
> contributes to air cleaning and oxygen production (a cactus is
> considered a tree but has a low green load), etc...
Perhaps. Is it private land?
> The issue is far
> more complex than a right-wing radio sound bite.
Then how will the lefties ever understand it?
> The US Forest Service, by the way, had it's ass kicked a few years back
> for calling large tracts of land above the timberline in elevation as
> harvestable forest lands. Games people play.
With GIS all things are possible.
> Koz
And the Fish And Wildlife Service DIDN'T have its ass kicked for
falsifying the range extent of a lynx for the purpose of denying
sportsmen access to millions of acres of BLM land.
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Private" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> > Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained
> > to people who do not share similar feelings.
>
> Raise your own livestock, grow your own veggies and generate your own
> electricity?
Hah. I have a friend still doing that, mostly, out west where there is
more space. But he's about the same age I am, and is now looking to
sell his land, the house he and his first ex built, and move closer to
civilization as the creaks of age become louder than the fears of youth
and middle age. He's as self-sufficient as anyone I've ever met, but is
smart enough to realize that it's time to get a tad closer to medical
help, among other things.
Self-sufficiency in today's world is pretty much illusory. Someone
still had to supply his batteries for the wind-power set up; he had to
locate the motorcycles he rebuilt to make money and buy the parts to
repair them; even the fence lines he worked on to make spare cash had
to belong to someone.
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>
> Last time I changed oil was in May, 1991. I had about 3000 miles on my new
> Regal. It was not easier, quicker, or more convenient. It was a royal PITA
> that was never repeated. I can come and go as I please at work so time is
> not a problem. I just go over to Bill's and pay $25. Yes, I can take a
> look around under the car while is on the lift, even when it is 10 degrees
> outside and snow is falling. I have no plans to ever crawl under a car and
> change oil again even if a new model is easier.
>
>
> > Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained
> > to people who do not share similar feelings.
>
> Raise your own livestock, grow your own veggies and generate your own
> electricity?
Like anything the more one does something the easier it gets. Changing
the oil is the same way.
I live about 7 miles to any commercial establishments, although there
is a garage about three miles away. But it is on the fringe of a
residential area and there are no other businesses within easy walking
distance. So for me to take my truck somewhere to get the oil changed
is a royal PITA. Also note that I have a truck. Way easier than
changing the oil on a car. Lots more room all around the engine. So
to change the oil, I pull out a couple of ramps and drive the front
wheels on them. That really gives lots of room to get under with a
creeper. I have an old stainless steel container that the oil drains
into. I have the right size oil filter wrench and a funnel to drain
the oil from the stainless container back into the now empty oil
bottles. So I can change the oil in about the same time as a garage
can. Don't save much money, but do save the time to drive somewhere
and back.
If I had a Buick, I would take it somewhere.
I do grow some veggies, and cut firewood to heat the house and shop.
In the PNW it is hard to compete with commercial hydroelectric power.
Dan
Bainbridge
Island, Wa.
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:32:34 +0100, Steve Taylor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >R. Lander wrote:
> >
> >> That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
> >> outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves.
> >
> >Except in Russia, where the growth of forests has been enormous over the
> >last few years.
(source?)
> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
> land now than in 1900.
Since 1900 perhaps, but not compared to the pinnacle of replanting
efforts several decades ago. We cut down trees to build more homes each
day. There's no physical way a population can be kept growing without
using more timber unless steel framework supplants most of it. The
forest industry puts out smooth propaganda, but renewability is being
lost to population growth in most places. They plant tree farms at
higher density and try to call it "more acreage."
http://mvh.sr.unh.edu/mvhinvestigations/old_growth_forests.htm
(compare 1926 to 1990)
R. Lander
Steve Taylor wrote:
> R. Lander wrote:
>
> > That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
> > outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves.
>
> Except in Russia, where the growth of forests has been enormous over the
> last few years.
Are you talking about a few plots here and there? Communism was as bad
or worse for nature than unfettered capitalism. Where are you getting
your information?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1586889.stm
"Russian experts who have spent five years mapping the forests say much
of what is left is in jeopardy.....researchers say what little is left
of the forests is at risk, as the parts likeliest to attract
exploitation have no protection under federal or local law."
R. Lander
Upscale wrote:
> "R. Lander" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > lost to population growth in most places. They plant tree farms at
> > higher density and try to call it "more acreage."
>
> And also, what kind of acreage is it? Old growth trees of hundreds of years
> ago, certainly don't measure up to what is grown today. Same acreage maybe,
> but certainly not same quality, durability or foliage.
Very true. Here's one of many maps showing the general plight of old
growth:
http://mvh.sr.unh.edu/mvhinvestigations/old_growth_forests.htm
Many on the Right don't believe Man can impact nature unless it was
decreed in the Bible. They will always claim that down means up when a
resource is discussed; or price matters more than physical abundance.
They'll spotlight some guy planting a dozen trees in his backyard,
while a nearby subdivision flattens the last wild oaks in the county.
Of course, a few oaks will be left standing so they can give it a trite
name.
R. Lander
pipedope wrote:
> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> > On 9 Aug 2006 18:36:24 -0700, [email protected]
> > wrote:
> >
> >> pipedope wrote:
> >>> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
> >>>> land now than in 1900.
> >>> But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
> >> You tell us...
> >>
> >>> On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
> >>> tree farm land.
> >>>
> >>> michael
> >> You have a problem with trees being replanted for future cuts?
> >
> > If he gets to define the terms any way he likes, he can
> > prove anything -- anything at all.
> >
> > Forests are forests, regardless of whether they are tree
> > farms or "virgin" forests.
> >
> > --
> > Robert Sturgeon
> > Summum ius summa inuria.
> > http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
>
> Looks like the pot calling the kettle black.
You know and I know that pots can't talk.
> Start with how bad I am for simply asking a question by implying that I
> am defining terms to fit my argument and the you make a strange
> definition to support your own argument.
>
> There are major differences between virgin forests and tree farms. Not
> even all virgin forests are the same.
Indeed. Pots and kettles talking to each other...
> There is lots of good science on the subject, far more than will fit
> into net news sound bites.
So cutting trees is bad, and cutting trees expressly grown to be cut is
bad, too.
It's always that way with the libs. I saw a lib movie where they sat
around a stump and wailed and cried...
>>I think a lot of people today have too much money at their disposal.
>>Before you jump on that statement, remember necessity is the mother of
>>invention. If the pipes leaked and you couldn't afford a plumber,you
>>would probably find a way to repair the leak.
A friend of mine had a drippy bathroom sink. It had been driving her nuts
for months. I suggested that she put a washrag under the drip; then you
won't hear the drip anymore. It worked and she was happy. I replaced the
washer for her a few days later. You'd think she would have tried the
washrag under the drip trick already. Women. Beautiful, sexy creatures,
but most are clueless when it comes to things mechanical. I personally
know 4 or 5 women who've burned up engines by not changing the oil, adding
the oil, or even checking their oil. As long as the car starts, they're
happy and drive it until it stops starting. Of course, some men are like
this too, and they're even more pathetic! My brother's former brother-in-
law (late 20's) burned up the engine in a 1 year old Honda Civic by not
caring about the oil. His father, even more stupid than he was, went out
and bought the dude a brand new Acura Integra! More money thna brains.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
pipedope wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > So cutting trees is bad, and cutting trees expressly grown to be cut is
> > bad, too.
>
> I never said anything like that at all.
Then it's a good that we're talking this through. You sure left me
with that impression.
> I am pointing out that when comparing things it is important to define
> the terms and understand the time frame of the comparison.
And we will find that most things aren't comparable.
> There is such a thing as sustainable forestry and logging but in the USA
> today it is really only being done by owners of small woodlots.
Hmmmm? Mead/Westvaco and Weyerhauser would wince at your suggestion.
> The reason clear cutting is popular is that it is cheap and can be done
> with much less skilled labor.
It is popular because the large timber companies wish to replant a
single desireable species that can be harvested again in a shorter
period of time.
> Selectively harvesting only the mature
> trees and removing them with minimal damage to the rest of the forest
"The rest of the forest" may not contain desireable trees.
> requires more labor and people with more education and experience.
You are only considering ONE aspect of the situation and then put a
negative spin on it, such as the timber work force being comprised of
stupid people.
> Yes, that also would mean that I would pay more for my lumber but I
> already pay top dollar for quality lumber so it really wouldn't change
> things for me so much.
Don't be so sure.
steve wrote:
>> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the la=
ck
>> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>=20
> No, its just the workshop has changed, it can live in a computer, for=
> instance, workshops are alive and well, they are just different,
> today's workshop can involved hooking up a wireless router to a wired=
> LAN that supports Appletalk, before your time it=A0=A0was=A0thatching=
=A0a=A0roof
I'm not sure about the lack of interest. I work part time in a Woodcra=
ft
store and our classes are usually filled way before the class takes pla=
ce.=20
We give at least one class a week. The only class I can remember not b=
eing
full was one called "Wiring your workshop" and I got the feeling most p=
eople
would rather hire a professional to do that than take a chance on burni=
ng the
place down :-).
We sell one heck of a lot of books as well.
IMNSHO there seems to be no lack of interest in learning in our area.
--=20
It's turtles, all the way down
CW wrote:
> Blew your credibility with that statement. Work at a desk, don't you?
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > There just isn't the same demand for, say, a room full of
>> machinists when they can be replaced by a CNC machine or two. There is
>>
>
I wrote some software for a roll grinding machine once. I pointed out that I
thought a good machinist could do as well or better than the machine. I was
told that they knew that, but all their machinists were retiring soon and
they just couldn't find replacements that knew anything. So they imported an
expensive machine to do the job.
Note that they had to import the grinder. They also had to import the rolling
mill the rolls were for. Nobody in the US could/would build such a mill.
--
It's turtles, all the way down
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:32:34 +0100, Steve Taylor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>R. Lander wrote:
>>
>>> That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
>>> outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves.
>>
>>Except in Russia, where the growth of forests has been enormous over the
>>last few years.
>
> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
> land now than in 1900.
>
There is a difference between a forest and a tree farm :-).
--
It's turtles, all the way down
Prometheus wrote:
> I've been doing construction and steel work my whole life, and as a
> result, I'm a pretty big guy.=A0=A0When=A0it=A0comes=A0to=A0knowing=A0=
*what*=A0to=A0do
> to fix the car, there isn't a problem- but when it comes down to
> trying to fish my arm down through an engine when every availible inc=
h
> has been packed full of vacuum lines and plastic covers, the job
> becomes impossible.
Amen! I have fond memories of standing INSIDE the engine compartment t=
o work
on an old inline six cylinder. Those days are, alas, gone forever. I =
now
need to be a contortionist to work on a motorcycle.
--=20
It's turtles, all the way down
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
> On 9 Aug 2006 18:36:24 -0700, [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> pipedope wrote:
>>> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>>>
>>>> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
>>>> land now than in 1900.
>>> But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
>> You tell us...
>>
>>> On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
>>> tree farm land.
>>>
>>> michael
>> You have a problem with trees being replanted for future cuts?
>
> If he gets to define the terms any way he likes, he can
> prove anything -- anything at all.
>
> Forests are forests, regardless of whether they are tree
> farms or "virgin" forests.
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
Looks like the pot calling the kettle black.
Start with how bad I am for simply asking a question by implying that I
am defining terms to fit my argument and the you make a strange
definition to support your own argument.
There are major differences between virgin forests and tree farms. Not
even all virgin forests are the same.
There is lots of good science on the subject, far more than will fit
into net news sound bites.
[email protected] wrote:
> So cutting trees is bad, and cutting trees expressly grown to be cut is
> bad, too.
I never said anything like that at all.
I am pointing out that when comparing things it is important to define
the terms and understand the time frame of the comparison.
There is such a thing as sustainable forestry and logging but in the USA
today it is really only being done by owners of small woodlots.
The reason clear cutting is popular is that it is cheap and can be done
with much less skilled labor. Selectively harvesting only the mature
trees and removing them with minimal damage to the rest of the forest
requires more labor and people with more education and experience.
Yes, that also would mean that I would pay more for my lumber but I
already pay top dollar for quality lumber so it really wouldn't change
things for me so much.
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:51:10 GMT, Kristian Ukkonen
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Emmo wrote:
>> I would mention that those men who can do even the most basic of work,
>> whether on the home or car, are richly rewarded by all the women who love
>> being with someone who is 'handy'.
>
>It depends a lot. Many women regard those kinds of
>technical skills as "nerdy" and stay away from such
>men. Understanding how things work, and being interested
>in such things, has become a wierdness/freakyness, and
>an alarming thing for many women. Stuff like that is
>only something one does for a job, and not something to
>be interested in during free time. Really. Having a
>machine shop, or even lots of electronics/RF equipment,
>is a social suicide with women. I'm talking about the
>age group 20-35 years. The "acceptable" hobbies include
>sports and culture, but definitely not technology/science.
It is indeed social suicide with SOME women in that age range. It
largely depends on if they are rural or rural raised, versus urban
types. And if they had a handy father or brothers also adds to the mix.
Frankly..I find the Urban type of women to be shallow, superficial and
in large part...high maintainence air heads.
Ive had more phone numbers handed to me by women Ive helped out on some
fix it issue, or after having had a group conversation in a bar etc etc
where the the subject of being "handy" comes up.
Some by young ladies looking for "a guy just like Dad", others from
practical women..usually country types, to those who are clueless and
just bought a condo..<G>
On the other hand...a Pendelton button down shirt, pocket protector and
tape mended eye glasses is the kiss of death no matter who you are.
In the cities..being a country boy..boots, jeans, big buckle and cowboy
hat can be the kiss of death in some areas. Primarily those who favor
italian suits, Lexus automobiles and a brief case. Though its surprising
the numbers of ladies who find the country boy fascinating, though dont
want their friends to know <VBG>..oddly enough..in many cases, its black
ladies who take the lead in this.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>
>
>BULL.
>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts.
$12 per quart for Oil? Blink blink..are you buying extra pure sperm
whale oil in silver flasks?
Even Mobile 1 is less than $5
Gunner
"I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:14:11 -0500, "Ron Moore" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
>no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
>productive or creative can this person be?
Maybe they have a basement?
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:30:37 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
>on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT in rec.crafts.metalworking :
>>On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>>
>>>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>>> the world we live in.
>>>
>>>You can learn a lot about someone by handing them a simple tool like a
>>>ratcheting socket wrench, especially to assemble something. The
>>>inexperienced try to tighten the still loose bolt holding the end of
>>>the ratchet handle and of course have it always falling off the nut...
>>>the experienced finger tighten,
>
> Works real well when bolting fixtures to vise, tables, etc. Where I
>work, there seems to be a tendency for people to stick the bolt in the
>hole, grab the air wrench, and just press the trigger. Which explains why
>the vise had the first 1/4 inch of threads stripped out. Do you really
>need 100 ft/pounds of torque to hold a vice jaw in place?
> And some one needs to stand over the dayshifters and beat them when
>they tighten the 10-24 screws (to hold a 3/16 plate in place while the
>peripheral pattern is milled) with the same force they normally used on
>1/2-13 bolts used to hold 50 pound blocks to the tombstone! ("I have here
>in my hand, two ball peen hammers. One is a standard 12 ounce head, the
>other a 1/2 ounce head. Which would you rather have me use when I play the
>Anvil Chorus on your knuckles?")
Sounds like they need my uncle John to give 'em hell for a while. I
still end up arguing with coworkers over the overtightening "lessons"
I got from him when I was an apprentice. There were to be absolutely
no broken bolts or stripped fasteners in his shop, and it seems he was
a bit of an oddity in that when I watch most guys work these days- but
it sure was a valuable lesson for me, especially now that I have my
own equipment to maintain.
Good lesson for life in general, too- always use the right tool and
the right amount of force to get the job done properly, and you save
yourself an asswhipping later.
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
Kids being raised by single moms who didn't learn to work with their
hands because it wasn't a woman's place to do these things.
For awhile I owned a hardware store in Alaska. I knew absolutely
nothing about hardware when we bought it, but I eventually learned
what the stuff was called. Never did learn what to do with most of
it.
Luckily, I now have a very kind, generous gentleman friend who does a
lot of the repair stuff for me. Some I could do but have this great
fear of making whatever it is worse than when I started.
>
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
I doubt my son can do much in the way of working with his hands. His
girlfriend is better at car stuff than he is because she worked in the
motor pool in the Army. At one time she was probably better with guns
than he is, but he's catching up.
Sue
>
>TMT
>
>
>Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
>Writer
>Thu Aug 3
>
>The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
>a distance.
>
>He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
>no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
>
>The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
>bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
>they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
>
>For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
>parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
>learn basic repair skills.
>
>With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
>recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
>when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
>seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
>
>"They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
>investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
>pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
>who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
>and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
>manual."
>
>Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
>young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
>
>Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
>
>Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
>Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
>He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
>because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
>
>"The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
>trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
>they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
>them.'"
>
>Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
>in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
>tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
>
>"We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
>younger set," she says.
>
>For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
>try - and sometimes fail.
>
>With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
>hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
>kitchen.
>
>In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
>forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
>sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
>head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
>for a couple of other mishaps.
>
>"The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
>the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
>job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
>financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
>up."
>
>Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
>he means.
>
>Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
>bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
>the wall.
>
>"There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
>someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
>
>But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
>then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
>
>Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
>for know-how.
>
>Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
>classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
>dimmer switch.
>
>"It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
>they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
>who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
>
>Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
>- the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
>
>Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
>HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
>Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
>astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
>among young adults.
>
>While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
>shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
>closer to home: her mom.
>
>Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
>Chicago condo.
>
>But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
>She'll leave that to a professional.
>
>"I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
>much."
>
>___
>
>On the Net:
>
>Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
>
>Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
>
>Lowe's clinics:
>http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I think you have a good point Robert.
>
>In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
>"fragile" it becomes.
A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:55:28 -0500, "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>John Husvar (in
>[email protected]) said:
>
>| With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple
>
>Are your sure that you really want to continue this subthread?
Why not? You think the tangos are going to learn something from reading
these particular newsgroups? The same tangos who have been to Terrorist
Training Camp 202?
Its better to know what you could be up against, and be proactive..then
to blithely and blindly fumble around waiting for the sledge hammer to
fall.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
>> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>
>> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>> today?
>>
>> TMT
>
> Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
> garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every
> "Man of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build
> items from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every
> garage in the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a
> work shop, storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms
> and a maid's quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2
> bedroom 1 bath house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not
> having some kind of work area or work shop.
>
don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
them.
The message <[email protected]>
from Robert Sturgeon <[email protected]> contains these words:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:31:04 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > > the world we live in.
> ><snip>
> >
> >It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
> >specialized equipment.
> >
> >Few doctors make house calls any more.
> >
> >Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
> >most places where people live these days.
> >
> >Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
> >society keep changing.
> >
> >Think the process is called "life".
> No, it is called "post-modern" life. What happens when
> post-modern life suddenly and unexpectedly becomes
> post-post-modern life? COULD you butcher a hog, if you
> really needed to?
I could and have done many times in the past.
Whats more I can even do them anyway you want, In continental Europe,
they skin pork and are butchered along individual muscles.
In Britain we like the skin still on, and basically cut along the 4 quarters.
The pigs I kept for myself were slaughtered about 12 months old and
weighed in at about 250lb each.
Those I used to butcher as beef and bone them out as if not you'd end up
with pork chops nearly 2" thick and weighing about 40oz each!!
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
The message <[email protected]>
from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
words:
> Retief wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
> >>> really needed to?
> >> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
> >> do it.
> >
> > No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> > "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> > get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> > of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
> >
> > And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
> >
> > Retief
> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
250lb of pork trimmings.
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
The message <[email protected]>
from John Husvar <[email protected]> contains these words:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Mark Trudgill <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Those I used to butcher as beef and bone them out as if not you'd end up
> > with pork chops nearly 2" thick and weighing about 40oz each!!
> Ummmm.
> Pray tell: What is the downside here. :)
> John, lover of _thick_ pork chops; seared, then slow grilled.
The thing is you and I may be greedy bastards, and my do they eat well.
But the wife and kids couldn't eat one of these in a month of sundays so
you end up throwing most of it away!!
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
The message <[email protected]>
from "Martin H. Eastburn" <[email protected]> contains these words:
> Problem with a sow that big is they will run you down if they want.
> Mom once kicked a big sow and it charged here. Grandma had to come
> and run it off. Since the sow grew from a piglet under the slop bucket
> from Grandma.
> So don't wish for the biggest.
Pigs kept for meat were usually gelded boars.
Gilts were kept as breeding stock, except things that didn't measure up,
ie things with 8 tits and what have you.
The strain of pigs we had were very docile, until they had little uns.
The first sow we got was having a litter, and dad was in the sty helping
out, taking the young uns and placing them in a box under a heat lamp
out the way.
One of these little uns squeaked and the sow flew round and bit my dad
around the midriff and shook him around like a rag doll and my dad isn't
a small bloke!!
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
The message <[email protected]>
from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
words:
> Mark Trudgill wrote:
> > The message <[email protected]>
> > from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
> > words:
> >
> >> Retief wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
> >>>>> really needed to?
> >>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
> >>>> do it.
> >>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> >>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> >>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> >>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
> >>>
> >>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
> >>>
> >>> Retief
> >> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
> >
> > Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
> > 250lb of pork trimmings.
> >
> That isn't part of the scheme, he said he could
> butcher it, so he must have a clue, probably way
> more than a clue.
> My point is there is no incorrect way as long as
> one observes sanitary procedure, may not be the
> way a professional does it and one may not end up
> with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot
> would prefer pork trimmings (whatever that is). I
> usually end up with bite size pieces before I
> stuff them in my mouth.
Feel free to roast mouth sized pieces.
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
The message <[email protected]>
from pyotr filipivich <[email protected]> contains these words:
> Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
> on Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:54:53 GMT in misc.survivalism :
> >On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:59:36 +0100, Mark Trudgill <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>The message <[email protected]>
> >>from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
> >>words:
> >>
> >>> Retief wrote:
> >>> > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you really needed to?
> >>> >> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
> >>> >> do it.
> >>> >
> >>> > No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> >>> > "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> >>> > get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> >>> > of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
> >>> >
> >>> > And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
> >>> >
> >>> > Retief
> >>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
> Based on a sermon title from Dad's Seminary days ("Dead Hog and no Hot
> Water...") I'd say not having enough hot water is one factor. Don't ask
> me, I just pass 'em along.
You need hot water to scrape the hair off the skin.
You basically scold a small area of skin at a time and the hair and top
layer of skin peels off.
> >>Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
> >>250lb of pork trimmings.
> If the dead pig doesn't manage to stick him in the process.
> I'm not sure of all the details, but is seems that after Udo killed the
> hog, he placed the knife in the wrong place, and the dead pork roast
> "kicked" the knife right through his foot. In one side and out the other.
> Fortunately, Germany has good health care, but Udo was rather unhappy. he
> didn't feel right laying in bed all week, but orders are orders, especially
> when delivered by Herr Doctor. (And we had a couple English Nursing
> Sisters in the group, so he was Confined to his Room for the duration.)
> >
> >Make some good hotlinks though ....
> I'll take your word for it.
> pyotr
--
Just when you think you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you find
out it's a 900lb gorilla with a flashlight!!
pipedope wrote:
> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>
>> The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
>> land now than in 1900.
>
>
> But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
>
> On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
> tree farm land.
>
> michael
You can go on....comparing virgin forests of 1400 to what is there today
by comparing acres in forest is apples to oranges in the worst sense.
It's like saying the city park is a "forest" because there are trees in it.
You have to compare board feet of harvestable timber as well as issues
such as forest diversity and health, watershed necessities (can't cut it
if your towns water is collected there) and whether that harvestable
timber has any reasonable value (Lots of maple in Washington but mostly
only good for fire wood), "green" load..as in how much a tree type
contributes to air cleaning and oxygen production (a cactus is
considered a tree but has a low green load), etc... The issue is far
more complex than a right-wing radio sound bite.
The US Forest Service, by the way, had it's ass kicked a few years back
for calling large tracts of land above the timberline in elevation as
harvestable forest lands. Games people play.
Koz
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:51:48 -0400, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> My point is there is no incorrect way as long as
>> one observes sanitary procedure, may not be the
>> way a professional does it and one may not end up
>> with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot
>> would prefer pork trimmings (whatever that is). I
>> usually end up with bite size pieces before I
>> stuff them in my mouth.
>
>If you puncture the intestine you contaminate the meat and have a bunch
>of scrap. Pig shit must taste as bad as it smells. It will poison you
>too.
>
>
>John
Only if you dont follow proper procedures and wash out the body cavity
after dropping the guts. Use a garden hose, then follow up with a gallon
of vinegar. Works great on deer too.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
"Gunner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Im a CNC machine tool repair guy. I front for a couple manufactures, do
> repair of their machines, do infrastructure repair (air/electical etc
> etc) and there are two types of "machinist".
>
> 1. Actually involved in setting up and performing operations, able to do
> design and determine if the machine is optimal etc etc
>
> 2. Button pushers. Somone who loads parts, pushes a button, takes
> measurements, maybe changes offsets, but basically a human parts loader.
>
> #1 is very very hard to find
> #2 is very very easy to find, and in Southern California..is nearly 50%
> female, with many learning to be rated in Catagory #1
I'd sure like to have a 1 but if yoiu can find a couple of 2's that want to
move north (Seattle area), send them my way.
We have manual machines too. People qualified to do anything with them is
becoming near non existent. I've been told I'm old school. Guess I am but,
to me, 2 is not a machinist. They're a machine operator. A machinist, the
way it used to be, is a machine maker. The tools he uses (mills, lathes,
grinders, ect) are incidental to the job, they aren't THE job.
Gunner wrote:
>
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:56:49 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
> >garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every "Man
> >of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build items
> >from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every garage in
> >the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a work shop,
> >storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms and a maid's
> >quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2 bedroom 1 bath
> >house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not having some kind
> >of work area or work shop.
>
> And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
> garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
>
> A house in most new developments is no longer a home..but a place to
> sleep, and park your fat ass in front of the TV
>
> Gunner
>
Anyone that likes to live in a controlled enviorment gets what they
deserve.
You have to get approval to do just about anything around your house.
You even need a fart licence or they lock you up.
John
Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:34:47 -0400, LiRM <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> >>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> >>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> >>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> >>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >>
> >>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> >>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> >>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >>
> >>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >>today?
> >>
> >>TMT
> >
> >I grew up around an uncle who literally rebuilt his entire house.
>
> My father literally built his house -- cement work,
> plumbing, framing, siding, wiring, roofing, everything. I
> am somewhat embarrassed that I will probably hire my roof
> replaced. It comes down to 2 factors: he HAD to (no money);
> and I don't want to. I'm sure I could redo the roof if I
> really needed to. I used to do stuff like that all the
> time. Now I'm lazy (and old) -- and I want it done right,
> not cheaply.
>
> (rest snipped)
>
> --
> Robert Sturgeon
> Summum ius summa inuria.
> http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
In many cases those factors are changing. You may have the money to hire
someone, but it is becoming increasingly difficult in some areas to find
someone to hire who will actually do the job correctly. In more and more
cases I'm finding I have to do a job myself to get it done right.
In once case I had an auto repair done several times by several
different dealers (some under warranty) that all failed again in short
order. I finally got fed up and did the job myself, found evidence of
how incompetent they were while tearing into it myself and have not had
a recurrence of the problem since I fixed it correctly myself.
Pete C.
Ace wrote:
>
> Guess it would be nice to see their basements, or even a workshop ????
Workshop? I already have three, and it's taking over the house, too.
;-)
Sure, I've had to make some adjustments now that I'm disabled, but i
still spend what time I can in the shops. Some modifications help, like
the foot switches on the drill press, and some other tools. Since I can
no longer do the micro electronics I did for a living I am concentrating
un finishing my main shop, and my non profit efforts to collect and
refurbish computers for other disabled Veterans in my area. A basic
computer system is given free to Veterans in need, and the only cost
incurred is if they want something we have to purchase wholesale. The
work is done by me, and a couple part time volunteers. I also have a
lot of older PC parts, from the original PC on up. If anyone needs
older parts, let me know. Most of the stuff can be had for the cost of
shipping, and a little, for what i paid for it, plus shipping. I have
piles of good XT, 286, 386, 486 and early Pentium motherboards that are
not usable for the computer project, but I don't want to toss them.
Plenty of video cards, I/O cards and other odds and ends, including
early SIMM and DIMM memory are floating around on the different
motherboards. XT and AT powers supplies, if you need them, along with
mini tower type supplies. I will use some of it for my projects, but I
can't use it all.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Bonehenge wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:14:11 -0500, "Ron Moore" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
> >no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
> >productive or creative can this person be?
>
> Maybe they have a basement?
Not very common in Florida, unless you build it above ground, then
bring in lots of truckloads of dirt to make it look like its sitting on
a small hill.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
digitalmaster wrote:
>
> "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> >> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> >> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> >> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> >> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> >>
> >> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> >> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> >> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> >>
> >> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >> today?
> >>
> >> TMT
> >
> > Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
> > garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every
> > "Man of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build
> > items from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every
> > garage in the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a
> > work shop, storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms
> > and a maid's quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2
> > bedroom 1 bath house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not
> > having some kind of work area or work shop.
> >
> don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
> sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
> them.
When I bought this house eight years ago, I couldn't even find a
realtor who even knew what a workshop was. One listing claimed to have a
workshop, so I got directions and went to see it. The "Workshop" was two
feet of 1" * 12" particle board over the dryer in the laundry room. I
went back to the realtor's office and read him the riot act in front of
everyone there, including other people looking for homes. I asked him if
he had been married so long that he had forgot what it was like to have
the space to do what he wanted, when he wanted. Finally, he asked, "Just
what the hell are you looking for?" I smiled and told him that I wanted
a house suitable for a single many with hobbies. A 150 square foot
house, and a 3000 square foot shop. he told me that i would NEVER find
it in Florida, because no one wanted a workshop. He was wrong. I found
a home with a 30' * 40" garage, a 18' * 28' storage building, a 12' *
12' "Workshop", a 12' * 12' laundry building, a 12' * 24" one bedroom
cottage, and a three bedroom home with a large family room and a small
library.
All for under 40K, and it should be paid off in a few more years. ;-)
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>
> digitalmaster wrote:
> >
> > "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > >> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > >> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > >> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> > >> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
> > >>
> > >> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> > >> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> > >> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
> > >>
> > >> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> > >> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> > >> today?
> > >>
> > >> TMT
> > >
> > > Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
> > > garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every
> > > "Man of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build
> > > items from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every
> > > garage in the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a
> > > work shop, storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms
> > > and a maid's quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2
> > > bedroom 1 bath house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not
> > > having some kind of work area or work shop.
> > >
> > don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
> > sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
> > them.
>
> When I bought this house eight years ago, I couldn't even find a
> realtor who even knew what a workshop was. One listing claimed to have a
> workshop, so I got directions and went to see it. The "Workshop" was two
> feet of 1" * 12" particle board over the dryer in the laundry room. I
> went back to the realtor's office and read him the riot act in front of
> everyone there, including other people looking for homes. I asked him if
> he had been married so long that he had forgot what it was like to have
> the space to do what he wanted, when he wanted. Finally, he asked, "Just
> what the hell are you looking for?" I smiled and told him that I wanted
> a house suitable for a single many with hobbies. A 150 square foot
> house, and a 3000 square foot shop. he told me that i would NEVER find
> it in Florida, because no one wanted a workshop. He was wrong. I found
> a home with a 30' * 40" garage, a 18' * 28' storage building, a 12' *
> 12' "Workshop", a 12' * 12' laundry building, a 12' * 24" one bedroom
> cottage, and a three bedroom home with a large family room and a small
> library.
>
> All for under 40K, and it should be paid off in a few more years. ;-)
>
> --
> Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
> prove it.
> Member of DAV #85.
>
> Michael A. Terrell
> Central Florida
A friend of mine found a nice place with a work shop.... An old chicken
farm. 5 buildings 60 feet wide by 150 feet long with good roofs, and
construction, with a nice house. Total cost was 200K. Oh I forgot, 14
acres of land too. This was in lower NY state.
John
"George E. Cawthon" wrote:
>
> Mark Trudgill wrote:
> > The message <[email protected]>
> > from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
> > words:
> >
> >> Retief wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
> >>>>> really needed to?
> >>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
> >>>> do it.
> >>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> >>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> >>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> >>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
> >>>
> >>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
> >>>
> >>> Retief
> >> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
> >
> > Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
> > 250lb of pork trimmings.
> >
>
> That isn't part of the scheme, he said he could
> butcher it, so he must have a clue, probably way
> more than a clue.
>
> My point is there is no incorrect way as long as
> one observes sanitary procedure, may not be the
> way a professional does it and one may not end up
> with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot
> would prefer pork trimmings (whatever that is). I
> usually end up with bite size pieces before I
> stuff them in my mouth.
If you puncture the intestine you contaminate the meat and have a bunch
of scrap. Pig shit must taste as bad as it smells. It will poison you
too.
John
carl mciver wrote:
>
> In the Seattle area, the aerospace community has been complaining for
> several years about just that, and it isn't until the concrete heads in the
> legislature realized they were chasing all the skilled labor and shops out
> of state have they realized what a skill shortage there is. A day late and
> a dollar short, but better late than never. Unfortunately, when I hired on
> at Boeing, with a million others barely able to breathe, they trained me on
> company time. Got a whole lot of useless folks in the process. This time,
> they're training the new hires on their time, for two weeks. A coworker of
> mine got hit in the head by a fast moving rivet die. Seems the gal she was
> teaching thought it was okay to put the die in the gun while holding the
> trigger down. Absent the retainer spring, of course. As soon as she did it
> the second time, just minutes later, they told her to take a hike. That's
> why they're doing it differently this time around, as the dead wood gets
> weeded out quickly. They aren't kicking people out for not having the
> skills, they're removing them for not having a trainable attitude.
>
> I recently got a very cool new job. One of the reasons I got the job
> was the last line on my resume: "With the right attitude all skill deficits
> can be overcome." That impresses the hell out of folks, especially when
> your attitude seems to match the resume. (I once had the honor of bringing
> onto my crew an older Greek lady who had no skills but just the exact
> attitude I wanted. She worked her ass off and made the folks who had been
> around for years look like amateurs once I taught her what she needed to
> know.) I had also showed them pictures of some machines I had recently
> built, which the interviewers (a structured interview with several folks
> there) were almost fighting over. They wanted someone who could "do things"
> instead of just talking about stuff. My fingernails being a bit chewed up
> and slightly dirty helped a bit, I suspect.
My last job was at Microdyne which built telemetry equipment for the
aerospace industry. I was hired as a test technician on the module
line. I was told I only had six weeks to prove that I could do at least
80% of the average work done by everyone else on the line, and that I
would work with another tech as a trainer for the full six weeks. I
started on a Wednesday morning. By the Friday afternoon of that week my
training was terminated and I was assigned a test stamp. The following
Monday afternoon a "Committee" showed up at my bench to "Order" me to
slow down, that i was already producing more work than anyone else in
the department, and "You will slow down, if you know what was good for
you." I smiled and thanked them, then told them that if they didn't
want to look bad, they had three choices:
1: Learn to work faster.
2: Learn to work smarter.
or
3: Get out of my way because I was hired to do a job, not to win a
popularity contest. Then I offered to teach them to be better techs and
they laughed at me. One asked "How can you teach us anything?" I
shrugged and said, I don't know, but if I can do the job better and
faster after just three days, you might be surprised. ;-)
They informed me that I was rude, arrogant, and opinionated. Within
a couple weeks they started to ask questions. I answered, and got
stupid looks, but they did what I suggested, and they came back with big
smiles to tell ne it solved the problem. They didn't know that most of
my electronics work had been mission critical jobs, ad you didn't have
time to waste, so you studied the manuals and schematics ahead of time
so you knew how it worked.
They finally realized I wasn't bragging about my skills, that I had
worked very hard to develop them, and that I willing shared them with
anyone willing to learn.
I was there a little over four years, and ended up working with
almost every part of the company because of my, "It will be done. Done
Right. Done on time. Done on budget." attitude. On day my boss
commented, "You just won't take NO for an answer." I smiled and said,
"You're right, and I won't take YES, if I don't believe them."
Management kept coming around with new "Quality Statements" we were
supposed to memorize. I shoved the printout back into the HR manager's
hands and told him I wouldn't lower my standards for anyone. He turned
red and asked, "Well, What is your standard?" I grinned and told him
that "I do the best possible job with the tools and materials available,
and strive to do even better." His jaw dropped, and he walked away
muttering under his breath. ;-)
I was a volunteer advisor for the electronics program at the Lake
County Votech, until they decided to shut the course down and replace it
with a computer repair course. The "Instructor" was the school system's
IT director, and he was teaching with bad materials from the XT days.
No one had made the boards he was teaching about for over 10 years, and
he was having to read it from a ratty old library book, because he
didn't know what he was doing. All he knew was how to admin a small
Novel network.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
"Lobby Dosser" wrote in message
> And if the electricity goes out for six months or even six weeks?
Swelter in the apartment without air conditioning. Start suffering from
dehydration because the water pumps to the roof water towers have shut off,
suffer a heart attack going down 17 flights of stars because the elevators
aren't working, break a leg in the taxi cab after the accident because all
the stop lights are out, die in the hospital parking lot from a stroke
because the emergency is packed and the intern working on you in the taxicab
back seat can't properly work a manual blood pressure gauge.
F. George McDuffee (in [email protected])
said:
<snip>
| History clearly shows that any society/culture/economy where a
| majority of its people loses (or never attains) at least a basic
| level of understanding of its principal and major activities is
| doomed in the long run (and most likely in the short run) because
| they are unable to control what they have created (popularly
| termed a "Frankenstein's monster"). Failure to understand
| farming in an agricultural society, science in a technical
| society, etc. is a disaster in the making.
Agreed - but I'd like to point out that we're failing at even more
fundamental levels than you've stated:
We're not succeeding at teaching the basics of problem-solving. I'm
finding that, more and more, kids and young adults seem to have
difficulty applying knowledge they already posess to the solution of
problems they haven't confronted previously.
Our educational institutions aren't getting across to students *why*
it's important to learn what's being taught. History, for example, has
become the boring exercise of learning dates and names rather than the
adventure of discovering what mankind can/can't, must do, and must not
do in order to survive and flourish.
Too much of education is disjoint from the real world. In the past, I
occasionally taught junior high and high school math. In one school I
was told to do nothing more than baby sit an unruly seventh grade
class. The principal knew that I was a "computer guy" and suggested
that I spend the hour talking about computers to fill the time. It was
interesting that this bunch of "problem" kids, was able (in _one_
hour) to design logic for a (very basic) CPU - and they were so "into"
the process that they didn't want to stop when the bell rang. The only
possible conclusion for me was that it wasn't the kids who were the
problem.
At another high school I was called in to take over for a math teacher
who was laid up in the hospital for several weeks following an
accident. I decided to take in a "show and tell" for each topic for
all of the classes to illustrate how the stuff they were studying was
used in the real world - and encouraged questions and discussions of
the applications. It was damn near magical! The kids - all of 'em -
decided that math could be not only interesting, but fun. The
eighth-graders (studying arithmetic and geometric series) took the bit
between their teeth and galloped into differential calculus without
having a clue that's what they were doing. I feel truly sorry for all
of the math teachers who miss out on having the kind of highs I
experienced. But the important point is that all it took was providing
links between the subject matter and the real world to "set the hook."
| It does not matter if the lack of understanding occurs because of
| failure to teach and pass on hard-won knowledge, or new "things"
| are introduced into the society/culture without a basic
| understanding by the majority of the people *AND THEIR LEADERS*.
Actually, it _does_ matter if we consider it a problem and have
serious intentions about solving it.
<snip>
| This is yet another example, where a critical public asset or
| facility, in this case free compulsory education, has been
| hi-jacked by the elite so they can impose their ideology and skim
| the benefits (i.e. college preparatory education) while the vast
| majority is deprived of the benefits (i.e. preparation for life
| rather than for yet more education) although the majority is
| expected to keep paying [more] for it.
I'm not sure that it's been hi-jacked by the "elite". I think it's
being suffocated by apathy, mis-directed good intention, incompetence,
changes to family structure, and laziness - and I don't think it's
possible to lay the responsibility on any single grouping of people.
| The cure for this is local action, where the voters (parents)
| fire the existing school board, and where the new school board
| then fires the existing superintendents and principals, and so
| on.
Some of the above (and I'm not excluding parents) definitely need to
be replaced with better; but I have difficulty believing that what
you're advocating would amount to very much more than a bureaucratic
version of musical chairs. I think we need a better solution than
that.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
CW (in [email protected]) said:
| A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop.
| Business has been picking up greatly and we are in need of
| machinists. We are having very little luck in finding qualified
| people and when we find someone that seems promising, it generally
| turns out that they are no more than a machine operator. Able to
| set up and operate a CNC (usually a vertical mill) but no more, nor
| do they want to do more. We have gotten to the point of training
| people into the position. We have gone through a number of them.
| Many, when they find out that it is real work and they can't just
| stop thinking and show up to work on autopilot after a month or
| two, either quit or become worthless to the point that they get
| fired. We have two trainees in the shop right now. One is female
| (extremely rare in this trade). She never made it through high
| school but has a GED. I'm finding that she has a great learning
| ability and enthusiasm. It is quite obvious that her problems in
| school were due to boredom.
I see the exact same thing. One of my discoveries has been that
enthusiasm, like love, is the outcome of an ongoing decision process.
Let me encourage you to nurture her enthusiasm and to encourage the
people around her to do the same (there are real benefits to both the
nurturer and the nurtured in this process).
| To get her math skills up to par, I
| have been giving her homework. She has been doing quite well now
| that she sees a need. To bad someone couldn't have instilled a real
| world need in her in school. She'd be that much further ahead.
I think I recall reading once that the root of "educate" was a word
meaning "to lead". Those who failed to lead her missed out on the
incredible experience of "turning the lights on" for another human
being, which - to me - is truly sad.
Good on you!
| The
| other trainee, a male, just out of high school, made a comment the
| other day that really struck me. He said "I took trigonometry for
| two years and thought it would never be good for anything. Then,
| the first job I get, I need it".
Amazing, that :-D
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in.
> <snip>
>
> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
> specialized equipment.
>
> Few doctors make house calls any more.
>
> Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
> most places where people live these days.
>
> Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
> society keep changing.
>
> Think the process is called "life".
>
> Lew
>
That's the first response to this thread I fully agree with. The fact
that fewer and fewer people have workshops in their garages doesn't
really concern me.
The fact that I have one is really what matters. If someone down the
road can use the yellow pages, as Ed pointed out, then that's fine. And
if some neighbour kid wants to look over my shoulder to see what I'm
doing, that's ok by me. OTOH, if he (or she) would rather build a web
page that's also ok.
One argument is that it's where people's interests lie. The other side
of that, as pointed out by the single mother reference, is that how can
a kid know where their interests lie if they're not shown? The 26 year
old who bought the condo in Chicago found his interest - albeit a bit
late, but he's still fumbling his way around, and he'll likely make it
through. I was over 30 when I bought my first house, and scrambled to
find the tools (and skills) to bring the house up to par.
There will always be people like that. If they have a leaning that way,
they will eventually spackle over wallpaper, realize their mistake, and
do a better job next time.
We can't have a myopic view of what we do for either a hobby or
profession. The reason we do this kind of thing is that we either love
it or we have a special talent for it. Hopefully it's a big dollop of both.
Tanus
--
This is not really a sig.
Robert Sturgeon (in [email protected]) said:
| On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:02:58 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
| <[email protected]> wrote:
||
|| I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a
|| society options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to
|| assess and remediate problems.
Probably two sides of the same coin. Along with the advancements and
capacity for flexibility come increasing specialization and narrowness
of focus that leads to brittleness. One of the advantages we have is
the wide geographic distribution of our assets - which means that as
long as damage is localized, workload can be picked up in undamaged
areas.
| Perhaps. I don't know. I was thinking the other day of
| what would happen to the metropolitan area just to the
| northwest of where I live -- millions of people who are
| primarily living in the symbolic economy -- in the event of
| a societal collapse caused by, say, a series of nuclear
| detonations in 5 or 6 of our major financial and
| governmental centers: say, DC, NYC, LA, Chicago, Seattle,
| etc. People smarter than me have estimated that even such
| "limited" destruction would inevitably cause the collapse of
| the U.S. economy and society. I don't see these millions of
| symbolic workers being able to survive a return to a more
| material economy.
I don't think there'd be a complete collapse. There would be
substantial changes and restructuring. The agricultural areas would
continue to produce food, for example, and there'd still be a demand
for what they produced, but the marketing and distribution systems
would likely change. The food producers would still want equipment,
chemicals, seed, etc and that demand would likely be satisfied.
| My (possibly wrong) conclusion is that the post-modern
| symbolic economy/society is much more fragile than the
| industrial economy/society it replaced. Too many of us are
| no longer able to create goods, including food, and instead
| are now only able to engage in symbol manipulation -- the
| information/entertainment economy, a.k.a the post-modern
| economy. Lawyers, data entry clerks, web masters, writers,
| actors, singers, photographers, programmers, personal
| trainers, relationship counselors, what have you. Can any
| of them put actual food on an actual table? What happens to
| them if their post-modern services are no longer in demand?
| And that ignores entirely those dependent on
| "entitlements"...
In some ways, yes - and in some ways, no. It might be an interesting
exercise to look back and ask just how long it's been since some
majority of the population of any primary city engaged in the creation
of goods. Haven't the cities tended to be marketing and information
centers almost from the time they became regarded as "cities" rather
than "towns"?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
In Message-ID:<[email protected]> posted on
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 22:08:07 GMT, Gunner wrote:
>LITTLE BOXES
<~~~>
>Pete Seeger
Actually, Pete Seeger only sang it,
credit to Malvina Reynolds for writing it.
--
Bart
John Husvar (in
[email protected]) said:
| With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple
Are your sure that you really want to continue this subthread?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
John Husvar (in
[email protected]) said:
| Whether they read newsgroups or not, they're likely planning all
| sorts of nasty little surprises -- and probably a few really big
| ones.
|
| Fact of life anymore: They're here. They're weird. We have to deal
| with it.
I'm aware of these things. I'm also aware of the extent to which a
free society is vulnerable, and how very little it would take to
(quietly) take the lives of tens of millions of innocent people.
My carefully considered choice is to provide neither confirmation of
effectiveness of any ideas they may already have - nor to suggest new
ideas for their consideration.
I would not even consider asking you to not address these topics - my
suggestion was that you consider the possible consequences of doing so
in this (global) public forum.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 21:19:42 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Frank Boettcher wrote:
>
> > Don't know where you live but I've never heard of that anywhere.
>
>If it interests you, start checking around.
I think it is poppycock, but I know it's not true in Boston, Philly,
Houston, Tulsa, Mineapolis, Birmingham, and anywhere else I've ever
lived or have relatives living. Please, you made the claim, tell us
where you are restricted from working on your car. By who, the
government?
>
> > Most vehicles take 4 quarts. Cost for those and a filter about 12
> > bucks on sale. Cost at the quick change places about $25. There are
> > no corner gas stations that change oil around here.
>
>Even my little Tonka Toy truck uses 6 qts with a filter change.
>
Tonka toy? Please tell us what vehicle you have or know of that,
without an extended pan, uses six quarts. I'm curious.
>Must be a very small vehicle.
Average.
>
>Around here, $15 gets an oil & filter change when they run a sale, but
> haven't checked since crude hit $75/bbl.
Where is here. Maybe I need to move there. At that rate, labor and
overhead are free.
>
> > Special tools? I maintain four vehicles in my family and the only
> > tools needed are a plug socket, extension, swivel and a rachet.
>
>You obviously never worked on Volkswagons, especially the diesel ones,
>the little buggers damn near require a special tool to pop the hood.
Yes, I have, but not recently.
>
> > My four vehicles currently average 140K. I do almost all the work on
> > them.
>
>It is obviously a labor of love.
No, a matter of wanting it done right and not paying a fortune to have
it done wrong.
>
> > However, in the spirit of the original post, my sons do very little,
> > and I don't know why they never took to it.
>
>They are obviously smart enough to have found what they consider more
>productive ways to spend their free time than being a weekend grease
>monkey.
They are very smart, however, I hope they will eventually learn that a
little elbow grease will save them a lot of money.
>
>Give them credit.
>
>Everybody adopts what works for them.
>
>Today, I'd rather make sawdust than spend time trying to get the
>grease out from my fingernails (even with gloves) after trying to mess
>with a vehicle.
I do both.
>
>Lew
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:05:48 GMT, Gary Tomada <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I think a lot of people today have too much money at their disposal.
>Before you jump on that statement, remember necessity is the mother of
>invention. If the pipes leaked and you couldn't afford a plumber,you
>would probably find a way to repair the leak.
BTDT, used the T-shirt to stuff the holes shut. Have been blessed to not
have had to do that for a while. When people to reach the point you
describe, the most resourceful figure out how to adapt and fix things.
>However some fools would rather drown.....
>
>Gary
... and then have their survivors wail about how the government was so
uncaring to let them drown.
[Just a little gasoline for the fire ;-) ]
>
>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
>>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>
>>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>>today?
>>
>>TMT
>>
>>
>>Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
>>Writer
>>Thu Aug 3
>>
>>The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
>>a distance.
>>
>>He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
>>no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
>>
>>The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
>>bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
>>they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
>>
>>For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
>>parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
>>learn basic repair skills.
>>
>>With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
>>recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
>>when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
>>seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
>>
>>"They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
>>investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
>>pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
>>who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
>>and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
>>manual."
>>
>>Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
>>young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
>>
>>Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
>>
>>Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
>>Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
>>He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
>>because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
>>
>>"The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
>>trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
>>they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
>>them.'"
>>
>>Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
>>in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
>>tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
>>
>>"We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
>>younger set," she says.
>>
>>For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
>>try - and sometimes fail.
>>
>>With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
>>hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
>>kitchen.
>>
>>In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
>>forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
>>sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
>>head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
>>for a couple of other mishaps.
>>
>>"The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
>>the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
>>job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
>>financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
>>up."
>>
>>Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
>>he means.
>>
>>Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
>>bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
>>the wall.
>>
>>"There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
>>someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
>>
>>But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
>>then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
>>
>>Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
>>for know-how.
>>
>>Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
>>classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
>>dimmer switch.
>>
>>"It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
>>they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
>>who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
>>
>>Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
>>- the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
>>
>>Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
>>HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
>>Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
>>astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
>>among young adults.
>>
>>While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
>>shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
>>closer to home: her mom.
>>
>>Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
>>Chicago condo.
>>
>>But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
>>She'll leave that to a professional.
>>
>>"I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
>>much."
>>
>>___
>>
>>On the Net:
>>
>>Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
>>
>>Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
>>
>>Lowe's clinics:
>>http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:31:04 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in.
><snip>
>
>It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
>specialized equipment.
>
>Few doctors make house calls any more.
>
>Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
>most places where people live these days.
>
>Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
>society keep changing.
>
>Think the process is called "life".
No, it is called "post-modern" life. What happens when
post-modern life suddenly and unexpectedly becomes
post-post-modern life? COULD you butcher a hog, if you
really needed to?
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:56:10 GMT, "George E. Cawthon"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Mark Trudgill wrote:
.. snip
>>> Based on a sermon title from Dad's Seminary days ("Dead Hog and no Hot
>>> Water...") I'd say not having enough hot water is one factor. Don't ask
>>> me, I just pass 'em along.
>>
>> You need hot water to scrape the hair off the skin.
>> You basically scold a small area of skin at a time and the hair and top
>> layer of skin peels off.
>>
... snip
>>
>
>What kind of words do you use when you scold the
>hog? I've heard of people using words that would
>burn your hide when scolding kids, but never with
>hogs.
Just find a former sailor. :-)
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
>
> TMT
Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every "Man
of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build items
from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every garage in
the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a work shop,
storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms and a maid's
quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2 bedroom 1 bath
house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not having some kind
of work area or work shop.
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT, Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
... snip
>
>
>Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
>
>Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
>
Only time I have a problem with that is when the nut is on the bottom of
something and I'm reaching down and around a bunch of obstacles from the
top. Then I have to remember that CCW for the nut is CW when viewed from
the top. And that's after 15+ years working on a farm (first 8 years
weren't that productive :-) ) as well as various machinery work after
getting out of college.
>Gunner
>
>"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
>Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
>off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
>them self determination under "play nice" rules.
>
>Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
>for torturing the cat." Gunner
Really like your sig.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"Never_Enough_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "NewsJunky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> >
> Kudos for going the legal route....As a remodeling contractor, I have to
> play by the rules as well. However, I am curious as to how you felt when
> all was done. Did you get your moneys worth for all those permits???
> Were the inspectors helpful or a PITA ???
>
> I have seen em all ranging from the electrical inspector who spent more
> time finding a place for the Passed Sticker than he did looking at the
> wiring (he was there about 15 sec.)
>
> Had another one walk thru the door and ask "who's gonna take the
> heat....??" I think he was kinda pissed afterwards when he found nothing
> wrong.....
>
> I'll bet these two guys have no tools in their garages...
>
> I have also worked with plenty of inspectors who know their stuff AND are
> nice and helpful with any questions. These are the guys who don't have the
> Power Trip Ego thing goin....Cause they don't need to prove themselves
> when the knowledge is apparent.
>
> Anyone else care to comment ???
>
> Jeff
The foundation and rough framing was very uneventful. I may not have even
been around? Electrical was a FAST run by. Slap the pass sticker on, and out
of the house. Never looked at the connections back to the breaker box, never
checked the wire runs in the attic (that was ok).
The plumbing was completely different. I go to the offices to show my plans
and prove I know plumbing. (Golden Rule-- shit don't run uphill), and for
him to approve my plans. I wait as he reams out a contractor. I actually
thought the guy might cry. Holy crap he worked him over. So......next up is
little ol' me. Show him my plans, talk about what and how I plan to do
this.....blah, blah. In no time at all he is redrawing my plans and showing
me a cheaper and easier way to do the DWV. What I had was text book, but
what he showed me was legal and much easier. Guess what.....I did it his
way. The plumbing inspector ended up becoming a customer of mine (Banker in
real life) long after the job was over.
The long and short of it is.....show me someone who is logical, creative and
has good common sense, and I will hire that SOB right out from underneath
you!!
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
>
>TMT
<article snipped>
If we don't get what we want, we get what we deserve
.
Although this will draw the usual cries of "off topic" etc., I
feel that it is never-the-less one of the more important posts
that directly impacts the readers of these newsgroups and their
topics.
To put this screed in perspective, I spent the last 15 years of
my working career in post-secondary education at small to medium
sized community [junior] colleges. This could be a full-length
article, and I have indeed written several.
History clearly shows that any society/culture/economy where a
majority of its people loses (or never attains) at least a basic
level of understanding of its principal and major activities is
doomed in the long run (and most likely in the short run) because
they are unable to control what they have created (popularly
termed a "Frankenstein's monster"). Failure to understand
farming in an agricultural society, science in a technical
society, etc. is a disaster in the making.
It does not matter if the lack of understanding occurs because of
failure to teach and pass on hard-won knowledge, or new "things"
are introduced into the society/culture without a basic
understanding by the majority of the people *AND THEIR LEADERS*.
NOTE: Simply knowing "stuff" is not the same thing as knowing the
*RIGHT* "stuff" in this context. Indeed, it appears one of the
most definitive symptoms of this emerging and progressive problem
is an endless expansion of "education," with no rationale or
justification, into areas of limited or no utility, and in many
cases into areas more properly called magic, the occult, and
theology (in the sense that the assumptions and tenets can not be
proved or disproved by physical evidence). Consider how many of
our current "hot button issues" fit the occult and theological
templates of unseen forces and arcane knowledge limited to
specialist practitioners.
In the United States most states require a minimum of 180 days
and/or 1080 hours of student attendance per year. It should be
obvious that as this time is now fully "booked," when additional
"stuff" is added, something else must be dropped. With the
imposition of "Academic Trivial Pursuit" AKA "no child left
behind," what was imposed was instruction in the skills necessary
to score well on standardized objective tests [bingo cards] and
short-term rote memorization and rapid recall of "factoids."
What is being dropped are all vocational or "shop" classes. In
addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
for the vocational classes.
This is yet another example, where a critical public asset or
facility, in this case free compulsory education, has been
hi-jacked by the elite so they can impose their ideology and skim
the benefits (i.e. college preparatory education) while the vast
majority is deprived of the benefits (i.e. preparation for life
rather than for yet more education) although the majority is
expected to keep paying [more] for it.
The cure for this is local action, where the voters (parents)
fire the existing school board, and where the new school board
then fires the existing superintendents and principals, and so
on.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> the world we live in.
>
>You can learn a lot about someone by handing them a simple tool like a
>ratcheting socket wrench, especially to assemble something. The
>inexperienced try to tighten the still loose bolt holding the end of
>the ratchet handle and of course have it always falling off the nut...
>the experienced finger tighten, palm the ratchet mechanism, and only
>shift down to the end of the handle for the last little bit. Of course
>we haven't thought about that since we were 8 or so... which is why
>it's so shocking to see how a newbie treats the tool!
Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > COULD you butcher a hog, if you
> > really needed to?
>
>Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else do it.
No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
"grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
Retief
I think a lot of people today have too much money at their disposal.
Before you jump on that statement, remember necessity is the mother of
invention. If the pipes leaked and you couldn't afford a plumber,you
would probably find a way to repair the leak.
However some fools would rather drown.....
Gary
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
>
>TMT
>
>
>Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
>Writer
>Thu Aug 3
>
>The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
>a distance.
>
>He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
>no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
>
>The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
>bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
>they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
>
>For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
>parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
>learn basic repair skills.
>
>With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
>recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
>when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
>seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
>
>"They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
>investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
>pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
>who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
>and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
>manual."
>
>Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
>young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
>
>Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
>
>Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
>Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
>He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
>because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
>
>"The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
>trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
>they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
>them.'"
>
>Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
>in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
>tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
>
>"We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
>younger set," she says.
>
>For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
>try - and sometimes fail.
>
>With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
>hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
>kitchen.
>
>In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
>forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
>sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
>head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
>for a couple of other mishaps.
>
>"The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
>the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
>job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
>financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
>up."
>
>Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
>he means.
>
>Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
>bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
>the wall.
>
>"There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
>someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
>
>But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
>then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
>
>Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
>for know-how.
>
>Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
>classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
>dimmer switch.
>
>"It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
>they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
>who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
>
>Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
>- the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
>
>Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
>HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
>Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
>astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
>among young adults.
>
>While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
>shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
>closer to home: her mom.
>
>Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
>Chicago condo.
>
>But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
>She'll leave that to a professional.
>
>"I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
>much."
>
>___
>
>On the Net:
>
>Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
>
>Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
>
>Lowe's clinics:
>http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
I have to mildly disagree with the originaly sentiment. I go to garage
sales often, and I do see many garages with tools and machinery. Just
recently I bought a huge kiln from such a garage (resold for 8x what I
paid), or a big shop compressor (which I kept), etc. There are people
out there with interesting stuff, although they are a clear minority.
Just today I saw someone selling 1-2-3 blocks, machinist vise etc. (he
wanted too much for his stuff, e.g., $35 for a 1 hp motor with bad
bearings)
i
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Wish I still had the one I had in school. It was along the same line but
> was
> machine shop specific. Published in the thirties, I believe. The school
> had
> it reprinted for them. The best of it's kind I've seen. Technology has
> changed but math hasn't.
>
> "digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I have an excellent book I got in trade school called "Mathematics for
>> the
>> trades".It puts every problem in real world terms.For example how many
>> pieces 27 inches long can be cut from a 20 foot length of bar?
>> This book really makes a huge difference in how I understood mathematics.
>>
>>
>
>
I used to be a supervisor at a shop building custom bakery equipment.We had
a little test to see if someone could read a tape measure.Out of 12 high
school graduate applicants only 2 could find 1/4 on the tape measure.
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:52:56 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
>Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
>Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
>were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
>through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
>to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
>Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
>immune.
========================
This was addressed at some length in my dissertation in Appendix
A -- THE LINEAR AND ACCRETION MODELS OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION
I attach the section on empire below as the most applicable,
however W. W. Rostow's observations/comments about "Newtonian
Science" in Stage VI --Renaissance also directly apply.
Note the [short] discussion where technical methodology is
regarded as magic [symbolic manipulation?] and the bad effects
this produced.
If you want to see the entire thing, or scan excerpts goto
http://www.mcduffee-associates.us
references cited are in the bibliography
Enjoy
Stage IV -- Empires
There is no sharp dividing line between a large city state and an
empire, however it can be posited that when a city state begins
to impose its rule on other linguistic and ethnic groups,
especially if it imposes taxes for this "service," it has become
an empire. This stage tends to produce large entities such as
the Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian, Roman and Chinese,
possibly because of the existence of well-trained and efficient
specialists in governance / administration and military science.
It appears that the policy makers of a stage 4 society tended to
engage in and promote activities which cause their society to
become too centralized, too specialized and too highly
concentrated to be sustainable.
Generally considerable technical progress is made in the
pragmatic sense. That is that while certain procedures were
known to produce certain effects, these are regarded more as
magic spells or procedures than as a cause-effect relationship
which can be systematized or integrated. Examples of this are
the conversion of iron into steel and the tempering of the steel
to provide sharp, durable weapons. A major contributing factor to
the decline and destruction of a specific empire may have been
the tendency to regard any technical knowledge as a family or
guild "trade secret" which was to be protected to maximize
profit. Thus while a family or guild knowledge of pragmatic
procedures may allow the production of complex and sophisticated
products, it also tended to restrict the diffusion of such
procedures and products into other areas and thus limit the rate
of change and improvement.
It is unfortunate that in many cases moral and ethical
considerations have been introduced into this discussion as these
tend to produce considerably more heat than light. (For example
Rousseau 1712-1778 and Gibbons 1737-1794 )
What seems to be the general case is that all cultures are
subject to random stresses. These stresses can be an invasion,
an internal revolution, a famine, a plague, a new social theory,
a new religion, etc. Cumulative environmental effects also
appear to be important. For example, some writers have posited
that a major contributor to the decline in some stage III
societies was the depletion of available natural resources such
as arable land for food and timber for building ships and
fortifications. The less developed transportation systems and
technologies would have caused societies in this stage to be more
vulnerable than would societies in the later stages. There
appears to have been little realization of the importance of
using sustainable agricultural techniques, reforestation and the
productivity of and thus the need for the protection of wetlands.
Indeed, some of the major "public works" of antiquity and the
medieval period was specifically the draining of swamps and
marshes. Long term climatic changes could also have a similar
decisive effect.[Wright, K.] Additionally, geographic changes
such as the shifting of the course of a river or the silting of a
harbor are also known to have caused the abrupt economic decline
if not collapse of ancient city-states.
It also seems apparent that the more perfectly an organism, and
by extension a society or culture, is adapted to one set of
conditions the less well it will be adapted to a new or changed
set of circumstances, and it is observed that the older an
organization the less "flexible" it is. A further consideration
is that most societies in stage III historically tend to engage
in behaviors which cause extensive amounts of animosity and
resentment. These animosities include but are not limited to
envy of their flaunted wealth, hatred of their affectation of
political and intellectual superiority or simply a desire for
revenge for military defeat.
While the historical record is not completely clear on this
point, it appears that most stage IV societies succumb, not to a
single factor but rather a combination of simultaneous factors.
That is to say that while an empire may have successfully coped
with famines, plagues, invasions and internal revolutions in the
past, they are unable to cope with all of these at the same time.
This is especially true if their nominal allies and vassals have
been biding their time for the proper moment to obtain revenge.
Each of the characteristics that helped create an empire then
becomes a characteristic that assists in its downfall. The
concentration of governance and military science into the hands
of a few, albeit highly talented, specialists means that if
these few people can be isolated or incapacitated then the entire
society is paralyzed. The specialization by large numbers of the
population in specific trades means that they are extremely
vulnerable if the demand for their specific knowledge/skill no
longer exists as they no longer have the means or knowledge to
feed themselves and their families in the sense of subsistence
agriculture or hunting. Economic devastation of large numbers of
people, what ever the cause, generally results in revolution.
Responsible or not, the existing social structure and leaders are
held answerable for the disaster. The concentration of people
into large cities, while promoting trade and generally improving
the perceived quality of life means that to control the city, all
that must be done is to control the food (or water) supply and as
there is no need to breach the fortifications, advanced
technologies such as siege engines and catapults are not required
for their capture. This means that a stage IV society or economy
is vulnerable to organized and warlike peoples such as the Huns,
Goths and Mongols even though they may lack "technology" or
"culture." The separation between the "thinking" and "doing"
classes tended to grow more pronounced over time. In most
empires slave holding tended to become more pronounced, thus
further debasing the status of labor, gainful employment and
useful physical (other than military and sports) activity.
Another factor may also be that the specialization of occupations
has resulted in the development of a large mass of people with no
more military capability or "will to resist" than a flock of
sheep. Slaves, almost by definition, are forbidden to own arms
or even learn the "arts of war ," thus making this segment of the
population useless in the military sense. This means that as
soon as the "professional" military segment of the culture is no
longer available, for what ever reason, the culture is instantly
vulnerable to even small para-military groups, even if these are
not particularly well armed, trained, or led.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > You mean like it did here after the last hurricane? No problem; my
> > generator worked fine.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> But you were referring to society. Did all of your neighbors have
> generators also?
Many did, others didn't. Many an extension cord snaked it's way over a
neighbor's fence. Life went on. We improvised, adapted and overcame. It
was rougher for some than for others, but the local economy is booming, tax
coffers are swelling, and local unemployment is below 3%.
Jeff
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:43:22 GMT, "Emmo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I would mention that those men who can do even the most basic of work,
>whether on the home or car, are richly rewarded by all the women who love
>being with someone who is 'handy'.
>
>Examples: I changed an alternator in the parking lot of the Autozone in
>less time than the guy next to me took to replace his windshield wipers, and
>the woman I did this for couldn't wait to richly reward me for being so
>skilled. I nailed up a soffet vent that had come loose for my neighbor, and
>got a delicious cherry pie. I swapped out a ceiling fan for a sales rep and
>the woman told everyone at work what a great guy I was, "...and so handy,
>too"
>
>I think its a code word...
>
>I used these stories to convince my son to learn how to do this stuff,
Now that was clever. Your son was lucky to have someone to teach him.
> and
>recently he replaced a hood release cable for a girl in his dorm. He told
>me that she was very grateful, but he wouldn't share the details wih his old
>man...
Lucky you. My son was always willing to share with me. TMI.
Sue
>
>> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lew Hodgett wrote:
... snip
>>>>Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
>>>>for the first 75,000 miles.
>>>>
>>>>Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
>>>
>>>Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>>>>that's another matter<G>.
>>>>
>>>>Lew
>>>
>>>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>>>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>>>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>>
>>
>> Its never a lose lose proposition learning how to do anything, and
>> really its not all that hard working on today's cars if you buy and
>> read the manuals, have access to tools and don't mind getting dirty.
>>
>> I'm still driving a 1996 grand am with 260,000 miles on it and a 1995
>> Chevy S10 with 225,000 miles on it. I rebuilt the automatic
>> transmission in the S10 5 years ago by following a books instruction
>> (I don't think I ever want to do that again, but I learned something).
>> I've done all the maintenance myself on all the cars I've owned and
>> can't imagine the amounts of money I've saved over the years.
>>
>> I'll be buying a Prius January 2007 and my intent is to do all the
>> service work on that as well.
Rather interesting point of view from a book by Roger Welsch, "Old
Tractors and the Men Who Love Them", subtitled, "How to Keep Your Tractors
Happy and Your Family Running" Highly recommended light, fun reading.
However, he made an interesting statement. Now, he admittedly has no
background or training in various manual arts, so his work on tractor
restoration is his first forray into mechanical work. None the less, the
following has some merit:
"I wouldn't dream of building my own house, too much rides on it. The
welfare of my family and possessions depnds on strong walls and a tight
roof. Actually it's a matter of life and death. I don't know enough about
house construction to reisk my life and property on it ... " Now, his
mistake here is that he fails to realize that he is probably trainable, but
there is a time element required.
"... What would happen if I broke off a pan bolt or ignored a faulty
brake on my Taruus? We'd die [a bit extreme] or lose an awful lot of maney
we don't have to lose. In other words, wehn I work with a tractor [one
could substitute any hobby here -- such as woodworking], there are no
losses, only victories". Elsewhere he makes the comment that he relies on
his car for his employment and transportation, if he screws up, then he
messes with his livelihood. There may be that trepidation on the part of
some to undertake projects that, if messed up, will result in more loss
than savings.
In my own case, it's more a matter of available time. There are things
that I *want* to do, but because of the other things in life (like work,
family, and church activities), I don't have enough time to do the things I
like and to do things such as mechanical repair on my vehicles. Thus, it
makes more sense to pay someone to do those tasks that I'm not really
interested in doing while allowing me time to do those that I either must,
should, and want to do as well as those for which I really like doing for
my own pleasure. If the time comes when I have more time than available
money, I will once again start doing those other things to save money.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
>
Our culture, such as it is, informs our children that working with
their hands is beneath them and that self reliance is no more than
knowing which phone number to call when you need something.
It takes some strong involvement on a parent's part to expose children
to the joys of doing for yourself; the joys of making, rather than
managing, and the satisfaction to be gained from having a basic
understanding of the things that inhabit and sometimes seem to
overwhelm our day to day lives.
In a society that seems to be so focused on happiness as a result of
the acquisition of objects, one would think that simple curiosity
about the making and maintenance of those objects would drive people
to gain some knowledge in those areas.
Apparently not.
It's having the bling, rather than making it that drives them.
We've managed to outsource our contact with the fundamental
necessities of life in the current age - much to our eventual peril,
I'm afraid.
I can see the next edition of the Foxfire series dealing with how the
old dudes managed to set up their own Wireless Internet connections,
changed their own light bulbs, cleaned their own gutters, and just
maybe - wiped their own ass.
Not that I'm cynical.
Regards,
Tom Watson
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> the world we live in.
>
> You can learn a lot about someone by handing them a simple tool like a
> ratcheting socket wrench, especially to assemble something. The
> inexperienced try to tighten the still loose bolt holding the end of
> the ratchet handle and of course have it always falling off the nut...
> the experienced finger tighten, palm the ratchet mechanism, and only
> shift down to the end of the handle for the last little bit.
And the really experienced start the nut, hold the Air ratchet handle and
then squeeze.
"Gunner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:05:26 GMT, "
>
> a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
> shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
> them shut down for at least a month or longer
>
> Gunner
Exactly what I was inferring to except that I did not want that thought
getting out.
The possibility of it happening would be just one more excuse to jack up
electric rates and gas prices. ;~)
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:05:26 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Lobby Dosser wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>>> Was the electricity out for six months? Nation wide? It is possible.
>>
>> Possible but highly unlikely. In the Pacific NW lots of the
>> electricity is hydroelectric.
>> Other places are coal, or natural gas. What do you see as possibly
>> causing a nation wide power outage?
>
>
>Destruction of power lines. Right now there are disruptions and everything
>is working. OK. If several producers go out and lines go down you could see
>a system that is over taxed and totally fail. It happened years ago in New
>York, a few years ago, or maybe last summer in the Midwest, and it happens
>in California.
>There would be no extreme hurry to repair as energy shortages are a
>palatable excuse to drive up prices. Both the energy companies and oil
>companies are enjoying this scenario right now.
>
>Gosh, BP is shutting down its Oil pipe line today and already prices for
>gasoline are going up.
>
a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
them shut down for at least a month or longer
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:02:58 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >I think you have a good point Robert.
>> >
>> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
>> >"fragile" it becomes.
>>
>> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
>
>I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a society
>options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess and remediate
>problems.
Perhaps. I don't know. I was thinking the other day of
what would happen to the metropolitan area just to the
northwest of where I live -- millions of people who are
primarily living in the symbolic economy -- in the event of
a societal collapse caused by, say, a series of nuclear
detonations in 5 or 6 of our major financial and
governmental centers: say, DC, NYC, LA, Chicago, Seattle,
etc. People smarter than me have estimated that even such
"limited" destruction would inevitably cause the collapse of
the U.S. economy and society. I don't see these millions of
symbolic workers being able to survive a return to a more
material economy.
My (possibly wrong) conclusion is that the post-modern
symbolic economy/society is much more fragile than the
industrial economy/society it replaced. Too many of us are
no longer able to create goods, including food, and instead
are now only able to engage in symbol manipulation -- the
information/entertainment economy, a.k.a the post-modern
economy. Lawyers, data entry clerks, web masters, writers,
actors, singers, photographers, programmers, personal
trainers, relationship counselors, what have you. Can any
of them put actual food on an actual table? What happens to
them if their post-modern services are no longer in demand?
And that ignores entirely those dependent on
"entitlements"...
I don't see redundancy and flexibility -- to the contrary, I
see fragility and extreme vulnerability. But I could be
wrong.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
SNIP
>In the 9th week, success! Power is restored.
>
>Oh, happy day.
>
>"Oh, look Mommy, the sky is grey, and its so cold. Can I have a leg
>this time?"
>
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Man, this is a good story. Will there be a movie soon?
Pete :)
[email protected] wrote:
> Oh, happy day.
>
Oh, and the cell phone batteries die.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:47:52 +0100, Steve Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Gunner wrote:
>
>> For those who are history challenged...go too Google, images..then
>> type in London Blitz
>
>Look at Liverpool, Manchester, and particularly Coventry - where a lot
>of aircraft were built ( Jaguar's factory made Spitfires for example)
>
>>
>> Take a good look at the photos.
>>
>> One should note..British Civilizaton (such as it is <G>) didnt
>> collapse despite even that.
>
>Thank you.
>
>We won after all. With a bit of help (We finish paying the bills to the
>US any day now -seriously). People have accused our civilisation of
>having become corrupt and effete compared to the people of the 1940s,
>but the reaction of the people to the London bombings last year was
>utterly magnificent, as was the US reaction to 9/11.
>
>Steve
Yes. Positively magnificent. A few buses blew up and you survived.
How did you do it?
Here's a real challenge.
London has a population of what, about 8 to 9,000,000? Consider now
the widespread loss of electrical power. Britain has 23 operating
commercial nuclear power reactors, 14 of which are at the end-of-life
cycle. Let's say that one of these units fails causing an abrupt load
demand causing two more stations to overload in quick succession.
They fail increasing demand down the line. Weaknesses in the
management software and slow components could allow this cascade
effect to bring down the grid.
Now, taking down your power grid is not a good thing. When an entire
grid goes down due to the failure of power generation, it can take a
long time to restart nukes and bring them on line while balancing
loads. Instability in the system may cause certain components to
respond in uncontrollable ways.
Weeks, months may go by before a successful restart. Will 9,000,000
people simply go into hibernation? Will their businesses take a
holiday? Will their bank loans be forgiven? Will Tony Blair take a
flier?
Well, it is sometime in 2008 and the lights go out.
At first there is anger and laughter, acceptance and
denial. Generators run TV and radio broadcasts - "Don't worry.
Food, water and generators are on the way. Distribution points
have already been established. Now we must ask all residents to
remain at home. The areas around London are also without
power so there's no where for you to go. The important thing is not
to panic. The outage is widespread but we're British. We'll make do
just as we have before. So stay home and stay tuned."
As the strains of Brittania Rules the Waves drift out of the BBC,
the Queen and everyone else with juice is quietly exiting Merry
Ole England by vehicle, boat and helicopter, many headed for Germany
and Switzerland where things work.
Some ordinary people try to leave the city but authorities limit the
major thoroughfares to emergency traffic. The word is to to remain
calm. Rations and water will be brought into the city. And they are.
Nonetheless the secondary arteries and roads soon fill with
the hopeful who, for whatever reason, must get out. Authorities try
to control these as well but as traffic builds and time passes, the
cars run out of gas and are abandoned, these hulks effectively block
all vehicle escape.
The first few nights are filled with novelty and pass uneventfully.
Stories are told of the magnificent days of WWII and how the
Jerries fell from the sky into Aunt Harriet's garden. Those were the
days.
Food and water along with radios and batteries are made liberally
available and on time. Government has largely left London for some
undisclosed location but most London based corporate hdqs and
financial institutions suffer from lack of management, their
committments go undone.
As in other cases of mass deprivation and isolation, it is the
mind that is most vulnerable. It depends on the time of year, the
weather and other circumstances but generally speaking, after a week
one can expect to see behavioral deviations as psychological stress
builds. Through the second and third week expect dramatic increases
in crime and gang activity. This and family violence eruptions soon
enough overwhelm the police and calls to them will go unanswered.
There is a strong military presence of course, guarding government and
some commercial buildings and food/water distribution points. Food
and water is distributed as best as can be given the amount needed and
conditions of some areas. Grocery and hardware stores are empty by
the end of week two.
So, there it is. After 3 weeks with no heat, AC and lights the
residential generators have run out of fuel, even that remaining in
the parked and abandoned cars that litter London. Boredom
and novelty is turning into panic. The first wave of suicides begins
after a fire breaks out in a warehouse district and spreads through
adjacent residential neighborhoods. Rumor has it that thousands
were killed during the night and no fire suppression was available.
Panic combined with depression drive many to raving paranoia or
paralysis. Families and neighbors deal with this as best they can.
Some maniacs are subdued and locked in basements while others, like
the rampant criminal element that is so prevalent, are killed
outright. Families exchange with other families the killing duty
so the weight of grief is bearable. Many older folks, weakened by a
month's malnutrition, depression and unable to get medications, fall
comatose and die.
Corpses of dogs, cats and people have become a problem by the fifth
week as the stench of death wafts through the air. Intersections that
are the points for rations distribution, are also the place to leave
bodies for pickup. But the number of distribution points decrease as
parts of the city become inaccessible. The areas around the remaining
points are filled with tent people seeking an escape from the crime
that has driven them away from their homes. Except for the outlying
areas with access to soil, corpses are more often than just left in
the streets. Attempts are made to burn them.
London is now a city of displaced persons.
The Thames is flooded with thrown-together craft, debris and bodies.
The river banks crowded with squatters. What had been a good place a
few weeks earlier to get water for drinking and bathing is now a
contaminated distortion. Authorities, long worried about disease,
have posted the military on the river at the municipal limits. Their
orders are to stop travel out of the city.
At first this was a simple arrest and hold operation which in the
third week was changed into one of turning the escapees back. In the
fifth week however, the orders came down to sink all non-official
craft and gather the bodies and burn them. There was no word about
identification or arrests.
In the 8th week of the power outage, ten of the system's nuclear
generators are restarted but attempts to bring them on line fail. The
management software and grid components cannot stabilize the loads.
Efforts are underway to construct a subgrid to bypass the monster that
is consuming London.
It is estimated that 3,000,000 Londoners are dead. Another three
million are thought to be dying. Tests have shown that typhoid
is probably the chief ravager in the city closely followed by an
assortment of coliform and pneumonic killers. London being an
international magnet to a large population of illegal aliens typically
has examples of most known diseases at any given time. In
ordinary times its an incubator, a huge petri dish. Now its a science
experiment gone very bad. Outsiders dare not go in and insiders
cannot come out. Where would you put five or six million people? Not
to mention that most of those are diseased.
Shelter is disappearing. Vast residential and commercial areas have
been devastated by fire. The tall, enclosed commercial buildings are
considered deathtraps for the unwary. Some people have vied for the
greener fringes of the city but these are prone to constant milling by
gangs. Yes, there is cannibalism. A few have found isolated spots to
prevent contact with disease and gangs. Starvation is their main
problem. Airdrops of supplies are made continuously but there is now
way to pinpoint need or to determine effectiveness.
Air surveillance intel and the few onsite civilians with transmitters
inform us that gangs of disaffected youth are living in the
underground and control the more select territories.
In the 9th week, success! Power is restored.
Oh, happy day.
"Oh, look Mommy, the sky is grey, and its so cold. Can I have a leg
this time?"
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]>
wrote on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:44:20 GMT in misc.survivalism :
>On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 20:56:53 +0100, Steve Taylor
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Jeff McCann wrote:
>>
>>> It really is hard to say, but I do know quite alot from direct personal
>>> observation about how people react when their lives are totally disrupted,
>>> homes and jobs completely gone, communities devastated, loved ones missing,
>>> hurt or killed, little or no news from outside, etc. I'm willing to rely
>>> more than you appear to be on the basic resiliency of the American character
>>> in the face of adversity, as well as in the basic robustness of our social,
>>> economic and political systems.
>>
>>That's true for any people, look at the way we (I'm English) reacted to
>>Germany's bombings of London and other major cities, or how we reacted
>>when the IRA destroyed the centre of my city (Manchester), or when our
>>home grown Islamists butchered people in the subways of London.
>>
>>Everyone adapts, and very quickly.
>>
>>Steve
>
>
>For those who are history challenged...go too Google, images..then
>type in London Blitz
>
>Take a good look at the photos.
>
>One should note..British Civilizaton (such as it is <G>) didnt
>collapse despite even that.
That collapse occurred later, when the Brits successively leveled great
parts of Urban Britain. At least the luftwaffe had just demolished the
buildings, not replaced them with ugly edifices as monuments to the bottom
line.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Typos, Grammos and da kind are the result of ragin hormones
Fortesque Consulting: Teaching Pigs to Sing since 1968.
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:20:08 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
<[email protected]> wrote:
>By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
>concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
>real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
>icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
That is, they're all candidates for the "B Ark"... ;)
Retief
I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
When I was young, a garage full of tools and such was like a beacon in
the night. Had to look, ask questions, wanted to get to know the person and
try to learn. Nowadays, kids couldn't care less.
I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less garage
creativity is visible.
Respectfully,
Ron Moore
"Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
>
> TMT
>
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:20:21 GMT, "CW" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>He said "I took
>trigonometry for two years and thought it would never be good for anything.
===================
Exactly the same reaction I got from both high-school [release
time / concurrent] students and people who have been out of
school for a while [work force development] when we get into
using a sine bar to set/determine angles and do simple
calculations such as helix angles in the machining classes.
Just how good can something be where you have to have a special
police force to round people up and laws to imprison/fine their
parents to get them to attend? It is the total lack of "hands on
examples" and "contextualization" that is killing our educational
system and it will continue to do so no matter how many times we
make the students pee in a bottle, how many dress codes we
impose, or how many uniforms we make them wear.
Slogans and endless repeating has not sold high cost, low quality
Detroit cars and it won't sell high cost, low quality education
to the students either, although it may keep the tax money
flowing from Washington.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
>
>TMT
I grew up around an uncle who literally rebuilt his entire house. He
knows how to do it all. I helped some while growing up, but looked at
all as grunt work and took no interest in watching what the man was
doing.
I'm paying for that now. There are some projects I'll take on, but I
regret not taking a bigger interest in what could have been a great
learning experience.
So at times, I have to grudgingly call in a guy - an electrician,
plumber or carpenter to do things I wish I could.
On the other hand, I haven't owned a home in years, so had no real
need to fix things. If it broke, I called the landlord.
My wife and I recently bought a house, so I wish I knew more.
But I'm also dedicated to learning more as I go along, so I hope to
reach a point in the future of being able to handle at least some
minor projects.
But yeah, I do have a workbench area and it's getting more and more
use so I'm happy about that. I just wish I had paid more attention as
a kid.
Larry Blanchard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Prometheus wrote:
>
>> I've been doing construction and steel work my whole life, and as a
>> result, I'm a pretty big guy. When it comes to knowing
> *what* to do
>> to fix the car, there isn't a problem- but when it comes down to
>> trying to fish my arm down through an engine when every availible inc
> h
>> has been packed full of vacuum lines and plastic covers, the job
>> becomes impossible.
>
> Amen! I have fond memories of standing INSIDE the engine compartment
> to work on an old inline six cylinder.
1962 Chevy! Used to climb in there to do the timing.
> Those days are, alas, gone
> forever. I now need to be a contortionist to work on a motorcycle.
Well, changing the oil filter from above on a Chrysler slant six was not
fun.
>
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> F. George McDuffee (in [email protected])
> said:
>
> <snip>
>
> | History clearly shows that any society/culture/economy where a
> | majority of its people loses (or never attains) at least a basic
> | level of understanding of its principal and major activities is
> | doomed in the long run (and most likely in the short run) because
> | they are unable to control what they have created (popularly
> | termed a "Frankenstein's monster"). Failure to understand
> | farming in an agricultural society, science in a technical
> | society, etc. is a disaster in the making.
>
> Agreed - but I'd like to point out that we're failing at even more
> fundamental levels than you've stated:
>
> We're not succeeding at teaching the basics of problem-solving. I'm
> finding that, more and more, kids and young adults seem to have
> difficulty applying knowledge they already posess to the solution of
> problems they haven't confronted previously.
>
> Our educational institutions aren't getting across to students *why*
> it's important to learn what's being taught. History, for example, has
> become the boring exercise of learning dates and names rather than the
> adventure of discovering what mankind can/can't, must do, and must not
> do in order to survive and flourish.
>
> Too much of education is disjoint from the real world. In the past, I
> occasionally taught junior high and high school math. In one school I
> was told to do nothing more than baby sit an unruly seventh grade
> class. The principal knew that I was a "computer guy" and suggested
> that I spend the hour talking about computers to fill the time. It was
> interesting that this bunch of "problem" kids, was able (in _one_
> hour) to design logic for a (very basic) CPU - and they were so "into"
> the process that they didn't want to stop when the bell rang. The only
> possible conclusion for me was that it wasn't the kids who were the
> problem.
>
> At another high school I was called in to take over for a math teacher
> who was laid up in the hospital for several weeks following an
> accident. I decided to take in a "show and tell" for each topic for
> all of the classes to illustrate how the stuff they were studying was
> used in the real world - and encouraged questions and discussions of
> the applications. It was damn near magical! The kids - all of 'em -
> decided that math could be not only interesting, but fun. The
> eighth-graders (studying arithmetic and geometric series) took the bit
> between their teeth and galloped into differential calculus without
> having a clue that's what they were doing. I feel truly sorry for all
> of the math teachers who miss out on having the kind of highs I
> experienced. But the important point is that all it took was providing
> links between the subject matter and the real world to "set the hook."
>
> | It does not matter if the lack of understanding occurs because of
> | failure to teach and pass on hard-won knowledge, or new "things"
> | are introduced into the society/culture without a basic
> | understanding by the majority of the people *AND THEIR LEADERS*.
>
> Actually, it _does_ matter if we consider it a problem and have
> serious intentions about solving it.
>
> <snip>
>
> | This is yet another example, where a critical public asset or
> | facility, in this case free compulsory education, has been
> | hi-jacked by the elite so they can impose their ideology and skim
> | the benefits (i.e. college preparatory education) while the vast
> | majority is deprived of the benefits (i.e. preparation for life
> | rather than for yet more education) although the majority is
> | expected to keep paying [more] for it.
>
> I'm not sure that it's been hi-jacked by the "elite". I think it's
> being suffocated by apathy, mis-directed good intention, incompetence,
> changes to family structure, and laziness - and I don't think it's
> possible to lay the responsibility on any single grouping of people.
>
> | The cure for this is local action, where the voters (parents)
> | fire the existing school board, and where the new school board
> | then fires the existing superintendents and principals, and so
> | on.
>
> Some of the above (and I'm not excluding parents) definitely need to
> be replaced with better; but I have difficulty believing that what
> you're advocating would amount to very much more than a bureaucratic
> version of musical chairs. I think we need a better solution than
> that.
>
> --
> Morris Dovey
> DeSoto Solar
> DeSoto, Iowa USA
> http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
>
>
I believe the most important skill to teach is problem solving and research
skills.With these 2 skills a person can learn anything.You cannot instill in
a person all the knowledge they will need,No 2 people have the need for all
the same knowledge.I guess the best way to put it is like my old drill
sergeant said...."adapt and overcome".We must teach our children to "adapt
and overcome" problems and challenges.
There is a continuum of jobs "around the house", ranging from one
extreme to another.
One extreme are those jobs where no special expertise or license is
necessary, most of the cost is materials, and where the cost of
finding a contractor and negotiating work is very considerable
compared to the cost of the job itself.
Example, repairing a toilet tank flapper valve. A trip to Home Depot
and 30 minutes with pliers and screwdriver, is easier than calling
contractors, dealing with assholes, etc etc.
The other kind requires specialized equipment, expertise, or license,
or a lot of labor that is cheap compared to the opportunity cost of
the homeowner (ie when he can make in spare time). Examples are
installation of A/C, pouring a concrete foundation, making house
additions (needs to be signed off by architect etc).
Where people find themselves on this continuum (where the boundary
between DIY and for hire jobs is) depends on personal income,
availability of personal time, availability of tools, etc etc. There
is no single answer.
i
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business has
> been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having
> very
> little luck in finding qualified people and when we find someone that
> seems
> promising, it generally turns out that they are no more than a machine
> operator. Able to set up and operate a CNC (usually a vertical mill) but
> no
> more, nor do they want to do more. We have gotten to the point of
> training
> people into the position. We have gone through a number of them. Many,
> when
> they find out that it is real work and they can't just stop thinking and
> show up to work on autopilot after a month or two, either quit or become
> worthless to the point that they get fired. We have two trainees in the
> shop
> right now. One is female (extremely rare in this trade). She never made it
> through high school but has a GED. I'm finding that she has a great
> learning
> ability and enthusiasm. It is quite obvious that her problems in school
> were
> due to boredom. To get her math skills up to par, I have been giving her
> homework. She has been doing quite well now that she sees a need. To bad
> someone couldn't have instilled a real world need in her in school. She'd
> be
> that much further ahead. The other trainee, a male, just out of high
> school,
> made a comment the other day that really struck me. He said "I took
> trigonometry for two years and thought it would never be good for
> anything.
> Then, the first job I get, I need it".
>
> "Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> F. George McDuffee (in [email protected])
>> said:
>>
>>
>> At another high school I was called in to take over for a math teacher
>> who was laid up in the hospital for several weeks following an
>> accident. I decided to take in a "show and tell" for each topic for
>> all of the classes to illustrate how the stuff they were studying was
>> used in the real world - and encouraged questions and discussions of
>> the applications. It was damn near magical! The kids - all of 'em -
>> decided that math could be not only interesting, but fun. The
>> eighth-graders (studying arithmetic and geometric series) took the bit
>> between their teeth and galloped into differential calculus without
>> having a clue that's what they were doing. I feel truly sorry for all
>> of the math teachers who miss out on having the kind of highs I
>> experienced. But the important point is that all it took was providing
>> links between the subject matter and the real world to "set the hook."
>
>
I have an excellent book I got in trade school called "Mathematics for the
trades".It puts every problem in real world terms.For example how many
pieces 27 inches long can be cut from a 20 foot length of bar?
This book really makes a huge difference in how I understood mathematics.
Good for you and/or your employer.
Just another view on the subject of education. Say you have a very
lucrative hand assembly job for some of your machined components, but the
actual procedure is so simple/boring that 'nobody in their right mind' would
sit there all day doing it.
Will you insist on the person you hire for the job have math skills, etc, or
would you settle for someone with a somewhat lower IQ who would be very
happy to sit there all day? In other words, what happens to the individuals
who don't happen to have the intellectual capacity on par with your top
machinists?
Are they to be forever 'held back' in school till they become laughing stock
of their so called class mates? Or should they be given a 'lower' grade,
and proceed along with their friends/peers and ultimately enter society with
some sense of dignity, get that boring assembly job you have and work
tirelessly etc. for you?
I saw a scenario similar to this happen. After a employee was pestered for
so long, he did quit...... It took four(4) other employees to do the same
job, each only able to tolerate it for about 2 hours. Oh well............
Ace
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business has
> been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having
> very
Snippity snip, etc....
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Around $15.00 for oil and a filter and I have too provide the labor to
> change as well as providing the labor to disposel of the used oil.
>
> From time to time, local gas station offers an oil change with filter for
> $14.95, otherwise the going rate is about $20.00
>
> I have better things to do with my time than trying to save $0-$5 max by
> playing grease monkey.
You are correct that oil changes are inexpensive and frequently offered as
loss leaders, however:
A - I buy my premium oil by the (several) case when it is on sale, same for
premium filters. The oil and filters used by cheap oil changers are not of
equal quality.
B - I can change the oil at home in MUCH less time than it takes to travel
(more $ for gas) and wait for someone else to do the job, according to how
busy they are this wait is often not insignificant.
C - By doing the work myself, I can do it at my convenience and when it
should be done at not when I have the time to schedule the chore into the
time the oil changer has available. There is never a line up at home and I
am open for business any time I want to be.
D - I do not change my own oil because I am saving money (which I do, but
not a substantial amount). I do it because it is easier, quicker and more
convenient. It is usually combined with other preventative maintenance work
which I do not trust an oil changer to perform. I did make the mistake of
going to an oil changer (once) and because I thought it would be convenient
(long story), had them check and change the manual transmission oil and top
off the OD. I neglected to get a firm price quote for this service and
ended up paying a huge amount for the trans service and the trans oil AND
had to show the kid how to do the job as he did not have a clue.
Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained to
people who do not share similar feelings. Different strokes for different
folks, as always YMMV
Private wrote:
> A - I buy my premium oil by the (several) case when it is on sale,
same for
> premium filters. The oil and filters used by cheap oil changers
are not of
> equal quality.
The manufacturer suggests changing oil at 7,500 mile intervals, I
change at 3,000 miles so the so called stuff is adequate for my purposes.
> B - I can change the oil at home in MUCH less time than it takes to
travel
> (more $ for gas) and wait for someone else to do the job, according
to how
> busy they are this wait is often not insignificant.
I leave the vehicle and pick it up at my convenience. Yes, that
requires some planning, but NBD.
> It is usually combined with other preventative maintenance work
> which I do not trust an oil changer to perform.
I have been very fortunate finding competent mechanics, when I need
one, that expect to be paid a fair price while providing quality service.
> I neglected to get a firm price quote for this service and
> ended up paying a huge amount for the trans service and the trans
oil AND
> had to show the kid how to do the job as he did not have a clue.
Was it Jiffy Lube?
They have been caught with their fingers in the cookie jar a few times
around here.
> Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be
explained to
> people who do not share similar feelings.
Trust me, I'm VERY self sufficient, but working on cars is not my
thing, if I have a choice.
> Different strokes for different
> folks, as always YMMV
That's my line<G>
Lew
>
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:_tOBg.7403$7m5.2775@trnddc05...
>> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
>> > technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you
>> > think anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still
>> > alive to see those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a very
>> > long time indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It didn't
>> > suddenly collapse within a portion of a single lifetime, like, say,
>> > the Incan Empire.
>>
>> The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both
>> collapsed
> in
>> a lifetime.
>
> No, they were not technologically advanced. They had some skill at
> celestial observation, and a very rich culture, but they barely even
> used the wheel or any other form of technology more advanced than that
> commonly found in the Western world of thousands of years ago.
>
Their agriculture was extremely well advanced and both controlled watr to
their benefit. Both lived in areas which could not support their
populations without intesive agriculture. They lived on the edge. A decade
or two of drought put them over the edge.
We live Over the edge in our use fossil fuels. Imagine our suppliers
cutting us off. 100% of the food eaten by the average American is fossil
fuel based. From putting it into the ground, growing it, harvesting it, to
getting it to the table. Now cut the availability of oil by 60%.
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:V7hBg.2535$7m5.1154@trnddc05...
>> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > "Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I think you have a good point Robert.
>> >> >
>> >> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the
>> >> >more "fragile" it becomes.
>> >>
>> >> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
>> >
>> > I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a
>> > society options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to
>> > assess and remediate problems.
>> >
>> > Jeff
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> And if the electricity goes out for six months or even six weeks?
>
> You mean like it did here after the last hurricane? No problem; my
> generator worked fine.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Was the electricity out for six months? Nation wide? It is possible.
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Many did, others didn't. Many an extension cord snaked it's way over a
> > neighbor's fence. Life went on. We improvised, adapted and overcame.
It
> > was rougher for some than for others, but the local economy is booming,
> > tax
> > coffers are swelling, and local unemployment is below 3%.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> Now consider yourself being without fuel for 3 or 4 months or much longer.
> You merely made best of a minor inconvenience. If real trouble came that
> shut down fuel production for months you too would soon feel the effects.
Yes, I would. But would it mean the end of American society? I don't think
so. I know how to do for myself without many things. Moreover, I've seen
many a disaster come and go, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, 9/11, etc, up
close and personal. It's my job. One thing I have learned is that our
society's coping mechanisms are quite robust.
Jeff
John wrote:
> Gunner wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:56:49 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
>>>garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every "Man
>>>of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build items
>>
>>>from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every garage in
>>
>>>the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a work shop,
>>>storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms and a maid's
>>>quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2 bedroom 1 bath
>>>house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not having some kind
>>>of work area or work shop.
>>
>>And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
>>garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
>>
>>A house in most new developments is no longer a home..but a place to
>>sleep, and park your fat ass in front of the TV
>>
>>Gunner
>>
>
>
> Anyone that likes to live in a controlled enviorment gets what they
> deserve.
>
> You have to get approval to do just about anything around your house.
> You even need a fart licence or they lock you up.
>
> John
They sure do sound like my idea of hell.
I've always held the opinion that my property rights extend as far as my
property line and my neighbors should be free to do anything that's
legal they want to their property as long as it doesn't create an
imminent danger or an audible, foul odored or a physical intrusion over
the property line.
If my next door neighbor decides he wants to paint his house to look
like it's covered with tartan plaid with a black and white striped
chimney or forgos cuttting his grass for two months, so be it. I can
probably screen out the view from my side if I'm so inclined.
In fact, that's just what I did two years ago when my next door neighbor
had some major improvements done to his home which left me looking at a
pretty ugly looking "rubble wall":
http://home.comcast.net/~jwisnia18/jeff/mmiv.html
The bushes I planted in 2004 have grown so they now just about block out
all view of the messy job his contractors did.
To my neighbor's credit, when he saw me schlepping those arborvitae
bushes home in the trunk of my car three at a time and planting them
over several weekends, he came over and insisted on paying for them. He
wouldn't take "no" for an answer so we settled on his writing a
comparable sized check to a local charity we support. Everyone won that way.
Jeff
--
Jeffry Wisnia
(W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 19:02:58 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I think you have a good point Robert.
> >> >
> >> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the more
> >> >"fragile" it becomes.
> >>
> >> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
> >
> >I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a society
> >options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess and
remediate
> >problems.
>
> Perhaps. I don't know. I was thinking the other day of
> what would happen to the metropolitan area just to the
> northwest of where I live -- millions of people who are
> primarily living in the symbolic economy -- in the event of
> a societal collapse caused by, say, a series of nuclear
> detonations in 5 or 6 of our major financial and
> governmental centers: say, DC, NYC, LA, Chicago, Seattle,
> etc. People smarter than me have estimated that even such
> "limited" destruction would inevitably cause the collapse of
> the U.S. economy and society. I don't see these millions of
> symbolic workers being able to survive a return to a more
> material economy.
>
> My (possibly wrong) conclusion is that the post-modern
> symbolic economy/society is much more fragile than the
> industrial economy/society it replaced. Too many of us are
> no longer able to create goods, including food, and instead
> are now only able to engage in symbol manipulation -- the
> information/entertainment economy, a.k.a the post-modern
> economy. Lawyers, data entry clerks, web masters, writers,
> actors, singers, photographers, programmers, personal
> trainers, relationship counselors, what have you. Can any
> of them put actual food on an actual table? What happens to
> them if their post-modern services are no longer in demand?
> And that ignores entirely those dependent on
> "entitlements"...
>
> I don't see redundancy and flexibility -- to the contrary, I
> see fragility and extreme vulnerability. But I could be
> wrong.
Societal collapse is a macro-scale event. What happens to individuals
within that society are micro-level events. Individuals win and lose all
the time, even in a thriving society. Whole groups have been caused to
suffer many times by rapid changes within a complex society, yet the society
as a whole endures.
It sucked to be a technology worker during the dot-com bust or an
aeronautical engineer when we retreated from manned space exploration. It
also sucked to be a buggy whip maker during the advent of the automobile.
Jeff
Tom Veatch (in [email protected]) said:
| I suspect that anyone with an ounce of reasoning power can complete
| this sentence:
|
| "If technology is necessary to support the population at it's
| current number, and that technology fails, then ..."
...at that point it becomes imperative to shift to alternative
technology (or technologies) as rapidly as possible to minimize the
damage.
(It doesn't even take /half/ an ounce.)
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
Morris Dovey (in [email protected]) said:
| Tom Veatch (in [email protected]) said:
|
|| I suspect that anyone with an ounce of reasoning power can complete
|| this sentence:
||
|| "If technology is necessary to support the population at it's
|| current number, and that technology fails, then ..."
|
| ...at that point it becomes imperative to shift to alternative
| technology (or technologies) as rapidly as possible to minimize the
| damage.
I'd like to expand on my response. About two years ago, I went through
a contingency planning exercise for my business (manufacturing passive
solar heating panels) and detailed the steps that'd need to be taken
to provide enough panels to solar heat every dwelling in the state of
Iowa. I used the assumption that raw materials would be available and
that the time to procure materials would not be degraded by more than
25%. I also made the assumption that there would be sufficient power
available to run shop machinery (either from the grid, local
generators, or alternative sources). I did /not/ assume that I would
be able to procure additional CNC machines.
I was a bit surprised to discover that it would be possible, with
those assumptions, to meet that objective within seven months. It'd
mean long hours of exhausting work; but it could be done, if needed.
I'm not sure how "real world" that is; and I'm very aware that Iowa
has a small population (around 3 million) - but I have a high degree
of confidence in our ability to weather even major disasters provided
that we don't sit on our hands and wait for the government to solve
our problems.
I'm rather hoping that other businesses have put together their own
contingency plans...
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Private wrote:
>
> > Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be
> explained to
> > people who do not share similar feelings.
>
> I have to smile when I see somebody, not necessarily "Private" above,
> spouting off about being self sufficient while living on land as has
> happened with this thread.
>
> Really want to see if you can be self sufficient?
>
> Become a cruising sailor, actually a single handed cruising sailor.
>
> Get a decent sail boat, say about a 30 ft sloop, depart from somewhere
> here along the left coast and set sail for say, someplace like Fiji or
> even Australia.
>
> You'll be by yourself, out of sight of land, for 30+ days, if you are
> lucky.
>
> If not lucky, add another 10-20 days sailing time.
>
> No 911, no cell phone, no hardware stores, no towing service.
>
> There are no gas stations at sea.
>
> Good thing, you won't need one anyway.
>
> There will probably be some rather nasty weather along the way.
>
> Weather forecasts beyond 48 hours start to get iffy.
>
> 15 minute cat naps are the best you will get while underway.
>
> If you are not careful, you can hallucinate.
>
> It is what that is between your ears that will bring you safely to the
> next port.
>
>
> Lew
Similarly, a large part of pilot training is communicating the concept of
PIC (pilot in command) which basically means that the pilot is responsible
for everything and no matter what goes wrong:
A - the pilot gets blamed.
B - the pilot dies.
Similar attitude and resourcefulness is required in most mountaineering and
wilderness activity.
IMHO self sufficiency does not require the exclusion of external resources
but rather is a mastery of the technology that we choose to utilize and a
desire to 'do for ourselves' when possible and practical. The practical
part is a judgment call we must each make for ourselves. Many do not
understand the urge of some to steer their own boat when it is so much
easier (and usually cheaper) to just buy a ticket on a ship. Some of us
feel that the journey is at least as important as the destination.
I suspect that Lew and I share much agreement.
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Many did, others didn't. Many an extension cord snaked it's way over a
> > neighbor's fence. Life went on. We improvised, adapted and overcame.
It
> > was rougher for some than for others, but the local economy is booming,
> > tax
> > coffers are swelling, and local unemployment is below 3%.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> Now consider yourself being without fuel for 3 or 4 months or much longer.
> You merely made best of a minor inconvenience. If real trouble came that
> shut down fuel production for months you too would soon feel the effects.
>
>
"digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
> sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
> them.
>
That's not entirely true. The builder can build the house cheaper with a
plain two car garage. How many people actually only store only their cars
in their garages?
Jeff Wisnia wrote:
> To my neighbor's credit, when he saw me schlepping those arborvitae
> bushes home in the trunk of my car three at a time and planting them
> over several weekends, he came over and insisted on paying for them.
Talk about ugly on an ape.
Give those arborvitae about 10 years, you will probably wish you had
never planted them.
Lew
"digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>> don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
>>> sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
>>> them.
>>>
>>
>> That's not entirely true. The builder can build the house cheaper with a
>> plain two car garage. How many people actually only store only their
>> cars in their garages?
>>
> And he can sell it cheaper...The market is driven by the buyer.If more
> people are willing to pay for a shop more builders will build houses with
> a shop.If most people do not want to pay extra for a shop they are not
> built.Builders try to build what sells.
Most people who want a shop want to build it themselves.
I would mention that those men who can do even the most basic of work,
whether on the home or car, are richly rewarded by all the women who love
being with someone who is 'handy'.
Examples: I changed an alternator in the parking lot of the Autozone in
less time than the guy next to me took to replace his windshield wipers, and
the woman I did this for couldn't wait to richly reward me for being so
skilled. I nailed up a soffet vent that had come loose for my neighbor, and
got a delicious cherry pie. I swapped out a ceiling fan for a sales rep and
the woman told everyone at work what a great guy I was, "...and so handy,
too"
I think its a code word...
I used these stories to convince my son to learn how to do this stuff, and
recently he replaced a hood release cable for a girl in his dorm. He told
me that she was very grateful, but he wouldn't share the details wih his old
man...
"Private" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> B - I can change the oil at home in MUCH less time than it takes to travel
> (more $ for gas) and wait for someone else to do the job, according to how
> busy they are this wait is often not insignificant.
> C - By doing the work myself, I can do it at my convenience and when it
> should be done at not when I have the time to schedule the chore into the
> time the oil changer has available. There is never a line up at home and
> I am open for business any time I want to be.
> D - I do not change my own oil because I am saving money (which I do, but
> not a substantial amount). I do it because it is easier, quicker and more
> convenient.
Last time I changed oil was in May, 1991. I had about 3000 miles on my new
Regal. It was not easier, quicker, or more convenient. It was a royal PITA
that was never repeated. I can come and go as I please at work so time is
not a problem. I just go over to Bill's and pay $25. Yes, I can take a
look around under the car while is on the lift, even when it is 10 degrees
outside and snow is falling. I have no plans to ever crawl under a car and
change oil again even if a new model is easier.
> Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained
> to people who do not share similar feelings.
Raise your own livestock, grow your own veggies and generate your own
electricity?
Frank Boettcher wrote:
> Don't know where you live but I've never heard of that anywhere.
If it interests you, start checking around.
> Most vehicles take 4 quarts. Cost for those and a filter about 12
> bucks on sale. Cost at the quick change places about $25. There are
> no corner gas stations that change oil around here.
Even my little Tonka Toy truck uses 6 qts with a filter change.
Must be a very small vehicle.
Around here, $15 gets an oil & filter change when they run a sale, but
haven't checked since crude hit $75/bbl.
> Special tools? I maintain four vehicles in my family and the only
> tools needed are a plug socket, extension, swivel and a rachet.
You obviously never worked on Volkswagons, especially the diesel ones,
the little buggers damn near require a special tool to pop the hood.
> My four vehicles currently average 140K. I do almost all the work on
> them.
It is obviously a labor of love.
> However, in the spirit of the original post, my sons do very little,
> and I don't know why they never took to it.
They are obviously smart enough to have found what they consider more
productive ways to spend their free time than being a weekend grease
monkey.
Give them credit.
Everybody adopts what works for them.
Today, I'd rather make sawdust than spend time trying to get the
grease out from my fingernails (even with gloves) after trying to mess
with a vehicle.
Lew
John Husvar wrote:
> And for the organ meat crowd: Smithville Restaurant in Smithville, OH,
> not far from here, makes a serving of seasoned, breaded, deep fried
> chicken livers that melts in your mouth and tastes like heaven on a
> fork. At least they do if they're still in business.
You mean that place is still in business?
I knew it as "The Smithville Inn", home of the chicken dinner, served
family style.
Amish country is less than 10 miles away, so you can guess what the
quality and taste of the food is/was.
Haven't been in the place since 1955.
Lew
That explains a lot. The PRC (Peoples Republic of California) can be
excluded when talking about normal circumstances.
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Frank Boettcher wrote:
>
> I'm in Southern California.
"Jeff Wisnia" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> They sure do sound like my idea of hell.
>
> I've always held the opinion that my property rights extend as far as my
> property line and my neighbors should be free to do anything that's legal
> they want to their property as long as it doesn't create an imminent
> danger or an audible, foul odored or a physical intrusion over the
> property line.
That sounds like a set of rules that meet your aproval.
>> Anyone that likes to live in a controlled enviorment gets what they
>> deserve.
>>
>> You have to get approval to do just about anything around your house. You
>> even need a fart licence or they lock you up.
>>
>> John
You got that right. I can understand why some people buy into these, and I
know people who live in just such communities. They mostly love it because
they like everything in its place at all times. Homes they are not. Very
sterile atmosphere. But they like the golfing, mah jong marathons, and soy
burger cookouts, so, whatever winds yer clock.
I just bought a home with two acres at the end of a road in a very rural
Utah town. Nothing but BLM land all around that won't be developed in my
lifetime. Or probably in this century. It does have some zoning
restrictions, but they mainly apply to building permits, setbacks, and
common sense items that affect others. That is why I bought there. The
people I know who live in HOAs wouldn't consider living there, but they
don't have to.
Whatever winds your clock.
Steve
Modat22 wrote:
"doing all the work on a Prious"
Not a chance in hell dude
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>
>>>Trevor Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set of
>>> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
>>> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
>>> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
>>> > roadside.
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>>>
>>>If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
>>>car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
>>>unit.
>>>
>>>Want to change your oil?
>>>
>>>6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>>>for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>>>least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>
>>
>>BULL.
>>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
>>Oil disposal fee? No place selling oil can charge you a fee legally. The
>>law states that ANY business selling new oil MUST accept used oil for
>>recycling, at NO CHARGE. Cost 0.00 Drop off the used oil from the
>>vehicle when you buy the new oil. You can even pour it back into the
>>empty bottles to save on container expense.
>>Benefits to the owner: YOU know the oil was changed, while under there
>>YOU can look over the engine and underside of the vehicle and look for
>>problems or leaks. While under the vehicle YOU can also grease any items
>>that can be greased, this has the side benefit of lowering wear on items
>>that should be lubed but usually are not.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>>>
>>>Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>>>
>>>Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
>>>being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
>>
>>And again you can return the used coolant to any store that does coolant
>>changes for free. And again you can return it when you buy the new coolant.
>>
>>
>>>The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
>>>tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
>>
>>Not likely. Just a normal plug wrench for any plug on the market today.
>>You may need a torx bit or similar item if you need to remove a coil
>>pack or pull a cover but those are hardly special tools.
>>
>>
>>>Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
>>>even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
>>
>>Nope because they have the same attitude you have, that it is easier to
>>trade them than to LEARN how to repair them.
>>
>>
>>>Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
>>>for the first 75,000 miles.
>>>
>>>Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
>>
>>Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
>>
>>
>>>Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>>>that's another matter<G>.
>>>
>>>Lew
>>
>>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
>
>
> Its never a lose lose proposition learning how to do anything, and
> really its not all that hard working on today's cars if you buy and
> read the manuals, have access to tools and don't mind getting dirty.
>
> I'm still driving a 1996 grand am with 260,000 miles on it and a 1995
> Chevy S10 with 225,000 miles on it. I rebuilt the automatic
> transmission in the S10 5 years ago by following a books instruction
> (I don't think I ever want to do that again, but I learned something).
> I've done all the maintenance myself on all the cars I've owned and
> can't imagine the amounts of money I've saved over the years.
>
> I'll be buying a Prius January 2007 and my intent is to do all the
> service work on that as well.
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in.
> <snip>
>
> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
> specialized equipment.
Not true.specialized equipment helps troubleshoot some problems.You can
still change plugs,wires,air filter,brakes.oil,transmission filter,etc.
without "a lot of specialized tools."
>
> Few doctors make house calls any more.
>
> Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
> most places where people live these days.
>
> Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
> society keep changing.
>
> Think the process is called "life".
>
> Lew
>
Well, you may be right, but I am 52, so the women I want to attract are old
enough to have experience with everything around them breaking, with having
to deal with rip-off servicemen, and with being patronized by jerks at the
hardware or big box stores. I think there is also a huge difference in
appreciation once they own their own homes, cars, and appliances. Twenty to
thirty-five year olds don't yet know enough or own enough to be
appreciative.
I also make a big distinction between 'being handy' and having a nerdy
hobby. I once thought about getting into ham radio, and my wife (now
ex-wife) asked me "Is this one of those hobbies where you go into your
office and close the door? We don't need any more of those..."
I have recently been responding to the postings on Craigslist where people
are looking for someone to cut some wood, weld up a chair, or sandblast a
motorcycle part. I charge them a large roast beef sub, and I've been
meeting a bunch of great people.
"Kristian Ukkonen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Emmo wrote:
>> I would mention that those men who can do even the most basic of work,
>> whether on the home or car, are richly rewarded by all the women who love
>> being with someone who is 'handy'.
>
> It depends a lot. Many women regard those kinds of
> technical skills as "nerdy" and stay away from such
> men. Understanding how things work, and being interested
> in such things, has become a wierdness/freakyness, and
> an alarming thing for many women. Stuff like that is
> only something one does for a job, and not something to
> be interested in during free time. Really. Having a
> machine shop, or even lots of electronics/RF equipment,
> is a social suicide with women. I'm talking about the
> age group 20-35 years. The "acceptable" hobbies include
> sports and culture, but definitely not technology/science.
>
> Just today I noticed that my internet access didn't work.
> Checked stuff, and found out that ADSL modem had stopped
> working. I switched power off and back on, and only the
> power light was lit, but no life otherwise. I opened it,
> measured the SMPS voltages with oscilloscope, noticed
> that 5V had huge ripple, and replaced the electrolytic
> capasitor with a similar low-ESR cap I had. Started working
> again. Yeah, there's advange - did get internet access
> working still during sunday, and it cost me practically
> nothing. A normal person would have waited until monday,
> and bought a new ADSL modem, and propably paid someone
> to get it configured/installed.
Gunner wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 11:00:43 GMT, Glen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>F. George McDuffee wrote:
>>
>>>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>><SNIP>
>>
>> In
>>
>>>addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
>>>things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
>>>a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
>>>for the vocational classes.
>>>
>>
>><SNIP>
>>
>>Oh my God! Does this mean all my woodshop classes for next year
>>(2006-07) at the high school where I teach have been dropped? Does this
>>mean I am now out of work? Are my fellow IA teachers who teach masonry,
>>auto shop and computer repair also out of work? Do we now hold our
>>department meetings at the unemployment office?
>>
>>The scenario you present might be true in some places, but not in all.
>>I have been asked (along with a few of my cohorts)to work on a funding
>>grant to expand our vocational offerings in our school, and maybe the
>>district as a whole.
>>
>>Glen
>
>
> The school that has any sort of shop class..is the exception, rather
> than the rule. And not just in California where I live.
>
> Gunner
>
I, too, live and work in SoCal, and you are correct in saying that VocEd
is the exception rather than the rule, but I merely wanted to point out
that there are some good VocEd programs out there, and some are growing
and flourishing. There is such a demand for our Wood classes that
sessions of Wood are offered after regular school hours, and the Masonry
and Auto classes are filled to capacity with many more wanting the
classes than there is room for students.
In response to another gentleman's comments later on, our principal is
nearing retirement (as am I), but our three previous principals were
also devoted to VocEd. We will have a new superintendent next year, and
I hope that this individual has the same commitment as the previous super.
As a side note, the community college near where I live (I don't know
much about the CC near to my job) has an excellent Wood program, even
periodically offerring a guiter building class.
Glen
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >I think you have a good point Robert.
>> >
>> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the
>> >more "fragile" it becomes.
>>
>> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
>
> I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a
> society options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess
> and remediate problems.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
And if the electricity goes out for six months or even six weeks?
Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:01:41 GMT in misc.survivalism :
>
>>Primitive to an extreme, but possible, even practical with off-the-shelf
>>materials.
>>
>>And Homeland Security doesn't offer to hire us why? :)
>
>Because those folks have others far far nastier than us.
>>
>>>
>>> Compressed air/black powder chain cannons on timers would be hard to
>>> spot and deadly effective against substations, as would carbon fibre.
>>> Carbon fibre dispensers btw..were used against Iraqi substations to good
>>> effect.
>>
>>Gunner, get the Hell _outta_ my head! :)
>>
>>You have an evil, devious mind. I like that characteristic in a man --
>>or woman for that matter.
>
>Shrug..its a knack.
Larry Bond has an interesting novel "Enemy Within". All about how an
increase in "domestic" terrorism turns out to be part of the cover for an
Iranian invasion of Saudi Arabia. The other part was the Iranian military
taking out "all" of the of the terrorists bases in Iran.
As Judy Tend would say "It could happen."
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Typos, Grammos and da kind are the result of ragin hormones
Fortesque Consulting: Teaching Pigs to Sing since 1968.
In Message-ID:<[email protected]> posted on
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:01:41 GMT, Gunner wrote:
>The arab terrorists use secondary bombs to catch medical personel and
>have been doing this for years.
Did they learn that from Eric Robert Rudolph?
--
Bart
Very well said! Good luck with the 'higher' management. Maybe I should be
wishing them luck instead ???
Ace
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Where I'm at right now, we do have that type of assembly work and yes, it
> is
> quite lucrative but very boring work. Our requirements are not nearly so
> high for that job for a couple of reasons. As you pointed out, the higher
> IQ
> individuals are not willing to do such a job and, of course, the job
> doesn't
> require it. Yes, people like that are very important. Unfortunately,
> getting
> the higher management to see that is proving difficult. Day before
> yesterday
> was the last day for our spring winder. He found an assembly job with
> another company making a few dollars an hour more. My thought is that
> there
> are no unimportant jobs. If a job was unimportant, why would anybody pay
> you
> to do it? You can't have a top without a bottom. Without a solid
> foundation,
> the top will collapse.
>
>
> "Ace" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Good for you and/or your employer.
>>
>> Just another view on the subject of education. Say you have a very
>> lucrative hand assembly job for some of your machined components, but the
>> actual procedure is so simple/boring that 'nobody in their right mind'
> would
>> sit there all day doing it.
>>
>> Will you insist on the person you hire for the job have math skills, etc,
> or
>> would you settle for someone with a somewhat lower IQ who would be very
>> happy to sit there all day? In other words, what happens to the
> individuals
>> who don't happen to have the intellectual capacity on par with your top
>> machinists?
>>
>> Are they to be forever 'held back' in school till they become laughing
> stock
>> of their so called class mates? Or should they be given a 'lower' grade,
>> and proceed along with their friends/peers and ultimately enter society
> with
>> some sense of dignity, get that boring assembly job you have and work
>> tirelessly etc. for you?
>>
>> I saw a scenario similar to this happen. After a employee was pestered
> for
>> so long, he did quit...... It took four(4) other employees to do the same
>> job, each only able to tolerate it for about 2 hours. Oh
>> well............
>>
>> Ace
>>
>> "CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business
> has
>> > been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having
>> > very
>>
>> Snippity snip, etc....
>>
>>
>
>
A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business has
been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having very
little luck in finding qualified people and when we find someone that seems
promising, it generally turns out that they are no more than a machine
operator. Able to set up and operate a CNC (usually a vertical mill) but no
more, nor do they want to do more. We have gotten to the point of training
people into the position. We have gone through a number of them. Many, when
they find out that it is real work and they can't just stop thinking and
show up to work on autopilot after a month or two, either quit or become
worthless to the point that they get fired. We have two trainees in the shop
right now. One is female (extremely rare in this trade). She never made it
through high school but has a GED. I'm finding that she has a great learning
ability and enthusiasm. It is quite obvious that her problems in school were
due to boredom. To get her math skills up to par, I have been giving her
homework. She has been doing quite well now that she sees a need. To bad
someone couldn't have instilled a real world need in her in school. She'd be
that much further ahead. The other trainee, a male, just out of high school,
made a comment the other day that really struck me. He said "I took
trigonometry for two years and thought it would never be good for anything.
Then, the first job I get, I need it".
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> F. George McDuffee (in [email protected])
> said:
>
>
> At another high school I was called in to take over for a math teacher
> who was laid up in the hospital for several weeks following an
> accident. I decided to take in a "show and tell" for each topic for
> all of the classes to illustrate how the stuff they were studying was
> used in the real world - and encouraged questions and discussions of
> the applications. It was damn near magical! The kids - all of 'em -
> decided that math could be not only interesting, but fun. The
> eighth-graders (studying arithmetic and geometric series) took the bit
> between their teeth and galloped into differential calculus without
> having a clue that's what they were doing. I feel truly sorry for all
> of the math teachers who miss out on having the kind of highs I
> experienced. But the important point is that all it took was providing
> links between the subject matter and the real world to "set the hook."
"CW" <[email protected]> wrote in news:%KaCg.1811$Qf.1025
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
> Blew your credibility with that statement. Work at a desk, don't you?
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > There just isn't the same demand for, say, a room full of
>> machinists when they can be replaced by a CNC machine or two. There is
>>
Huh?
The tool & die shop where I served my apprenticeship had about 10 guys all
working with manual machines. There is no doubt that all of that work could
be done by two guys a VMC and a couple of wire EDMs nowadays.
If you think that all the manufacturing jobs were lost overseas, you are
misinformed. Most were lost to automation, which includes CNC.
--
Dan
Scopulus est usquequaque nefas
Where I'm at right now, we do have that type of assembly work and yes, it is
quite lucrative but very boring work. Our requirements are not nearly so
high for that job for a couple of reasons. As you pointed out, the higher IQ
individuals are not willing to do such a job and, of course, the job doesn't
require it. Yes, people like that are very important. Unfortunately, getting
the higher management to see that is proving difficult. Day before yesterday
was the last day for our spring winder. He found an assembly job with
another company making a few dollars an hour more. My thought is that there
are no unimportant jobs. If a job was unimportant, why would anybody pay you
to do it? You can't have a top without a bottom. Without a solid foundation,
the top will collapse.
"Ace" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Good for you and/or your employer.
>
> Just another view on the subject of education. Say you have a very
> lucrative hand assembly job for some of your machined components, but the
> actual procedure is so simple/boring that 'nobody in their right mind'
would
> sit there all day doing it.
>
> Will you insist on the person you hire for the job have math skills, etc,
or
> would you settle for someone with a somewhat lower IQ who would be very
> happy to sit there all day? In other words, what happens to the
individuals
> who don't happen to have the intellectual capacity on par with your top
> machinists?
>
> Are they to be forever 'held back' in school till they become laughing
stock
> of their so called class mates? Or should they be given a 'lower' grade,
> and proceed along with their friends/peers and ultimately enter society
with
> some sense of dignity, get that boring assembly job you have and work
> tirelessly etc. for you?
>
> I saw a scenario similar to this happen. After a employee was pestered
for
> so long, he did quit...... It took four(4) other employees to do the same
> job, each only able to tolerate it for about 2 hours. Oh well............
>
> Ace
>
> "CW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business
has
> > been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having
> > very
>
> Snippity snip, etc....
>
>
digitalmaster wrote:
> "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>"digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>>don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
>>>sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
>>>them.
>>>
>>
>>That's not entirely true. The builder can build the house cheaper with a
>>plain two car garage. How many people actually only store only their cars
>>in their garages?
>>
>
> And he can sell it cheaper...The market is driven by the buyer.If more
> people are willing to pay for a shop more builders will build houses with a
> shop.If most people do not want to pay extra for a shop they are not
> built.Builders try to build what sells.
>
>
We've got a two car garage with two doors, but we never "park" the cars
in them.
I or my son will pull a car into one of them to work on it, but as far
as regular parking goes, there's so much stuff stacked up against the
walls (plus a couple of lally columns down the centerline) that
squeezing through a barely openable car door inside the garage is such a
PIA that we just park outside.
But we still use a garage door as our usual entry/exit to the house,
'cause it's much closer to where we park than the front door is, and it
has "keyless entry" via a push of the garage door opener button inside
the car. <G>
Jeff
--
Jeffry Wisnia
(W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE)
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength."
"Gunner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:20:21 GMT, "CW" <[email protected]> wrote:
>A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business has
>been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having
very
>little luck in finding qualified people and when we find someone that seems
>promising, it generally turns out that they are no more than a machine
>operator. Able to set up and operate a CNC (usually a vertical mill) but no
>more, nor do they want to do more. We have gotten to the point of training
>people into the position. We have gone through a number of them. Many, when
>they find out that it is real work and they can't just stop thinking and
>show up to work on autopilot after a month or two, either quit or become
>worthless to the point that they get fired. We have two trainees in the
shop
>right now. One is female (extremely rare in this trade). She never made it
>through high school but has a GED. I'm finding that she has a great
learning
>ability and enthusiasm. It is quite obvious that her problems in school
were
>due to boredom. To get her math skills up to par, I have been giving her
>homework. She has been doing quite well now that she sees a need. To bad
>someone couldn't have instilled a real world need in her in school. She'd
be
>that much further ahead. The other trainee, a male, just out of high
school,
>made a comment the other day that really struck me. He said "I took
>trigonometry for two years and thought it would never be good for anything.
>Then, the first job I get, I need it".
Im a CNC machine tool repair guy. I front for a couple manufactures, do
repair of their machines, do infrastructure repair (air/electical etc
etc) and there are two types of "machinist".
1. Actually involved in setting up and performing operations, able to do
design and determine if the machine is optimal etc etc
2. Button pushers. Somone who loads parts, pushes a button, takes
measurements, maybe changes offsets, but basically a human parts loader.
#1 is very very hard to find
#2 is very very easy to find, and in Southern California..is nearly 50%
female, with many learning to be rated in Catagory #1
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
"Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
| skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
| you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
| the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
| training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
|
| When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
| anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
| of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
|
| Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
| is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
| today?
|
| TMT
The first thing that came to my mind was: You usually don't have to.
That brings us to my second point: If you don't have to, you'll never
learn how. If you have to a lot, you'll even get good at it.
When I took driver's ed back in the 80's (okay, that puts me squarely in
the middle of most of my peers nowadays, its seems) we had actual cutaway
car components in the classroom. I had grown up sort of out in the country,
so doing mechanical things weren't out of the ordinary for me, but my dad
never taught me much, or not at least actual instruction that I recall. I
think he was satisfied with me taking all kinds of stuff apart and figuring
out how it worked, and even getting lucky in getting it back together again.
If it worked afterwards, that was always a bonus. I think I just had the
knack for things like that, and eventually wound up working on electronics
in the service, where I had some problems with a used car I had. Took it to
a mechanic, since I had no tools or skills, and got my own spark plugs back
for ten bucks, in a car that only ran slightly better. That made me mad, so
I got a manual and started collecting tools. Eventually solved the problem
myself. That kinda told me that I could do whatever I set my mind to.
Nowadays I have a small fleet of cars for my family and little time, or
money, to maintain them all properly. If I would have had newer vehicles, I
likely wouldn't have had to work on them as much, so whether that would have
been better for me financially or not still remains to be seen. Folks used
to ask me if I liked working on cars. "Only when I don't have to." is my
usual response.
Once my family and financial situation settled down, I got my piece of
the American dream and bought a home. I used to be a whole lot better at
this kind of thing, and could do a good job, but recently have started to
try and balance what I can do, what I could do, what I'll really do, and
it's really something I could do better. Having a major unfinished,
unscheduled major home repair (rotted kitchen subfloor. Overhauled the
cabinets since replacing them with equivalent quality was cost prohibitive,
laid down new sub floor and underlay, but have temporary vinyl tile on the
floor and counters now) I'm to the point where I have to come to grips with
my abilities versus my time, and the cost of the two. I think many people
are in that sort of situation, but for some, money is easier to throw at a
situation, and for some, money is the thing they have the least, so they
have to do it themselves, albeit poorly.
I used to have a job that didn't stimulate me much mentally, so there
was plenty of time to ponder things I wanted to do and so on. I have a very
cool new job that sends me home wiped out mentally, so I rarely feel
inclined to deal with that list of things to do. Haven't touched it in
weeks. Gotta figure out where I can find the round tuits now that I used to
have. I'm starting to have some sympathy with those folks, and I don't
really have a single thing to blame it on. Sort of how things have turned
out.
We sort of went through this awhile back. Americans existed happily on
the east coast, crowded into cramped cities, when the US government started
offering free land west of the Mississippi. I'm sure each family that
headed out had a book or two that explained how to make a living in the
middle of nowhere with little more than what you could have carried with you
in a wagon. Likely even explained what to bring in the wagon, too.
Sort of got me thinking about a series of how-to books for stuff, but
most of that is on the web now, since that's the first place most folks go
for information, even if it's really generic and useless to the rest of us.
Perhaps what needs to be out there is a non-condescending tome about how to
find/acquire the core skills that most of us take for granted when we tackle
a new task, such as righty tighty, doing a visual, gathering information
first, and so on. That bit is missing from every book I've ever read on how
to do stuff, but how to approach such a subject is actually a whole lot
harder than it sounds.
Mark Trudgill wrote:
> The message <[email protected]>
> from pyotr filipivich <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
>> Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
>> on Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:54:53 GMT in misc.survivalism :
>>> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:59:36 +0100, Mark Trudgill <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The message <[email protected]>
>>> >from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
>>>> words:
>>>>
>>>>> Retief wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you really needed to?
>>>>>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>>>>>> do it.
>>>>>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>>>>>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>>>>>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>>>>>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Retief
>>>>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
>
>> Based on a sermon title from Dad's Seminary days ("Dead Hog and no Hot
>> Water...") I'd say not having enough hot water is one factor. Don't ask
>> me, I just pass 'em along.
>
> You need hot water to scrape the hair off the skin.
> You basically scold a small area of skin at a time and the hair and top
> layer of skin peels off.
>
>>>> Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
>>>> 250lb of pork trimmings.
>
>> If the dead pig doesn't manage to stick him in the process.
>
>> I'm not sure of all the details, but is seems that after Udo killed the
>> hog, he placed the knife in the wrong place, and the dead pork roast
>> "kicked" the knife right through his foot. In one side and out the other.
>> Fortunately, Germany has good health care, but Udo was rather unhappy. he
>> didn't feel right laying in bed all week, but orders are orders, especially
>> when delivered by Herr Doctor. (And we had a couple English Nursing
>> Sisters in the group, so he was Confined to his Room for the duration.)
>>> Make some good hotlinks though ....
>
>> I'll take your word for it.
>
>
>> pyotr
>
What kind of words do you use when you scold the
hog? I've heard of people using words that would
burn your hide when scolding kids, but never with
hogs.
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
> technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you think
> anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still alive to see
> those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a very long time
> indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It didn't suddenly
> collapse within a portion of a single lifetime, like, say, the Incan
> Empire.
The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both collapsed in
a lifetime.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Lobby Dosser wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Was the electricity out for six months? Nation wide? It is possible.
>
> Possible but highly unlikely. In the Pacific NW lots of the
> electricity is hydroelectric.
> Other places are coal, or natural gas. What do you see as possibly
> causing a nation wide power outage?
Destruction of power lines. Right now there are disruptions and everything
is working. OK. If several producers go out and lines go down you could see
a system that is over taxed and totally fail. It happened years ago in New
York, a few years ago, or maybe last summer in the Midwest, and it happens
in California.
There would be no extreme hurry to repair as energy shortages are a
palatable excuse to drive up prices. Both the energy companies and oil
companies are enjoying this scenario right now.
Gosh, BP is shutting down its Oil pipe line today and already prices for
gasoline are going up.
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:56:49 GMT, "Leon" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Blame the home builder. The last 4 homes that I have lived in have had
>garages only big enough for cars. When I was a kid I recall most every "Man
>of the house" was able to change a tire, make minor repairs and build items
>from wood. This neighborhood was built just after WWII and every garage in
>the neighborhood had at least 1 additional room attached for a work shop,
>storage, and in my case the garage had 2 extra storage rooms and a maid's
>quarters. All this detached from the main 1,200 sq. ft. 2 bedroom 1 bath
>house. I do not recall any of these extra garage rooms not having some kind
>of work area or work shop.
And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
A house in most new developments is no longer a home..but a place to
sleep, and park your fat ass in front of the TV
Gunner
http://home.lightspeed.net/~gunner/myshop
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
"NewsJunky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
>Snipped<
>
> Ok, to prevent some of the backlash--- I was in no hurry, and I could only
> get something that was 3½ feet wide in the backyard, so I dug it by hand.
> And for the rest of you--- my community allows homeowners that can show
> competency the option of pulling a "homeowner" permit for all phases. So I
> had to do that for footing/stem wall, rough framing, rough plumbing, rough
> electrical, final plumbing, and final electrical. Damn expensive for all
> those permits, but I did it legal.
Kudos for going the legal route....As a remodeling contractor, I have to
play by the rules as well. However, I am curious as to how you felt when all
was done. Did you get your moneys worth for all those permits??? Were the
inspectors helpful or a PITA ???
I have seen em all ranging from the electrical inspector who spent more time
finding a place for the Passed Sticker than he did looking at the wiring (he
was there about 15 sec.)
Had another one walk thru the door and ask "who's gonna take the heat....??"
I think he was kinda pissed afterwards when he found nothing wrong.....
I'll bet these two guys have no tools in their garages...
I have also worked with plenty of inspectors who know their stuff AND are
nice and helpful with any questions. These are the guys who don't have the
Power Trip Ego thing goin....Cause they don't need to prove themselves when
the knowledge is apparent.
Anyone else care to comment ???
Jeff
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:15:26 -0400, "digitalmaster"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> > the world we live in.
>> <snip>
>>
>> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
>> specialized equipment.
>Not true.specialized equipment helps troubleshoot some problems.You can
>still change plugs,wires,air filter,brakes.oil,transmission filter,etc.
>without "a lot of specialized tools."
Well, there is a component here that hasn't been addressed in any way-
I've been doing construction and steel work my whole life, and as a
result, I'm a pretty big guy. When it comes to knowing *what* to do
to fix the car, there isn't a problem- but when it comes down to
trying to fish my arm down through an engine when every availible inch
has been packed full of vacuum lines and plastic covers, the job
becomes impossible. It's not a matter of complexity, it's a matter of
space, and I'd much rather find a mechanic who needs some remodeling
done in exchange for a repair job then spend 14 hours and half my skin
on my day off trying to do something that someone else can do in 30
minutes.
"F. George McDuffee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:52:56 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
> >Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
> >Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
> >were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
> >through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
> >to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
> >Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
> >immune.
> ========================
> This was addressed at some length in my dissertation in Appendix
> A -- THE LINEAR AND ACCRETION MODELS OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION
[snip]
> (For example
> Rousseau 1712-1778 and Gibbons 1737-1794 )[snip]
How did your dissertation advisor feel about such obvious proofing errors?
What was your dissertation for, and when and where was it accepted?
Published? Just curious.
Jeff
"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:57:09 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (snips)
>
> >Societal collapse is a macro-scale event. What happens to individuals
> >within that society are micro-level events. Individuals win and lose all
> >the time, even in a thriving society. Whole groups have been caused to
> >suffer many times by rapid changes within a complex society, yet the
society
> >as a whole endures.
>
> Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
> Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
> Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
> were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
> through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
> to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
> Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
> immune.
Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you think
anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still alive to see those
wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a very long time indeed, for Roman
society to decline and fall. It didn't suddenly collapse within a portion
of a single lifetime, like, say, the Incan Empire.
> >It sucked to be a technology worker during the dot-com bust or an
> >aeronautical engineer when we retreated from manned space exploration.
It
> >also sucked to be a buggy whip maker during the advent of the automobile.
>
> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
collapse mean to you?
Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a bang,
over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent to
many who are living through it.
Jeff
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:09:01 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"F. George McDuffee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:52:56 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
>> >Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
>> >Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
>> >were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
>> >through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
>> >to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
>> >Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
>> >immune.
>> ========================
>> This was addressed at some length in my dissertation in Appendix
>> A -- THE LINEAR AND ACCRETION MODELS OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION
>
>[snip]
>> (For example
>> Rousseau 1712-1778 and Gibbons 1737-1794 )[snip]
>
>How did your dissertation advisor feel about such obvious proofing errors?
>What was your dissertation for, and when and where was it accepted?
>Published? Just curious.
>
>Jeff
>
===============
I am not sure how obvious an "s" on Gibbon is. I hope this did
not interrupt the flow too badly when you were reading the
section.
Dissertation was for
EdD
Oklahoma State University, 1999
(Stillwater, Oklahoma)
Occupational and Adult Education
I was one of the last two graduates from that
department/discipline. The other was a very good friend from
Brazil and we still email about vocational/technical education in
our countries.
Several problems.
I used endnotes and these don't come over [well] when doing a
cut-n-paste to "text only" newsgroup postings.
I have made three moves since graduation and when I finely got
around to converting the formatted and proofed MS doc file [done
by some very talented dissertation typists] into pdf format for
posting on my web site after I retired and had time, I discovered
that several parts of the final file were unreadable, so had to
use my unformatted block left working files. The appendix was
one of those sections.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Trevor Jones wrote:
> Want to change your oil?
My Daughter is at College away from home and has a car of mine. I remind her
every few months to change the oil and have the fluids looked at. She even
has a credit card of mine to cover maintenance. I have told her many times
that the Jiffy Lube guys sometimes are not all that smart, but they often
get things right...
Daughters boyfriend decided that he could do it better, so he climbed under
the car, drained into a gallon milk container with a small funnel (spilled
all over the street), cleaned up with kitty litter, and added 4 quarts of
oil (no filter change).
Daughter called me a half hour later and told me the car starts and the
engine runs well, but the car won't move. I had her verbally repeat the
maintenance efforts boyfriend attempted.
You guessed it... he drained the automatic transmission.
Boyfriend thinks it is better for me to call him by his current nickname
"Dipstick" than the other one "dips&%t"
Jack
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 14:38:51 -0500, "Morris Dovey"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>We have gotten to the point of training
>| people into the position. We have gone through a number of them.
>| Many, when they find out that it is real work and they can't just
>| stop thinking and show up to work on autopilot after a month or
>| two, either quit or become worthless to the point that they get
>| fired.
=====================
This is becase the students are doing what they were
trained/educated to do -- exactly what they were told -- no more
and no less. If you were looking for machine loaders/operators
this would be what you were looking for.
Unfortunatly, you are expecting trainee machinists with
initative, curosity, interest in a manual trade/activity, and a
willingness to experiment. Students are quickly "cured" of these
traits or are kicked out of school for being "disruptive."
Try posting your help wanted notices in places where the type of
person you are interested in is likely to be, such as auto parts
stores, hardware stores, machine supply stores, etc. Gun ranges
can also be productive. Also talk to the machine shop
instructors [*NOT* the department/division heads] at your local
community colleges. They will generally have several people in
their classes which have talent, interest and the right attitude.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
Mark Trudgill wrote:
> The message <[email protected]>
> from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
> words:
>
>> Mark Trudgill wrote:
>>> The message <[email protected]>
>>> from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
>>> words:
>>>
>>>> Retief wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>>>>>>> really needed to?
>>>>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>>>>> do it.
>>>>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>>>>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>>>>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>>>>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>>>>
>>>>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Retief
>>>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
>>> Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
>>> 250lb of pork trimmings.
>>>
>
>> That isn't part of the scheme, he said he could
>> butcher it, so he must have a clue, probably way
>> more than a clue.
>
>> My point is there is no incorrect way as long as
>> one observes sanitary procedure, may not be the
>> way a professional does it and one may not end up
>> with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot
>> would prefer pork trimmings (whatever that is). I
>> usually end up with bite size pieces before I
>> stuff them in my mouth.
>
> Feel free to roast mouth sized pieces.
>
Thanks. You buying? I'd prefer to BBQ them. But
soups are good, pork and beans, all sorts of
things you can do with scraps (I suppose he meant
little pieces). Of course bacon even a 10" strip
is just one bite when compressed.
Not to belabor the point, but I can't imagine
anyone cutting up a whole hog into scraps, way too
much work. OTOH, if I had to do it, I would
debone the whole thing.
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in.
<snip>
It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
specialized equipment.
Few doctors make house calls any more.
Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
most places where people live these days.
Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
society keep changing.
Think the process is called "life".
Lew
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:59:36 +0100, Mark Trudgill <[email protected]>
wrote:
>The message <[email protected]>
>from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
>words:
>
>> Retief wrote:
>> > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>> >>> really needed to?
>> >> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>> >> do it.
>> >
>> > No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>> > "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>> > get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>> > of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>> >
>> > And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>> >
>> > Retief
>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
>
>Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
>250lb of pork trimmings.
Make some good hotlinks though ....
Gunner
"I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
"F. George McDuffee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 21:09:01 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"F. George McDuffee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:52:56 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
> >> >Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
> >> >Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
> >> >were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
> >> >through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
> >> >to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
> >> >Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
> >> >immune.
> >> ========================
> >> This was addressed at some length in my dissertation in Appendix
> >> A -- THE LINEAR AND ACCRETION MODELS OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION
> >
> >[snip]
> >> (For example
> >> Rousseau 1712-1778 and Gibbons 1737-1794 )[snip]
> >
> >How did your dissertation advisor feel about such obvious proofing
errors?
> >What was your dissertation for, and when and where was it accepted?
> >Published? Just curious.
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> ===============
> I am not sure how obvious an "s" on Gibbon is. I hope this did
> not interrupt the flow too badly when you were reading the
> section.
>
>
> Dissertation was for
> EdD
> Oklahoma State University, 1999
> (Stillwater, Oklahoma)
> Occupational and Adult Education
>
> I was one of the last two graduates from that
> department/discipline. The other was a very good friend from
> Brazil and we still email about vocational/technical education in
> our countries.
Congratulations on your achievement.
Jeff
> Several problems.
>
> I used endnotes and these don't come over [well] when doing a
> cut-n-paste to "text only" newsgroup postings.
>
> I have made three moves since graduation and when I finely got
> around to converting the formatted and proofed MS doc file [done
> by some very talented dissertation typists] into pdf format for
> posting on my web site after I retired and had time, I discovered
> that several parts of the final file were unreadable, so had to
> use my unformatted block left working files. The appendix was
> one of those sections.
>
>
>
> Unka George
> (George McDuffee)
>
> ...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
> with the name of the late deceased, and
> the epitaph drear:
> "A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East."
>
> Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
Trevor Jones <[email protected]> said:
>Specialization is for insects!
Looks like someone has been reading Robert A. Heinlein. TANSTAAFL.
Much of RAH's work should be required reading prior to reaching high
school age.
Steve W. wrote:
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> Trevor Jones wrote:
>>
>> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set
>> > of
>> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
>> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
>> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
>> > roadside.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>>
>> If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
>> car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
>> unit.
>>
>> Want to change your oil?
>>
>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>
>
> BULL.
> New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
> Oil disposal fee? No place selling oil can charge you a fee legally. The
> law states that ANY business selling new oil MUST accept used oil for
> recycling, at NO CHARGE. Cost 0.00 Drop off the used oil from the
> vehicle when you buy the new oil. You can even pour it back into the
> empty bottles to save on container expense.
> Benefits to the owner: YOU know the oil was changed, while under there
> YOU can look over the engine and underside of the vehicle and look for
> problems or leaks. While under the vehicle YOU can also grease any items
> that can be greased, this has the side benefit of lowering wear on items
> that should be lubed but usually are not.
>
>
>> Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>>
>> Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>>
>> Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
>> being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
>
> And again you can return the used coolant to any store that does coolant
> changes for free. And again you can return it when you buy the new
> coolant.
>
>>
>> The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
>> tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
>
> Not likely. Just a normal plug wrench for any plug on the market today.
> You may need a torx bit or similar item if you need to remove a coil
> pack or pull a cover but those are hardly special tools.
>
>>
>> Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
>> even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
>
> Nope because they have the same attitude you have, that it is easier to
> trade them than to LEARN how to repair them.
More like they get sick of riding around in something that looks like it has
100,000 miles on it. Simple fact is that when something goes wrong with a
modern car it's generally an expensive piece of non-field-repairable
electronics or something that requires a lift and a well equipped shop.
>> Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
>> for the first 75,000 miles.
>>
>> Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition,
>> IMHO.
>
> Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
Life is finite. If you want to spend it learning how to fix cars that's
your privilege. I'd rather spend it learning to do things that I like to
do or things that get me the income to do things that I like to do.
>> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>> that's another matter<G>.
>>
>> Lew
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy
> via Encryption =----
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Modat22 wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>Lew Hodgett wrote:
>>> Trevor Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set
>>> > of
>>> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you
>>> > or anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or
>>> > various electrical components like starters or alternators, at home
>>> > or on the roadside.
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>>>
>>> If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
>>> car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
>>> unit.
>>>
>>> Want to change your oil?
>>>
>>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>
>>
>>BULL.
>>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
>>Oil disposal fee? No place selling oil can charge you a fee legally. The
>>law states that ANY business selling new oil MUST accept used oil for
>>recycling, at NO CHARGE. Cost 0.00 Drop off the used oil from the
>>vehicle when you buy the new oil. You can even pour it back into the
>>empty bottles to save on container expense.
>>Benefits to the owner: YOU know the oil was changed, while under there
>>YOU can look over the engine and underside of the vehicle and look for
>>problems or leaks. While under the vehicle YOU can also grease any items
>>that can be greased, this has the side benefit of lowering wear on items
>>that should be lubed but usually are not.
>>
>>
>>> Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>>>
>>> Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>>>
>>> Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
>>> being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
>>
>>And again you can return the used coolant to any store that does coolant
>>changes for free. And again you can return it when you buy the new
>>coolant.
>>
>>>
>>> The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
>>> tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
>>
>>Not likely. Just a normal plug wrench for any plug on the market today.
>>You may need a torx bit or similar item if you need to remove a coil
>>pack or pull a cover but those are hardly special tools.
>>
>>>
>>> Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
>>> even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
>>
>>Nope because they have the same attitude you have, that it is easier to
>>trade them than to LEARN how to repair them.
>>
>>>
>>> Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
>>> for the first 75,000 miles.
>>>
>>> Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition,
>>> IMHO.
>>
>>Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
>>
>>>
>>> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>>> that's another matter<G>.
>>>
>>> Lew
>>
>>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
>>News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>>120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy
>>via Encryption =----
>
> Its never a lose lose proposition learning how to do anything, and
> really its not all that hard working on today's cars if you buy and
> read the manuals, have access to tools and don't mind getting dirty.
>
> I'm still driving a 1996 grand am with 260,000 miles on it and a 1995
> Chevy S10 with 225,000 miles on it. I rebuilt the automatic
> transmission in the S10 5 years ago by following a books instruction
> (I don't think I ever want to do that again, but I learned something).
> I've done all the maintenance myself on all the cars I've owned and
> can't imagine the amounts of money I've saved over the years.
How much did you _lose_ while the thing was down with the transmission
apart?
Do you honestly think that most people have the tools and work space
available to pull and overhaul a transmission?
> I'll be buying a Prius January 2007 and my intent is to do all the
> service work on that as well.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Private wrote:
>
> "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>> Around $15.00 for oil and a filter and I have too provide the labor to
>> change as well as providing the labor to disposel of the used oil.
>>
>> From time to time, local gas station offers an oil change with filter for
>> $14.95, otherwise the going rate is about $20.00
>>
>> I have better things to do with my time than trying to save $0-$5 max by
>> playing grease monkey.
>
> You are correct that oil changes are inexpensive and frequently offered as
> loss leaders, however:
>
> A - I buy my premium oil by the (several) case when it is on sale, same
> for
> premium filters. The oil and filters used by cheap oil changers are not
> of equal quality.
> B - I can change the oil at home in MUCH less time than it takes to travel
> (more $ for gas) and wait for someone else to do the job, according to how
> busy they are this wait is often not insignificant.
> C - By doing the work myself, I can do it at my convenience and when it
> should be done at not when I have the time to schedule the chore into the
> time the oil changer has available. There is never a line up at home and
> I am open for business any time I want to be.
> D - I do not change my own oil because I am saving money (which I do, but
> not a substantial amount). I do it because it is easier, quicker and more
> convenient. It is usually combined with other preventative maintenance
> work
> which I do not trust an oil changer to perform. I did make the mistake of
> going to an oil changer (once) and because I thought it would be
> convenient (long story), had them check and change the manual transmission
> oil and top
> off the OD. I neglected to get a firm price quote for this service and
> ended up paying a huge amount for the trans service and the trans oil AND
> had to show the kid how to do the job as he did not have a clue.
>
> Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be explained
> to
> people who do not share similar feelings. Different strokes for different
> folks, as always YMMV
Changing your own oil is not "self sufficiency". "Self sufficiency" is
drilling your own oil well, pumping it, and refining it yourself. All
you're doing is engaging in a hobby.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
[email protected] wrote:
>
> Gunner wrote:
>> And home owner associations that forbid you from even leaving your
>> garage door open for more than 30 minutes.
>>
>
> This is what I don't understand. When I was coming up, your house
> looked *abandoned* of you didn't have the garage door open. Everyone
> in my neighborhood had their garage open all day long...it signified
> someone was home...someone actually lived there. Kids were always
> playing hoops above the garage door, or girls were jumping rope with
> friends in the driveway. Or if you looked up in the trees, there were
> kids plotting all sorts of mischief.
>
> Nowdays, I drive through a neighborhood, and all the doors are closed.
> THAT is what looks ugliest to me.
These "homeowner's associations" need to be taken down a peg. They're
starting to get too big for their britches. I would _not_ buy in a
community where there was such a thing.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Trevor Jones wrote:
> digitalmaster wrote:
>>> Specialization is for insects!
>>
>>
>> Robert Heinlen I beleive.
>>
> I beleive so. Part of a long winded rant about all the things a person
> should be able to do or at least be willing to try, given the opportunity.
>
> Cheers
> Trevor Jones
>
Someone thought rather a lot of that 'rant'
http://specializationisforinsects.com/
Joe
"Ron Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less garage
> creativity is visible.
Of course, someone will mention that they might have a workshop in the
basement, but it makes me think of the house forsale ads that I read on
occasion. Almost all of them advertise completely finished basements with a
nanny suite or an inlaw apartment. Never have I seen mention of a house with
workshop space in the basement.
Should I buy a house one of these days, I'm going to have trouble finding
what I want because I'll be looking for a house with an unfinished or
partially finished basement, naturally for a workshop.
Guess it would be nice to see their basements, or even a workshop ????
Ace
"Ron Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:9B2Bg.1769$uW1.885@dukeread06...
> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
> no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
> productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
> they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
> When I was young, a garage full of tools and such was like a beacon in
> the night. Had to look, ask questions, wanted to get to know the person
> and try to learn. Nowadays, kids couldn't care less.
> I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less
> garage creativity is visible.
> Respectfully,
> Ron Moore
>
> "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
>> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>
>> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>> today?
>>
>> TMT
>>
>
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
(snips)
>> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
>> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
>
>Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
>collapse mean to you?
>
>Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a bang,
>over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent to
>many who are living through it.
That's possible, and most likely. But...
I can give you another scenario: 5 or 6 120 kt nukes go off
in NYC, LA, DC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. (Hezbollah, Al Qaida,
etc. have "won".) The investment, banking, and fed gov
systems go into paralysis. No banks open, no stock markets,
no commodity markets. No way to maintain the electrical
grids, because of no way to pay the workers and suppliers.
No way to restart the financial markets, because most of the
leadership and workers in NYC are dead, and the buildings
are in ruins, and the financial infrastructure won't be
rebuilt for years, if ever. Then what's left of the fed gov
(most of the leadership already being dead) starts
distributing the billions (or is it trillions?) of dollars
in paper money they have stored up for just such an
emergency. Then the worker bees in places like Denver and
San Jose figure out that they aren't going to get paid, and
if they do get paid, it will be in money that is losing its
value faster than a 1923 German Mark. Then you go to your
standard rioting, looting, killing, and general collapse of
society. Millions of dead bodies start piling up, and the
population of the U.S. is rapidly heading towards half or
less of what it was a couple of months before. State and
local governments start devolving from fed gov control and
issue their own currencies, which don't hold their value
either. Local warlords start... well, you get the idea.
I'm not suggesting that is likely, or even the most likely
result of that nuclear attack scenario. What I am saying is
-- assuming that it can't possibly happen is a mistake. It
has recently happened, to lesser extents, in societies which
have suffered lesser shocks. A good example is the former
USSR, which has gone through a monetary collapse, a severe
population decline (the life expectancy is now only about
60), a social collapse, with alcoholism becoming even a
bigger problem (contributing to that life expectancy
decrease) and with millions of pensioners becoming
impoverished as their state pensions' values evaporated
along with the value of the ruble. And all they had to
shock them was an inefficient social/economic system, a
failed war in Afghanistan, and a nuclear power plant
disaster. Extrapolate the results from my 5 or 6 nukes
scenario, and you easily get to a near-total societal
collapse. For fictional depictions, see: The Postman, Road
Warrior, etc.
It wouldn't be like the transition from buggy whips to Model
Ts. It would be a transition from the complex, highly
ordered Information Society to a chaotic world of scarcity,
destruction, and death. Another poster summed it up
succinctly in another thread -- no cops.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:32:34 +0100, Steve Taylor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>R. Lander wrote:
>
>> That has nothing to do with the fact that human overpopulation is
>> outstripping forests' ability to renew themselves.
>
>Except in Russia, where the growth of forests has been enormous over the
>last few years.
The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
land now than in 1900.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:09:55 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
>>>concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
>>>real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
>>>icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
>>
>>That is, they're all candidates for the "B Ark"... ;)
>
>?
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
The working people and scientists put all of the marketing people,
telephone sanitizers and their ilk on the "B Ark", because "a
catastrophy was going to destroy the planet", and launched them all
out into space... (and the remaining 2/3 of the population stayed on
the planet, because no such disaster was imminent ;)
Retief
Private wrote:
> Self sufficiency is an attitude and a lifestyle which cannot be
explained to
> people who do not share similar feelings.
I have to smile when I see somebody, not necessarily "Private" above,
spouting off about being self sufficient while living on land as has
happened with this thread.
Really want to see if you can be self sufficient?
Become a cruising sailor, actually a single handed cruising sailor.
Get a decent sail boat, say about a 30 ft sloop, depart from somewhere
here along the left coast and set sail for say, someplace like Fiji or
even Australia.
You'll be by yourself, out of sight of land, for 30+ days, if you are
lucky.
If not lucky, add another 10-20 days sailing time.
No 911, no cell phone, no hardware stores, no towing service.
There are no gas stations at sea.
Good thing, you won't need one anyway.
There will probably be some rather nasty weather along the way.
Weather forecasts beyond 48 hours start to get iffy.
15 minute cat naps are the best you will get while underway.
If you are not careful, you can hallucinate.
It is what that is between your ears that will bring you safely to the
next port.
Lew
"R. Lander" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> lost to population growth in most places. They plant tree farms at
> higher density and try to call it "more acreage."
And also, what kind of acreage is it? Old growth trees of hundreds of years
ago, certainly don't measure up to what is grown today. Same acreage maybe,
but certainly not same quality, durability or foliage.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:25:08 -0400, "Never_Enough_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Kudos for going the legal route....As a remodeling contractor, I have to
>play by the rules as well. However, I am curious as to how you felt when all
>was done. Did you get your moneys worth for all those permits??? Were the
>inspectors helpful or a PITA ???
>
>I have seen em all ranging from the electrical inspector who spent more time
>finding a place for the Passed Sticker than he did looking at the wiring (he
>was there about 15 sec.)
>
>Had another one walk thru the door and ask "who's gonna take the heat....??"
>I think he was kinda pissed afterwards when he found nothing wrong.....
>
>I'll bet these two guys have no tools in their garages...
>
>I have also worked with plenty of inspectors who know their stuff AND are
>nice and helpful with any questions. These are the guys who don't have the
>Power Trip Ego thing goin....Cause they don't need to prove themselves when
>the knowledge is apparent.
>
>Anyone else care to comment ???
It's about 90/10 as far as I can tell when I do homeowner or small
contractor remodeling. 90% of the inspectors are great- they give you
very little trouble, and are more than willing to help find
workarounds for specific code issues if you want to do something a
little unorthadox. The other 10% could kill you with a look, but I've
found that in most of those cases, the homeowner had previously
contacted them before I ever came into the picture, and did something
to really irritate the guy. (Missing scheduled appointments, doing
other work without permits, etc.)
Retief wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>>> really needed to?
>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else do it.
>
> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>
> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>
> Retief
How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:57:09 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
(snips)
>Societal collapse is a macro-scale event. What happens to individuals
>within that society are micro-level events. Individuals win and lose all
>the time, even in a thriving society. Whole groups have been caused to
>suffer many times by rapid changes within a complex society, yet the society
>as a whole endures.
Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
immune.
>It sucked to be a technology worker during the dot-com bust or an
>aeronautical engineer when we retreated from manned space exploration. It
>also sucked to be a buggy whip maker during the advent of the automobile.
I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>today?
By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
world is the ability to manipulate symbols (known also as
the Symbolic Economy -- spreadsheets, databases, web pages,
data entry, reading and writing reports, politicking,
entertainment, lawyering, etc.).
A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
Fun, huh???
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:29:31 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> (snips)
>>
>> >> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
>> >> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
>> >
>> >Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
>> >collapse mean to you?
>> >
>> >Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a bang,
>> >over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent to
>> >many who are living through it.
>>
>> That's possible, and most likely. But...
>>
>> I can give you another scenario: 5 or 6 120 kt nukes go off
>> in NYC, LA, DC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. (Hezbollah, Al Qaida,
>> etc. have "won".) The investment, banking, and fed gov
>> systems go into paralysis.
>
>All of which is backed up, off site, routinely, at least as to the more
>important stuff, and all of which tends to have a rather extensive paper
>trail (an auditing requirement), allowing fairly easy restoration in many
>cases.
You are ignoring the psychological shock inflicted on the
survivors which might cause them to re-examine, and then
discard, the underlying assumptions propping up the existing
socio-economic system. For example, exactly from whom would
they take direction if almost all the leadership of the
Federal Government, Wall Street, et al., are killed within a
half hour? Given that the currency is based solely on the
faith and credit of the United States, and not any real
assets or values at all, and that the Federal Government is
suddenly decapitated (actually, worse than merely
decapitated), why do you suppose things would just go on --
business as usual? Run the backups, get out the paper
records, find the Secretary of Agriculture and swear him in
-- he happened to be in Iowa at time -- and everything will
get back on track in a day or two? The geezers will still
get their SS checks, the welfare checks will still go out as
usual (I know -- the EBT cards will be refilled), people
will still dutifully file their 1040s, the money will still
be as valuable as it was, or even half as valuable as it
was? Assuming that seems to me to be overly optimistic.
The economic shocks from 9/11 cost the U.S. economy hundreds
of billions of dollars, and that was trivial compared to a
multi-city nuclear attack.
I'm sure you're right in that a good faith effort would be
made to maintain something close to the status quo ante, but
I doubt it could be done.
(rest snipped)
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
Jeff McCann wrote:
> It really is hard to say, but I do know quite alot from direct personal
> observation about how people react when their lives are totally disrupted,
> homes and jobs completely gone, communities devastated, loved ones missing,
> hurt or killed, little or no news from outside, etc. I'm willing to rely
> more than you appear to be on the basic resiliency of the American character
> in the face of adversity, as well as in the basic robustness of our social,
> economic and political systems.
That's true for any people, look at the way we (I'm English) reacted to
Germany's bombings of London and other major cities, or how we reacted
when the IRA destroyed the centre of my city (Manchester), or when our
home grown Islamists butchered people in the subways of London.
Everyone adapts, and very quickly.
Steve
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:54:11 GMT, Lobby Dosser
<[email protected]> wrote:
>"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:_tOBg.7403$7m5.2775@trnddc05...
>>> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
>>> > technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you
>>> > think anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still
>>> > alive to see those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a very
>>> > long time indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It didn't
>>> > suddenly collapse within a portion of a single lifetime, like, say,
>>> > the Incan Empire.
>>>
>>> The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both
>>> collapsed
>> in
>>> a lifetime.
>>
>> No, they were not technologically advanced. They had some skill at
>> celestial observation, and a very rich culture, but they barely even
>> used the wheel or any other form of technology more advanced than that
>> commonly found in the Western world of thousands of years ago.
>>
>
>Their agriculture was extremely well advanced and both controlled watr to
>their benefit. Both lived in areas which could not support their
>populations without intesive agriculture. They lived on the edge. A decade
>or two of drought put them over the edge.
>
>We live Over the edge in our use fossil fuels. Imagine our suppliers
>cutting us off. 100% of the food eaten by the average American is fossil
>fuel based. From putting it into the ground, growing it, harvesting it, to
>getting it to the table. Now cut the availability of oil by 60%.
Yep. Even chicken is getting to be out of reach in my household
unless we buy whole livestock and butcher locally- and that's just
with a increase in gas prices, not a shortage.
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:26:33 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>It's my job. One thing I have learned is that our
>society's coping mechanisms are quite robust.
=================================
In academic terms this is called an error of composition.
Society is not a monolith, and is becoming less so all the time.
Some segments of society and areas of the country may well be
able to "cope," but these will *NOT* be the same for all
problems. It is well to remember in this context "cope" does not
mean a continuation of the current soccer-mom "high conspicuous
consumption / air conditioned" life-style to which they are
accustomed, but rather survival as in "staying alive."
Historically, there were two successive and compounding errors
that produced national disasters on this scale.
#1 the failure to accurately and timely identify the problem(s);
and
#2 was the incorrect identification of the causes (there may well
be several).
Minority groups have always been popular scape goats, but
ignoring the moral factors, punitive actions / pogroms have
never cured anything, and have generally made the problems worse
by diverting time/effort/attention away from the real
problems/causes.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
Lobby Dosser wrote:
> Prometheus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:54:11 GMT, Lobby Dosser
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:_tOBg.7403$7m5.2775@trnddc05...
>>>>> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
>>>>> > technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you
>>>>> > think anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still
>>>>> > alive to see those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a
>>>>> > very long time indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It
>>>>> > didn't suddenly collapse within a portion of a single lifetime,
>>>>> > like, say, the Incan Empire.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both
>>>>> collapsed
>>>> in
>>>>> a lifetime.
>>>>
>>>> No, they were not technologically advanced. They had some skill at
>>>> celestial observation, and a very rich culture, but they barely even
>>>> used the wheel or any other form of technology more advanced than
>>>> that commonly found in the Western world of thousands of years ago.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Their agriculture was extremely well advanced and both controlled watr
>>>to their benefit. Both lived in areas which could not support their
>>>populations without intesive agriculture. They lived on the edge. A
>>>decade or two of drought put them over the edge.
>>>
>>>We live Over the edge in our use fossil fuels. Imagine our suppliers
>>>cutting us off. 100% of the food eaten by the average American is
>>>fossil fuel based. From putting it into the ground, growing it,
>>>harvesting it, to getting it to the table. Now cut the availability of
>>>oil by 60%.
>>
>> Yep. Even chicken is getting to be out of reach in my household
>> unless we buy whole livestock and butcher locally- and that's just
>> with a increase in gas prices, not a shortage.
>>
>
> And the rationing that goes with it. Lots of folks around now who don't
> remember those halcyon days of 1972.
That was mostly politicians in Doing Something mode. I doubt that there was
any real effect on gasoline consumption.
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
Prometheus <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:54:11 GMT, Lobby Dosser
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:_tOBg.7403$7m5.2775@trnddc05...
>>>> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
>>>> > technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you
>>>> > think anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still
>>>> > alive to see those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a
>>>> > very long time indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It
>>>> > didn't suddenly collapse within a portion of a single lifetime,
>>>> > like, say, the Incan Empire.
>>>>
>>>> The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both
>>>> collapsed
>>> in
>>>> a lifetime.
>>>
>>> No, they were not technologically advanced. They had some skill at
>>> celestial observation, and a very rich culture, but they barely even
>>> used the wheel or any other form of technology more advanced than
>>> that commonly found in the Western world of thousands of years ago.
>>>
>>
>>Their agriculture was extremely well advanced and both controlled watr
>>to their benefit. Both lived in areas which could not support their
>>populations without intesive agriculture. They lived on the edge. A
>>decade or two of drought put them over the edge.
>>
>>We live Over the edge in our use fossil fuels. Imagine our suppliers
>>cutting us off. 100% of the food eaten by the average American is
>>fossil fuel based. From putting it into the ground, growing it,
>>harvesting it, to getting it to the table. Now cut the availability of
>>oil by 60%.
>
> Yep. Even chicken is getting to be out of reach in my household
> unless we buy whole livestock and butcher locally- and that's just
> with a increase in gas prices, not a shortage.
>
And the rationing that goes with it. Lots of folks around now who don't
remember those halcyon days of 1972.
"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:29:31 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> (snips)
> >>
> >> >> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
> >> >> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
> >> >
> >> >Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
> >> >collapse mean to you?
> >> >
> >> >Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a
bang,
> >> >over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent
to
> >> >many who are living through it.
> >>
> >> That's possible, and most likely. But...
> >>
> >> I can give you another scenario: 5 or 6 120 kt nukes go off
> >> in NYC, LA, DC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. (Hezbollah, Al Qaida,
> >> etc. have "won".) The investment, banking, and fed gov
> >> systems go into paralysis.
> >
> >All of which is backed up, off site, routinely, at least as to the more
> >important stuff, and all of which tends to have a rather extensive paper
> >trail (an auditing requirement), allowing fairly easy restoration in many
> >cases.
>
> You are ignoring the psychological shock inflicted on the
> survivors which might cause them to re-examine, and then
> discard, the underlying assumptions propping up the existing
> socio-economic system. For example, exactly from whom would
> they take direction if almost all the leadership of the
> Federal Government, Wall Street, et al., are killed within a
> half hour? Given that the currency is based solely on the
> faith and credit of the United States, and not any real
> assets or values at all, and that the Federal Government is
> suddenly decapitated (actually, worse than merely
> decapitated), why do you suppose things would just go on --
> business as usual? Run the backups, get out the paper
> records, find the Secretary of Agriculture and swear him in
> -- he happened to be in Iowa at time -- and everything will
> get back on track in a day or two? The geezers will still
> get their SS checks, the welfare checks will still go out as
> usual (I know -- the EBT cards will be refilled), people
> will still dutifully file their 1040s, the money will still
> be as valuable as it was, or even half as valuable as it
> was? Assuming that seems to me to be overly optimistic.
> The economic shocks from 9/11 cost the U.S. economy hundreds
> of billions of dollars, and that was trivial compared to a
> multi-city nuclear attack.
>
> I'm sure you're right in that a good faith effort would be
> made to maintain something close to the status quo ante, but
> I doubt it could be done.
It really is hard to say, but I do know quite alot from direct personal
observation about how people react when their lives are totally disrupted,
homes and jobs completely gone, communities devastated, loved ones missing,
hurt or killed, little or no news from outside, etc. I'm willing to rely
more than you appear to be on the basic resiliency of the American character
in the face of adversity, as well as in the basic robustness of our social,
economic and political systems.
As for the large scale economic losses, we've been down that road before,
and not just in the Great Depression of the 1930s. Prosperity isn't just
centered on Wall Street, it's built on Main Street, as well. There's a lot
of fat and fluff in the American economy and lifestyle, and most people can
manage to do with far less than they think, and they can rebuild and
overcome faster than they think, too. Crises have a way of evolving into
new opportunities. It's would suck big-time, to be sure, but it wouldn't
suck forever.
And no, I don't think "everything will get back on track in a day or two,"
but I do think most things will get back on track eventually, in many cases
faster than you think. Some things will, indeed, change or be lost forever.
But a new "normal" will soon be established, perhaps different than status
quo ante, but not all that different.
Jeff
On 7 Aug 2006 12:05:54 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>"And all they had to shock them was an inefficient social/economic
>system, a
>failed war in Afghanistan, and a nuclear power plant disaster."
>
>Robert, you missed the BIG one.. the Cold War arms race caused them to
>spend their society into the ground.
Yes, but that spending went on for 44 years, as did their
WWII spending for 4 years before that. But yes, you are
right that it did help ruin them.
>Now consider where the United States (Republican) budget deficit stands
>at this moment and ask yourself how close we are to the same situation.
>
>A heck of a lot closer than we were in 2000.
Yes we are. And we will be even closer 10 years from now,
regardless of which party wins. Both parties favor ever
increasing spending. The only difference is in what they
want to spend the money on.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
"F. George McDuffee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:26:33 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >It's my job. One thing I have learned is that our
> >society's coping mechanisms are quite robust.
> =================================
> In academic terms this is called an error of composition.
> Society is not a monolith, and is becoming less so all the time.
Do follow along. My point is that primitive societies tend to be more
monolithic than more technologically advanced ones. This makes them more
vulnerable to sudden collapse from a single or cluster of just a few
factors, internal or external.
> Some segments of society and areas of the country may well be
> able to "cope," but these will *NOT* be the same for all
> problems. It is well to remember in this context "cope" does not
> mean a continuation of the current soccer-mom "high conspicuous
> consumption / air conditioned" life-style to which they are
> accustomed, but rather survival as in "staying alive."
Very good. Now, see if you can figure out what types of societies are best
equipped to make major adjustments to drastically changed circumstances.
> Historically, there were two successive and compounding errors
> that produced national disasters on this scale.
>
> #1 the failure to accurately and timely identify the problem(s);
> and
> #2 was the incorrect identification of the causes (there may well
> be several).
And #3, resistance to, or inability to, make the necessary adaptations,
often led by those who are profiteering off the collapse or the conditions
leading to it. Sound familiar?
> Minority groups have always been popular scape goats, but
> ignoring the moral factors, punitive actions / pogroms have
> never cured anything, and have generally made the problems worse
> by diverting time/effort/attention away from the real
> problems/causes.
Yep.
Jeff
On 9 Aug 2006 18:36:24 -0700, [email protected]
wrote:
>
>pipedope wrote:
>> Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>>
>> > The same is true of the U.S., where we have more forested
>> > land now than in 1900.
>>
>> But how does it compare to, say, 1400?
>
>You tell us...
>
>> On top of that how much is actual forest and how much is mono culture
>> tree farm land.
>>
>> michael
>
>You have a problem with trees being replanted for future cuts?
If he gets to define the terms any way he likes, he can
prove anything -- anything at all.
Forests are forests, regardless of whether they are tree
farms or "virgin" forests.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:49:02 GMT, Trevor Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I have three vehicles right now. The low mileage one is my wifes car,
>250 thousand kilometers, my car has 394 thousand, and my new truck has
>341 thousand.
> I just gave away a truck that had 425 thousand Km's on it. I put most
>of them there. It passed a safety check a couple years back.
My daily driver...94 Mazda B3000/Ford Ranger has 421,000 MILES on it.
I just hauled home a 800lb air compressor and next weekend..a 2000 lb
milling machine
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:34:47 -0400, LiRM <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
>>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>
>>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>>today?
>>
>>TMT
>
>I grew up around an uncle who literally rebuilt his entire house.
My father literally built his house -- cement work,
plumbing, framing, siding, wiring, roofing, everything. I
am somewhat embarrassed that I will probably hire my roof
replaced. It comes down to 2 factors: he HAD to (no money);
and I don't want to. I'm sure I could redo the roof if I
really needed to. I used to do stuff like that all the
time. Now I'm lazy (and old) -- and I want it done right,
not cheaply.
(rest snipped)
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:%[email protected]...
>
> ">
> I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a society
> options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess and remediate
> problems.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Yeah, that is not working out so well with the residence of New Orleans.
The storm did little damage but the few broken levies which did the most
damage are still a threat. This is not the first city to be pounded by a
hurricane but probably one of the few where the residence simply sit back
blame the governmant.
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:40:15 -0400, Jeff Wisnia <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> Anyone that likes to live in a controlled enviorment gets what they
>> deserve.
>>
>> You have to get approval to do just about anything around your house.
>> You even need a fart licence or they lock you up.
>>
>> John
>
>They sure do sound like my idea of hell.
>
>I've always held the opinion that my property rights extend as far as my
>property line and my neighbors should be free to do anything that's
>legal they want to their property as long as it doesn't create an
>imminent danger or an audible, foul odored or a physical intrusion over
>the property line.
LITTLE BOXES
Little boxes on the hillside, little boxes made of ticky tacky.
Little boxes on the hillside, little boxes all the same.
There's a pink one and a green one and a blue one and a yellow one,
And they're all made out of ticky tacky, and they all look just the
same.
And the people in the houses all went to the university
Where they were put in boxes, and they came out all the same.
And there's doctors and there's lawyers, and business executives
And they're all made out of ticky tacky and they all look just the same.
And they all play on the golf course and drink their martinis dry,
And they all have pretty children and the children go to school.
And the children go to summer camp and then to the university
Where they are put in boxes and they come out all the same.
And the boys go into business and marry and raise a family
In boxes made of ticky tacky and they all look just the same.
Theres a pink one and a green one and a blue one and a yellow one,
And they're all made out of ticky tacky and they all look just the same.
Pete Seeger
*******************************
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On 5 Aug 2006 19:50:25 -0700, "steve" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> you get the idea...
>
>caused some of those skills are rarely needed, I rarely get any flats
>anymore, haven't had one in ten years, I used to get them at least once
>a year 25 years ago.
>
>TV's can't be repaired
>
>now it's cheaper to buy a new lawnmower then to fix one (due to China
>the price of a new one is less now then 25 years ago, and our income
>has gone way up, the cost of parts, however, has stayed the same)
>
When I hear or read comments like these, a little shiver hits me. My dad
tells the story of how Dad's grandfather (an increasingly successful farmer
in Eastern Colorado) once told Dad's grandmother that she didn't need to
patch overalls anymore, it was cheaper and more efficient to buy new ones.
That was in the late 1920's; we all know what happened in the 1930's --
especially in the dustbowl areas.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:05:11 GMT, Lew Hodgett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Trevor Jones wrote:
>
> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple
>set of
> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
> > roadside.
>
><snip>
>
>Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>
>If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
>car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
>unit.
Don't know where you live but I've never heard of that anywhere.
>
>Want to change your oil?
>
>6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
Most vehicles take 4 quarts. Cost for those and a filter about 12
bucks on sale. Cost at the quick change places about $25. There are
no corner gas stations that change oil around here.
I always do at least two cars at a time, takes about thirty minutes
total, at that rate I figure I make about $52 per hour spent. An ok
part time endeavour, and I know it is done right.
The place where I buy my oil takes the old for nothing. National
chains. Advance, Autozone, O'reillys, etc all do it here. I drop off
the old when I buy the new.
>
>Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>
>Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>
>Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
>being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
City will take it. no charge. Encourage you not to send it down the
sewer.
>
>The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
>tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
Special tools? I maintain four vehicles in my family and the only
tools needed are a plug socket, extension, swivel and a rachet.
Those transverse V6 engines offer a challenge for the back plugs but
can be done.
>
>Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
>even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
My four vehicles currently average 140K. I do almost all the work on
them.
>
>Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track
>record for the first 75,000 miles.
>
>Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
The only issue today is having to buy an OBD II scan tool. But even
those are not terribly expensive, and all the parts stores have them
to use if you can get the vehicle to the store. May loan them out.
>
>Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>that's another matter<G>.
Well, never have done that with a diesel, but I kept an old Universal
Atomic Four going for about 16 years in my last sailboat. Talk about
a simple engine.
>
However, in the spirit of the original post, my sons do very little,
and I don't know why they never took to it.
>Lew
"grappletech" wrote in message
> this too, and they're even more pathetic! My brother's former brother-in-
> law (late 20's) burned up the engine in a 1 year old Honda Civic by not
> caring about the oil. His father, even more stupid than he was, went out
> and bought the dude a brand new Acura Integra! More money thna brains.
Results of f(*&king with mother nature's survival of the fittest ... the
stupid beget stupid and pretty soon that's all you got. Just look around you
on the freeway.
--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 8/10/06
In article <[email protected]>,
"Morris Dovey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> John Husvar (in
> [email protected]) said:
>
> | With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple
>
> Are your sure that you really want to continue this subthread?
>
Hi, Morris.
I really don't see why it'd be a problem.
The terrorists are fanatical, not stupid. :)
They've probably thought of many or most of these scenarios on their
own. The real problem is determining _which_ scenario they'll try to
pull off _when_. That they'll try one or another or something no one has
thought of is almost certain.
I suspect more than ignoring the field guys' notes about people taking
flying lessons but not being interested in landings, the FBI, etc. said
something like: "Are you kidding? No fucking way! Jeez, get a grip, you
guys!"
99.9% of the time they'd be right: We just got that .01% on 9/11.
Seems to me, when thinking about people whose fondest wish is to die for
Allah, thinking of ways they might do it is more productive than
otherwise.
Whether they read newsgroups or not, they're likely planning all sorts
of nasty little surprises -- and probably a few really big ones.
Fact of life anymore: They're here. They're weird. We have to deal with
it.
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
>
> a dozen Islamic Jihadists and less than 1000 lbs of explosives could
> shut down the Northeast and the Northwest in less than a day..and keep
> them shut down for at least a month or longer
>
> Gunner
>
Always knew you were a closet incurable optimist. :)
With a little study and planning, they could do it with a couple hundred
feet of 1/4-inch link chain -- thrown across just the right busses. Some
of the bigger substation transformers are virtually irreplaceable. Get
some arcing started and the disconnects won't be able to break their
circuits before the transformers are scrap.
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
"Never_Enough_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have seen em all ranging from the electrical inspector who spent more time
> finding a place for the Passed Sticker than he did looking at the wiring (he
> was there about 15 sec.)
>
> Had another one walk thru the door and ask "who's gonna take the heat....??"
> I think he was kinda pissed afterwards when he found nothing wrong.....
>
> I'll bet these two guys have no tools in their garages...
>
> I have also worked with plenty of inspectors who know their stuff AND are
> nice and helpful with any questions. These are the guys who don't have the
> Power Trip Ego thing goin....Cause they don't need to prove themselves when
> the knowledge is apparent.
>
> Anyone else care to comment ???
>
> Jeff
A good relationship with a good inspector is one of the best helps a
contractor can have.
When I held my electrician license, Old Al, one of the county inspectors
I dealt with, often suggested different approaches to jobs than my
proposed plans. He was seldom wrong and always very conscientious. If he
did find something wrong, he'd make sure to mark it or reference it
clearly so I could find and fix it easily.
It's a lot easier to correct a problem when the inspector leaves a note
like: "3rd receptacle from door on the sink side no ground. Fix it and
call me. I'll pass the job so you can get paid."
He'd better never go back and find you hadn't fixed it, though. No way
you'd ever do another job in that county in one try thereafter. He got
out his microscope then and would even measure staple placement on a
rough-in or exactly how much ground rod was sticking out of the dirt.
Couple of fellows found that out the hard way.:)
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
Lew Hodgett <[email protected]> wrote:
> John Husvar wrote:
>
> > And for the organ meat crowd: Smithville Restaurant in Smithville, OH,
> > not far from here, makes a serving of seasoned, breaded, deep fried
> > chicken livers that melts in your mouth and tastes like heaven on a
> > fork. At least they do if they're still in business.
>
> You mean that place is still in business?
Far as I know, but I haven't been there in a few years either.
>
> I knew it as "The Smithville Inn", home of the chicken dinner, served
> family style.
You're correct. I misremembered.
>
> Amish country is less than 10 miles away, so you can guess what the
> quality and taste of the food is/was.
Oh, yeah! :)
>
> Haven't been in the place since 1955.
>
> Lew
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
John <[email protected]> wrote:
> A 150 square foot
> > house, and a 3000 square foot shop. he told me that i would NEVER find
> > it in Florida, because no one wanted a workshop. He was wrong. I found
> > a home with a 30' * 40" garage, a 18' * 28' storage building, a 12' *
> > 12' "Workshop", a 12' * 12' laundry building, a 12' * 24" one bedroom
> > cottage, and a three bedroom home with a large family room and a small
> > library.
> >
> > All for under 40K, and it should be paid off in a few more years. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
> > prove it.
> > Member of DAV #85.
> >
> > Michael A. Terrell
> > Central Florida
>
> A friend of mine found a nice place with a work shop.... An old chicken
> farm. 5 buildings 60 feet wide by 150 feet long with good roofs, and
> construction, with a nice house. Total cost was 200K. Oh I forgot, 14
> acres of land too. This was in lower NY state.
>
> John
Brings to mind a place that went up for sale around here about 15-20
years ago: 10 acres on a corner, 4BR ranch house, two-story workshop
with loading dock and crane, three other concrete block outbuildings,
all heated, free gas from well on property. Previous owner was a
contractor of some sort.
Few bid on it. The realtor said because the owner had committed suicide
and there were silly rumors about it being haunted.
I told a blacksmithing colleague in Ft. Wayne, Indiana about it. His
comment: Haunted? So what? If there's a ghost there, the sonofabitch
better have a hammer in his hand during working hours! What he does
after that is his problem long as he doesn't disturb my sleep.
Place finally went for ~60,000, about half or less what it should have
brought. Same nice folks are still there and haven't said anything about
being bothered by ghosts.
They do have a tendency to consume a fair amount of spirits on weekends
however.
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
Mark Trudgill <[email protected]> wrote:
> The message <[email protected]>
> from John Husvar <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > Mark Trudgill <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > > Those I used to butcher as beef and bone them out as if not you'd end up
> > > with pork chops nearly 2" thick and weighing about 40oz each!!
>
> > Ummmm.
>
> > Pray tell: What is the downside here. :)
>
> > John, lover of _thick_ pork chops; seared, then slow grilled.
>
> The thing is you and I may be greedy bastards, and my do they eat well.
Yes we may and that they do. Guilty as charged!:)
> But the wife and kids couldn't eat one of these in a month of sundays so
> you end up throwing most of it away!!
's OK, I'll handle the leftovers. :)
Cholesterol on the hoof, but what a way to go!
And for the organ meat crowd: Smithville Restaurant in Smithville, OH,
not far from here, makes a serving of seasoned, breaded, deep fried
chicken livers that melts in your mouth and tastes like heaven on a
fork. At least they do if they're still in business.
Coronary Artery Disease on the hoof -- or wing as the case may be --
but, again, what a way to go! :)
That was one place one could go and suddenly realize that every stick of
wood in the building was American Chestnut, wall paneling included. The
doorjambs, window sashes and frames were probably worth than my whole
house. :)
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
In article <[email protected]>,
Mark Trudgill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Those I used to butcher as beef and bone them out as if not you'd end up
> with pork chops nearly 2" thick and weighing about 40oz each!!
Ummmm.
Pray tell: What is the downside here. :)
John, lover of _thick_ pork chops; seared, then slow grilled.
--
Bring back, Oh bring back
Oh, bring back that old continuity.
Bring back, oh, bring back
Oh, bring back Clerk Maxwell to me.
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:20:21 GMT, "CW" <[email protected]> wrote:
>A little background. I'm the foreman of a small machine shop. Business has
>been picking up greatly and we are in need of machinists. We are having very
>little luck in finding qualified people and when we find someone that seems
>promising, it generally turns out that they are no more than a machine
>operator. Able to set up and operate a CNC (usually a vertical mill) but no
>more, nor do they want to do more. We have gotten to the point of training
>people into the position. We have gone through a number of them. Many, when
>they find out that it is real work and they can't just stop thinking and
>show up to work on autopilot after a month or two, either quit or become
>worthless to the point that they get fired. We have two trainees in the shop
>right now. One is female (extremely rare in this trade). She never made it
>through high school but has a GED. I'm finding that she has a great learning
>ability and enthusiasm. It is quite obvious that her problems in school were
>due to boredom. To get her math skills up to par, I have been giving her
>homework. She has been doing quite well now that she sees a need. To bad
>someone couldn't have instilled a real world need in her in school. She'd be
>that much further ahead. The other trainee, a male, just out of high school,
>made a comment the other day that really struck me. He said "I took
>trigonometry for two years and thought it would never be good for anything.
>Then, the first job I get, I need it".
Im a CNC machine tool repair guy. I front for a couple manufactures, do
repair of their machines, do infrastructure repair (air/electical etc
etc) and there are two types of "machinist".
1. Actually involved in setting up and performing operations, able to do
design and determine if the machine is optimal etc etc
2. Button pushers. Somone who loads parts, pushes a button, takes
measurements, maybe changes offsets, but basically a human parts loader.
#1 is very very hard to find
#2 is very very easy to find, and in Southern California..is nearly 50%
female, with many learning to be rated in Catagory #1
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:03:44 -0500, F. George McDuffee
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:52:56 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Sometimes it doesn't. At the height of the Roman Empire,
>>Rome had a population of around 1,000,000. By the late
>>Middle Ages, that was down to less than 10,000, and wolves
>>were roaming the streets. Various other societies have gone
>>through collapses that were as bad, if not worse. Contrary
>>to what we like to think, things can, in fact, go Very
>>Badly. There is no reason to suppose that we are somehow
>>immune.
>========================
>This was addressed at some length in my dissertation in Appendix
>A -- THE LINEAR AND ACCRETION MODELS OF ECONOMIC EVOLUTION
<<< Snip >>>
Thers is also a good deal of lasting value in The Republic of Plato,
Book VIII, 562a-569c, where he deals with the methods by which a
democracy devolves into tyrannical rule. There is little doubt that
any number of people will yell that Plato lived too long ago for his
work to be relevant to our society, but the preceeding section dealing
with the transistion from oligarchy to democracy is a fine description
of the change from colonial times to our current society, and grants
the argument cited above more than a little credibility when viewed
through that lens.
The overall argument of this thread seems to be focused on some type
of TSHTF (I like that acronym, btw) event or events that would toss us
back into the stone age- but that is not necessarily the most likely
or most dangerous situation that our society could face. I agree with
the nub of the argument that men need to remember the means and
methods by which we have built our modern world, but to my mind it is
more important that those things be remembered so that we do not end
up with a thousand years of darkness similar to Europe following the
fall of the Roman empire. Rome had a high standard of living as well,
and had the people at large retained the knowledge used to build that
emipre, they could very well have lived in comfort rather than being
cowed by the church and left to cower in hovels because they had spent
too much time watching the reality TV of gladitorial combat and
overspecializing.
Yeah, I know- some other fella called me a nutjob over this not too
long ago on this list, but it's happened before, it'll happen again.
Nothing much new under the sun, after all.
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> > the world we live in.
> <snip>
>
> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
> specialized equipment.
>
> Few doctors make house calls any more.
>
> Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
> most places where people live these days.
>
> Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
> society keep changing.
>
> Think the process is called "life".
>
> Lew
>
Lew, I'll call BS on the "impossible to work on cars without
specialized equipment"
It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set
of hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you
or anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
roadside.
Those are the stuff that make the bread and butter money for the
dealers. They are also the things that the average driver should be
quite able to recognize while they are starting to fail, too.
Even simple stuff like changing a flat seems to stump people these days.
Advanced diagnostics on the emissions control stuff is only a little
more difficult, now that most manufacturers are using somewhat
standardized on board diagnostics (OBD)in the computers. A simple code
reader and reset tool can be got for way less than $100, and you can get
a very nice diagnostic tool for less than the price of a set of good
tires. Most OBD systems allow you to read the codes without tools, if
you know how (hint: the manuals usually list the codes and tell how to
get them)
Specialization is for insects!
Cheers
Trevor Jones
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:51:40 -0400, Joe Gorman <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Trevor Jones wrote:
>> digitalmaster wrote:
>>>> Specialization is for insects!
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert Heinlen I beleive.
>>>
>> I beleive so. Part of a long winded rant about all the things a person
>> should be able to do or at least be willing to try, given the opportunity.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Trevor Jones
>>
>Someone thought rather a lot of that 'rant'
>http://specializationisforinsects.com/
>Joe
I, and quite a number of others have printed this out over the years
and have it framed on my wall at home.
Gunner
"If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third
hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're
around."
"Democrat. In the dictionary it's right after demobilize and right
before demode` (out of fashion).
-Buddy Jordan 2001
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Many did, others didn't. Many an extension cord snaked it's way over a
> neighbor's fence. Life went on. We improvised, adapted and overcame. It
> was rougher for some than for others, but the local economy is booming,
> tax
> coffers are swelling, and local unemployment is below 3%.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Now consider yourself being without fuel for 3 or 4 months or much longer.
You merely made best of a minor inconvenience. If real trouble came that
shut down fuel production for months you too would soon feel the effects.
"Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:13:55 -0500, "Jeff McCann"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (snips)
>
> >> I'm not talking about going through an economic shift, but
> >> an economic/societal collapse. Different story...
> >
> >Time to define our terms, I think. So, what does an economic/societal
> >collapse mean to you?
> >
> >Personally, I expect American society to die with a whimper, not a bang,
> >over a span of many generations, in a way that is not readily apparent to
> >many who are living through it.
>
> That's possible, and most likely. But...
>
> I can give you another scenario: 5 or 6 120 kt nukes go off
> in NYC, LA, DC, Chicago, Seattle, etc. (Hezbollah, Al Qaida,
> etc. have "won".) The investment, banking, and fed gov
> systems go into paralysis.
All of which is backed up, off site, routinely, at least as to the more
important stuff, and all of which tends to have a rather extensive paper
trail (an auditing requirement), allowing fairly easy restoration in many
cases.
> No banks open,
The banks outside the affected zones, and even in them, may well be open
much sooner than you think. One neat innovation is portable banking centers
built on mobile trucks or vans, specifically for use in disasters. Have you
seen them? Most major banks seem to have them lately.
> no stock markets,
> no commodity markets.
Most of which have either backup arrangments or ownership interest in
various other exchanges, so that they are capable of continuing their
essential activities.
See, e.g., Disaster planning saves Wall Street, and Corporate Governance,
Business Continuity Planning, and Disaster Recovery, below, and especially:
Policy Statement:
Business Continuity Planning for Trading Markets
Securities and Exchange Commission
[Release No. 34-48545; File No. S7-17-03]
http://www.sec.gov/rules/policy/34-48545.htm
> No way to maintain the electrical
> grids, because of no way to pay the workers and suppliers.
Don't underestimate the willingness of these people to work for deferred pay
in an emergency. Also, there are interagency agreements for utility
companies to provide essential labor and expertise to each other in
emergencies.
> No way to restart the financial markets, because most of the
> leadership and workers in NYC are dead, and the buildings
> are in ruins, and the financial infrastructure won't be
> rebuilt for years, if ever.
> Then what's left of the fed gov
> (most of the leadership already being dead) starts
> distributing the billions (or is it trillions?) of dollars
> in paper money they have stored up for just such an
> emergency.
There is no reason that they need to give the money out in an inflationary
manner. They will simply exchange other obligations for cash, as necessary,
though.
> Then the worker bees in places like Denver and
> San Jose figure out that they aren't going to get paid, and
> if they do get paid, it will be in money that is losing its
> value faster than a 1923 German Mark.
Extremely unlikely that there will be that sort of currency devaluation.
> Then you go to your
> standard rioting, looting, killing, and general collapse of
> society. Millions of dead bodies start piling up, and the
> population of the U.S. is rapidly heading towards half or
> less of what it was a couple of months before. State and
> local governments start devolving from fed gov control and
> issue their own currencies, which don't hold their value
> either. Local warlords start... well, you get the idea.
There may be a series of civil disturbances, but nothing that can't be
handled. We've had that before.
> I'm not suggesting that is likely, or even the most likely
> result of that nuclear attack scenario. What I am saying is
> -- assuming that it can't possibly happen is a mistake.
True.
> It
> has recently happened, to lesser extents, in societies which
> have suffered lesser shocks. A good example is the former
> USSR, which has gone through a monetary collapse, a severe
> population decline (the life expectancy is now only about
> 60), a social collapse, with alcoholism becoming even a
> bigger problem (contributing to that life expectancy
> decrease) and with millions of pensioners becoming
> impoverished as their state pensions' values evaporated
> along with the value of the ruble.
Has the Russian society and economy actually collapsed, even with a
revolutionary change in government as well as all the other problems you
mentioned? In other words, in most places for most people, does the mail
get delivered? Do most people go to work each day and buy shelter, food and
other necessities with their earnings? Do their kids get go to school?
Does the electricity still come on when you flip a light switch? Does water
flow from the tap when you open the valve? Can decent people walk the
streets of their neighborhood without being killed and eaten by spiky haired
mutants?
> And all they had to
> shock them was an inefficient social/economic system, a
> failed war in Afghanistan, and a nuclear power plant
> disaster. Extrapolate the results from my 5 or 6 nukes
> scenario, and you easily get to a near-total societal
> collapse. For fictional depictions, see: The Postman, Road
> Warrior, etc.
> It wouldn't be like the transition from buggy whips to Model
> Ts. It would be a transition from the complex, highly
> ordered Information Society to a chaotic world of scarcity,
> destruction, and death. Another poster summed it up
> succinctly in another thread -- no cops.
To a greater or lesser degree in most places for most people. But will that
be a permanent condition, or deteriorate even further? Or will things soon
begin to get better and problems get sorted out as a recovery begins within,
say, months?
Jeff
"Trevor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:jz4Bg.155296$I61.114205@clgrps13...
> Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> > It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh
>> basic
>> > skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>> > you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>> > the world we live in.
>> <snip>
>>
>> It is impossible to work on the modern car without a lot of very
>> specialized equipment.
>>
>> Few doctors make house calls any more.
>>
>> Might find it a little difficult to raise and butcher your own hogs in
>> most places where people live these days.
>>
>> Times change, people change, the skills required to live in a modern
>> society keep changing.
>>
>> Think the process is called "life".
>>
>> Lew
>>
> Lew, I'll call BS on the "impossible to work on cars without specialized
> equipment"
>
> It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set of
> hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
> anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
> electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
> roadside.
>
> Those are the stuff that make the bread and butter money for the dealers.
> They are also the things that the average driver should be quite able to
> recognize while they are starting to fail, too.
>
> Even simple stuff like changing a flat seems to stump people these days.
>
> Advanced diagnostics on the emissions control stuff is only a little more
> difficult, now that most manufacturers are using somewhat standardized on
> board diagnostics (OBD)in the computers. A simple code reader and reset
> tool can be got for way less than $100, and you can get a very nice
> diagnostic tool for less than the price of a set of good tires. Most OBD
> systems allow you to read the codes without tools, if you know how (hint:
> the manuals usually list the codes and tell how to get them)
>
> Specialization is for insects!
Robert Heinlen I beleive.
>
> Cheers
> Trevor Jones
>
I refer to my 4 cylinder Toyota Tacoma as a Toy Taco.
John
--
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
| Frank Boettcher wrote:
|
|
| > I think it is poppycock, but I know it's not true
in Boston, Philly,
| > Houston, Tulsa, Mineapolis, Birmingham, and
anywhere else I've ever
| > lived or have relatives living. Please, you made
the claim, tell us
| > where you are restricted from working on your car.
By who, the
| > government?
|
| I'm in Southern California.
|
| City ordinance or owner(s) if it is a condo or owner
if a rental property.
|
| A lot of it depends on location.
|
| > Tonka toy? Please tell us what vehicle you have
or know of that,
| > without an extended pan, uses six quarts. I'm
curious.
|
| A 4 cyl, Toyota Tacoma pick up truck, AKA: Tonka Toy.
|
| Lew
DaddyMonkey wrote:
> PLEASE excuse me for not reading ALL of the thread in this post (It's
> now kind of long).
>
> Here in central VA (Centerville, Va) We have what is called "Field Days
> of the Past". It's like a local Fair/Carnival.
>
> Although, It DOES have a great deal of old/antique farm equipment... it
> totally blows my mind that we once, 100 years ago, had washing machines
> that were kept outside and had to be started with a pull rope (just like
> a lawnmower) because they were gasoline powered. We had rock crushers
> that turned watermellon sized stones into gravel (gas/steam powered) and
> all wicker baskets were local made (not from China at Pier1)
>
> If we go back 100 years from THAT (1806), Saw mills were just two men
> working a HUGE hand saw back and forth to saw the logs into planks.
> I even heard stories of people moving away from their houses and then
> burning- down their house, just to re-collect the nails. (They were
> expensive to produce)
> WOW!
>
> Let's push forward to today.
> What would happen if we were faced with a natural catastrophe? Could I
> hunt/fish?
> Could I build a fire? Basic shelter?
> It makes me think!
>
> Great Post!!!
> Dave
I don't now, but I have hunted and fished, I can build a fire from
scratch, I can toss together basic shelter in a rush, but if it comes
to the point we need to do something like this, even in a rural area
like mine, where do, for example, the 98,000 residents of Roanoke and
the 65,000 people in Lynchburg go to nail a deer (or turkey, or,
failing all else, a possum), grub up some branches and get a fire
going, rip the branches off cedars and pines, and dig slit trenches,
but...the sanitary arrangements alone for today's population in central
and southern and western Virginia would be a major feat that probably
cannot be accomplished without technology. The same holds true for
clean drinking water when the wells go out. My county has 754 square
miles, but also about 60,000 residents now, many of whom are true city
boys and girls who never spent day one in the military, either. They're
living their rural dream in their McMansions, but that dream of theirs
may become a nightmare for all of us, unless things keep ticking over
in the current kindly manner.
And this would probably be one of the better areas in the east, should
a catastrophe occur.
PLEASE excuse me for not reading ALL of the thread in this post (It's
now kind of long).
Here in central VA (Centerville, Va) We have what is called "Field Days
of the Past". It's like a local Fair/Carnival.
Although, It DOES have a great deal of old/antique farm equipment... it
totally blows my mind that we once, 100 years ago, had washing machines
that were kept outside and had to be started with a pull rope (just like
a lawnmower) because they were gasoline powered. We had rock crushers
that turned watermellon sized stones into gravel (gas/steam powered) and
all wicker baskets were local made (not from China at Pier1)
If we go back 100 years from THAT (1806), Saw mills were just two men
working a HUGE hand saw back and forth to saw the logs into planks.
I even heard stories of people moving away from their houses and then
burning- down their house, just to re-collect the nails. (They were
expensive to produce)
WOW!
Let's push forward to today.
What would happen if we were faced with a natural catastrophe? Could I
hunt/fish?
Could I build a fire? Basic shelter?
It makes me think!
Great Post!!!
Dave
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 11:53:16 -0500, F. George McDuffee
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
... snip
>
>In the United States most states require a minimum of 180 days
>and/or 1080 hours of student attendance per year. It should be
>obvious that as this time is now fully "booked," when additional
>"stuff" is added, something else must be dropped. With the
>imposition of "Academic Trivial Pursuit" AKA "no child left
>behind," what was imposed was instruction in the skills necessary
>to score well on standardized objective tests [bingo cards] and
>short-term rote memorization and rapid recall of "factoids."
>What is being dropped are all vocational or "shop" classes. In
>addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
>things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
>a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
>for the vocational classes.
>
While I believe that most of your premise is pretty close to on the mark,
I'm surprised that you pick no child left behind (NCLB) as your sore point.
Vocational and shop classes were being dropped long before the NCLB bill
was initiated. The standardized tests and other elements of that bill were
a response to the very real fact that children were graduating from school
who were unable to read, write, or perform basic math. Those are skills
that are fundamental, regardless of whether the person is going to college
or to a career in the trades. Some means of assuring that high school
graduates are capable of performing the most rudimentary elements of
societal activities (ability to balance a checkbook, read instructions and
ballots, etc) need to be established -- how else to do this but testing
those candidates for graduation? IMO, the real culprits in taking time
away from true education are those things identified as "crucial" by social
engineers in the education system to effect their own view of how the world
should work -- diversity education, inability to call anything "failure",
and other "classes" that spend more time worrying about emotional
adjustment of the child rather than instilling true knowledge, thinking
skills, and information into that child. We've got to get the social
engineers out of the educational system and get real educators back in. I
don't care if Johnny or Jill are emotionally "well adjusted" graduates able
to accept anyone who lives any sort of lifestyle and that Johnny knows that
as a male he is responsible for all of the oppression and ills of society
as it exists and that he must work to tear down the patriarchy and
male-oppression in this society all the while working to ban any sort of
technological advances in order to save the planet -- if neither of them
can read or do math they are going to become drains on society and
incapable of providing any sort of meaningful contribution beyond asking
"do you want fries with that?"
Please, note, I'm not defending NCLB; after Bush let Kennedy write the
bill and strip away the only portion that had any hope of saving education
in America (vouchers that would have instituted a competitive, truly
accountable educational system), I've seen no point in having the federal
government get involved in what should constitutionally be a state and
local issue.
... snip
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:26:19 -0700, Tim May
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, Robert
>Sturgeon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Steve wrote, "No, its just the workshop has changed, it can
>> live in a computer, for instance, workshops are alive and
>> well, they are just different, today's workshop can involved
>> hooking up a wireless router to a wired LAN that supports
>> Appletalk, before your time it was thatching a roof"
>>
>> A wired LAN is an artifact of the symbolic economy. It is a
>> Good Thing, right now. But if what you need is a new roof,
>> and there is no longer much demand for wireless routers,
>> LANs, Appletalk, etc., (as would be the case in a post-SHTF
>> scenario) then being able to mess with LANs and such, but
>> not roofs, leaves you out.
>>
>
>There are plenty of roofers and roofing companies in my area. When I
>needed a roof replacement several years ago, they did it in a tiny
>fraction of the time (and effort) it would have taken me to figure out
>how to do it, how to order the materials, how to fix the mistakes I
>would inevitably make, how to finish the job.
>
>Should I learn roofing now? Not hardly, as my own roof will likely not
>need patching in the decades ahead of me. And I have no desire to make
>it a career.
I didn't mean to be specific about roofing, or any other
particular skill.
>Ditto for welding, horseshoeing, logging, midwifing, and all sorts of
>other jobs which some/many think will be up-n-coming career options in
>the Post-Industrial Economy. ("You, too, can become a farrier. Just
>call 1-800-HOR-SHOE for information on our study at home course!")
>
>I expect that the "symbolic economy," as you call it, will become even
>more important after a Big Event (SHTF, TEOTWAWKI, whatever). Wireless
>networks, even over radio (and satellites, which will remain largely
>unaffected) will be used to trade options and access to things.
>
>Consider the rise of cellphones in Mogadishu after the civil war.
>
>E-Bay and services of that sort will become MORE important, not LESS
>important. Think about it. Combine online barter and sales with
>jitney-type delivery services and new payment approaches and one has a
>vibrant sub-economy.
>
>(And vehicles will still be running. This is separate subject, but
>there are many, many options for fueling. NG will not vanish, biofuels
>are readily made, and even all-electric vehicles are here....one of my
>neighbors has a large photovoltaic installation sufficient to charge up
>his fleet of vehicles....a few entrepreneurs like this, mediating
>trades via satphones and Mobile WiMax, could do quite well trading the
>already-extant supply of tools, materials, and forms of money.)
>
>Look to Hong Kong for one example, to Mogadishu for the other extreme.
>Both remain heavily "symbolic."
You could be right. I just don't see wireless routers and
such as being critical parts of the post-post-modern
economy. I hope we don't find out.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
"Edwin Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
> > Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> > is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> > today?
>
> Well my son can use the Yellow Pages and write checks. He know what a
> hammer is, but does not have the desire to find out which end does what
> functions.
>
True story:
Was visiting my aunt Prudence (that's her true name, too) and she had us all
doing errands at the mall while she bought groceries. I got to go to the
hardware store for something-or-other. I noticed a lady asking the clerk
something and as I passed by I overheard him say "Those are what we call
hammers, ma'am."
The best part was the _absolutely_ neutral tone of voice he used; give that
guy a raise.
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 07:47:01 GMT, Lobby Dosser
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a
>> society options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess
>> and remediate problems.
====================
While increasing technologies may indeed provide options,
redundancies, etc, these are of use only if people know (1) they
are available, and (2) how to use them.
While increasing societal "complexity" is a separate issue, the
rapidil accelerating decline in trust and trustworthiness is not
and it is THE critical and most problematic in the so-called
symbolic manipulation [interesting word choice] areas such as
stocks, bonds, pensions, insurance, and currency trading.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
"Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:V7hBg.2535$7m5.1154@trnddc05...
> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Robert Sturgeon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> On 5 Aug 2006 09:30:43 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I think you have a good point Robert.
> >> >
> >> >In my opinion the more technologically advanced a society is, the
> >> >more "fragile" it becomes.
> >>
> >> A miracle! We agree on something. Great.
> >
> > I think the reverse is true. Technological advancement gives a
> > society options, redundancies, flexibility and the ability to assess
> > and remediate problems.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
>
> And if the electricity goes out for six months or even six weeks?
You mean like it did here after the last hurricane? No problem; my
generator worked fine.
Jeff
"Lobby Dosser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:_tOBg.7403$7m5.2775@trnddc05...
> "Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yep. No society is immune from collapse. My point is only that
> > technologically advanced societies are much less so. So, do you think
> > anyone alive at the height of the Roman Empire was still alive to see
> > those wolves roaming the streets? No. It took a very long time
> > indeed, for Roman society to decline and fall. It didn't suddenly
> > collapse within a portion of a single lifetime, like, say, the Incan
> > Empire.
>
> The Inca and the Maya were very technologically advanced. Both collapsed
in
> a lifetime.
No, they were not technologically advanced. They had some skill at
celestial observation, and a very rich culture, but they barely even used
the wheel or any other form of technology more advanced than that commonly
found in the Western world of thousands of years ago.
Jeff
Jeff
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 11:00:43 GMT, Glen <[email protected]>
wrote:
>F. George McDuffee wrote:
>> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
><SNIP>
>
> In
>> addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
>> things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
>> a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
>> for the vocational classes.
>>
><SNIP>
>>
>Oh my God! Does this mean all my woodshop classes for next year
>(2006-07) at the high school where I teach have been dropped? Does this
>mean I am now out of work? Are my fellow IA teachers who teach masonry,
>auto shop and computer repair also out of work? Do we now hold our
>department meetings at the unemployment office?
>
>The scenario you present might be true in some places, but not in all.
>I have been asked (along with a few of my cohorts)to work on a funding
>grant to expand our vocational offerings in our school, and maybe the
>district as a whole.
>
>Glen
=======================
You are very fortunate in that your schools appear to be run by
educators and not administrators. The students and community are
fortunate in that the board members are acting in the best
interest of the majory of the students and community and not
responding to the latest fad or buzz-word.
My guess is that you leadership is very senior and approaching
retirement. When your educators are replaced with administrators
that conduct per pupil class cost evaluations, legal risk
evaluation of possible injury, and avoidance of things that make
noise or a mess, your vocational programs will die the death of
1,000 cuts. I note in passing that far more students are injured
and injured more seriously in contact sports than vocational
education.
Most universities have dropped their Industrial Arts teachining
options because of the falling demand for their graduates.
Fearless forecast -- as your vocational programs are scaled back,
your student retention and completion problems will increase.
Following normal administrator logic, additional vocational
programs will be eliminated to make funds available for
retention/completion activities and remedial education that are
then required to keep the now totally academic programs filled.
Unka George
(George McDuffee)
...and at the end of the fight is a tombstone white
with the name of the late deceased, and
the epitaph drear:
A Fool lies here, who tried to hustle the East.
Rudyard Kipling The Naulahka, ch. 5, heading (1892).
Steve W. wrote:
> New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
Precisely.
Around $15.00 for oil and a filter and I have too provide the labor to
change as well as providing the labor to disposel of the used oil.
From time to time, local gas station offers an oil change with filter
for $14.95, otherwise the going rate is about $20.00
I have better things to do with my time than trying to save $0-$5 max
by playing grease monkey.
Lew
True, there are some bastions of creativity out there still. Not many in
this area. Mostly I see a benchtop drill press, a plastic table saw and a
few hand tools. Maybe an RAS. Nothing wrong with this picture if it's
being used. Too many times around here, it's either brand new (and been
that way for a while) or hasn't been used for many years. Maybe we just
don't take time to use the tools we have available. Too hot, too tired, two
jobs, etc. It's true, there out there. Just not that often. In other
parts of the country, machinery is much more prevalent.
Respectfully,
Ron Moore
Oklahoma
"Ignoramus8770" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I have to mildly disagree with the originaly sentiment. I go to garage
> sales often, and I do see many garages with tools and machinery. Just
> recently I bought a huge kiln from such a garage (resold for 8x what I
> paid), or a big shop compressor (which I kept), etc. There are people
> out there with interesting stuff, although they are a clear minority.
>
> Just today I saw someone selling 1-2-3 blocks, machinist vise etc. (he
> wanted too much for his stuff, e.g., $35 for a 1 hp motor with bad
> bearings)
>
> i
>
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:44:06 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Ace wrote:
>>
>> Guess it would be nice to see their basements, or even a workshop ????
>
>
> Workshop? I already have three, and it's taking over the house, too.
>;-)
>
> Sure, I've had to make some adjustments now that I'm disabled, but i
>still spend what time I can in the shops. Some modifications help, like
>the foot switches on the drill press, and some other tools. Since I can
>no longer do the micro electronics I did for a living I am concentrating
>un finishing my main shop, and my non profit efforts to collect and
>refurbish computers for other disabled Veterans in my area. A basic
>computer system is given free to Veterans in need, and the only cost
>incurred is if they want something we have to purchase wholesale. The
>work is done by me, and a couple part time volunteers. I also have a
>lot of older PC parts, from the original PC on up. If anyone needs
>older parts, let me know. Most of the stuff can be had for the cost of
>shipping, and a little, for what i paid for it, plus shipping. I have
>piles of good XT, 286, 386, 486 and early Pentium motherboards that are
>not usable for the computer project, but I don't want to toss them.
>Plenty of video cards, I/O cards and other odds and ends, including
>early SIMM and DIMM memory are floating around on the different
>motherboards. XT and AT powers supplies, if you need them, along with
>mini tower type supplies. I will use some of it for my projects, but I
>can't use it all.
I need a few Hercules monochrome graphics cards, some small footprint
486light pentium mobos (4-8meg ram max) and a half dozen monchrome
monitors.
I repair several brands of CNC equipment, PC (dos) based..and they use
the above. Getting hard to find mono monitors
I can personally use some SCSI hard drives, no smaller than 10 gig. The
(cant remember the connector name) that looks like IDE
My email addy..drop the no spam if its on this one.
I can pay modest amounts plus shipping to California.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:34:47 -0400, LiRM <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
>>training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>>
>>When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
>>anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
>>of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>>
>>Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
>>is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
>>today?
>>
>>TMT
>
>I grew up around an uncle who literally rebuilt his entire house. He
>knows how to do it all. I helped some while growing up, but looked at
>all as grunt work and took no interest in watching what the man was
>doing.
I lived in Alaska for 3 years and noted that lots of people build
their own up there. They usually had no loans on the materials and
built as they could - living in 5th wheelers or, when finished, their
basements.
>
>I'm paying for that now. There are some projects I'll take on, but I
>regret not taking a bigger interest in what could have been a great
>learning experience.
>
>So at times, I have to grudgingly call in a guy - an electrician,
>plumber or carpenter to do things I wish I could.
>
>On the other hand, I haven't owned a home in years, so had no real
>need to fix things. If it broke, I called the landlord.
>
>My wife and I recently bought a house, so I wish I knew more.
>
>But I'm also dedicated to learning more as I go along, so I hope to
>reach a point in the future of being able to handle at least some
>minor projects.
>
>But yeah, I do have a workbench area and it's getting more and more
>use so I'm happy about that. I just wish I had paid more attention as
>a kid.
That's the way I feel about gardening. My parents were outside all
weekend, every weekend (weather permitting). I paid no attention.
Like you, I sure wish I had.
Sue
"Jeff McCann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You mean like it did here after the last hurricane? No problem; my
> generator worked fine.
>
> Jeff
>
>
But you were referring to society. Did all of your neighbors have
generators also?
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Lew Hodgett wrote:
>> Trevor Jones wrote:
>>
>> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set of
>> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
>> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
>> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
>> > roadside.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
>>
>> If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
>> car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
>> unit.
>>
>> Want to change your oil?
>>
>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>
>
>BULL.
>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts. Filter - 3-4 bucks.
>Oil disposal fee? No place selling oil can charge you a fee legally. The
>law states that ANY business selling new oil MUST accept used oil for
>recycling, at NO CHARGE. Cost 0.00 Drop off the used oil from the
>vehicle when you buy the new oil. You can even pour it back into the
>empty bottles to save on container expense.
>Benefits to the owner: YOU know the oil was changed, while under there
>YOU can look over the engine and underside of the vehicle and look for
>problems or leaks. While under the vehicle YOU can also grease any items
>that can be greased, this has the side benefit of lowering wear on items
>that should be lubed but usually are not.
>
>
>> Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
>>
>> Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>>
>> Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
>> being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
>
>And again you can return the used coolant to any store that does coolant
>changes for free. And again you can return it when you buy the new coolant.
>
>>
>> The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
>> tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
>
>Not likely. Just a normal plug wrench for any plug on the market today.
>You may need a torx bit or similar item if you need to remove a coil
>pack or pull a cover but those are hardly special tools.
>
>>
>> Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
>> even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
>
>Nope because they have the same attitude you have, that it is easier to
>trade them than to LEARN how to repair them.
>
>>
>> Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
>> for the first 75,000 miles.
>>
>> Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
>
>Not if you have the foresight to learn all you can.
>
>>
>> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
>> that's another matter<G>.
>>
>> Lew
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Its never a lose lose proposition learning how to do anything, and
really its not all that hard working on today's cars if you buy and
read the manuals, have access to tools and don't mind getting dirty.
I'm still driving a 1996 grand am with 260,000 miles on it and a 1995
Chevy S10 with 225,000 miles on it. I rebuilt the automatic
transmission in the S10 5 years ago by following a books instruction
(I don't think I ever want to do that again, but I learned something).
I've done all the maintenance myself on all the cars I've owned and
can't imagine the amounts of money I've saved over the years.
I'll be buying a Prius January 2007 and my intent is to do all the
service work on that as well.
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 11:00:43 GMT, Glen <[email protected]> wrote:
>F. George McDuffee wrote:
>> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
><SNIP>
>
> In
>> addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
>> things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
>> a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
>> for the vocational classes.
>>
><SNIP>
>>
>Oh my God! Does this mean all my woodshop classes for next year
>(2006-07) at the high school where I teach have been dropped? Does this
>mean I am now out of work? Are my fellow IA teachers who teach masonry,
>auto shop and computer repair also out of work? Do we now hold our
>department meetings at the unemployment office?
>
>The scenario you present might be true in some places, but not in all.
>I have been asked (along with a few of my cohorts)to work on a funding
>grant to expand our vocational offerings in our school, and maybe the
>district as a whole.
>
>Glen
The school that has any sort of shop class..is the exception, rather
than the rule. And not just in California where I live.
Gunner
"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.
Think of it as having your older brother knock the shit out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:26:45 -0500, Retief <> wrote:
>On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:20:08 -0700, Robert Sturgeon
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>By and large, no. The post-modern economy is primarily
>>concerned with symbol manipulation -- not the creation of
>>real goods. There is very little call for the ability to do
>>icky stuff like using tools. What is needed in today's
>
>That is, they're all candidates for the "B Ark"... ;)
?
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
charlie wrote:
> Mark & Juanita wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT, Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>
>>... snip
>>
>>>
>>>Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
>>>
>>>Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
>>>
>>
>> Only time I have a problem with that is when the nut is on the bottom of
>>something and I'm reaching down and around a bunch of obstacles from the
>>top. Then I have to remember that CCW for the nut is CW when viewed from
>>the top. And that's after 15+ years working on a farm (first 8 years
>>weren't that productive :-) ) as well as various machinery work after
>>getting out of college.
>
>
> hold your right hand in a fist with thumb extended.
>
> twisting the nut in the same direction that your fingers are pointing
> will move the nut in the direction that your thumb is pointed.
>
Don't do this if you're replacing the clutch on a
Hamilton Beach commercial blender. <VBG>
> regards,
> charlie
> cave creek, az
>
--
Gary A. Gorgen | "From ideas to PRODUCTS"
[email protected] | Tunxis Design Inc.
| Cupertino, Ca. 95014
Frank Boettcher wrote:
> I think it is poppycock, but I know it's not true in Boston, Philly,
> Houston, Tulsa, Mineapolis, Birmingham, and anywhere else I've ever
> lived or have relatives living. Please, you made the claim, tell us
> where you are restricted from working on your car. By who, the
> government?
I'm in Southern California.
City ordinance or owner(s) if it is a condo or owner if a rental property.
A lot of it depends on location.
> Tonka toy? Please tell us what vehicle you have or know of that,
> without an extended pan, uses six quarts. I'm curious.
A 4 cyl, Toyota Tacoma pick up truck, AKA: Tonka Toy.
Lew
Gunner wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>>>for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>>>least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>
>>
>>BULL.
>>New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts.
>
>
> $12 per quart for Oil? Blink blink..are you buying extra pure sperm
> whale oil in silver flasks?
>
>
> Even Mobile 1 is less than $5
>
>
> Gunner
I got that it would cost $12 for enough oil to do his vehicle.
That would put it around $2 per quart.
Cheers
Trevor Jones
On 8 Aug 2006 09:39:16 -0700, "charlie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Mark & Juanita wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT, Gunner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> ... snip
>> >
>> >
>> >Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
>> >
>> >Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
>> >
>>
>> Only time I have a problem with that is when the nut is on the bottom of
>> something and I'm reaching down and around a bunch of obstacles from the
>> top. Then I have to remember that CCW for the nut is CW when viewed from
>> the top. And that's after 15+ years working on a farm (first 8 years
>> weren't that productive :-) ) as well as various machinery work after
>> getting out of college.
>
>hold your right hand in a fist with thumb extended.
>
>twisting the nut in the same direction that your fingers are pointing
>will move the nut in the direction that your thumb is pointed.
>
Dang! You mean the right hand rule is good for more than the direction
of a vector cross-product? Thanks. (Still learning)
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 23:16:44 -0400, John <[email protected]> wrote:
>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
>>
... snip
>>
>> When I bought this house eight years ago, I couldn't even find a
>> realtor who even knew what a workshop was. One listing claimed to have a
>> workshop, so I got directions and went to see it. The "Workshop" was two
>> feet of 1" * 12" particle board over the dryer in the laundry room. I
>> went back to the realtor's office and read him the riot act in front of
>> everyone there, including other people looking for homes. I asked him if
>> he had been married so long that he had forgot what it was like to have
>> the space to do what he wanted, when he wanted. Finally, he asked, "Just
>> what the hell are you looking for?" I smiled and told him that I wanted
>> a house suitable for a single many with hobbies. A 150 square foot
>> house, and a 3000 square foot shop. he told me that i would NEVER find
>> it in Florida, because no one wanted a workshop. He was wrong. I found
>> a home with a 30' * 40" garage, a 18' * 28' storage building, a 12' *
>> 12' "Workshop", a 12' * 12' laundry building, a 12' * 24" one bedroom
>> cottage, and a three bedroom home with a large family room and a small
>> library.
>>
>> All for under 40K, and it should be paid off in a few more years. ;-)
>>
>
>A friend of mine found a nice place with a work shop.... An old chicken
>farm. 5 buildings 60 feet wide by 150 feet long with good roofs, and
>construction, with a nice house. Total cost was 200K. Oh I forgot, 14
>acres of land too. This was in lower NY state.
>
>John
That's a really great idea. Only downside that I can think of is that
(at least around where I grew up), those buildings typically had openings
half-way up that easily opened for fresh air during the warm months. Not
sure they were very weather or air-tight. Also, do you know whether they
had concrete or dirt floors? But for a relatively small amount of
remodeling, one could have a woodshop, a tractor restoration shed, a
metalworking shop --- (Dang, I'm out of hobbies and still have two more
buildings to go; I guess one could be used by the family for storage).
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:46:22 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]> wrote:
>Gunner wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:55:54 -0400, "Steve W." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
>>>> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
>>>> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
>>>>
>>> BULL.
>>> New oil - 12.00 for mid line oil in quarts.
>>
>> $12 per quart for Oil? Blink blink..are you buying extra pure sperm
>> whale oil in silver flasks?
>>
>>
>> Even Mobile 1 is less than $5
>>
>>
>> Gunner
>>
>> "I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
>> As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
>> patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
>> in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
>
>
>Total price of 12 bucks in quart bottles@ 5 quarts. Buy the 5 quart
>bottle and it is about 9 bucks.
Ah! Sorry about the misreading.
Gunner
>
>----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
>----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
"I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
"Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
Well my son can use the Yellow Pages and write checks. He know what a
hammer is, but does not have the desire to find out which end does what
functions.
Trevor Jones wrote:
> It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple
set of
> hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
> anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
> electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
> roadside.
<snip>
Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
unit.
Want to change your oil?
6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track
record for the first 75,000 miles.
Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
that's another matter<G>.
Lew
"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>> don't blame the home builder...blame the home buyer.Builders build what
>> sells.If workshops were a priority for most people most homes would have
>> them.
>>
>
> That's not entirely true. The builder can build the house cheaper with a
> plain two car garage. How many people actually only store only their cars
> in their garages?
>
And he can sell it cheaper...The market is driven by the buyer.If more
people are willing to pay for a shop more builders will build houses with a
shop.If most people do not want to pay extra for a shop they are not
built.Builders try to build what sells.
I always liked Kipling's (as I remember) "Dissertation on Roast Pig".
Respectfully,
Ron Moore
"George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Mark Trudgill wrote:
>> The message <[email protected]>
>> from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
>> words:
>>
>>> Mark Trudgill wrote:
>>>> The message <[email protected]>
>>>> from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains
>>>> these
>>>> words:
>>>>
>>>>> Retief wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>>>>>>>> really needed to?
>>>>>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>>>>>> do it.
>>>>>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>>>>>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>>>>>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>>>>>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Retief
>>>>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
>>>> Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
>>>> 250lb of pork trimmings.
>>>>
>>
>>> That isn't part of the scheme, he said he could butcher it, so he must
>>> have a clue, probably way more than a clue.
>>
>>> My point is there is no incorrect way as long as one observes sanitary
>>> procedure, may not be the way a professional does it and one may not end
>>> up with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot would prefer pork
>>> trimmings (whatever that is). I usually end up with bite size pieces
>>> before I stuff them in my mouth.
>>
>> Feel free to roast mouth sized pieces.
>>
>
> Thanks. You buying? I'd prefer to BBQ them. But soups are good, pork
> and beans, all sorts of things you can do with scraps (I suppose he meant
> little pieces). Of course bacon even a 10" strip is just one bite when
> compressed.
> Not to belabor the point, but I can't imagine anyone cutting up a whole
> hog into scraps, way too much work. OTOH, if I had to do it, I would
> debone the whole thing.
Mark Trudgill wrote:
> The message <[email protected]>
> from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
> words:
>
>> Retief wrote:
>>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you
>>>>> really needed to?
>>>> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>>> do it.
>>> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>>> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>>> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>>> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>>
>>> And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>>
>>> Retief
>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
>
> Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
> 250lb of pork trimmings.
>
That isn't part of the scheme, he said he could
butcher it, so he must have a clue, probably way
more than a clue.
My point is there is no incorrect way as long as
one observes sanitary procedure, may not be the
way a professional does it and one may not end up
with the standard cuts. Maybe the total idiot
would prefer pork trimmings (whatever that is). I
usually end up with bite size pieces before I
stuff them in my mouth.
Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:46:37 GMT in rec.crafts.metalworking :
>On 6 Aug 2006 19:17:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>
>>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
>>> the world we live in.
>>
>>You can learn a lot about someone by handing them a simple tool like a
>>ratcheting socket wrench, especially to assemble something. The
>>inexperienced try to tighten the still loose bolt holding the end of
>>the ratchet handle and of course have it always falling off the nut...
>>the experienced finger tighten,
Works real well when bolting fixtures to vise, tables, etc. Where I
work, there seems to be a tendency for people to stick the bolt in the
hole, grab the air wrench, and just press the trigger. Which explains why
the vise had the first 1/4 inch of threads stripped out. Do you really
need 100 ft/pounds of torque to hold a vice jaw in place?
And some one needs to stand over the dayshifters and beat them when
they tighten the 10-24 screws (to hold a 3/16 plate in place while the
peripheral pattern is milled) with the same force they normally used on
1/2-13 bolts used to hold 50 pound blocks to the tombstone! ("I have here
in my hand, two ball peen hammers. One is a standard 12 ounce head, the
other a 1/2 ounce head. Which would you rather have me use when I play the
Anvil Chorus on your knuckles?")
>> palm the ratchet mechanism, and only
>>shift down to the end of the handle for the last little bit. Of course
>>we haven't thought about that since we were 8 or so... which is why
>>it's so shocking to see how a newbie treats the tool!
>
>Its embarrassing how many folks have to be reminded:
>
>Righty tighty, lefty loosey.
Hey, I still have to make that motion with my hands, unless I've the
thing in my hand. We didn't bolt things together, we used nails. Of
course, we had to straighten the nails before we started ...
--
pyotr filipivich.
as an explaination for the decline in the US's tech edge, James
Niccol wrote "It used to be that the USA was pretty good at
producing stuff teenaged boys could lose a finger or two playing with."
Retief wrote:
> No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
> "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
> get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
> of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
I have a fraternity brother who built a rather successful consulting
engineering business.
We were having lunch one day when he told me he was going to fold up
the business.
I asked him "Why".
His answer, "I'm getting tired of having to take everybody to the
bathroom and hold their swantz while they do their business."
I understood.
Basic reason I run a one man band.
Lew
We're in Oklahoma. VERY few basements because of the water table.
Definitely none in the neighborhoods I referred to.
Respectfully,
Ron Moore
"Bonehenge" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 10:14:11 -0500, "Ron Moore" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
>>no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
>>productive or creative can this person be?
>
> Maybe they have a basement?
On 6 Aug 2006 05:28:08 -0700, "Andrew VK3BFA"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>RANT
>ON..............................................................................
>
>I am in agreement with everyone. Its all stuffed becasue the Youth of
>Today are slack, cant drive a nail, butcher a hog, build their own 4
>engine heavy bomber etc - all the stuff WE did as kids. (yeh, sure....)
>
>And I bet they dont have to walk to school, barefoot, through the snow,
>with only a pointy stick to protect themselves against wolves......
Uh, just a point of clarification, that's "up hill, both ways, against
the wind, while being chased by bears." Maybe there's wolves there
too. I was too worried about the bears. Funny that, my dad
experienced the same thing. I know, I asked him about it.
>
>Get real, people. Its ALWAYS been like this - we are a bunch of Old
>Farts who get the shits because our 10yo grandchildren can program our
>cellphones, but we cant. I think Socrates or Aristotle wrote about this
>a few thousand years ago. Nothings changed.
What's a cellphone?
Actually I know, but they're far far far too expensive for the kind of
use I'd give one.
>
>This group is devoted to people like us, it self-selects people who
>like building things (with machine tools), who take great pride in hard
>learned skills, and yet are slightly AMAZED that the rest of the world
>doesnt find them at all interesting. Funny that. Wonder why?
>
>So, dont take it too seriously - what will get us all in the end is
>collapse of the basic infrastructure that allows us (among other
>things) to sit in front of our PC's and have mad rants like this.
>Loosen up, lighten up - just because we are not awash with competent
>machinists or skilled artisans doesnt mean that society is ruined.
Everyone needs stuff. Furniture, houses, appliances, whatever.
Sooner or later the pen pushers and button pressers have to come to
us.
It gets funnier. I was asked to make something, I worked up a quote
and never heard about it again. I was over to that persons house
recently and note that the task to be done wasn't. Apparently no one
would do the work at their price. Or something like that.
>
>So........
>
>RANT OFF
Yeah! What he said.
Wish I still had the one I had in school. It was along the same line but was
machine shop specific. Published in the thirties, I believe. The school had
it reprinted for them. The best of it's kind I've seen. Technology has
changed but math hasn't.
"digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I have an excellent book I got in trade school called "Mathematics for the
> trades".It puts every problem in real world terms.For example how many
> pieces 27 inches long can be cut from a 20 foot length of bar?
> This book really makes a huge difference in how I understood mathematics.
>
>
On 5 Aug 2006 20:44:41 -0700, "hex"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Robert Sturgeon wrote:
>
>> A serious question, but one most of us don't like to think
>> about, is -- what skills might be needed in a
>> post-post-modern (a.k.a. post-SHTF) economy? And could we
>> meet such needs, if necessary? Probably not, which leads us
>> to the possibility of Tim May's "massive die-off," which
>> people like Jared Diamond assure us is possible when any
>> society/economy collapses. It is probably true that the
>> more symbolic, abstract, and detached from the production of
>> real goods a society/economy becomes, the more likely it is
>> to suffer a catastrophic collapse.
>>
>> Fun, huh???
>
>One man's catastrophe is another's opportunity. Raise your kids to
>understand both worlds and they'll come out alright.
Too late. They're both grown. One works in a big city as
the CFO of a non-profit foundation and the other is a
temporarily retired (children to raise)
writer/reporter/political aide who is married to a lawyer.
All are successful in the symbolic economy and I have no
influence over them -- at all. If TSHTF, I can only hope
they can escape the chaos and start over. All I can do is
provide them with a slight chance, IF they "make it out."
Of course, I also hope the S never does HTF, but I have no
influence over that, either.
(rest snipped)
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
>
> It's disapointing that in the four or so years that I've had a shop in
> my garage, not one kid has asked me anything about it.
>
> Jeff Polaski
>
I hadn't thought of that. My neighbors always pop in to see what is going on
(65+), but never a kid from the neighborhood. I can remember as a child,
going to the garage that was making the most noise. Grinding sparks could
draw me blocks! I always wanted to weld, but didn't try it until I was over
40. Damn I was missing some fun.
I also spent MANY summer days watching the construction of the homes in my
area. I am sure I bugged the crap out of the guys, but there is not a
construction project I won't take on because of inability. I have done
everything for a large addition. Including digging for the footings by hand!
Ok, to prevent some of the backlash--- I was in no hurry, and I could only
get something that was 3½ feet wide in the backyard, so I dug it by hand.
And for the rest of you--- my community allows homeowners that can show
competency the option of pulling a "homeowner" permit for all phases. So I
had to do that for footing/stem wall, rough framing, rough plumbing, rough
electrical, final plumbing, and final electrical. Damn expensive for all
those permits, but I did it legal.
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:32:33 -0700, Mark & Juanita
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5 Aug 2006 19:50:25 -0700, "steve" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
>>> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
>>> you get the idea...
>>
>>caused some of those skills are rarely needed, I rarely get any flats
>>anymore, haven't had one in ten years, I used to get them at least once
>>a year 25 years ago.
>>
>>TV's can't be repaired
>>
>>now it's cheaper to buy a new lawnmower then to fix one (due to China
>>the price of a new one is less now then 25 years ago, and our income
>>has gone way up, the cost of parts, however, has stayed the same)
>>
>
> When I hear or read comments like these, a little shiver hits me. My dad
>tells the story of how Dad's grandfather (an increasingly successful farmer
>in Eastern Colorado) once told Dad's grandmother that she didn't need to
>patch overalls anymore, it was cheaper and more efficient to buy new ones.
>That was in the late 1920's; we all know what happened in the 1930's --
>especially in the dustbowl areas.
Your great grandfather and Steve were/are both correct about
their current conditions. What happens if current
conditions deteriorate a bit?
Steve wrote, "No, its just the workshop has changed, it can
live in a computer, for instance, workshops are alive and
well, they are just different, today's workshop can involved
hooking up a wireless router to a wired LAN that supports
Appletalk, before your time it was thatching a roof"
A wired LAN is an artifact of the symbolic economy. It is a
Good Thing, right now. But if what you need is a new roof,
and there is no longer much demand for wireless routers,
LANs, Appletalk, etc., (as would be the case in a post-SHTF
scenario) then being able to mess with LANs and such, but
not roofs, leaves you out.
--
Robert Sturgeon
Summum ius summa inuria.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/
Okay, so I'm late and catching up, but Gunner <[email protected]> wrote
on Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:54:53 GMT in misc.survivalism :
>On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:59:36 +0100, Mark Trudgill <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>The message <[email protected]>
>>from "George E. Cawthon" <[email protected]> contains these
>>words:
>>
>>> Retief wrote:
>>> > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:21:51 GMT, Lew Hodgett
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>> COULD you butcher a hog, if you really needed to?
>>> >> Yes, BUT, because I can, I've got sense enough to let somebody else
>>> >> do it.
>>> >
>>> > No, you charge a fair bit to do the butchering operation, and hire a
>>> > "grunt" to do the hard parts (i.e. you supervise). The hog owner
>>> > get's his hog butchered correctly, your assistant gets food (a piece
>>> > of the action), and you get a big hunk of hog.
>>> >
>>> > And everyone is happy and well fed... :)
>>> >
>>> > Retief
>>> How do you incorrectly butcher a hog?
Based on a sermon title from Dad's Seminary days ("Dead Hog and no Hot
Water...") I'd say not having enough hot water is one factor. Don't ask
me, I just pass 'em along.
>>Give a pig and a knife to someone who hasn't a clue and end up with
>>250lb of pork trimmings.
If the dead pig doesn't manage to stick him in the process.
I'm not sure of all the details, but is seems that after Udo killed the
hog, he placed the knife in the wrong place, and the dead pork roast
"kicked" the knife right through his foot. In one side and out the other.
Fortunately, Germany has good health care, but Udo was rather unhappy. he
didn't feel right laying in bed all week, but orders are orders, especially
when delivered by Herr Doctor. (And we had a couple English Nursing
Sisters in the group, so he was Confined to his Room for the duration.)
>
>Make some good hotlinks though ....
I'll take your word for it.
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
"With Age comes Wisdom. Although more often, Age travels alone."
F. George McDuffee wrote:
> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
<SNIP>
In
> addition to creating a generation that has no knowledge of how
> things work, the abolition of the vocational classes has lead to
> a huge upsurge in male dropouts who were attending school only
> for the vocational classes.
>
<SNIP>
>
Oh my God! Does this mean all my woodshop classes for next year
(2006-07) at the high school where I teach have been dropped? Does this
mean I am now out of work? Are my fellow IA teachers who teach masonry,
auto shop and computer repair also out of work? Do we now hold our
department meetings at the unemployment office?
The scenario you present might be true in some places, but not in all.
I have been asked (along with a few of my cohorts)to work on a funding
grant to expand our vocational offerings in our school, and maybe the
district as a whole.
Glen
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:36:26 GMT, "Ace" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Guess it would be nice to see their basements, or even a workshop ????
>
>Ace
Good on ya, Ace. Anyone driving past my garage when the door was open
would likely be "disgusted" by the room for the car- but the whole
basement is filled with some fairly serious woodworking equipment.
Aside from the basic increase in security, the basement is climate
controlled, and keeps my large tool investment from rusting on me.
Better it stays that way, even (perhaps especially) if the folks
driving through the neighborhood have no idea the shop is there.
>"Ron Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:9B2Bg.1769$uW1.885@dukeread06...
>> I always thought it was somewhat disgusting to see an open garage with
>> no workbench or tools of any kind in it. Just space for CARS! How
>> productive or creative can this person be? What are they going to do when
>> they retire? What skills are they teaching their kids?
>> When I was young, a garage full of tools and such was like a beacon in
>> the night. Had to look, ask questions, wanted to get to know the person
>> and try to learn. Nowadays, kids couldn't care less.
>> I have noticed that the more expensive the neighborhood, the less
>> garage creativity is visible.
>> Respectfully,
>> Ron Moore
"digitalmaster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>>
> And he can sell it cheaper...The market is driven by the buyer.If more
> people are willing to pay for a shop more builders will build houses with
> a shop.If most people do not want to pay extra for a shop they are not
> built.Builders try to build what sells.
>Oddly, when many of our parents were making darn little they were buying
>these homes with the garages that offered more. Now, as people do want
>more space in their garages and are more capable of paying for them, there
>are fewer garages built like this.
The sad thing is, most of these young people don't realize they're
deficient. You can always spot this when one of them asks: "is this
something *I* can do?" which shows they have NO idea what the project
requires or what they may may be able to contribute to it, skill-wise. Sad.
JR
Dweller in the cellar
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> It has always concerned me when the young amoung us are not taugh basic
> skills such as how to change a tire, how to use a saw, how to...well
> you get the idea...there are basic skills that one needs to deal with
> the world we live in. Well this article shows what that lack of
> training, due to whatever reason, means as they get older.
>
> When I drive through a neighborhood, it is a rare garage that has
> anything like a workshop within it anymore....a reflection of the lack
> of interest or knowledge of the homeowner to work with their hands?
>
> Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> today?
>
> TMT
>
>
> Repair jobs challenge young homeowners By MARTHA IRVINE, AP National
> Writer
> Thu Aug 3
>
> The staff at his neighborhood hardware store can spot John Carter from
> a distance.
>
> He's the slightly befuddled guy who often comes in declaring, "I have
> no idea what I'm doing. Can you at least get me through tonight?"
>
> The 26-year-old Chicagoan, who's been slowly rehabbing the condo he
> bought last year, is part of a generation of young homeowners who admit
> they often have no clue how to handle home projects.
>
> For them, shop class was optional. It also was more common for their
> parents to hire contractors, leaving fewer opportunities for them to
> learn basic repair skills.
>
> With low interest rates allowing more young adults to buy property in
> recent years, many inexperienced homeowners are desperate for advice
> when the furnace goes out, the roof leaks or when a home project that
> seemed like a no-brainer goes terribly wrong.
>
> "They know they've got to buy real estate; they know it's a good
> investment. But that doesn't help you when you swing a hammer and hit a
> pipe in the wall," says Lou Manfredini, a Chicago hardware store owner
> who gives do-it-yourself advice on local radio and nationally online
> and on TV. "Unfortunately, homes don't come with an instruction
> manual."
>
> Contractors say it's not unusual for them to get frantic calls from
> young do-it-yourselfers who get in over their heads.
>
> Sometimes, the mistakes are silly.
>
> Michel Hanet, who owns a door replacement business called IDRC in
> Scottsdale, Ariz., has arrived at homes to find doors hung upside down.
> He's also discovered more than one sliding pocket door that won't open
> because someone nailed a picture on the wall and into the door.
>
> "The younger generation are more likely the ones that are getting into
> trouble," Hanet says. "The baby boomers have the money to do it, so
> they just call and say 'I don't like my doors; just come and replace
> them.'"
>
> Kirsten Pellicer, the 30-year-old vice president of Ace hardware stores
> in Longmont and Boulder, Colo., sees many young customers looking to
> tackle projects on their own, often to save money.
>
> "We rarely get requests for 'Do you know a good handyman?' from the
> younger set," she says.
>
> For Carter, the young Chicagoan, it's all about being brave enough to
> try - and sometimes fail.
>
> With the help of a buddy who has rehabbing experience, he's put in
> hardwood floors, knocked out a wall and completely remodeled his condo
> kitchen.
>
> In the process, he's also managed to nearly flood the kitchen after
> forgetting to completely seal off a refrigerator water line; had a
> sliding closet door he was installing shatter a light bulb over his
> head and crash on top of him; and been fined by his condo association
> for a couple of other mishaps.
>
> "The one thing about home remodeling is that it is intimidating. But in
> the end, you find it's definitely worthwhile," says Carter, whose day
> job is at a large accounting firm where he secures computerized
> financial data. "You just have to accept that you're going to screw
> up."
>
> Dave Payne, a 26-year-old condo owner in suburban Atlanta, knows what
> he means.
>
> Payne made the mistake of trying to spackle over wallpaper in his condo
> bathroom, leaving uneven chunks where the wallpaper pulled away from
> the wall.
>
> "There were just times when I wanted to pull my hair out and hire
> someone when I looked at my ruined walls," he says.
>
> But after hours of "spackling, sanding, spackling again, sanding again,
> then priming," he's hoping no one will notice.
>
> Increasingly, hardware professionals and others are addressing the need
> for know-how.
>
> Some community colleges and stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot offer
> classes in projects from changing a faucet to tiling and putting in a
> dimmer switch.
>
> "It gives them some exposure, so if they want to do it on their own,
> they have a starting point," says Peter Marx, a remodeling contractor
> who teaches home repair at North Seattle Community College.
>
> Others find help online, including at the Ace site, where Manfredini
> - the Chicago hardware store owner - answers questions.
>
> Home-centered television networks, including HGTV, are also in vogue.
> HGTV executives say shows such as "Design on a Dime" and "What's Your
> Sign? Design" - a show that builds on the unlikely combination of
> astrology and home decorating - have helped boost its recent ratings
> among young adults.
>
> While 27-year-old Amy Choate occasionally goes online or watches TV
> shows to get home-improvement ideas, more often she uses a resource
> closer to home: her mom.
>
> Among other things, mom showed her how to fix wall cracks in her
> Chicago condo.
>
> But Choate has no intention of tackling an upcoming kitchen rehab.
> She'll leave that to a professional.
>
> "I'd probably do it wrong," she says, "and end up paying twice as
> much."
>
> ___
>
> On the Net:
>
> Answers (at) Ace: http://www.acehardware.com
>
> Home Depot clinics: http://www.homedepotclinics.com/
>
> Lowe's clinics:
> http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?actionclinicSchedProcessor
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Home Page: http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
If you're not the lead dog, the view never changes
Doubt yourself, and the real world will eat you alive
The world doesn't revolve around you, it revolves around me
No skeletons in the closet; just decomposing corpses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dependence is Vulnerability:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Open the Pod Bay Doors please, Hal"
"I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.."
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Lobby Dosser wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Was the electricity out for six months? Nation wide? It is possible.
>
> Possible but highly unlikely. In the Pacific NW lots of the
> electricity is hydroelectric.
> Other places are coal, or natural gas. What do you see as possibly
> causing a nation wide power outage?
>
>
> Dan
>
Grid failure, for example. IIRC, the grid can fail in such a way that it
takes down equipment. Equipment not readily avaiable.
Take a different situation. Are we prepared for a bird flu epidemic? Say
25% of the population down?
Lew Hodgett wrote:
> Trevor Jones wrote:
>
> > It is in fact not only possible, but pretty easy to do. A simple set of
> > hand tools and a Haynes or Chilton manual for your vehicle, and you or
> > anyone else is quite capable of changing the oil, belts, or various
> > electrical components like starters or alternators, at home or on the
> > roadside.
>
> <snip>
>
> Totally impractical to try to work on an automobile today.
For you perhaps, for me, not so much.
>
> If you live in an urban area, many places do not permit working on a
> car, especially outside, even on your own property, much less a rental
> unit.
That, I'll have to leave to the discretion of the individuals
involved, though I have not yet run across it in a situation that caused
any serious inconvenience.
>
> Want to change your oil?
>
> 6 qts of oil, an air and oil filter costs as much or more than paying
> for that same service down at the corner gas station, in this area at
> least, never mind the used oil disposal process and cost.
I can get the oil changed in my car for about the same as it costs me
to get it done for me. I do it myself. Seen a couple botched oil plugs
from the minimum wage earners at the oil change places. They won't
cover costs on repairs or towing. All the places I buy my oil, aso
collect for no charge. In one area that I lived, this was mandated by
provincial law. In any case, there are always hazmat collection days or
dropoffs.
>
> Sort of makes changing your own oil a non productive process.
Not really. I can visually inspect the condition of the other parts
while I am so doing.
>
> Want to change the coolant every couple of years?
>
> Again you face a toxic waste disposal problem which does not include
> being able to pour used coolant into the sewer.
Same as oil. I can drop coolant at the places I buy, or send it
through a couple different routes for recycling. Doesn't cost me, but
for the time it takes.
>
> The plugs on my vehicle are good for 100,000 miles and require special
> tools to change. Think I'll pass on that one.
Special as in a couple flex joints in the extension, or special like a
seven sided socket? FWIW I probably would not buy a special tool for
most of what I do. If the option is a $30 special tool or a bill for an
hours shop time, so they can do a twenty minute job, I'll buy the tool.
>
> Most people don't keep a vehicle 100,000 miles like I do so they don't
> even have to think about changing plugs and wires.
>
> Matter of fact, most of today's vehicles have a pretty good track record
> for the first 75,000 miles.
I have three vehicles right now. The low mileage one is my wifes car,
250 thousand kilometers, my car has 394 thousand, and my new truck has
341 thousand.
I just gave away a truck that had 425 thousand Km's on it. I put most
of them there. It passed a safety check a couple years back.
>
> Trying to do your own auto repairs today is a lose-lose proposition, IMHO.
>
Not as much as paying some joker $85 an hour shop rate to do what I
can do in less time, not to mention that I don't bill out at book rate
to myself. I try to keep a straight face when I hear of guys being
quoted better than a months wages for work that takes less than a decent
days work to do. The ones that pay those rates are keeping the economy
rolling right along. :-)
I don't muck with tires much anymore, and won't touch airbags or a/c
(other than belts).
> Now you want to talk about diesel engine maintenance on a sail boat,
> that's another matter<G>.
Let's not. Your money is already gone! :-)
Cheers
Trevor Jones
jack wrote:
> "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Trevor Jones wrote:
>
>> Want to change your oil?
>
>
> My Daughter is at College away from home and has a car of mine. I remind her
> every few months to change the oil and have the fluids looked at. She even
> has a credit card of mine to cover maintenance. I have told her many times
> that the Jiffy Lube guys sometimes are not all that smart, but they often
> get things right...
> Daughters boyfriend decided that he could do it better, so he climbed under
> the car, drained into a gallon milk container with a small funnel (spilled
> all over the street), cleaned up with kitty litter, and added 4 quarts of
> oil (no filter change).
> Daughter called me a half hour later and told me the car starts and the
> engine runs well, but the car won't move. I had her verbally repeat the
> maintenance efforts boyfriend attempted.
> You guessed it... he drained the automatic transmission.
>
> Boyfriend thinks it is better for me to call him by his current nickname
> "Dipstick" than the other one "dips&%t"
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
>
Could call that a failure of parenting. But quite
often, it's failure of the kid's brain. No
experience with daughters, but one son was enough.
Emmo wrote:
> I would mention that those men who can do even the most basic of work,
> whether on the home or car, are richly rewarded by all the women who love
> being with someone who is 'handy'.
It depends a lot. Many women regard those kinds of
technical skills as "nerdy" and stay away from such
men. Understanding how things work, and being interested
in such things, has become a wierdness/freakyness, and
an alarming thing for many women. Stuff like that is
only something one does for a job, and not something to
be interested in during free time. Really. Having a
machine shop, or even lots of electronics/RF equipment,
is a social suicide with women. I'm talking about the
age group 20-35 years. The "acceptable" hobbies include
sports and culture, but definitely not technology/science.
Just today I noticed that my internet access didn't work.
Checked stuff, and found out that ADSL modem had stopped
working. I switched power off and back on, and only the
power light was lit, but no life otherwise. I opened it,
measured the SMPS voltages with oscilloscope, noticed
that 5V had huge ripple, and replaced the electrolytic
capasitor with a similar low-ESR cap I had. Started working
again. Yeah, there's advange - did get internet access
working still during sunday, and it cost me practically
nothing. A normal person would have waited until monday,
and bought a new ADSL modem, and propably paid someone
to get it configured/installed.
"Glen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| >
| Oh my God! Does this mean all my woodshop classes for next year
| (2006-07) at the high school where I teach have been dropped? Does this
| mean I am now out of work? Are my fellow IA teachers who teach masonry,
| auto shop and computer repair also out of work? Do we now hold our
| department meetings at the unemployment office?
|
| The scenario you present might be true in some places, but not in all.
| I have been asked (along with a few of my cohorts)to work on a funding
| grant to expand our vocational offerings in our school, and maybe the
| district as a whole.
|
| Glen
In the Seattle area, the aerospace community has been complaining for
several years about just that, and it isn't until the concrete heads in the
legislature realized they were chasing all the skilled labor and shops out
of state have they realized what a skill shortage there is. A day late and
a dollar short, but better late than never. Unfortunately, when I hired on
at Boeing, with a million others barely able to breathe, they trained me on
company time. Got a whole lot of useless folks in the process. This time,
they're training the new hires on their time, for two weeks. A coworker of
mine got hit in the head by a fast moving rivet die. Seems the gal she was
teaching thought it was okay to put the die in the gun while holding the
trigger down. Absent the retainer spring, of course. As soon as she did it
the second time, just minutes later, they told her to take a hike. That's
why they're doing it differently this time around, as the dead wood gets
weeded out quickly. They aren't kicking people out for not having the
skills, they're removing them for not having a trainable attitude.
I recently got a very cool new job. One of the reasons I got the job
was the last line on my resume: "With the right attitude all skill deficits
can be overcome." That impresses the hell out of folks, especially when
your attitude seems to match the resume. (I once had the honor of bringing
onto my crew an older Greek lady who had no skills but just the exact
attitude I wanted. She worked her ass off and made the folks who had been
around for years look like amateurs once I taught her what she needed to
know.) I had also showed them pictures of some machines I had recently
built, which the interviewers (a structured interview with several folks
there) were almost fighting over. They wanted someone who could "do things"
instead of just talking about stuff. My fingernails being a bit chewed up
and slightly dirty helped a bit, I suspect.
Often heard phrase: "you can't make one of those, you have to buy 'em".
I really shouldn't complain. I make a living making things for those that
can't.
"Tom Watson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 5 Aug 2006 07:27:58 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >Do your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, the generation who
> >is succeeding us, have the basic skills that are needed in the world
> >today?
> >
>
> Our culture, such as it is, informs our children that working with
> their hands is beneath them and that self reliance is no more than
> knowing which phone number to call when you need something.
>
> It takes some strong involvement on a parent's part to expose children
> to the joys of doing for yourself; the joys of making, rather than
> managing, and the satisfaction to be gained from having a basic
> understanding of the things that inhabit and sometimes seem to
> overwhelm our day to day lives.
>
> In a society that seems to be so focused on happiness as a result of
> the acquisition of objects, one would think that simple curiosity
> about the making and maintenance of those objects would drive people
> to gain some knowledge in those areas.
>
> Apparently not.
>
> It's having the bling, rather than making it that drives them.
>
> We've managed to outsource our contact with the fundamental
> necessities of life in the current age - much to our eventual peril,
> I'm afraid.
>
> I can see the next edition of the Foxfire series dealing with how the
> old dudes managed to set up their own Wireless Internet connections,
> changed their own light bulbs, cleaned their own gutters, and just
> maybe - wiped their own ass.
>
> Not that I'm cynical.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Watson
>
> tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/