Ah

"Andrew"

01/02/2005 8:01 PM

brushed shellac vs. padding

I have been reading quite a bit on applying shellac. One thing I keep
coming back to is the padding method. I understand you pad on a thin
coat, then when you've reached the end, go back to where you started
and repeat process several times. I haven't worked up the courage to
try it, but I have been brushing with #1.5 with okay results. I
understand once you lay down a layer don't go back and brush anymore
because shellac dries so quickly. My question is why can't I simulate
the padding method with a brush? Not the result, just the method. By
that I mean brush on the first layer, then when I've finished the
surface go back to the beginning and repeat, like padding. I've only
read about brushing on 1 layer then wait.


This topic has 1 replies

DB

Dave Balderstone

in reply to "Andrew" on 01/02/2005 8:01 PM

01/02/2005 10:05 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
Andrew <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been reading quite a bit on applying shellac. One thing I keep
> coming back to is the padding method. I understand you pad on a thin
> coat, then when you've reached the end, go back to where you started
> and repeat process several times. I haven't worked up the courage to
> try it, but I have been brushing with #1.5 with okay results.

It's beyond "okay results".

Pad, or pad not. There is no "try".

djb

--
"Modern technology has enabled us to communicate and organize with speed and
efficiency never before possible. People have gotten less competent to
compensate for this." - CW


You’ve reached the end of replies