Ll

Leon

17/02/2018 6:33 PM

Assembly Bench Completed

A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.

I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
table has enough. ;~)

The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/

All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/

I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....


This topic has 62 replies

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 6:32 PM

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:10:45 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 9:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>>>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>>>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>>>
>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>> table has enough. ;~)
>>>>
>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>
>>>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>
>>>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>>>
>>> Very nice.
>>>
>>> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>>
>> The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
>> thing.
>>
>
>I used to store stuff like that way up there, total PIA, plus my cieling
>are 12~16" taller now.

I used to store all my ladders hanging from the ceiling. I had pulleys
and lines for each one to help put them away. Worked well.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

21/02/2018 8:17 AM

Sonny <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 10:15:09 PM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
>
>
>> Yeah, they are to replace some 6 year old Jack Daniels Whiskey barrels.
>> We'll see how well they hold up. I bought them BTW. ;~)
>
> Yep, I'm familiar with those planters. They eventually decay. Taking a
> cue from those barrels (giving a try at barrel and bucket making), long
> ago I made this planter bucket/home decor, adding an accent rope handle:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/43836144@N04/5323301973/in/photostream

Cool planter. Did you make the plant too? :-)



>
> With our near 80° weather, I'm getting the spring-planting fever, also.
> Monday, I mowed some of Mom's grass and thought about overhauling one
> flower bed and tilling the garden. I just don't have the all-day energy
> to multitask, that way, any more. The spring-time to-do list is
> growing. Jonas' son came over to help mow, as well.... about 3 acres to
> mow. I washed his car, while he mowed.
>
> Sonny
>


Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 8:31 AM

On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>
>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>
>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>
> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>
> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok but
> takes up lots of floor/wall space.

When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.


I have neither left.  Too damn many
> tools/cabinets etc for that thing.  I have a 7' tool cabinet on wheels
> the same height as my Tsaw.  So with that, and extensions front and side
> on the TSaw that works together as a 7x7' sanding/painting/assembly table.
>

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 20/02/2018 8:31 AM

03/03/2018 1:21 PM

On 3/3/2018 1:19 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
> [email protected] wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
> *trim*
>>
>> The drawback is that things get further apart. Need a screwdriver?
>> Dang, they're in the other room.
>
> It doesn't seem to matter how many you have, either! They're *all* in the
> other room!

AND..... not where they are suppose to be once you get there.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 20/02/2018 8:31 AM

03/03/2018 11:14 AM

On 3/3/2018 10:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Snip

>
> But what "Doesn't know Jack" doesn't get is that there are still
> Neanders out there, who appreciate a good Neander bench. I don't have
> a desire for such a bench because I'm more of a Tim. OTOH, I don't
> like Festering tool "benches" because they are way too spindly. I
> don't like my work moving around under my (more power) tools. The
> Festool router table is just nuts.

FWIW I have the larger Festool work table. It does wobble...and there
are braces to add at an additional cost. I have used this bench
extensively over the past 5 or so years. The wobble does not bother me.
Like you I thought it would drive me nuts. But I do not notice the
wobble when I am using it to hold clamped work when using the Domino, or
when sanding, or when using the cross cut for the track saw. I love
it's versatility and because it has all the holes for dogs and clamps
and slots for vertical clamping I chose not to make my latest work
surface with holes in the top.


>
>>> Also, if you own a lathe, why would you rather have sand bags holding
>>> it down than a cabinet with drawers full of tools and stuff? Even
>>> someone like you should be able to figure it out, let alone one with
>>> a lifetime of experience.
>>>
>>
>> Now you're just trying to force your preference on others. :-)
>
> Lefties do that.
>
>> When I had my lathe I did both. I added covered storage underneath for
>> the lathe-associated tools and that was extremely handy. I also had
>> sandbags and/or brake drums on the bottom.
>> But to criticize someone for not building a cabinet into their lathe
>> stand is a bit narrow-minded to me. Maybe these people have plenty of
>> room in the shop and don't need the extra storage space. Yeah, I know,
>> that's an oxymoron, but I'm sure there are unicorn woodworkers out there
>> with lots of room in their shops.
>
> Or the storage space is more useful elsewhere. OTOH, a cabinet under
> a lathe may make cleanup a little easier (not so many nooks and
> crannies to collect shavings).
>
>> In my shop, the cabinet tops *are* work spaces and if I had tools
>> permanently attached, I would need to build more work space. I'd rather
>> have bigger power tools on mobile bases and roll them in and out of the
>> work area. If/when I have a big enough shop, I'll gladly have dedicated
>> floor space for each and every tool station.
>
> The drawback is that things get further apart. Need a screwdriver?
> Dang, they're in the other room.
>

k

in reply to Leon on 20/02/2018 8:31 AM

03/03/2018 11:42 AM

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:07:13 -0600, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 3/2/18 9:01 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/28/2018 8:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:53:47 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF just sitting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on top, held in place by side rails 1/4"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shy of the surface. I'm not short on space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so portability wasn't important. It's on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casters but it never moves more than a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordion folding work table "the centipede"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it was called? Everyone got all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the Comet cause he thought it looked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouTube before. Looks ok but takes up lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> print of 20"x17". You probably take up more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it
>>>>>>>>>>>> has a full sheet of plywood on top. To me, a full
>>>>>>>>>>>> sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side
>>>>>>>>>>> by side. Each is 96" long, 20" wide, and 8.5"
>>>>>>>>>>> tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with the
>>>>>>>>>>> bottom of one against the top of the other the foot
>>>>>>>>>>> print is 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how
>>>>>>>>>> you get the long 96" dimension to store against the
>>>>>>>>>> wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have
>>>>>>>>>>>> space for it. Kevin has space for it, I
>>>>>>>>>>>> personally don't really need it, nor have any
>>>>>>>>>>>> space for it if I did need it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not
>>>>>>>>>>> build one for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin
>>>>>>>>>> should build one, he won't even need to store it with
>>>>>>>>>> his 2000' shop. Make it same height as TS and he has
>>>>>>>>>> a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have
>>>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>> good for an outfeed table, for the same reasons. I
>>>>>>>>> don't currently have one, mostly because it hasn't
>>>>>>>>> floated to the top of the "do" list. But when I do
>>>>>>>>> build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting
>>>>>>>>> table. I already have the parts (though haven't decided
>>>>>>>>> if I want it on wheels).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were
>>>>>>>> Kevin, not sure why. Also not sure what "the same
>>>>>>>> reasons" are you mention that it wouldn't work as an
>>>>>>>> outfeed table?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing
>>>>>>>> it down between uses, is it has no storage. I would put
>>>>>>>> it on wheels, put drawered cabinet under the top and make
>>>>>>>> it the right height for the TS outfeed. I try to have
>>>>>>>> cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
>>>>>>>> press, planer and shaper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described
>>>>>>> by its designer, it to be a portable work surface that is
>>>>>>> (relatively) light, quickly set-up and torn down, and can
>>>>>>> be easily handled by one person, and also have some of the
>>>>>>> features of a shop workbench, like under-surface temporary
>>>>>>> tool storage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you
>>>>>>> might as well build a non-portable, regular shop work
>>>>>>> table. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly.
>>>>>> He has 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough.
>>>>>> For most a pair of saw horses is all that's needed for a
>>>>>> portable work surface. This thing Leon built is really just
>>>>>> a fancy top for a pair of saw horses, and would seem best
>>>>>> suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates has a
>>>>>> youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with
>>>>>> drawers and such for storage, and I'm not a fan of open
>>>>>> shelves under a bench. They end up collecting junk thats hard
>>>>>> to find and dig out. Drawers were invented for a reason.
>>>>>> There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that many
>>>>>> people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple,
>>>>>> drawerless work benches with tool tray in the back of the top
>>>>>> that all the books show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>>>>>
>>>>> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
>>>>> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
>>>>> chisels/mallets.
>>>>>
>>>> No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a
>>>> bench with drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass
>>>> you need, plus storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty
>>>> robust for 99.9999% to 100% of all the work a woodworker will be
>>>> doing on it. You can bang, plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top
>>>> and it won't move or bounce a silly millimeter. That's more than
>>>> twice as thick as the plywood floor in your house that is holding
>>>> up your grand piano.
>>>
>>> It don't work that way. The top needs the mass to resist
>>> movement.
>>>
>>>> Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand
>>>> bags on their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the
>>>> type that only does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood
>>>> shop, build a bench with drawers to hold your lathe up. You get
>>>> mass, storage, and build skills all at once, same with a
>>>> workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to do it.
>>>
>>> It's amazing that you know more than woodworkers who have been
>>> doing this for their entire life.
>>>
>> Amazing that woodworkers that have been doing it their entire life
>> don't agree with me, who has been doing it his entire life as well. I
>> explained the reasons behind my extremely experienced opinion, you
>> are free to disagree and give the basis for disagreement. Saying
>> others disagree with me is rather lame, but expected from one with
>> about no experience. Besides, if you look around, you will see very
>> few actual wood shops with 5" thick $1000 maple worktops, so
>> apparently plenty of woodworkers agree with me.
>
>Woodworking has certainly changed a lot since those heavy types of
>workbenches were necessary. Power tools have changed our world and the
>types of work surfaces we need.
>I think that's enough to explain why you don't see those hulking benches
>much anymore.

But what "Doesn't know Jack" doesn't get is that there are still
Neanders out there, who appreciate a good Neander bench. I don't have
a desire for such a bench because I'm more of a Tim. OTOH, I don't
like Festering tool "benches" because they are way too spindly. I
don't like my work moving around under my (more power) tools. The
Festool router table is just nuts.

>> Also, if you own a lathe, why would you rather have sand bags holding
>> it down than a cabinet with drawers full of tools and stuff? Even
>> someone like you should be able to figure it out, let alone one with
>> a lifetime of experience.
>>
>
>Now you're just trying to force your preference on others. :-)

Lefties do that.

>When I had my lathe I did both. I added covered storage underneath for
>the lathe-associated tools and that was extremely handy. I also had
>sandbags and/or brake drums on the bottom.
>But to criticize someone for not building a cabinet into their lathe
>stand is a bit narrow-minded to me. Maybe these people have plenty of
>room in the shop and don't need the extra storage space. Yeah, I know,
>that's an oxymoron, but I'm sure there are unicorn woodworkers out there
>with lots of room in their shops.

Or the storage space is more useful elsewhere. OTOH, a cabinet under
a lathe may make cleanup a little easier (not so many nooks and
crannies to collect shavings).

>In my shop, the cabinet tops *are* work spaces and if I had tools
>permanently attached, I would need to build more work space. I'd rather
>have bigger power tools on mobile bases and roll them in and out of the
>work area. If/when I have a big enough shop, I'll gladly have dedicated
>floor space for each and every tool station.

The drawback is that things get further apart. Need a screwdriver?
Dang, they're in the other room.

Pp

Puckdropper

in reply to Leon on 20/02/2018 8:31 AM

03/03/2018 7:19 PM

[email protected] wrote in
news:[email protected]:

*trim*
>
> The drawback is that things get further apart. Need a screwdriver?
> Dang, they're in the other room.

It doesn't seem to matter how many you have, either! They're *all* in the
other room!

Puckdropper
--
http://www.puckdroppersplace.us/rec.woodworking
A mini archive of some of rec.woodworking's best and worst!

wn

woodchucker

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 8:29 PM

On 2/18/2018 8:52 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 7:24:12 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>>> earlier...
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>>
>>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>>> the lower wings.
>>>>
>>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>
>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>
>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>
>>
>> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
>> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
>> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>>
>
> I've picked up a few hollow core door over the years 'cuz I kept hearing
> that they are "Dead flat, light, cheap". Maybe it's the doors I've tried
> 'cuz I only get 2 out of 3 and dead flat ain't one of them.
>
> This style:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/kwcSS1q.jpg
>
> The lower face of the main one in the picture is convex, the other one (on
> the right) is concave, as shown here:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/HzfZ1G3.jpg
>
> I've tossed 2 or 3 more that were also not flat.
>
> On the flip side, last week I ran across a local place on Offer-Up that has
> dozens of salvaged workbenches of all shapes and sizes. Some workbench tops
> without legs also. The guy was tossing around prices of $50 for tops, up to
> $150 for complete benches. I wasn't dressed to dig around and crawl through
> a salvage warehouse and I didn't have a straightedge with me anyway, but I'll
> be going back.
>
Hollow Core are not dead flat. A solid core door has a better chance
since they are particle board usually.

--
Jeff

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 5:19 PM

On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>> together.
>>
>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>
>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
> ...
>
> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
> earlier...
>
> Flat assembly surfaces are always near priceless

Pre-cicely! Worthe their weight in gold!



-what's the height;
I mentioned earlier 50 lbs ish but maybe less, The top and bottom on one
side add up to 40" x 96". All vertical pieces are hollowed put, 2 long
on the sides and 5 shot perpendicular to the sides.
Just a hair over the weight od a full sheet of 1/2" ply. Light enough
to not be concerned about setting up and breaking down by my self.



I
> made mine somewhat lower so a 30" or so piece on top wasn't out of reach
> or such a strain to reach...but they weren't nearly so fancily-built,
> either!  :)
>
> --

I wanted large the large flat area as a work surface. I assemble FF's
and I want them to be flat. This should work for those. IIRC this is
about 39" tall.

A close look and this ain't so fancy, no sir! ;~) I was not going for
purdy so much as functional.


I will say the blue nylon webbing/straps to replace hinges and to limit
the splay of the legs works surprisingly well. I think I got 25' of it
for $11.

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

25/02/2018 6:23 PM

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 11:19:39 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>
>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".
>>>
>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>
>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>
>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>
>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>> wheels).
>>
>Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>wouldn't work as an outfeed table?

No problem with the name. I don't use it often on the Usenet, so I
wouldn't expect anyone to remember. They usually just use the
initials.

I didn't say it wouldn't work. It's whole purpose is to save space,
which is of no consequence for me. I'd rather have the outfeed table
as a permanent feature.

>What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down between
>uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put drawered
>cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS outfeed.
>I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
>press, planer and shaper.

Exactly. Drawers take a lot of time to make, which is something I'm
dearly short of. Of course, right now I have time but can't
physically do the work (for the same reason I have time ;-).

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 9:27 AM

DerbyDad03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>
>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>> table has enough. ;~)
>>
>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>
> Very nice.

Thank you.


>
> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>

Weight, not sure. Probably 50 ish. Lbs each. Light enough for me to pick
up in the middle and carry around by my self. Think about the weight of a
single sheet of 1/2" plywood. Just a little more than that. Because the
sides, ends, and inner supports have the middles cut out they are just a
few pounds total. Each section is 20"x96".

I think I will be standing them on their ends at a wall just behind the end
of the garage door support rail. I have 9' ceilings in my garage so that
should not be an issue.

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 6:41 PM

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>> together.
>>>
>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>
>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>> ...
>>
>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>> earlier...
>
>Forgot to address in my precious response.
>
>The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>the lower wings.
>
>It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/

See? The fishing works. ;-)

I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?

I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.

k

in reply to [email protected] on 18/02/2018 6:41 PM

28/02/2018 8:20 PM

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:53:47 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>>>>>>>> is 96"
>>>>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>>>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>>>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>>>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>>>>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>>>>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>>>>> wheels).
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>>>>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>>>>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>>>>
>>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>>>>> between uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put
>>>>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>>>>> outfeed. I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>>>>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
>>>> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
>>>> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
>>>> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
>>>> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>>>>
>>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
>>>> build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)
>>>
>>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly. He has
>>> 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough. For most a pair
>>> of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface. This
>>> thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
>>> and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates
>>> has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>>
>>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
>>> for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
>>> up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
>>> for a reason. There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
>>> many people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple, drawerless
>>> work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
>>> show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>>
>> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
>> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
>> chisels/mallets.
>>
>No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a bench with
>drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass you need, plus
>storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty robust for 99.9999% to
>100% of all the work a woodworker will be doing on it. You can bang,
>plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top and it won't move or bounce a
>silly millimeter. That's more than twice as thick as the plywood floor
>in your house that is holding up your grand piano.

It don't work that way. The top needs the mass to resist movement.

>Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand bags on
>their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the type that only
>does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood shop, build a bench with
>drawers to hold your lathe up. You get mass, storage, and build skills
>all at once, same with a workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to
>do it.

It's amazing that you know more than woodworkers who have been doing
this for their entire life.

Jj

Jack

in reply to [email protected] on 18/02/2018 6:41 PM

02/03/2018 10:01 AM

On 2/28/2018 8:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:53:47 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>>>>>>>>> is 96"
>>>>>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>>>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>>>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>>>>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>>>>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>>>>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>>>>>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>>>>>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>>>>>> wheels).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>>>>>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>>>>>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>>>>>> between uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put
>>>>>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>>>>>> outfeed. I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>>>>>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
>>>>> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
>>>>> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
>>>>> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
>>>>> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
>>>>> build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly. He has
>>>> 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough. For most a pair
>>>> of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface. This
>>>> thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
>>>> and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates
>>>> has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>>>
>>>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
>>>> for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
>>>> up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
>>>> for a reason. There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
>>>> many people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple, drawerless
>>>> work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
>>>> show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>>>
>>> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
>>> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
>>> chisels/mallets.
>>>
>> No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a bench with
>> drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass you need, plus
>> storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty robust for 99.9999% to
>> 100% of all the work a woodworker will be doing on it. You can bang,
>> plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top and it won't move or bounce a
>> silly millimeter. That's more than twice as thick as the plywood floor
>> in your house that is holding up your grand piano.
>
> It don't work that way. The top needs the mass to resist movement.
>
>> Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand bags on
>> their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the type that only
>> does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood shop, build a bench with
>> drawers to hold your lathe up. You get mass, storage, and build skills
>> all at once, same with a workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to
>> do it.
>
> It's amazing that you know more than woodworkers who have been doing
> this for their entire life.
>
Amazing that woodworkers that have been doing it their entire life don't
agree with me, who has been doing it his entire life as well. I
explained the reasons behind my extremely experienced opinion, you are
free to disagree and give the basis for disagreement. Saying others
disagree with me is rather lame, but expected from one with about no
experience. Besides, if you look around, you will see very few actual
wood shops with 5" thick $1000 maple worktops, so apparently plenty of
woodworkers agree with me. Also, if you own a lathe, why would you
rather have sand bags holding it down than a cabinet with drawers full
of tools and stuff? Even someone like you should be able to figure it
out, let alone one with a lifetime of experience.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to [email protected] on 18/02/2018 6:41 PM

02/03/2018 10:07 AM

On 3/2/18 9:01 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/28/2018 8:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:53:47 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF just sitting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on top, held in place by side rails 1/4"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shy of the surface. I'm not short on space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so portability wasn't important. It's on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casters but it never moves more than a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordion folding work table "the centipede"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it was called? Everyone got all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the Comet cause he thought it looked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouTube before. Looks ok but takes up lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>> print of 20"x17". You probably take up more
>>>>>>>>>>>> space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it
>>>>>>>>>>> has a full sheet of plywood on top. To me, a full
>>>>>>>>>>> sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on anything
>>>>>>>>>>> 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side
>>>>>>>>>> by side. Each is 96" long, 20" wide, and 8.5"
>>>>>>>>>> tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with the
>>>>>>>>>> bottom of one against the top of the other the foot
>>>>>>>>>> print is 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how
>>>>>>>>> you get the long 96" dimension to store against the
>>>>>>>>> wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have
>>>>>>>>>>> space for it. Kevin has space for it, I
>>>>>>>>>>> personally don't really need it, nor have any
>>>>>>>>>>> space for it if I did need it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not
>>>>>>>>>> build one for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin
>>>>>>>>> should build one, he won't even need to store it with
>>>>>>>>> his 2000' shop. Make it same height as TS and he has
>>>>>>>>> a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have
>>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be
>>>>>>>> good for an outfeed table, for the same reasons. I
>>>>>>>> don't currently have one, mostly because it hasn't
>>>>>>>> floated to the top of the "do" list. But when I do
>>>>>>>> build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting
>>>>>>>> table. I already have the parts (though haven't decided
>>>>>>>> if I want it on wheels).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were
>>>>>>> Kevin, not sure why. Also not sure what "the same
>>>>>>> reasons" are you mention that it wouldn't work as an
>>>>>>> outfeed table?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing
>>>>>>> it down between uses, is it has no storage. I would put
>>>>>>> it on wheels, put drawered cabinet under the top and make
>>>>>>> it the right height for the TS outfeed. I try to have
>>>>>>> cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
>>>>>>> press, planer and shaper.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described
>>>>>> by its designer, it to be a portable work surface that is
>>>>>> (relatively) light, quickly set-up and torn down, and can
>>>>>> be easily handled by one person, and also have some of the
>>>>>> features of a shop workbench, like under-surface temporary
>>>>>> tool storage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you
>>>>>> might as well build a non-portable, regular shop work
>>>>>> table. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly.
>>>>> He has 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough.
>>>>> For most a pair of saw horses is all that's needed for a
>>>>> portable work surface. This thing Leon built is really just
>>>>> a fancy top for a pair of saw horses, and would seem best
>>>>> suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates has a
>>>>> youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with
>>>>> drawers and such for storage, and I'm not a fan of open
>>>>> shelves under a bench. They end up collecting junk thats hard
>>>>> to find and dig out. Drawers were invented for a reason.
>>>>> There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that many
>>>>> people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple,
>>>>> drawerless work benches with tool tray in the back of the top
>>>>> that all the books show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>>>>
>>>> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
>>>> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
>>>> chisels/mallets.
>>>>
>>> No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a
>>> bench with drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass
>>> you need, plus storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty
>>> robust for 99.9999% to 100% of all the work a woodworker will be
>>> doing on it. You can bang, plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top
>>> and it won't move or bounce a silly millimeter. That's more than
>>> twice as thick as the plywood floor in your house that is holding
>>> up your grand piano.
>>
>> It don't work that way. The top needs the mass to resist
>> movement.
>>
>>> Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand
>>> bags on their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the
>>> type that only does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood
>>> shop, build a bench with drawers to hold your lathe up. You get
>>> mass, storage, and build skills all at once, same with a
>>> workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to do it.
>>
>> It's amazing that you know more than woodworkers who have been
>> doing this for their entire life.
>>
> Amazing that woodworkers that have been doing it their entire life
> don't agree with me, who has been doing it his entire life as well. I
> explained the reasons behind my extremely experienced opinion, you
> are free to disagree and give the basis for disagreement. Saying
> others disagree with me is rather lame, but expected from one with
> about no experience. Besides, if you look around, you will see very
> few actual wood shops with 5" thick $1000 maple worktops, so
> apparently plenty of woodworkers agree with me.

Woodworking has certainly changed a lot since those heavy types of
workbenches were necessary. Power tools have changed our world and the
types of work surfaces we need.
I think that's enough to explain why you don't see those hulking benches
much anymore.


> Also, if you own a lathe, why would you rather have sand bags holding
> it down than a cabinet with drawers full of tools and stuff? Even
> someone like you should be able to figure it out, let alone one with
> a lifetime of experience.
>

Now you're just trying to force your preference on others. :-)
When I had my lathe I did both. I added covered storage underneath for
the lathe-associated tools and that was extremely handy. I also had
sandbags and/or brake drums on the bottom.
But to criticize someone for not building a cabinet into their lathe
stand is a bit narrow-minded to me. Maybe these people have plenty of
room in the shop and don't need the extra storage space. Yeah, I know,
that's an oxymoron, but I'm sure there are unicorn woodworkers out there
with lots of room in their shops.

In my shop, the cabinet tops *are* work spaces and if I had tools
permanently attached, I would need to build more work space. I'd rather
have bigger power tools on mobile bases and roll them in and out of the
work area. If/when I have a big enough shop, I'll gladly have dedicated
floor space for each and every tool station.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to [email protected] on 18/02/2018 6:41 PM

03/03/2018 9:28 AM

On 3/2/2018 11:07 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 3/2/18 9:01 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/28/2018 8:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:53:47 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF just sitting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on top, held in place by side rails 1/4"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shy of the surface. I'm not short on space
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so portability wasn't important. It's on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casters but it never moves more than a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or two.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accordion folding work table "the centipede"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it was called? Everyone got all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the Comet cause he thought it looked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YouTube before. Looks ok but takes up lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> print of 20"x17". You probably take up more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it
>>>>>>>>>>>> has a full sheet of plywood on top. To me, a full
>>>>>>>>>>>> sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on anything
>>>>>>>>>>>> 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side
>>>>>>>>>>> by side. Each is 96" long, 20" wide, and 8.5"
>>>>>>>>>>> tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with the
>>>>>>>>>>> bottom of one against the top of the other the foot
>>>>>>>>>>> print is 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how
>>>>>>>>>> you get the long 96" dimension to store against the
>>>>>>>>>> wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have
>>>>>>>>>>>> space for it. Kevin has space for it, I
>>>>>>>>>>>> personally don't really need it, nor have any space for it
>>>>>>>>>>>> if I did need it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not
>>>>>>>>>>> build one for yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin
>>>>>>>>>> should build one, he won't even need to store it with
>>>>>>>>>> his 2000' shop. Make it same height as TS and he has
>>>>>>>>>> a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have
>>>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be
>>>>>>>>> good for an outfeed table, for the same reasons. I
>>>>>>>>> don't currently have one, mostly because it hasn't
>>>>>>>>> floated to the top of the "do" list. But when I do
>>>>>>>>> build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>>>>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided
>>>>>>>>> if I want it on wheels).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were
>>>>>>>> Kevin, not sure why. Also not sure what "the same
>>>>>>>> reasons" are you mention that it wouldn't work as an
>>>>>>>> outfeed table?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing
>>>>>>>> it down between uses, is it has no storage. I would put
>>>>>>>> it on wheels, put drawered cabinet under the top and make
>>>>>>>> it the right height for the TS outfeed. I try to have
>>>>>>>> cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
>>>>>>>> press, planer and shaper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described
>>>>>>> by its designer, it to be a portable work surface that is
>>>>>>> (relatively) light, quickly set-up and torn down, and can
>>>>>>> be easily handled by one person, and also have some of the
>>>>>>> features of a shop workbench, like under-surface temporary
>>>>>>> tool storage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you
>>>>>>> might as well build a non-portable, regular shop work
>>>>>>> table. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly.
>>>>>> He has 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough.
>>>>>> For most a pair of saw horses is all that's needed for a
>>>>>> portable work surface. This thing Leon built is really just
>>>>>> a fancy top for a pair of saw horses, and would seem best
>>>>>> suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates has a
>>>>>> youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with
>>>>>> drawers and such for storage, and I'm not a fan of open
>>>>>> shelves under a bench. They end up collecting junk thats hard
>>>>>> to find and dig out. Drawers were invented for a reason.
>>>>>> There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that many
>>>>>> people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple,
>>>>>> drawerless work benches with tool tray in the back of the top
>>>>>> that all the books show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>>>>>
>>>>> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
>>>>> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
>>>>> chisels/mallets.
>>>>>
>>>> No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a
>>>> bench with drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass
>>>> you need, plus storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty
>>>> robust for 99.9999% to 100% of all the work a woodworker will be
>>>> doing on it. You can bang, plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top
>>>> and it won't move or bounce a silly millimeter. That's more than
>>>> twice as thick as the plywood floor in your house that is holding
>>>> up your grand piano.
>>>
>>> It don't work that way. The top needs the mass to resist
>>> movement.
>>>
>>>> Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand
>>>> bags on their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the
>>>> type that only does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood
>>>> shop, build a bench with drawers to hold your lathe up. You get
>>>> mass, storage, and build skills all at once, same with a
>>>> workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to do it.
>>>
>>> It's amazing that you know more than woodworkers who have been
>>> doing this for their entire life.
>>>
>> Amazing that woodworkers that have been doing it their entire life
>> don't agree with me, who has been doing it his entire life as well. I
>> explained the reasons behind my extremely experienced opinion, you
>> are free to disagree and give the basis for disagreement. Saying
>> others disagree with me is rather lame, but expected from one with
>> about no experience. Besides, if you look around, you will see very
>> few actual wood shops with 5" thick $1000 maple worktops, so
>> apparently plenty of woodworkers agree with me.
>
> Woodworking has certainly changed a lot since those heavy types of
> workbenches were necessary. Power tools have changed our world and the
> types of work surfaces we need.
> I think that's enough to explain why you don't see those hulking benches
> much anymore.

But we see those types of benches advertised, plans everywhere and so
on. If power tools changed anything it would be how easy it is to build
a cabinet with drawers full of tools instead of a $1000 5" thick maple
top for bulk, that had no storage other than a shelf.

>> Also, if you own a lathe, why would you rather have sand bags holding
>> it down than a cabinet with drawers full of tools and stuff? Even
>> someone like you should be able to figure it out, let alone one with
>> a lifetime of experience.
>>
>
> Now you're just trying to force your preference on others. :-)

Not at all, just vocalizing my opinion. I have no problem with someone
else spending a $1000 on an unneeded maple top for a bench with no
storage. Or building a stand for a lathe with no storage, and throwing a
sand bag on it for bulk. The lathe I could see if the turner had few
tools, and no skills to build a cabinet with drawers.

> When I had my lathe I did both. I added covered storage underneath for
> the lathe-associated tools and that was extremely handy. I also had
> sandbags and/or brake drums on the bottom.

> But to criticize someone for not building a cabinet into their lathe
> stand is a bit narrow-minded to me. Maybe these people have plenty of
> room in the shop and don't need the extra storage space. Yeah, I know,
> that's an oxymoron, but I'm sure there are unicorn woodworkers out there
> with lots of room in their shops.

I'd guess few home shops have enough room to waste space. Some might,
but most don't. When I see plans on the net for workbenches and lathe
stands, they almost always have no storage other than a shelf or two.
My opinion based on a lifetime of experience is that is lame. Actually,
that was my opinion before I had a lifetime of experience, and I'd think
it was just plain common sense.

Router tables of course have complicated cabinets with drawers to store
router bits and all that, not bad but really, a router is a portable
tool. a stand can be a flat piece of wood clamped to the workbench
(particularly easy if your work bench top isn't 5 inches thick)

> In my shop, the cabinet tops *are* work spaces and if I had tools
> permanently attached, I would need to build more work space. I'd rather
> have bigger power tools on mobile bases and roll them in and out of the
> work area. If/when I have a big enough shop, I'll gladly have dedicated
> floor space for each and every tool station.

Thats pretty much my point. Whether your work tops have tools
permanently attached or not, the space under the tops should be for
storage, lots of drawers to put stuff in. This really doesn't change
much even with plenty of space. Even with a 2000' shop like Keith has,
my experience is you need a place for everything, and cabinets with
plenty of drawers is the way to go. If building a cabinet for storage,
might as well design to hold a lathe, or building a workbench, might as
well build drawers for storage while you are at it. Just makes sense to
me. That doesn't negate building a tear down assembly table like
Leon's. That's not what I'm talking about.



--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 8:40 PM

On 2/18/2018 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:10:45 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/2018 9:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>>>>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>>>>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>>>>
>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>> table has enough. ;~)
>>>>>
>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>
>>>>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>
>>>>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>>>>
>>>> Very nice.
>>>>
>>>> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>>>
>>> The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
>>> thing.
>>>
>>
>> I used to store stuff like that way up there, total PIA, plus my cieling
>> are 12~16" taller now.
>
> I used to store all my ladders hanging from the ceiling. I had pulleys
> and lines for each one to help put them away. Worked well.
>

I kept full sheets of plywood up there. ;~(

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 8:44 PM

On 2/18/2018 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>> together.
>>>>
>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>
>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>> earlier...
>>
>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>
>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>> the lower wings.
>>
>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>
> See? The fishing works. ;-)

LOL
>
> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?

Well preciousely I cut on top of a grid of 2x4's and they were not flat
like this. I used a sheet of foam insulation board between sheets to
take the blade hit.

Ron Paulk, just uses thin strips of scrap plywood under the cut and to
support the keeper and waste side. I'm going to try that.


>
> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>

If room was no object..... ;~) Your method sounds great.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 8:47 PM

On 2/18/2018 6:24 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>> together.
>>>>>
>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>
>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>> earlier...
>>>
>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>
>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>> the lower wings.
>>>
>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>> to put my track with parallel guides.  It is normally an issue finding a
>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>
>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>
>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>
>
> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>
>
And that is a great use of those cheapie doors too. LOL

I finally wanted something 96" long and wider, 40". I can sit in the
middle of these torsion box sections and I get about 1/16" deflection.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

25/02/2018 7:43 PM

On 2/25/2018 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

>>>
>>>
>>> Would a picture help?
>>
>> I needed to add this to this drawing anyway.  ;~)
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39564825215/in/dateposted-public/
>>
> Now I get it, thanks.  So the wall space is 96" x 20" x 17.

A picture is worth a thousand words!


I think it
> was the "bottom of one against the top of the other" and ignoring the
> 96" dimension that threw me off.
>

Too many numbers. :~)

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 10:02 AM

On 2/18/2018 9:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:44:24 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/2018 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>>> earlier...
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>>
>>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>>> the lower wings.
>>>>
>>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>
>> LOL
>>>
>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>
>> Well preciousely I cut on top of a grid of 2x4's and they were not flat
>> like this. I used a sheet of foam insulation board between sheets to
>> take the blade hit.
>
> I've used 2x4s, too, but they're all twisted differently. Kinda
> defeats the purpose of a flat top. Foam insulation board had crossed
> my mind but foam is a PITA to get rid of.

Well the piece I have has the aluminum skin on both sides. There is
little to no foam escaping. But after using this piece for about 7
years it is getting to where it dies not lay flat. Seems to want to bow
on the side that has the most cuts. BUT it tends to be kinda easy to
break and can be a PIA.


>>
>> Ron Paulk, just uses thin strips of scrap plywood under the cut and to
>> support the keeper and waste side. I'm going to try that.
>
> Nice idea. At least they'll lie flat.

Yeah, but who has scraps. LOL


>>
>>>
>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>
>>
>> If room was no object..... ;~) Your method sounds great.
>
> No object at all. As long as it stays in the basement, SWMBO doesn't
> object. ;-) It's my 2000ft^2+ man cave. ;-)
>

That is like my whole house. LOL.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 5:27 PM

On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>> together.
>>
>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>
>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
> ...
>
> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
> earlier...

Forgot to address in my precious response.

The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
the lower wings.

It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 10:53 AM

On 2/24/2018 10:47 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4"
>>>>>> MDF
>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important.
>>>>>> It's
>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>>>> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok
>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>
>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".  You
>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>
>>>  From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>
>>
>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side.  Each is 96"
>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall.  If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".
>
> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?

I'm sorry but I cannot think of a simpler way to explain it. FWIW, I
said a 20x17 foot print, not 20x8.5.



>
>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it.  Kevin has
>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>> for it if I did need it.
>
>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.
>
> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that.  I think Kevin should build one,
> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 10:55 AM

On 2/24/2018 10:47 AM, Jac
On 2/24/2018 10:53 AM, Leon wrote:

>>>>>
>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>
>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
is 96"
>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>> 20"x17".
>>
>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>
> I'm sorry but I cannot think of a simpler way to explain it. FWIW, I
> said a 20x17 foot print, not 20x8.5.


Would a picture help?

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 11:54 AM

On 2/24/2018 10:55 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 10:47 AM, Jac
> On 2/24/2018 10:53 AM, Leon wrote:
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
> You
> >>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
> >>>>
> >>>>  From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
> >>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
> >>>> anything 20x17"?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side.  Each
> is 96"
> >>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall.  If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
> >>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
> >>> 20"x17".
> >>
> >> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
> >> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
> >
> > I'm sorry but I cannot think of a simpler way to explain it.  FWIW, I
> > said a 20x17 foot print, not 20x8.5.
>
>
> Would a picture help?

I needed to add this to this drawing anyway. ;~)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39564825215/in/dateposted-public/

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

27/02/2018 9:17 AM

On 2/27/2018 8:33 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the
>>>>>>>>> Comet
>>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side.  Each
>>>>>> is 96"
>>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall.  If I stand both on end, 96" tall,
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>>
>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it.  Kevin
>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that.  I think Kevin should build
>>>>> one,
>>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same
>>>>> height
>>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons.  I don't currently have one,
>>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list.  But
>>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>>> wheels).
>>>>
>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>>
>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>>> between uses, is it has no storage.  I would put it on wheels, put
>>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>>> outfeed. I  try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>>
>>
>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
>> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
>> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
>> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
>> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>>
>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
>> build a non-portable, regular shop work table.  :-)
>
> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly.  He has
> 2000' of work space.  Wheels makes it portable enough.  For most a pair
> of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface.  This
> thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
> and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites.  Jay Bates
> has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.

I only needed a "flat" assembly work surface. I already have adequate
out feed for my TS, 15 roller HTC fold down. I wanted it to break down
because I still take it to a location and more importantly when I'm not
working on a job or project my wife's car gets parked in the garage.
The fancy top, is very rigid and flat, the goal. The tool storage is
just a bonus. I'm in the middle of building a quilters design wall for
my wife and it is ironic that this 40x96 inch work surface is a bit too
narrow, but leaps and bounds better that anything I have used in the
past. Did I mention Flat and Rigid? LOL As far as fancy, nothing like
most others that have all of the holes drilled in the top. Jay's is the
acceptation to that too. But his is the older design built with 3/4"
material and 50% heavier than mine that I built with the later design
and 1/2" material.




>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>
> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
> for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
> up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
> for a reason.  There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
> many people love.  For example, those 5" thick,  solid maple, drawerless
> work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
> show.  What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>

Yes, piling stuff under a bench is a RPIA. Drawers are my preference
also. I have 4 mobile and one stationary drawer units/chests.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 10:07 AM

On 2/18/2018 8:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:40:25 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/2018 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:10:45 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>>>>>>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>>>>>>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>>> table has enough. ;~)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>>>>>
>>>>> The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
>>>>> thing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I used to store stuff like that way up there, total PIA, plus my cieling
>>>> are 12~16" taller now.
>>>
>>> I used to store all my ladders hanging from the ceiling. I had pulleys
>>> and lines for each one to help put them away. Worked well.
>>>
>>
>> I kept full sheets of plywood up there. ;~(
>
> You said your bench top wasn't as heavy as a sheet of plywood. Didn't
> the plywood sag? I wouldn't think that would be a good way to store
> sheet goods.
>

I had a support system made up of 2x4's that had an interior opening of
54" wide and spaced 2' apart for 8'. The plywood would have had to bow
between the 2' spans. And I mostly had 3/4" sheet goods up there. AND
that was in a 2 car garage above the garage door.

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

23/02/2018 6:39 PM

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:07:20 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/20/2018 4:48 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>> >centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>> >cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>
>> We talked about these but, no, I didn't buy one. I looked at them but
>> decided that I really didn't need such portability. For outside use,
>> I have a six or eight of these:
>>
>> <https://www.homedepot.com/p/TOUGHBUILT-41-5-in-Folding-Sawhorse-TB-C550/205068379>
>
>They look nice, I built my own fold ups that work OK, and store outside
>on french cleats on my sheds outside wall.
>
>I wonder what on earth you do with six or eight of these things? I've
>never used more than two, and never used them in my shop, only for rare
>outside building projects. I think I used them 2-3x since I made them
>about 10 years ago.

I bought them to paint Hardi-plank siding but they're useful for
doors, too.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 11:25 AM

On 2/20/2018 9:22 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 2/20/18 8:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>
>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>
>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table
>>> "the centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the
>>> Comet cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>
>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok
>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>
>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".  You
>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>
>
> Depends on what you're staining, right?   :-p
> Yeah, yeah, I know what you meant.
>
>
;~)

Dt

DerbyDad03

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 5:37 AM

On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>
> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
> table has enough. ;~)
>
> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>
> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>
> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....

Very nice.

How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?

Dt

DerbyDad03

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 8:58 AM

On Saturday, February 24, 2018 at 11:47:37 AM UTC-5, Jack Stein wrote:
> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
> > On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
> >> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
> >>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
> >>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
> >>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
> >>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
> >>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
> >>>>
> >>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
> >>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
> >>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
> >>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
> >>>
> >>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
> >>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
> >>
> >> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
> >> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
> >> anything 20x17"?
> >>
> >
> > Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
> > long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
> > the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".
>
> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>

Stand an 8' 2x4 on end. How much floor space does it take up?

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 10:46 AM

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>
>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>> table has enough. ;~)
>>
>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>
>Very nice.
>
>How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?

The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
thing.

Sc

Sonny

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 4:29 PM

On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 6:33:55 PM UTC-6, Leon wrote:

>
> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>
> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....

Getting to the party late.

Considering the size, weight, portability, etc., that's a practical solution for many folks. Neat idea, good job.

I see you have some planters, there. I suspect there's a Festool thumb joke lurking about, but I'm getting too far OT, already.

Sonny

Sc

Sonny

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

21/02/2018 6:54 PM

On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 8:17:53 AM UTC-6, Leon Bridges wrote:

> Cool planter. Did you make the plant too? :-)

LOL. No, it's fake, though. Most of these types of projects are given to friends or family. This planter is at Mom's.

Sonny

Sc

Sonny

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

21/02/2018 3:32 AM

On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 10:15:09 PM UTC-6, Leon wrote:

=20
> Yeah, they are to replace some 6 year old Jack Daniels Whiskey barrels.=
=20
> We'll see how well they hold up. I bought them BTW. ;~)

Yep, I'm familiar with those planters. They eventually decay. Taking a c=
ue from those barrels (giving a try at barrel and bucket making), long ago=
I made this planter bucket/home decor, adding an accent rope handle: http=
s://www.flickr.com/photos/43836144@N04/5323301973/in/photostream

With our near 80=C2=B0 weather, I'm getting the spring-planting fever, also=
. Monday, I mowed some of Mom's grass and thought about overhauling one f=
lower bed and tilling the garden. I just don't have the all-day energy to=
multitask, that way, any more. The spring-time to-do list is growing. =
Jonas' son came over to help mow, as well.... about 3 acres to mow. I wash=
ed his car, while he mowed.

Sonny

Dt

DerbyDad03

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 5:52 PM

On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 7:24:12 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> > wrote:
> >=20
> >> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
> >>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
> >>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
> >>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.=C2=
=A0 I'm
> >>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
> >>>> together.
> >>>>
> >>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool wo=
rk
> >>>> table has enough.=C2=A0 ;~)
> >>>>
> >>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
> >>> earlier...
> >>
> >> Forgot to address in my precious response.
> >>
> >> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further tha=
n
> >> the lower wings.
> >>
> >> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a plac=
e
> >> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding=
a
> >> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
> >>
> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-publi=
c/
> >=20
> > See? The fishing works. ;-)
> >=20
> > I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
> >=20
> > I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
> > just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
> > surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
> > on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
> >=20
>=20
> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>=20

I've picked up a few hollow core door over the years 'cuz I kept hearing
that they are "Dead flat, light, cheap". Maybe it's the doors I've tried
'cuz I only get 2 out of 3 and dead flat ain't one of them.

This style:

https://i.imgur.com/kwcSS1q.jpg

The lower face of the main one in the picture is convex, the other one (on=
=20
the right) is concave, as shown here:

https://i.imgur.com/HzfZ1G3.jpg

I've tossed 2 or 3 more that were also not flat.

On the flip side, last week I ran across a local place on Offer-Up that has
dozens of salvaged workbenches of all shapes and sizes. Some workbench tops
without legs also. The guy was tossing around prices of $50 for tops, up to=
=20
$150 for complete benches. I wasn't dressed to dig around and crawl through=
=20
a salvage warehouse and I didn't have a straightedge with me anyway, but I'=
ll
be going back.

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 10:04 PM

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:44:24 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>> together.
>>>>>
>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>
>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>> earlier...
>>>
>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>
>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>> the lower wings.
>>>
>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>
>LOL
>>
>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>
>Well preciousely I cut on top of a grid of 2x4's and they were not flat
>like this. I used a sheet of foam insulation board between sheets to
>take the blade hit.

I've used 2x4s, too, but they're all twisted differently. Kinda
defeats the purpose of a flat top. Foam insulation board had crossed
my mind but foam is a PITA to get rid of.
>
>Ron Paulk, just uses thin strips of scrap plywood under the cut and to
>support the keeper and waste side. I'm going to try that.

Nice idea. At least they'll lie flat.
>
>>
>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>
>
>If room was no object..... ;~) Your method sounds great.

No object at all. As long as it stays in the basement, SWMBO doesn't
object. ;-) It's my 2000ft^2+ man cave. ;-)

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 5:10 PM

On 2/18/2018 9:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>>
>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>> table has enough. ;~)
>>>
>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>>
>> Very nice.
>>
>> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>
> The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
> thing.
>

I used to store stuff like that way up there, total PIA, plus my cieling
are 12~16" taller now.

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 9:57 PM

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:40:25 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:10:45 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/18/2018 9:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 05:37:26 -0800 (PST), DerbyDad03
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 7:33:55 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
>>>>>> I was building and finally today I am just about finished. I'm debating
>>>>>> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>> table has enough. ;~)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40326963461/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>>>>>
>>>>> Very nice.
>>>>>
>>>>> How heavy is each section? Where will you keep them when the table isn't being used?
>>>>
>>>> The ceiling of a garage is a good place for a lot of this sort of
>>>> thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I used to store stuff like that way up there, total PIA, plus my cieling
>>> are 12~16" taller now.
>>
>> I used to store all my ladders hanging from the ceiling. I had pulleys
>> and lines for each one to help put them away. Worked well.
>>
>
>I kept full sheets of plywood up there. ;~(

You said your bench top wasn't as heavy as a sheet of plywood. Didn't
the plywood sag? I wouldn't think that would be a good way to store
sheet goods.

dn

dpb

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 9:52 AM

On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table that
> I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm debating
> whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units together.
>
> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
> table has enough.  ;~)
>
> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
...

I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
earlier...

Flat assembly surfaces are always near priceless--what's the height; I
made mine somewhat lower so a 30" or so piece on top wasn't out of reach
or such a strain to reach...but they weren't nearly so fancily-built,
either! :)

--

k

in reply to dpb on 18/02/2018 9:52 AM

25/02/2018 8:50 PM

On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 19:43:20 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
wrote:

>On 2/25/2018 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would a picture help?
>>>
>>> I needed to add this to this drawing anyway.  ;~)
>>>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39564825215/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>> Now I get it, thanks.  So the wall space is 96" x 20" x 17.
>
>A picture is worth a thousand words!
>
>
> I think it
>> was the "bottom of one against the top of the other" and ignoring the
>> 96" dimension that threw me off.
>>
>
>Too many numbers. :~)

See, if you'd hung it on the ceiling like I suggested, you would have
used zero floor space. ...and confused the crap out of Jack. ;-)

k

in reply to dpb on 18/02/2018 9:52 AM

27/02/2018 7:39 PM

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>>>>>> is 96"
>>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>>
>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>>
>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>>> wheels).
>>>>
>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>>
>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>>> between uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put
>>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>>> outfeed. I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>>
>>
>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
>> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
>> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
>> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
>> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>>
>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
>> build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)
>
>Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly. He has
>2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough. For most a pair
>of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface. This
>thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
>and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates
>has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>
>I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
>for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
>up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
>for a reason. There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
>many people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple, drawerless
>work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
>show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).

That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
chisels/mallets.

Jj

Jack

in reply to dpb on 18/02/2018 9:52 AM

28/02/2018 7:53 AM

On 2/27/2018 7:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:33:41 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>>>>>>> is 96"
>>>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>>>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>>>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>>>> wheels).
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>>>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>>>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>>>
>>>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>>>> between uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put
>>>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>>>> outfeed. I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>>>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
>>> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
>>> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
>>> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
>>> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>>>
>>> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
>>> build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)
>>
>> Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly. He has
>> 2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough. For most a pair
>> of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface. This
>> thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
>> and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates
>> has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA
>>
>> I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
>> for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
>> up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
>> for a reason. There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
>> many people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple, drawerless
>> work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
>> show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).
>
> That 5" thick top gives the bench some mass so it doesn't try
> escaping, stage left, while you're playing with planes and
> chisels/mallets.
>
No need for a super expensive maple top that thick. Build a bench with
drawers full of tools and you will have all the mass you need, plus
storage. An inch and a half pine top is plenty robust for 99.9999% to
100% of all the work a woodworker will be doing on it. You can bang,
plane and chisel all day an 1 1/2" top and it won't move or bounce a
silly millimeter. That's more than twice as thick as the plywood floor
in your house that is holding up your grand piano.

Another thing that makes me laugh is woodworkers putting sand bags on
their lathe to give it mass. OK I guess if you are the type that only
does turnings, but for a guy with a basic wood shop, build a bench with
drawers to hold your lathe up. You get mass, storage, and build skills
all at once, same with a workbench, and you don't need expensive wood to
do it.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 6:24 PM

On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>> together.
>>>>
>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>
>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>> earlier...
>>
>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>
>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>> the lower wings.
>>
>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>
> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>
> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>
> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>

Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
Dead flat, light, cheap.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

18/02/2018 8:30 PM

On 2/18/18 7:52 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 7:24:12 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>>> earlier...
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>>
>>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>>> the lower wings.
>>>>
>>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>
>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>
>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>
>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>
>>
>> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
>> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
>> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>>
>
> I've picked up a few hollow core door over the years 'cuz I kept hearing
> that they are "Dead flat, light, cheap". Maybe it's the doors I've tried
> 'cuz I only get 2 out of 3 and dead flat ain't one of them.
>
> This style:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/kwcSS1q.jpg
>
> The lower face of the main one in the picture is convex, the other one (on
> the right) is concave, as shown here:
>
> https://i.imgur.com/HzfZ1G3.jpg
>
> I've tossed 2 or 3 more that were also not flat.
>
> On the flip side, last week I ran across a local place on Offer-Up that has
> dozens of salvaged workbenches of all shapes and sizes. Some workbench tops
> without legs also. The guy was tossing around prices of $50 for tops, up to
> $150 for complete benches. I wasn't dressed to dig around and crawl through
> a salvage warehouse and I didn't have a straightedge with me anyway, but I'll
> be going back.
>

Maybe it's a regional thing and I'm sure it varies by lot, but the ones
I've gotten have pretty darn nice.
Also, I guess "dead flat" is relative to the context and applications.
I don't mean dead flat like a granite machinists table.
I mean dead flat for portable work surfaces when compared to a couple
2x4s sitting across sawhorses with a sheet of whatever on top.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 5:30 PM

On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>
> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>
> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>
> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.

Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.

Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok but
takes up lots of floor/wall space. I have neither left. Too damn many
tools/cabinets etc for that thing. I have a 7' tool cabinet on wheels
the same height as my Tsaw. So with that, and extensions front and side
on the TSaw that works together as a 7x7' sanding/painting/assembly table.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 5:01 PM

On 2/19/18 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>
>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>
>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>
> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>
> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok but
> takes up lots of floor/wall space.  I have neither left.  Too damn many
> tools/cabinets etc for that thing.  I have a 7' tool cabinet on wheels
> the same height as my Tsaw.  So with that, and extensions front and side
> on the TSaw that works together as a 7x7' sanding/painting/assembly table.
>

I think you're referring to me.
I bought the centipede and the jury is still out on it.
It *is* super portable and convenient but I just don't find myself drawn
to use it very often.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

19/02/2018 7:51 PM

On 2/19/18 7:29 PM, woodchucker wrote:
> On 2/18/2018 8:52 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 7:24:12 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>>>> earlier...
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>>>
>>>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further
>>>>> than
>>>>> the lower wings.
>>>>>
>>>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a
>>>>> place
>>>>> to put my track with parallel guides.  It is normally an issue
>>>>> finding a
>>>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>
>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
>>> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
>>> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>>>
>>
>> I've picked up a few hollow core door over the years 'cuz I kept hearing
>> that they are "Dead flat, light, cheap". Maybe it's the doors I've tried
>> 'cuz I only get 2 out of 3 and dead flat ain't one of them.
>>
>> This style:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/kwcSS1q.jpg
>>
>> The lower face of the main one in the picture is convex, the other one
>> (on
>> the right) is concave, as shown here:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/HzfZ1G3.jpg
>>
>> I've tossed 2 or 3 more that were also not flat.
>>
>> On the flip side, last week I ran across a local place on Offer-Up
>> that has
>> dozens of salvaged workbenches of all shapes and sizes. Some workbench
>> tops
>> without legs also. The guy was tossing around prices of $50 for tops,
>> up to
>> $150 for complete benches. I wasn't dressed to dig around and crawl
>> through
>> a salvage warehouse and I didn't have a straightedge with me anyway,
>> but I'll
>> be going back.
>>
> Hollow Core are not dead flat. A solid core door has a better chance
> since they are particle board usually.
>

They are flatter than two 2x4's and certainly flat enough for a
temporary work surface.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 9:22 AM

On 2/20/18 8:31 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>
>>>
>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>
>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>
>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>
>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>
>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok
>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>
> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".  You
> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>

Depends on what you're staining, right? :-p
Yeah, yeah, I know what you meant.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

23/02/2018 9:58 AM

On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>
>>>
>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>
>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>
>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>
>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>
>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>
> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.

From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on anything
20x17"?

Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space for
it if I did need it.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

23/02/2018 10:07 AM

On 2/20/2018 4:48 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>> >centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>> >cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.

> We talked about these but, no, I didn't buy one. I looked at them but
> decided that I really didn't need such portability. For outside use,
> I have a six or eight of these:
>
> <https://www.homedepot.com/p/TOUGHBUILT-41-5-in-Folding-Sawhorse-TB-C550/205068379>

They look nice, I built my own fold ups that work OK, and store outside
on french cleats on my sheds outside wall.

I wonder what on earth you do with six or eight of these things? I've
never used more than two, and never used them in my shop, only for rare
outside building projects. I think I used them 2-3x since I made them
about 10 years ago.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 11:47 AM

On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>
>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>
>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>
>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>
>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>> anything 20x17"?
>>
>
> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".

You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?

>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>> for it if I did need it.

> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.

Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

25/02/2018 10:48 AM

On 2/24/2018 12:54 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 10:55 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/24/2018 10:47 AM, Jac
>> On 2/24/2018 10:53 AM, Leon wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of
>> 20"x17". You
>> >>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>> >>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>> >>>> anything 20x17"?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>> is 96"
>> >>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall,
>> with
>> >>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>> >>> 20"x17".
>> >>
>> >> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>> >> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>> >
>> > I'm sorry but I cannot think of a simpler way to explain it. FWIW, I
>> > said a 20x17 foot print, not 20x8.5.
>>
>>
>> Would a picture help?
>
> I needed to add this to this drawing anyway. ;~)
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39564825215/in/dateposted-public/
>
Now I get it, thanks. So the wall space is 96" x 20" x 17. I think it
was the "bottom of one against the top of the other" and ignoring the
96" dimension that threw me off.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

25/02/2018 11:19 AM

On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>
>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>
>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".
>>
>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>
>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>
>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.
>>
>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>
> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
> wheels).
>
Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
wouldn't work as an outfeed table?

What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down between
uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put drawered
cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS outfeed.
I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
press, planer and shaper.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

25/02/2018 11:07 AM

On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table
>>>>>>> "the
>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok
>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".  You
>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>
>>>>>   From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side.  Each is
>>>> 96"
>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall.  If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>> 20"x17".
>>>
>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>
>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it.  Kevin has
>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>
>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>> yourself.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that.  I think Kevin should build one,
>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>
>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>> outfeed table, for the same reasons.  I don't currently have one,
>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list.  But
>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>> wheels).
>>
> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>
> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down between
> uses, is it has no storage.  I would put it on wheels, put drawered
> cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS outfeed.
> I  try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other than drill
> press, planer and shaper.
>

I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
under-surface temporary tool storage.

If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
www.mikedrums.com

Jj

Jack

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

27/02/2018 9:33 AM

On 2/25/2018 12:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 2/25/18 10:19 AM, Jack wrote:
>> On 2/24/2018 12:04 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the
>>>>>>>>> bench?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of
>>>>>>>>> 3/4" MDF
>>>>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't
>>>>>>>>> important. It's
>>>>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work
>>>>>>>> table "the
>>>>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.
>>>>>>>> Looks ok
>>>>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".
>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>>>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>>>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each
>>>>> is 96"
>>>>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>>>>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is
>>>>> 20"x17".
>>>>
>>>> You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>>>> 96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>>>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>>>>> for it if I did need it.
>>>>
>>>>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for
>>>>> yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>>>> he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>>>> as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.
>>>
>>> If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
>>> outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
>>> mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
>>> when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
>>> already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
>>> wheels).
>>>
>> Yes, sorry about the name, I always thought you were Kevin, not sure
>> why. Also not sure what "the same reasons" are you mention that it
>> wouldn't work as an outfeed table?
>>
>> What I don't like about it, assuming you are not tearing it down
>> between uses, is it has no storage. I would put it on wheels, put
>> drawered cabinet under the top and make it the right height for the TS
>> outfeed. I try to have cabinets under most of my big tools, other
>> than drill press, planer and shaper.
>>
>
> I believe the intended purpose of the table, as described by its
> designer, it to be a portable work surface that is (relatively) light,
> quickly set-up and torn down, and can be easily handled by one person,
> and also have some of the features of a shop workbench, like
> under-surface temporary tool storage.
>
> If you put wheels and cabinets underneath, when then you might as well
> build a non-portable, regular shop work table. :-)

Yes, for Kevin, I mean Keith, that was my thoughts exactly. He has
2000' of work space. Wheels makes it portable enough. For most a pair
of saw horses is all that's needed for a portable work surface. This
thing Leon built is really just a fancy top for a pair of saw horses,
and would seem best suited to hauling around to work sites. Jay Bates
has a youtube video of one he built, and made it permanent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPvkdU5kkqA

I see that as rather dumb, would prefer a cabinet with drawers and such
for storage, and I'm not a fan of open shelves under a bench. They end
up collecting junk thats hard to find and dig out. Drawers were invented
for a reason. There is a lot of stuff I'm not a fan of however, that
many people love. For example, those 5" thick, solid maple, drawerless
work benches with tool tray in the back of the top that all the books
show. What a waste they are (IMNSHO).

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

24/02/2018 12:04 PM

On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:47:30 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/23/2018 12:03 PM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>>>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>>>> centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>>>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok
>>>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>>>
>>>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17". You
>>>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>>>
>>> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
>>> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on
>>> anything 20x17"?
>>>
>>
>> Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
>> long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
>> the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".
>
>You lost me on the 96" long part. It's not clear how you get the long
>96" dimension to store against the wall in a 20x8.5" space?
>
>>> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it. Kevin has
>>> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space
>>> for it if I did need it.
>
>> With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.
>
>Thanks, I'll take your advice on that. I think Kevin should build one,
>he won't even need to store it with his 2000' shop. Make it same height
>as TS and he has a nice out feed table if he doesn't already have one.

If you mean me (it's "Keith", BTW), no it wouldn't be good for an
outfeed table, for the same reasons. I don't currently have one,
mostly because it hasn't floated to the top of the "do" list. But
when I do build one, it'll be made the same way as my cutting table. I
already have the parts (though haven't decided if I want it on
wheels).

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 4:48 PM

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:30:25 -0500, Jack <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>
>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>
>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>
>Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>centipede" I think it was called? Everyone got all over the Comet
>cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.

We talked about these but, no, I didn't buy one. I looked at them but
decided that I really didn't need such portability. For outside use,
I have a six or eight of these:

<https://www.homedepot.com/p/TOUGHBUILT-41-5-in-Folding-Sawhorse-TB-C550/205068379>

>Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before. Looks ok but
>takes up lots of floor/wall space. I have neither left. Too damn many
>tools/cabinets etc for that thing. I have a 7' tool cabinet on wheels
>the same height as my Tsaw. So with that, and extensions front and side
>on the TSaw that works together as a 7x7' sanding/painting/assembly table.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 10:14 PM

On 2/20/2018 6:29 PM, Sonny wrote:
> On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 6:33:55 PM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
>
>>
>> All set up with a full sheet of plywood on top.
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/39429408395/in/dateposted-public/
>>
>> I jumped up to sit in the middle of one side. Not a sound did I hear....
>
> Getting to the party late.
>
> Considering the size, weight, portability, etc., that's a practical solution for many folks. Neat idea, good job.

All credit goes to Ron Paulk the designer. I bought the plans from him
to help support his efforts. I ended up modifying size like most erery
one else. I wanted flat, and that is what I think I got. ;~)


>
> I see you have some planters, there. I suspect there's a Festool thumb joke lurking about, but I'm getting too far OT, already.

Yeah, they are to replace some 6 year old Jack Daniels Whiskey barrels.
We'll see how well they hold up. I bought them BTW. ;~)



>
> Sonny
>

k

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

20/02/2018 4:44 PM

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:29:04 -0500, woodchucker <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 2/18/2018 8:52 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 7:24:12 PM UTC-5, -MIKE- wrote:
>>> On 2/18/18 5:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 17:27:38 -0600, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/18/2018 9:52 AM, dpb wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/17/2018 6:33 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> A week or so back I posted pictures of the workbench/assembly table
>>>>>>> that I was building and finally today I am just about finished.  I'm
>>>>>>> debating whether to add 2 attachment bolts to hold the two units
>>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I elected to not drill the 32,548 holes in the top.... My Festool work
>>>>>>> table has enough.  ;~)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The legs. With material storage on the wings that stick out.
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had wondered the purpose of the wings in the construction photos
>>>>>> earlier...
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot to address in my precious response.
>>>>>
>>>>> The top wing, if you will notice, extends out a few inches further than
>>>>> the lower wings.
>>>>>
>>>>> It extends past the side of the work surface so that I can have a place
>>>>> to put my track with parallel guides. It is normally an issue finding a
>>>>> place to put it when working with multiple sheets of plywood.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>
>>>> See? The fishing works. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I like it. A lot! How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>
>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>> surface. I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Flat surface doors make great make-shift work surfaces.
>>> I've been known to buy hollow core cheapies for on-site work benches.
>>> Dead flat, light, cheap.
>>>
>>
>> I've picked up a few hollow core door over the years 'cuz I kept hearing
>> that they are "Dead flat, light, cheap". Maybe it's the doors I've tried
>> 'cuz I only get 2 out of 3 and dead flat ain't one of them.
>>
>> This style:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/kwcSS1q.jpg
>>
>> The lower face of the main one in the picture is convex, the other one (on
>> the right) is concave, as shown here:
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/HzfZ1G3.jpg
>>
>> I've tossed 2 or 3 more that were also not flat.
>>
>> On the flip side, last week I ran across a local place on Offer-Up that has
>> dozens of salvaged workbenches of all shapes and sizes. Some workbench tops
>> without legs also. The guy was tossing around prices of $50 for tops, up to
>> $150 for complete benches. I wasn't dressed to dig around and crawl through
>> a salvage warehouse and I didn't have a straightedge with me anyway, but I'll
>> be going back.
>>
>Hollow Core are not dead flat. A solid core door has a better chance
>since they are particle board usually.

That's what I use but they're a tad heavy for a portable or worksite
bench.

Ll

Leon

in reply to Leon on 17/02/2018 6:33 PM

23/02/2018 11:03 AM

On 2/23/2018 8:58 AM, Jack wrote:
> On 2/20/2018 9:31 AM, Leon wrote:
>> On 2/19/2018 4:30 PM, Jack wrote:
>>> On 2/18/2018 6:41 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/40302060902/in/dateposted-public/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See?  The fishing works.  ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I like it.  A lot!  How do you deal with cutting the top of the bench?
>>>>
>>>> I built my cutting bench on a solid-core door with a sheet of 3/4" MDF
>>>> just sitting on top, held in place by side rails 1/4" shy of the
>>>> surface.  I'm not short on space so portability wasn't important. It's
>>>> on casters but it never moves more than a foot or two.
>>>
>>> Wasn't it you that bought that goofy accordion folding work table "the
>>> centipede" I think it was called?   Everyone got all over the Comet
>>> cause he thought it looked gimmick-ee.
>>>
>>> Anyway, this thing Leon built I've seen on YouTube before.  Looks ok
>>> but takes up lots of floor/wall space.
>>
>> When not in use and being stored it has a foot print of 20"x17".  You
>> probably take up more space when you are staining in the shop.
>
> From the picture and your comments, you say it has a full sheet of
> plywood on top. To me, a full sheet of plywood wouldn't fit on anything
> 20x17"?
>

Picture this, the work bench is "2" sections, side by side. Each is 96"
long, 20" wide, and 8.5" tall. If I stand both on end, 96" tall, with
the bottom of one against the top of the other the foot print is 20"x17".




> Anyway, it looks OK if you need it, and have space for it.  Kevin has
> space for it, I personally don't really need it, nor have any space for
> it if I did need it.
>

With that comment, I would recommend that you not build one for yourself.

Mm

Markem

in reply to Leon on 23/02/2018 11:03 AM

03/03/2018 1:32 PM

On Sat, 03 Mar 2018 19:19:57 GMT, Puckdropper <[email protected]>
wrote:

>[email protected] wrote in
>news:[email protected]:
>
>*trim*
>>
>> The drawback is that things get further apart. Need a screwdriver?
>> Dang, they're in the other room.
>
>It doesn't seem to matter how many you have, either! They're *all* in the
>other room!
>
>Puckdropper

Thank you for trimming


You’ve reached the end of replies