KW

Ken Wood

27/10/2006 12:03 PM

Water Spots in Sprayed Lacquer?

Years ago our family lived in a house in the suburbs. I did my woodworking
in the basement, including sprayed finishes. I used polyurethane
exclusively. Once I built a canopy cradle for our firstborn. I laid the
polyurethane on so thick that years later somebody parked it next to a
heater outlet in the house that the finish blistered. Sawdust getting
dragged through the house and fumes coming up from the basement were a
couple of reasons why we moved to the country.

Now, years later I am getting back into woodworking. The woodshop is now
located on the second floor of an old carriage house next to the main house
here here. Because of the age of the carriage house I will never be able
to keep the dust down. So, I would like to get away from sprayed urethane
and try spraying fast drying clear lacquers.

I haven't been able to keep up with the latest advances in finishes. I am,
however, really concerned about water spotting problems that I have read
about when using lacquer finishes for tabletops and so forth. Can anybody
recommend a fast drying, state-of-the-art, lacquer that has either a
minimal, or no water spotting problems?

Thank you in advance for the help.


This topic has 10 replies

ll

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

30/10/2006 10:20 AM

You guys are just the people I needed for advice last weekend. In the
past I have used Sherwin Williams Nitrocelulose lacquer. Worked great.
Recently I switched to their waterborne lacquer and corresponding
sealer. I am using a Sharpe HVLP conversion gun. Right now I am
spraying the base cabinets for a new kitchen. Since they are not seen
after completion (exterior is hidden by other cabinets and interior is
filled with drawers)I am using them to get experience with the new
product. I had two problems that puzzle me. My sequence of operations
was:
Sand to 220
Wet to raise the grain
Sand lightly to 220
Spray water soluble analine dye to color the wood.
Wait 24 hrs
Spray sealer
Sand LIGHTLY to 220 --- THIS TOOK OFF SOME OF THE DYE -- Not a
real problem because it will not be seen
Spray 3 coats of lacquer - 1/2 hour apart with hand sanding to 400

grit between coats. I was using 65 psi
air pressure, 15 psi fluid pressure at
the tip,fluid wide open, reasonable fan

width, gun at about 10-12 inches from

the surface.
wait 24 hours
Light rubout with steel wool using Murphy soap for a carrier.



Questions:
Do I need 2 coats of sealer or 1 heavier coat to prevent sanding
out the dye?

The final finish is acceptable, but has a very fine orange peel
finish. Does this relate to the sealer being too thin, or
something in my technique?

Are the settings right for my gun??

Thanks,
Len
------------------------

ll

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

31/10/2006 8:46 AM

You can't use steel wook or tack rags in the finishing process - under
the lacquer etc... But, after it is hard there is no problem with it.

Len
------------
Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > wait 24 hours
> > Light rubout with steel wool using Murphy soap for a carrier.
>
> I thought you weren't supposed to use steel wool with any water-based
> finish due to the possibility of rust?

ll

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

02/11/2006 7:55 AM

The tack rag comment only applies to water borne products. Are you
using water borne stuff on cars?

Len
--------
Mike Marlow wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > You can't use steel wook or tack rags in the finishing process - under
> > the lacquer etc... But, after it is hard there is no problem with it.
> >
>
> I don't use steel wool, but I do use a tac cloth every time I paint a car.
> I have never had a problem in doing so. I know there is a lot of
> conversation around here about tac clothes, but I shoot a lot more paint
> than most here and like I said - I have never had a problem using them.
>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> [email protected]

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

30/10/2006 12:44 PM

[email protected] wrote:

> wait 24 hours
> Light rubout with steel wool using Murphy soap for a carrier.

I thought you weren't supposed to use steel wool with any water-based
finish due to the possibility of rust?

GM

"George M. Kazaka"

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

27/10/2006 8:34 PM

I also use the same product @ 30.00 Per Gallon
Good product dry's fast and dry's hard, is also self sealing

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I am using Sherwin Williams product called CAB-Acrylic Lacquer. It is
> about 50 dollars a gallon.
>
> "Ken Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Years ago our family lived in a house in the suburbs. I did my
> woodworking
>> in the basement, including sprayed finishes. I used polyurethane
>> exclusively. Once I built a canopy cradle for our firstborn. I laid the
>> polyurethane on so thick that years later somebody parked it next to a
>> heater outlet in the house that the finish blistered. Sawdust getting
>> dragged through the house and fumes coming up from the basement were a
>> couple of reasons why we moved to the country.
>>
>> Now, years later I am getting back into woodworking. The woodshop is now
>> located on the second floor of an old carriage house next to the main
> house
>> here here. Because of the age of the carriage house I will never be able
>> to keep the dust down. So, I would like to get away from sprayed
>> urethane
>> and try spraying fast drying clear lacquers.
>>
>> I haven't been able to keep up with the latest advances in finishes. I
> am,
>> however, really concerned about water spotting problems that I have read
>> about when using lacquer finishes for tabletops and so forth. Can
>> anybody
>> recommend a fast drying, state-of-the-art, lacquer that has either a
>> minimal, or no water spotting problems?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for the help.
>
>

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

02/11/2006 12:13 PM


<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> The tack rag comment only applies to water borne products. Are you
> using water borne stuff on cars?
>

That would be an oops on my part. Didn't realize the comment was specific
to water borne products.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

MM

"Mike Marlow"

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

31/10/2006 1:16 PM


<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> You can't use steel wook or tack rags in the finishing process - under
> the lacquer etc... But, after it is hard there is no problem with it.
>

I don't use steel wool, but I do use a tac cloth every time I paint a car.
I have never had a problem in doing so. I know there is a lot of
conversation around here about tac clothes, but I shoot a lot more paint
than most here and like I said - I have never had a problem using them.

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

KW

Ken Wood

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

28/10/2006 1:31 PM

Thanks to all for the help.

You have given me some places to start.

t

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

28/10/2006 12:31 AM

I am using Sherwin Williams product called CAB-Acrylic Lacquer. It is
about 50 dollars a gallon.

"Ken Wood" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Years ago our family lived in a house in the suburbs. I did my
woodworking
> in the basement, including sprayed finishes. I used polyurethane
> exclusively. Once I built a canopy cradle for our firstborn. I laid the
> polyurethane on so thick that years later somebody parked it next to a
> heater outlet in the house that the finish blistered. Sawdust getting
> dragged through the house and fumes coming up from the basement were a
> couple of reasons why we moved to the country.
>
> Now, years later I am getting back into woodworking. The woodshop is now
> located on the second floor of an old carriage house next to the main
house
> here here. Because of the age of the carriage house I will never be able
> to keep the dust down. So, I would like to get away from sprayed urethane
> and try spraying fast drying clear lacquers.
>
> I haven't been able to keep up with the latest advances in finishes. I
am,
> however, really concerned about water spotting problems that I have read
> about when using lacquer finishes for tabletops and so forth. Can anybody
> recommend a fast drying, state-of-the-art, lacquer that has either a
> minimal, or no water spotting problems?
>
> Thank you in advance for the help.

BA

B A R R Y

in reply to Ken Wood on 27/10/2006 12:03 PM

28/10/2006 12:46 PM

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:31:14 GMT, <[email protected]> wrote:

>I am using Sherwin Williams product called CAB-Acrylic Lacquer. It is
>about 50 dollars a gallon.

I've recently switched from M.L. Cambell nitrocellulose lacquers to
M.L. Campbell water based Ultrastar.

Ultrastar is ~ $40 / gallon at my local store and very resistant to
heat and moisture. It dries SLIGHTLY slower than NC lacquer, but much
faster than any varnish. Ultrastar also sands and rubs out very much
like NC lacquer.

M.L. Campbell also sells defoamer, flow additive, and anti-cratering
additives, should you need them.

You cannot brush Ultrastar, a fact mentioned in every document M.L.
Campbell prints, but lost in a recent FWW finish review.

All about Ultrastar:
<http://www.mlcampbell.com/secured/pisheets/C599%20-%20ULTRASTAR%2010-18-05.pdf>


You’ve reached the end of replies