DB

Dave Balderstone

08/02/2010 6:14 PM

OT: More bad news for AGW alarmists

See here, then follow the links...

<http://stevejanke.com/archives/298015.php>


This topic has 6 replies

Hh

"HeyBub"

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

09/02/2010 9:52 AM

Edward A. Falk wrote:
> In article <080220101814599229%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>,
> Dave Balderstone <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
>> See here, then follow the links...
>>
>> <http://stevejanke.com/archives/298015.php>
>
> Executive summary: author claims to know something about atmospheric
> modeling that all the other scientists in the world ignored. Oh,
> except one Hungarian scientist.
>
> Personally, I hope he's right, global warming would really suck, but I
> generally prefer that science questions be answered by scientists and
> not by politicians.

Ah, but when the "scientists" get corrupted and conspire in fraud, deceit,
repression, falsification and destruction of data, or felonious mopery,
what's one to do?

General warming would have some beneficial effects: Longer growing seasons
(3 crops instead of 2), decrease in many diseases, fewer climate-related
deaths, year-round Northwest Passage, and more.



DI

"Dave In Texas"

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

09/02/2010 1:06 PM



"LdB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> And if one of the beneficial effects results in the desertification of the
> American corn belt you all may be able to emigrate to Russia. Might be
> cheap land in Siberia. Sail across the Arctic Ocean just like they did in
> the old days. Isn't there an Elliski Island up there somewhere? Imagine
> how proud you would be if your grandson was the founder of Ruskireagenton
> or Bolshevikbushville.
>
> Dengue fever, Malaria, I can hardly wait for that part of the fun to
> start.

He could see Sarah Palin's house!

Dave in Houston

nn

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

09/02/2010 7:59 AM

One guppy...

nn

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

08/02/2010 6:07 PM

1. Dave Balderstone
View profile
More options Feb 8, 6:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
From: Dave Balderstone <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:59 -0600
Local: Mon, Feb 8 2010 6:14 pm
Subject: OT: More bad news for AGW alarmists
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Feb 15, 6:14 pm).

See here, then follow the links...

<http://stevejanke.com/archives/298015.php>

******************

I went ahead and copied your whole message in case you were just
embarrassing yourself and didn't want others to know it was you
trolling.

Looks like this is just another troll, though.

ZZZZZZzzzzzzzz *plop* of the bobber in the water.....

No need to look. It's just Dave trying to be a someone.

Robert

fE

[email protected] (Edward A. Falk)

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

09/02/2010 2:52 AM

In article <080220101814599229%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>,
Dave Balderstone <dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
>See here, then follow the links...
>
><http://stevejanke.com/archives/298015.php>

Executive summary: author claims to know something about atmospheric
modeling that all the other scientists in the world ignored. Oh, except
one Hungarian scientist.

Personally, I hope he's right, global warming would really suck, but I
generally prefer that science questions be answered by scientists and not
by politicians.

--
-Ed Falk, [email protected]
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

LL

LdB

in reply to Dave Balderstone on 08/02/2010 6:14 PM

09/02/2010 12:18 PM

On 2/9/2010 9:52 AM, HeyBub wrote:
> Edward A. Falk wrote:
>> In article<080220101814599229%dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>,
>> Dave Balderstone<dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
>>> See here, then follow the links...
>>>
>>> <http://stevejanke.com/archives/298015.php>
>>
>> Executive summary: author claims to know something about atmospheric
>> modeling that all the other scientists in the world ignored. Oh,
>> except one Hungarian scientist.
>>
>> Personally, I hope he's right, global warming would really suck, but I
>> generally prefer that science questions be answered by scientists and
>> not by politicians.
>
> Ah, but when the "scientists" get corrupted and conspire in fraud, deceit,
> repression, falsification and destruction of data, or felonious mopery,
> what's one to do?
>
> General warming would have some beneficial effects: Longer growing seasons
> (3 crops instead of 2), decrease in many diseases, fewer climate-related
> deaths, year-round Northwest Passage, and more.
>
>
>
>
A few more incidences like this would certainly be fun.

http://droughtsheatwaves.suite101.com/article.cfm/1995_chicago_heat_wave

And if one of the beneficial effects results in the desertification of
the American corn belt you all may be able to emigrate to Russia.
Might be cheap land in Siberia. Sail across the Arctic Ocean just like
they did in the old days. Isn't there an Elliski Island up there
somewhere? Imagine how proud you would be if your grandson was the
founder of Ruskireagenton or Bolshevikbushville.

Dengue fever, Malaria, I can hardly wait for that part of the fun to
start.

What's the fuss about anyway. It's not your problem. Most of us will
be long gone before they even figure out whose right. Let them worry
about in a hundred years. Grab as much as you can right now before the
socialists give it all away.

LdB









You’ve reached the end of replies