dD

[email protected] (Drew Eckhardt)

28/12/2004 5:36 PM

Dust collector and small tools?

I have a circular saw, sander, and router all of which have or could
have 1" dust collection ports.

Can I use adapters to reduce a 4" dust collector duct to a smaller hose
for these (4" -> 2.5" -> 1") or can I only use these with a shop vac?

--
<a href="http://www.poohsticks.org/drew/">Home Page</a>
9/11 was a premptive attack


This topic has 15 replies

Br

Ba r r y

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 1:24 AM

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:36:50 -0700, [email protected] (Drew
Eckhardt) wrote:

>I have a circular saw, sander, and router all of which have or could
>have 1" dust collection ports.
>
>Can I use adapters to reduce a 4" dust collector duct to a smaller hose
>for these (4" -> 2.5" -> 1") or can I only use these with a shop vac?

You can use a DC, but the Shop Vac will work better with such a small
hose. Also, the vac can be equipped with a HEPA filter for ~$20, so
it'll keep more of the tiny dust inside.

Sears has an "Auto Switch" for about $20 that will turn the vacuum on
and off with the tool. It's well worth the money.

Barry (who owns a decent DC, but still connects his ROS, biscuit
joiner, etc... to the Shop Vac)

Wx

"Woodcrafter"

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 9:25 PM

>
> Sears has an "Auto Switch" for about $20 that will turn the vacuum on
> and off with the tool. It's well worth the money.

Yes! These things are great, although my shop vac has this delayed auto
on/off feature built in.
--
Regards,

Dean Bielanowski
Editor,
Online Tool Reviews
http://www.onlinetoolreviews.com
Over 70 woodworking product reviews online!
WIN! A Bosch 18v Cordless Drill. Submit your entry today!
------------------------------------------------------------
Latest 6 Reviews:
- Jorgensen Cabinet Master Clamps
- Sherwood Lathe Copy Attachment
- Ryobi Right Angle Drill
- Porter Cable COIL250 Coil Nailer
- Ryobi 18v Cordless Jigsaw
- Taunton's Complete Illustrated Guide to Furniture & Cabinet Construction
------------------------------------------------------------



Br

Ba r r y

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

31/12/2004 1:21 PM

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 05:47:11 GMT, Nate Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:

>They are pretty good. I see that Penn State has some new 0.5um canister
>refits. I've been thinking about trying one of those out.

I just picked up a canister filter. Although it's only advertised to
2 microns, I just don't have the ceiling space for a large cloth bag.
The canister provides for a very noticeable increase in flow.

If I had the room, I'd go for big cloth bags in a minute.

Barry

b

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

28/12/2004 6:01 PM

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:36:50 -0700, [email protected] (Drew
Eckhardt) wrote:

>I have a circular saw, sander, and router all of which have or could
>have 1" dust collection ports.
>
>Can I use adapters to reduce a 4" dust collector duct to a smaller hose
>for these (4" -> 2.5" -> 1") or can I only use these with a shop vac?


shop vac.

Br

Ba r r y

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

01/01/2005 1:34 PM

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 04:28:10 GMT, Nate Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:


>This is the one I was thinking of. Is it the same as the one you are
>using?
>
>http://tinyurl.com/6sdgz

I have the Jet version that's 20" in diameter and sold with 1 1/2 and
2 HP Jet units. Jet rates the canister @ 2 microns, not .05. With
typical BS DC industry data, the Jet and PSI units may or may not use
the same filter media.

I look at CFM and particle size specs with a healthy grain of salt, no
matter who's selling it. <G>

Barry

Ds

Dan

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 4:52 AM

On Tue 28 Dec 2004 08:12:16p, Andy Dingley <[email protected]> wrote
in news:[email protected]:

> n general, no. Typical 4" dust collectors are a high volume low
> speed device. Vacuum cleaners use higher velocities, even though their
> smaller hoses are moving much less mass flow in total. Even if you
> make up the clumsy adapter you'll find that performance is very
> disappointing trying to use one of these low velocity multi-horsepower
> DCs instead of a tiny vacuum cleaner.

That's my experience too. The DC works great on the tablesaw but the
bandsaw and the miter saw both have small ports and the shop vac works
better for both of them. Next year there'll be a hood behind the miter saw
and a new four-inch hole in the back of the bandsaw, and they'll use the DC
but for now it's the shop vac.

NP

Nate Perkins

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 7:17 AM

[email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> I have a circular saw, sander, and router all of which have or could
> have 1" dust collection ports.
>
> Can I use adapters to reduce a 4" dust collector duct to a smaller hose
> for these (4" -> 2.5" -> 1") or can I only use these with a shop vac?
>

I don't know about the circular saw and router, but the reducer works very
well for me on my Porter-Cable 333 sander. Keeps the dust way way down.

Br

Ba r r y

in reply to Nate Perkins on 29/12/2004 7:17 AM

02/01/2005 11:53 AM

On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:37:18 GMT, Nate Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>This is the one I was thinking of. Is it the same as the one you are
>>>using?

I forgot to add that the canister did provide a large increase in flow
over the old bags. You can probably do the same for less money with
large bags, but I only have 7 foot ceilings.

Barry

NP

Nate Perkins

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 9:33 PM

Ba r r y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:17:03 GMT, Nate Perkins
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>I don't know about the circular saw and router, but the reducer works
>>very well for me on my Porter-Cable 333 sander. Keeps the dust way
>>way down.
>
>
> What level of filtration are your DC bags? If they're 30 micron, the
> sanding dust may be coming right through them.
>
> The dust generated by the ROS can be incredibly fine.
>
> Barry
>

1um bags from Penn State.

NP

Nate Perkins

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

31/12/2004 5:47 AM

Ba r r y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:33:40 GMT, Nate Perkins
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>1um bags from Penn State.
>
> Way mo' better! <G>
>
> Barry
>

They are pretty good. I see that Penn State has some new 0.5um canister
refits. I've been thinking about trying one of those out.

NP

Nate Perkins

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

01/01/2005 4:28 AM

Ba r r y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 05:47:11 GMT, Nate Perkins
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>They are pretty good. I see that Penn State has some new 0.5um canister
>>refits. I've been thinking about trying one of those out.
>
> I just picked up a canister filter. Although it's only advertised to
> 2 microns, I just don't have the ceiling space for a large cloth bag.
> The canister provides for a very noticeable increase in flow.
>
> If I had the room, I'd go for big cloth bags in a minute.

This is the one I was thinking of. Is it the same as the one you are
using?

http://tinyurl.com/6sdgz

Curious if anyone has experience with this canister upgrade.

Thanks,
Nate

NP

Nate Perkins

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

02/01/2005 5:37 AM

Ba r r y <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 04:28:10 GMT, Nate Perkins
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>This is the one I was thinking of. Is it the same as the one you are
>>using?
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/6sdgz
>
> I have the Jet version that's 20" in diameter and sold with 1 1/2 and
> 2 HP Jet units. Jet rates the canister @ 2 microns, not .05. With
> typical BS DC industry data, the Jet and PSI units may or may not use
> the same filter media.
>
> I look at CFM and particle size specs with a healthy grain of salt, no
> matter who's selling it. <G>
>
> Barry

You're right ... good advice.

AD

Andy Dingley

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 2:12 AM

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 17:36:50 -0700, [email protected] (Drew
Eckhardt) wrote:

>Can I use adapters to reduce a 4" dust collector duct to a smaller hose
>for these (4" -> 2.5" -> 1") or can I only use these with a shop vac?

In general, no. Typical 4" dust collectors are a high volume low
speed device. Vacuum cleaners use higher velocities, even though their
smaller hoses are moving much less mass flow in total. Even if you
make up the clumsy adapter you'll find that performance is very
disappointing trying to use one of these low velocity multi-horsepower
DCs instead of a tiny vacuum cleaner.

I have a small 4" that I use for the thicknesser and a few home-built
cyclones that I power from various cheap workshop vacuum cleaners.
Although I built a whole new lid to suit the 4" machine, it's dismal
when trying to drive the cyclone.
--
Smert' spamionam

Br

Ba r r y

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 12:00 PM

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:17:03 GMT, Nate Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:


>I don't know about the circular saw and router, but the reducer works very
>well for me on my Porter-Cable 333 sander. Keeps the dust way way down.


What level of filtration are your DC bags? If they're 30 micron, the
sanding dust may be coming right through them.

The dust generated by the ROS can be incredibly fine.

Barry

Br

Ba r r y

in reply to [email protected] (Drew Eckhardt) on 28/12/2004 5:36 PM

29/12/2004 11:51 PM

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:33:40 GMT, Nate Perkins
<[email protected]> wrote:


>1um bags from Penn State.

Way mo' better! <G>

Barry


You’ve reached the end of replies