m

27/09/2007 9:33 AM

Americas's Shocking, Hidden Black Against White Race War

THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
Paul Sheehan
>From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
It determined the result of last year's congressional election.

Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
suggesting, immediately.

No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
retribution against white America.

And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
violent crime has increased more than four times faster then the
population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
than young whites.

Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
been reported in America:

* According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.

* Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime
Victims," published in 1993.

* Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about
132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by
whites, according to the same survey.

* Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes
than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the
size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
committing more than 50 times the number of violent crimes of whites.

* According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black
assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times
the rate that whites murder blacks.

These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when
there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning the
modern civil rights movement.

Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison
58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
war.

When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
per cent in the reverse).

When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
Americans have commited at least 170 million crimes against white
Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
American life and American ideals since World War II.

All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic* double-standard in its
coverage of black America, a lower standard.

http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html


This topic has 33 replies

JT

Jason Todd

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 9:54 AM

On Sep 27, 12:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
> Paul Sheehan
>
> >From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995
>
> The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
> not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
> million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
> It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
>
> Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
> which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
> suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
> suggesting, immediately.
>
> No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
> acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
> ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
> years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
> retribution against white America.
>
> And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
> violent crime has increased more than four times faster then the
> population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
> generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
> than young whites.
>
> Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
> been reported in America:
>
> * According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
> victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
> and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
> cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
>
> * Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
> according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime
> Victims," published in 1993.
>
> * Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
> assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about
> 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by
> whites, according to the same survey.
>
> * Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes
> than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the
> size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
> capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
> committing more than 50 times the number of violent crimes of whites.
>
> * According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black
> assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times
> the rate that whites murder blacks.
>
> These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when
> there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
> which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning the
> modern civil rights movement.
>
> Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
> Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
> than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
> overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
> than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison
> 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
> war.
>
> When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
> theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
> Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
> committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
> the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
> per cent in the reverse).
>
> When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
> Americans have commited at least 170 million crimes against white
> Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
> American life and American ideals since World War II.
>
> All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
> the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
> media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic* double-standard in its
> coverage of black America, a lower standard.
>
> http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html

Perhaps next time you'll learn to pick your own cotton....
.
.
.
.
.
.

Jason "and get your own MOTHAFUCKIN ICE TEA, Honky!!" Todd

tt

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 10:21 AM

On Sep 27, 12:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:
>


Spy vs Spy was my favorite part of Mad magazine.

a.

TM

"Torrey M. Spears"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:31 PM

On Sep 27, 12:54 pm, Jason Todd <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 27, 12:33 pm, [email protected] wrote:

>
> >http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html
>
> Perhaps next time you'll learn to pick your own cotton....
> .

I saw this and thought... "Man, that Cindy Sheehan can really pick her
battles, can't she?"
-- TMS
Should pay closer attention. Really.

Tt

Too_Many_Tools

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 12:29 AM

On Sep 27, 11:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
> THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
> Paul Sheehan
>
> >From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995
>
> The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
> not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
> million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
> It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
>
> Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
> which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
> suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
> suggesting, immediately.
>
> No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
> acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
> ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
> years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
> retribution against white America.
>
> And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
> violent crime has increased more than four times faster then the
> population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
> generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
> than young whites.
>
> Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
> been reported in America:
>
> * According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
> victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
> and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
> cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
>
> * Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
> according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime
> Victims," published in 1993.
>
> * Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
> assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about
> 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by
> whites, according to the same survey.
>
> * Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes
> than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the
> size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
> capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
> committing more than 50 times the number of violent crimes of whites.
>
> * According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black
> assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times
> the rate that whites murder blacks.
>
> These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when
> there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
> which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning the
> modern civil rights movement.
>
> Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
> Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
> than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
> overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
> than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison
> 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
> war.
>
> When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
> theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
> Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
> committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
> the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
> per cent in the reverse).
>
> When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
> Americans have commited at least 170 million crimes against white
> Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
> American life and American ideals since World War II.
>
> All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
> the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
> media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic* double-standard in its
> coverage of black America, a lower standard.
>
> http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html

More racist BS....don't you conservatives ever stop drinking?

How about something worth reading...like how are we going to take out
those damn fire ants?

TMT

Tt

Too_Many_Tools

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 5:44 PM

On Sep 28, 7:18 pm, Unclaimed Mysteries
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Charles wrote:
> >> Now that's CRAZEE talk. Better to chalk it up to genetic inferiority; it
> >> sounds all scientific and stuff. And who doesn't wanna have
> >> sci-sci-sci-SCIENCE!($1) backing them up?
>
> > Genetic inferiority strikes again.
>
> I believe racists are genetically inferior to other people. DEATH TO THE
> INTOLERANT!
>
> --
> It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

Actually the truth is that the racist usually has mixed blood .....his
ancestors are the group that he hates.

If one does your homework, you will find that we all have a diverse
genetic makeup that is comprised of many different racial components.

DNA testing confirms it.

TMT

UM

Unclaimed Mysteries

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:22 PM

GWB wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>
>
> Yeah, me too.
> Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
> I may have to go nuclear.
>
>

Try some of these:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/video/vnr/phorid.htm

I don't know what to tell you if they get out of control.


--
It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

ch

cavelamb himself

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:40 PM

MoParMaN wrote:

> I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>

I'll join that one!

Texans Against Fire Ants.

Tiny terrorists in the lawn.

ch

cavelamb himself

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:41 PM

MoParMaN wrote:

> "Unclaimed Mysteries"
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>GWB wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah, me too.
>>>Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
>>>I may have to go nuclear.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Try some of these:
>>http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/video/vnr/phorid.htm
>>
>>I don't know what to tell you if they get out of control.
>>
>
> It doesn't say where you buy or get them?
>

Well for Pete sake keep them away from Washington DC....

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 8:03 PM

J T wrote:

> Thu, Sep 27, 2007, 9:33am (EDT-3) [email protected] doth
> crosspost some 12 year old racist crap:
>
> Gods above. Another sorry, dorky, crossposting little troll. This
> one racist even. And posting quotes 12 years old. Get a life idiot.
>
>

Oooh, he got one. Did you read the post JT? It isn't what you think it
is. Hope that hook didn't set too deep.


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 27/09/2007 8:03 PM

28/09/2007 8:24 PM

J T wrote:

> Thu, Sep 27, 2007, 8:03pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
> (Mark & Juanita) doth claimeth:
> Oooh, he got one.   Did you read the post JT? It isn't
> what you think it is. Hope that hook didn't set too deep.
>
> So, now I'm supposed to read it all, and then rate it as a troll or
> not? Bah. It's off-topic, cross-posted, with a antagonizing suject.
> If it looks like a troll, smells like a troll, walks like a troll, and
> posts like a trol, it ain't a duck; it's a sad, dorky, troll, invading
> yet again.
>
>
>
>
> JOAT
> What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
> humiliations?
> - Peter Egan

I'm going to post this twice, I'm truly sorry I thought you had been
trolled. As I said in my other apology, my New Service blocked the
original posting. What I saw was a posting talking about being at war with
fire ants.

Guess I need some help removing the hook.


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough

JJ

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 28/09/2007 8:24 PM

29/09/2007 8:45 PM

Fri, Sep 28, 2007, 8:24pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
(Mark=A0&=A0Juanita) doth sayeth:
I'm going to post this twice, <snip>=A0=A0Guess I need some help
removing the hook.

To worry not. Happens to all of us, one time or another.



JOAT
What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
humiliations?
- Peter Egan

JJ

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 27/09/2007 8:03 PM

28/09/2007 7:08 PM

Thu, Sep 27, 2007, 8:03pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
(Mark=A0&=A0Juanita) doth claimeth:
=A0=A0=A0=A0Oooh, he got one. =A0 Did you read the post JT? It isn't
what you think it is. Hope that hook didn't set too deep.

So, now I'm supposed to read it all, and then rate it as a troll or
not? Bah. It's off-topic, cross-posted, with a antagonizing suject.
If it looks like a troll, smells like a troll, walks like a troll, and
posts like a trol, it ain't a duck; it's a sad, dorky, troll, invading
yet again.




JOAT
What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
humiliations?
- Peter Egan

UM

Unclaimed Mysteries

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 4:20 PM

Sevenhundred Elves wrote:

> It should come as no surprise that the criminal classes are recruited
> from poor and uneducated people. This happens regardless of race. If the
> criminal class in the USA is black, it only proves that the blacks are
> over-represented among the poor and uneducated. This, in turn, may well
> be a result of discrimination against the blacks in your society.
>

Now that's CRAZEE talk. Better to chalk it up to genetic inferiority; it
sounds all scientific and stuff. And who doesn't wanna have
sci-sci-sci-SCIENCE!($1) backing them up?


--
It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

UM

Unclaimed Mysteries

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 7:18 PM

Charles wrote:
>> Now that's CRAZEE talk. Better to chalk it up to genetic inferiority; it
>> sounds all scientific and stuff. And who doesn't wanna have
>> sci-sci-sci-SCIENCE!($1) backing them up?
>
> Genetic inferiority strikes again.
>

I believe racists are genetically inferior to other people. DEATH TO THE
INTOLERANT!



--
It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 8:20 PM

Mark & Juanita wrote:

> J T wrote:
>
>> Thu, Sep 27, 2007, 9:33am (EDT-3) [email protected] doth
>> crosspost some 12 year old racist crap:
>>
>> Gods above. Another sorry, dorky, crossposting little troll. This
>> one racist even. And posting quotes 12 years old. Get a life idiot.
>>
>>
>
> Oooh, he got one. Did you read the post JT? It isn't what you think
> it
> is. Hope that hook didn't set too deep.
>
>

JT, my apologies, apparently my Newsserver wisely blocked the original
posting. What I saw as the original posting was a posting that was
actually on topic for this group and made a play on the words of the title.
It was only when some half-witted poster quoted the whole original posting
that I saw this evening, did I find that the original posting was so
offensive.


--
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough

JJ

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 28/09/2007 8:20 PM

29/09/2007 8:42 PM

Fri, Sep 28, 2007, 8:20pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
(Mark=A0&=A0Juanita) doth sayeth:
<snip> It was only when some half-witted poster quoted the whole
original posting that I saw this evening, did I find that the original
posting was so offensive.

Problem it is not.



JOAT
What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
humiliations?
- Peter Egan

Ll

LDR

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 28/09/2007 8:20 PM

30/09/2007 9:19 AM

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Fri, Sep 28, 2007, 8:20pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
> (Mark=A0&=A0Juanita) doth sayeth:
> <snip> It was only when some half-witted poster quoted the whole
> original posting that I saw this evening, did I find that the original
> posting was so offensive.
>

Not to start a flame war, but everyone who objected to the post should=20
lighten up. It was funny, and so were the tongue in cheek responses to=20
it. It would be really useful if we get together and object to the many=20
nontopic threads that tie up the flow of woodworking information. They=20
are almost always egotistical and boring. It's even a nuisance to get=20
rid of them without opening them.

I recently joined the Sawmill forum and what a pleasure it is in its=20
civility and sticking to the point. It's moderated, of course.

(JOAT, don't take my piggyback on your post personally, please)

Ll

LDR

in reply to Mark & Juanita on 28/09/2007 8:20 PM

30/09/2007 3:55 PM

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> In article <[email protected]>,=20
> [email protected] says...
> > Fri, Sep 28, 2007, 8:20pm (EDT-3) [email protected]
> > (Mark=A0&=A0Juanita) doth sayeth:
> > <snip> It was only when some half-witted poster quoted the whole
> > original posting that I saw this evening, did I find that the original
> > posting was so offensive.
> >
>=20
> Not to start a flame war, but everyone who objected to the post should=20
> lighten up. It was funny, and so were the tongue in cheek responses to=20
> it. It would be really useful if we get together and object to the many=
=20
> nontopic threads that tie up the flow of woodworking information. They=20
> are almost always egotistical and boring. It's even a nuisance to get=20
> rid of them without opening them.
>=20
> I recently joined the Sawmill forum and what a pleasure it is in its=20
> civility and sticking to the point. It's moderated, of course.
>=20
> (JOAT, don't take my piggyback on your post personally, please)
>=20
Excuse me. This post was intended for a different thread; sorry.

JJ

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 4:00 PM

Thu, Sep 27, 2007, 9:33am (EDT-3) [email protected] doth
crosspost some 12 year old racist crap:

Gods above. Another sorry, dorky, crossposting little troll. This
one racist even. And posting quotes 12 years old. Get a life idiot.



JOAT
What is life without challenge and a constant stream of new
humiliations?
- Peter Egan

MA

"Michael A. Terrell"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 3:04 AM

cavelamb himself wrote:
>
> MoParMaN wrote:
>
> > "Unclaimed Mysteries"
> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>GWB wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
> >>><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yeah, me too.
> >>>Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
> >>>I may have to go nuclear.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Try some of these:
> >>http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/video/vnr/phorid.htm
> >>
> >>I don't know what to tell you if they get out of control.
> >>
> >
> > It doesn't say where you buy or get them?
> >
>
> Well for Pete sake keep them away from Washington DC....


Why? It sounds like the presidential primaries. :(


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

MA

"Michael A. Terrell"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 3:06 AM

cavelamb himself wrote:
>
> MoParMaN wrote:
>
> > I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
> >
>
> I'll join that one!
>
> Texans Against Fire Ants.
>
> Tiny terrorists in the lawn.


It's time to fight fire with fire! Incinerate the little bastards!


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

MA

"Michael A. Terrell"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

29/09/2007 12:26 AM

MoParMaN wrote:
>
> "Michael A. Terrell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > cavelamb himself wrote:
> >>
> >> MoParMaN wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'll join that one!
> >>
> >> Texans Against Fire Ants.
> >>
> >> Tiny terrorists in the lawn.
> >
> >
> > It's time to fight fire with fire! Incinerate the little bastards!
> >
> Nukem!


Good idea, except it kills the resale value of your house.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Ms

"MoParMaN"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 10:48 AM


"Too_Many_Tools" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sep 27, 11:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
>> THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
>> Paul Sheehan
>>
>> >From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995
>>
>> The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
>> not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
>> million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
>> It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
>>
>> Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
>> which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
>> suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
>> suggesting, immediately.
>>
>> No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
>> acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
>> ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
>> years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
>> retribution against white America.
>>
>> And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
>> violent crime has increased more than four times faster then the
>> population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
>> generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
>> than young whites.
>>
>> Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
>> been reported in America:
>>
>> * According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
>> victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
>> and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
>> cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
>>
>> * Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
>> according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime
>> Victims," published in 1993.
>>
>> * Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
>> assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about
>> 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by
>> whites, according to the same survey.
>>
>> * Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes
>> than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the
>> size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
>> capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
>> committing more than 50 times the number of violent crimes of whites.
>>
>> * According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
>> Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black
>> assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times
>> the rate that whites murder blacks.
>>
>> These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when
>> there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
>> which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning the
>> modern civil rights movement.
>>
>> Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
>> Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
>> than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
>> overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
>> than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison
>> 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
>> war.
>>
>> When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
>> theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
>> Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
>> committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
>> the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
>> per cent in the reverse).
>>
>> When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
>> Americans have commited at least 170 million crimes against white
>> Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
>> American life and American ideals since World War II.
>>
>> All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
>> the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
>> media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic* double-standard in its
>> coverage of black America, a lower standard.
>>
>> http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html
>
> More racist BS....don't you conservatives ever stop drinking?
>
> How about something worth reading...like how are we going to take out
> those damn fire ants?
>
> TMT
>

I have an idea....Feedem Ragheads!

--
------MoParMaN------
---Scud Coordinates 32.61204 North 96.92989 West---
--Remove Clothes to Reply!--

TEDWARD Said:

Eggs are really good for you. They have all the nutrition needed to make a
chicken.

Gg

GWB

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:28 PM

On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:22:26 -0500, Unclaimed Mysteries
<[email protected]> wrote:

>GWB wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, me too.
>> Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
>> I may have to go nuclear.
>>
>>
>
>Try some of these:
>http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/video/vnr/phorid.htm
>
>I don't know what to tell you if they get out of control.


"Attack of the Phorids
Three short video clips show phorid flies as they emerge from eggs,
take flight and launch attacks on red imported fire ants. Soon after a
female fly stings an ant and inserts an egg, the ant's head falls off
and a fly larva emerges from the head."


Awwwright! Biological weapons!

Ms

"MoParMaN"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 5:35 PM


"Unclaimed Mysteries"
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> GWB wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, me too.
>> Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
>> I may have to go nuclear.
>>
>>
>
> Try some of these:
> http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/video/vnr/phorid.htm
>
> I don't know what to tell you if they get out of control.
>
It doesn't say where you buy or get them?

--
------MoParMaN------
---Scud Coordinates 32.61204 North 96.92989 West---
--Remove Clothes to Reply!--

TEDWARD Said:

Eggs are really good for you. They have all the nutrition needed to make a
chicken.

HR

[email protected] (Ross Hebeisen)

in reply to "MoParMaN" on 27/09/2007 5:35 PM

28/09/2007 5:35 AM

the dang usda are almost as good as the corps of engineers. usda brought
in these darn jap lady bugs to take care of aphids, now over run with
the jap beetles, gotta bring somethin in for them now. i never had a
prob with the aphids.
as far as the corps go's seems they have a water retention prob.
ross

JC

"J. Clarke"

in reply to "MoParMaN" on 27/09/2007 5:35 PM

28/09/2007 11:02 AM

Ross Hebeisen wrote:
> the dang usda are almost as good as the corps of engineers. usda
> brought in these darn jap lady bugs to take care of aphids, now over
> run with the jap beetles, gotta bring somethin in for them now. i
> never had a prob with the aphids.
> as far as the corps go's seems they have a water retention prob.
> ross

Is that intended as a parody of an earlier post? Ladybugs are native
to North America and eat aphids. Japanese Beetles were brought in
unintentionally and do not eat aphids.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Ms

"MoParMaN"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 4:34 PM

I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.

--
------MoParMaN------
---Scud Coordinates 32.61204 North 96.92989 West---
--Remove Clothes to Reply!--

TEDWARD Said:

Eggs are really good for you. They have all the nutrition needed to make a
chicken.

SE

Sevenhundred Elves

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 7:51 PM

[email protected] wrote:

> THE RACE WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE
> Paul Sheehan
> >From the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995
>
> The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is
> not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25
> million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War.
> It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
>
> Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War,
> which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even
> suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start
> suggesting, immediately.
>
> No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to
> acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing
> ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30
> years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent
> retribution against white America.
>
> And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years,
> violent crime has increased more than four times faster then the
> population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous
> generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder
> than young whites.
>
> Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not
> been reported in America:
>
> * According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime
> victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault
> and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per
> cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
>
> * Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white,
> according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime
> Victims," published in 1993.
>
> * Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed,
> assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about
> 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by
> whites, according to the same survey.
>
> * Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes
> than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the
> size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per
> capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are
> committing more than 50 times the number of violent crimes of whites.
>
> * According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black
> assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times
> the rate that whites murder blacks.
>
> These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when
> there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge
> which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning the
> modern civil rights movement.
>
> Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice
> Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more
> than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed,
> overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more
> than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparison
> 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean
> war.
>
> When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal
> theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The
> Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were
> committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of
> the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2
> per cent in the reverse).
>
> When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black
> Americans have commited at least 170 million crimes against white
> Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of
> American life and American ideals since World War II.
>
> All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling
> the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news
> media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic* double-standard in its
> coverage of black America, a lower standard.
>
> http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html

It should come as no surprise that the criminal classes are recruited
from poor and uneducated people. This happens regardless of race. If the
criminal class in the USA is black, it only proves that the blacks are
over-represented among the poor and uneducated. This, in turn, may well
be a result of discrimination against the blacks in your society.

S.

Ms

"MoParMaN"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 10:47 AM


"Michael A. Terrell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> cavelamb himself wrote:
>>
>> MoParMaN wrote:
>>
>> > I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.
>> >
>>
>> I'll join that one!
>>
>> Texans Against Fire Ants.
>>
>> Tiny terrorists in the lawn.
>
>
> It's time to fight fire with fire! Incinerate the little bastards!
>
Nukem!

--
------MoParMaN------
---Scud Coordinates 32.61204 North 96.92989 West---
--Remove Clothes to Reply!--

TEDWARD Said:

Eggs are really good for you. They have all the nutrition needed to make a
chicken.

Cc

"Charles"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 8:11 PM


> Now that's CRAZEE talk. Better to chalk it up to genetic inferiority; it
> sounds all scientific and stuff. And who doesn't wanna have
> sci-sci-sci-SCIENCE!($1) backing them up?

Genetic inferiority strikes again.

Gg

GWB

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

27/09/2007 4:48 PM

On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:34:25 -0500, "MoParMaN"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>I'm at war against fire ants. The fucking bastards gotta go.


Yeah, me too.
Chemical weaponry can't keep up.
I may have to go nuclear.

Cc

"Charles"

in reply to [email protected] on 27/09/2007 9:33 AM

28/09/2007 8:25 PM


"Unclaimed Mysteries"
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Charles wrote:
>>> Now that's CRAZEE talk. Better to chalk it up to genetic inferiority; it
>>> sounds all scientific and stuff. And who doesn't wanna have
>>> sci-sci-sci-SCIENCE!($1) backing them up?
>>
>> Genetic inferiority strikes again.
>
> I believe racists are genetically inferior to other people. DEATH TO THE
> INTOLERANT!

I believe that racists are paranoid. Intolerance is common, so death to
that group would solve global warming and make war almost impossible as
there would be only tiny groups left ... here and there.


You’ve reached the end of replies