[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>And you're not very good with English :-).
>>
> Is this the best you have?=A0=A0Who=A0ever=A0wrote=A0the=A0original=A0=
post=A0is
> smarter than you, he's at least asking questions.=A0=A0=A0Nothing=A0w=
rong=A0with
> being silly in an answer but the insults to=A0=A0typing=A0(or=A0readi=
ng=A0and
> speaking) ability to someone you've never met are a low blow.
I think you're a little too sensitive. I was commenting on the fact th=
at
someone whose command of English was so poor felt justified in being cr=
itical
of his teacher.
OTOH, if the OP was from a non-English speaking country, you're right a=
nd I
apologize. But I still wonder if he can comprehend an Autocad manual.=20=
Computer manuals are normally among the more incomprehensible of writin=
gs.
--=20
It's turtles, all the way down
>
>And you're not very good with English :-).
>
Is this the best you have? Who ever wrote the original post is
smarter than you, he's at least asking questions. Nothing wrong with
being silly in an answer but the insults to typing (or reading and
speaking) ability to someone you've never met are a low blow.
As a previous poster replied, he should get hold of the AutoCad people
who will give as much info as they can or put him onto their
authorized trainers.
Pete