md

mac davis

11/03/2010 11:12 PM

oversize mailing box blues

I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4" thick..

They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy and
cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..

I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this, especially
from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..


mac

Please remove splinters before emailing


This topic has 37 replies

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 9:00 AM

On Mar 12, 11:16=A0am, "Lee Michaels"
<leemichaels*[email protected]> wrote:
> "Swingman" =A0wrote
>
> > And one thing it does more quickly, safely, efficiently and accurately
> > than ANY table saw made is non 90 degree/angled cuts in sheet goods and
> > panels ... for some reason an increasing necessity with each project I =
do
> > these past few years.
>
> Are you saying that houses aren't being built square any more? =A0Say it =
ain't
> so! =A0LOL
>
> > Also, it is damn nice to have options other than a table saw when deali=
ng
> > with the combination of age AND 4 x 8 sheets of plywood/mdf. ;)
>
> My honey says that I am not getting older. I am getting better. But if fe=
els
> older to me.
>
> Most of my adult life, I never shied away from lifting or carrying anythi=
ng
> heavy. I grew up that way and always did it that way.
>
> Not so much any more. =A0And ANYTHING that can reduce the need to wrestle=
with
> large, unweildy and/or heavy objects is a good thing.
>
> Remember, old age and cunning will win over youth and enthusiasm. =A0Alth=
ough
> I have always tried to work smart, a strong body allows you to get away w=
ith
> things. That strength factor/edge just isn't there any more. I understand
> completely.

Some of the newer solid surface products now come in 120" x 30" x
1.125". Formica InDepth being one of the more common ones. Nice in the
sense that I don't have to have the edges built up, nice to be able to
show the full thickness around a undermounted sink. But HEAVY! Close
to 300 # per sheet. I CAN get one off the truck and onto the CNC, but
even with 2 guys it is heavy stuff.
To get one out of stock and onto the benches really is a 3-man job.
Then to cut to manageable chunks, the track saw approach really shines.

LH

"Lew Hodgett"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 12:27 AM


"mac davis" wrote:

>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable
> bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to
> buy and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
--------------------------------------

Standardization young man.

Minimizing the number of boxes reduces inventory needed, increases
volume of a given size, thus reducing unit cost.

Standardization simplifies automation designs, thus reducing fixed as
well as maintenance costs.

Standardization is the name of the game for those guys.

Many years ago was involved with a high speed sorting automation
project for the Post Office.

It would have been a bear without standardization.

Lew


LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:06 AM


"mac davis" wrote
>
>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>
I get packages in all the time that are packed in much larger boxes than
required. I asked about this a couple of times and was told that in addition
to the standardized shipping boxes, they had a sweetheart shipping rate.

So they pack everything into a few standard sizes and only have about four
rates to ship everything. A quantity discout for shipping. And the
inflatble bladders limit the weight.

I should mention that I recieve all my packages at a private post
ofice/mailbox. I recycle most of my shipping materials, the foam peanuts and
inflated plastic bags, not the paper. I take it into them and they reuse
everything. It saves waste, they get some shipping materials for free.

And I am on their good guys list. So, if I get a big package or a bunch of
boxes in a short time, I am forgiven. I help them out. The help me out.



LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:16 AM


"Swingman" wrote
>
> And one thing it does more quickly, safely, efficiently and accurately
> than ANY table saw made is non 90 degree/angled cuts in sheet goods and
> panels ... for some reason an increasing necessity with each project I do
> these past few years.
>
Are you saying that houses aren't being built square any more? Say it ain't
so! LOL

> Also, it is damn nice to have options other than a table saw when dealing
> with the combination of age AND 4 x 8 sheets of plywood/mdf. ;)
>
My honey says that I am not getting older. I am getting better. But if feels
older to me.

Most of my adult life, I never shied away from lifting or carrying anything
heavy. I grew up that way and always did it that way.

Not so much any more. And ANYTHING that can reduce the need to wrestle with
large, unweildy and/or heavy objects is a good thing.

Remember, old age and cunning will win over youth and enthusiasm. Although
I have always tried to work smart, a strong body allows you to get away with
things. That strength factor/edge just isn't there any more. I understand
completely.




LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 8:12 PM


"Swingman" wrote
>
> I mean, who needs spinach when 375 mg of Naproxen can make you superman
> for another ten hours or so ...
>
Does that stuff actually work for you?

I am one of those unfortunate bastards that has minimal effects from drugs.
Particularly pain meds. It helps a little. But not that much. If it works
for you, that is a good thing. I am always amazed when I find somebody who
has a simple solution to a problem. Even Aleve.


LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 8:22 PM


"Swingman" wrote
>
> LOL, I intimately know the feeling of having an 18 year old view point on
> getting something done, and a 67 year old body to get it done with! :)
>

I remember things I used to do as a teenager. If I tried those things today,
I would die. You got a few years on me. But the aging process is alive and
well in me. And as smart as I used to be when doing physical things, I am
even smarter today.


> And it kills my soul to _not_ grab one end of anything being moved within
> my view, and feel a nagging sense of guilt for not pitching in, like I am
> an old man or something.
>
Eggs zactly. I know of what you speak.

I was always the problem solver when it came to moving things or getting
things done. It just kills me to stand around and wait for a younger person
to assist. Hey, I am smarter than them. Why do I need to wait on them?

<grumble, grumble, bitch, bitch>

It is enough to make you a curmudgeon. Now that I think of it, how many
young curmudgeons are there out there? Damn. I had an original thought
there. Not to worry, I will forget it by tomorrow.


En

"EXT"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

17/03/2010 1:53 PM


"Greg O" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "mac davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
>> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
>> thick..
>>
>> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
>> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
>> and
>> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>>
>> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
>> especially
>> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>>
>>
>> mac
>>
>> Please remove splinters before emailing
>
> I order parts for my job and often get a kick out of how stuff comes
> packed. I never understand when I order one part, that comes well packed
> in it's own corrugated box , and it shows up packed into a larger box. For
> god's sake! Just stick a label on the box and ship the damn thing!

When I order delicate items I expect the original box will be shipped inside
an outer box with packing in between. This will keep it safe from many
hazards such as sharp edges that cut into the outer box or corners that are
crushed.

When I am reselling the item, and it comes in a printed box with description
and pictures on the outside, I do not want shipping labels slapped on the
box and shipped as is, I want it packed inside an outer box so that the
customer doesn't see the shipping labels, scratches, cuts and crushed
corners that show up on the outer box.

SS

Stuart

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:51 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
mac davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..

On one occassion, a while ago, at work, we watched the TNT guy kick our
packages off the back of his truck onto the ground.

We had a secure compound, remotely operated electric gates to let him him.
We watched on the security cameras as he drove round to the delivery door.
He arrived before our member of staff cound walk through the building to
the door and kicked the parcels off the truck.

You need good packing!

SS

Stuart

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 2:20 PM

In article <[email protected]>,
John Grossbohlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> You should post that on YouTube and post the URL for it here...

If a recording was available I would have done by now!

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 8:21 PM

On 3/12/2010 7:12 PM, Lee Michaels wrote:
> "Swingman" wrote
>>
>> I mean, who needs spinach when 375 mg of Naproxen can make you superman
>> for another ten hours or so ...
>>
> Does that stuff actually work for you?

I'm like you, most thing don't work, but Naproxen does. Too damn bad the
side effects will kill you. It figures ...

> I am one of those unfortunate bastards that has minimal effects from drugs.
> Particularly pain meds. It helps a little. But not that much. If it works
> for you, that is a good thing. I am always amazed when I find somebody who
> has a simple solution to a problem. Even Aleve.

I've got a high pain threshold, so I use it sparingly, but DAMN, it sure
is nice to be able to put a shop apron on just once in a while without
crying ... :)

<Hey ... if we start talking about regularity, or stool consistency, get
out the bullets and shoot this way, quick! :)>

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

MH

"Martin H. Eastburn"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 8:40 PM

The "water" might have been exterminated by security when scanned.

HeyBub wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>>> Mail goes (mainly) by weight, not size. If you mail a Helium-filled
>>> ballon, the postal service will pay you.
>> It is the government. They should like negative numbers.
>
> Saw a wonderful TV segment once. The producers mailed all kinds of stuff
> (much had to be left on the post office loading dock with no return
> address). Everything had the appropriate postage and a valid address. The
> things included:
>
> * A set of deer antlers.
> * A single snow ski.
> * A bottle of water.
> * A small clear plastic box containing a tooth.
> * Can of beer.
> * A John Deere gimmie cap.
> * A single tennis shoe.
> * A two-foot 2x4.
> * A brick.
> * A plastic trash-bag containing leaves.
>
> Most of it got delivered. The bottle of water was drunk by the postman.
>
>

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:52 AM

On Mar 12, 2:27=A0pm, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3/12/2010 11:56 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>
> > On 3/12/10 8:34 AM, Upscale wrote:
> >> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>
> >> Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
> >> tracksaw?
>
> > All I saw was the nice amp. :-)
>
> That's my rehearsal rig ... although lately it's slowly getting to be a
> "bring what's easy to carry and let the sound guys do the rest" kind of
> lifestyle. =A0:)
>
> --www.e-woodshop.net
> Last update: 10/22/08
> KarlC@ (the obvious)

That's a big tweeter.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 8:15 AM

On 3/12/2010 1:12 AM, mac davis wrote:
> I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4" thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this, especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..

Funny ... same thing happened to me yesterday:

http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg

The little DeWalt box (3/4x5x12) is a modern marvel of packing
efficiency, floating in a box (14x18x7) that would hold a dozen plus of
the little ones, and with more cardboard/paper than I recycle in a week.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 9:00 AM

On 3/12/2010 8:34 AM, Upscale wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>>
>
> Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
> tracksaw? The last woodworking show I went to, I specifically paid
> attention to dealers with Festool and DeWalt tracksaws. They both
> appeared to work quite well.
>
> What I'm interested in most is the kind of cut you get when using the
> tracksaw on veneered plywood. The show I went to appeared to crosscut
> splinter free, but I couldn't get close enough to the demonstrations
> to closely inspect or actually feel the edges for smoothness. With a
> decent work table, would you say that the tracksaw could permanently
> replace a decent tablesaw?

Actually, I have a Festool FS75 plunge saw ... it just so happens that
the DeWalt T-square fits the Festool guide rails, and would be cheaper
than Festool, if Festool actually had one. :)

<Festool has an adjustable, 'angle gauge' for their guide rails, but not
a dedicated 90 degree t-square, thus my ordering the DeWalt part>

The Festool FS75, or 55, plywood cut?

Out of the box, rivals a brand new Forrest WWII on my Unisaw, and with
the little splinter guard installed on the top side, there is no
discernable tearout on either side IME.

Whether either will replace a table saw?

While either Festool or DeWalt will do much of what a table saw will do
for rips, less so than for crosscuts, particularly if you need "batch
cut" precision, but with Festool's parallel guide system, you can do
batch cuts ... with the proviso that by the time you buy all the ash and
trash it takes, you've probably most of the way to paying for a good,
used cabinet saw.

That said, for the average woodworker doing one off projects, out of a
small shop, and with little room for a cabinet saw, I would say 'go for
it!', as the current track saws come close enough, in both cut quality
and precision to a table saw, to certainly do most jobs without compromise.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Ll

"Leon"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

14/03/2010 11:50 AM


"Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> "Leon" <[email protected]> wrote
>> So yes the larger container does waist more packaging material and is
>> not considered to some as being "green" but it is also not green to have
>> to reship or track a lost order or use special handling on physically
>> smaller items.
>
> Not much waste if you recycle that box or, better is to re-use it if
> possible.

Actually we NEVER purchased boxes for shipping, we reused everything
including pallets for all of our shippments. The only thing we purchased
for shipping were shipping labels and shrink wrap.

Ll

"Leon"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 8:47 AM


"Upscale" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:15:23 -0600, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>That should be good enough rationale to realistically consider one over
>>a table saw, if it's one or the other.
>>
>>Also, you will notice that Tommy Silva and crew are hot onto Festool
>>plunge saws on TOH and ATOH.
>
> Well, certainly a tracksaw is extremely convenient for the contractor
> going out to jobsites. I'd suggest that's its greatest benefit.
>
> Guess I'd have to work with one for awhile before I might be able to
> say that it mostly could replace a tablesaw. Considering that my
> tablesaw experience is almost forty years worth, it would have to be
> one hell of an effective tool though.

When Swingman first got the Festool saw he and I tried it out. It is cool.
Mostly quiet and very little dust with the Festool vac attached. As for
it's best use I would not say that it would replace a TS, but both would be
nice. The Festool saw really comes in handy when needing to cut up large
panels. Certainly easier for one person to cut up a 3/4" sheet of plywood
accurately than using a TS for the task. The TS would do a better job ac
cutting small and short pieces.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 1:27 PM

On 3/12/2010 11:56 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 3/12/10 8:34 AM, Upscale wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>>>
>>
>> Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
>> tracksaw?
>
> All I saw was the nice amp. :-)

That's my rehearsal rig ... although lately it's slowly getting to be a
"bring what's easy to carry and let the sound guys do the rest" kind of
lifestyle. :)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

GO

"Greg O"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:48 PM


"mac davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>
>
> mac
>
> Please remove splinters before emailing

I order parts for my job and often get a kick out of how stuff comes packed.
I never understand when I order one part, that comes well packed in it's own
corrugated box , and it shows up packed into a larger box. For god's sake!
Just stick a label on the box and ship the damn thing!

Ll

"Leon"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 8:39 AM


"mac davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>
>
> mac
>
> Please remove splinters before emailing

Consider that shipping containers under a certain size are more easily be
misplaced or hidden behind other larger objects. I think the over sized
containers help the shipper keep track of you shipment.

Back when I was in the automotive industry GM had a part that was a rare
earth magnet that was about the size of a pencil lead about 1/4" long. It
came in a box that would have held thousands but had it been placed in an
adequately sized box you would have needed a powerful magnifying glass to
see the part # on the box.

We did a lot of shipping and found that small parts had less problems
getting to their destinations when their shipping containers were a certain
size or larger. We seemed to have less calls from customers to located a
shipment when we used more "visible" containers. Basically parts shipped in
minimal sized boxes tended to take longer to get to where they were going.
IIRC we tracked a part that went thousands of miles to get to its 120 mile
destination and took 2-3 days. Larger packages to the same destination were
routinely delivered the next day.

While most of our shipments were stock orders and were shipped on pallets or
large boxes those small packages were typically single parts that the
customer needed quickly and typically were less profitable for us because it
was a single item being shipped. When the item got routed wrong or lost, it
cost us even more time and money to track and or reship the part again.


So yes the larger container does waist more packaging material and is not
considered to some as being "green" but it is also not green to have to
reship or track a lost order or use special handling on physically smaller
items.


Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 4:54 PM

On 3/12/2010 1:52 PM, Robatoy wrote:

> That's a big tweeter.

Woofers' got its own garage ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 9:57 AM

On 3/12/2010 9:26 AM, Upscale wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:15:23 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>> That should be good enough rationale to realistically consider one over
>> a table saw, if it's one or the other.
>>
>> Also, you will notice that Tommy Silva and crew are hot onto Festool
>> plunge saws on TOH and ATOH.
>
> Well, certainly a tracksaw is extremely convenient for the contractor
> going out to jobsites. I'd suggest that's its greatest benefit.
>
> Guess I'd have to work with one for awhile before I might be able to
> say that it mostly could replace a tablesaw. Considering that my
> tablesaw experience is almost forty years worth, it would have to be
> one hell of an effective tool though.

Obviously if you have a table saw already it will never be a comfortable
total transition, but now having extensive experience with both, I can
safely say, without question, that the Festool plunge saw can "mostly"
replace a table saw.

And one thing it does more quickly, safely, efficiently and accurately
than ANY table saw made is non 90 degree/angled cuts in sheet goods and
panels ... for some reason an increasing necessity with each project I
do these past few years.

Also, it is damn nice to have options other than a table saw when
dealing with the combination of age AND 4 x 8 sheets of plywood/mdf. ;)

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 9:15 AM

On 3/12/2010 9:00 AM, Swingman wrote:

> That said, for the average woodworker doing one off projects, out of a
> small shop, and with little room for a cabinet saw, I would say 'go for
> it!', as the current track saws come close enough, in both cut quality
> and precision to a table saw, to certainly do most jobs without compromise.

I forgot to mention one important fact ... the number of top notch trim
carpenters and cabinet makers in the building industry who have replaced
their 'job site' table saws with Festool plunge saws, guide rails, and
tables and accoutrement, is increasing by leaps and bounds due to the
increased "precision and portability".

That should be good enough rationale to realistically consider one over
a table saw, if it's one or the other.

Also, you will notice that Tommy Silva and crew are hot onto Festool
plunge saws on TOH and ATOH.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

EP

"Ed Pawlowski"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:41 PM



"Stuart" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> On one occassion, a while ago, at work, we watched the TNT guy kick our
> packages off the back of his truck onto the ground.

A large pharmaceutical company shipped cough syrup in 4 liter glass bottles,
much going by that big parcel carrier. Periodically they had shipments
with a lot of breakage. Losses were in the thousands of dollars each time.
After months of investigating a group of people representing the drug
company, transit company, box maker, foam pack maker piled in a car and
followed a shipment from plant to destination. Sure enough, they got to the
terminal where the boxes came down a conveyer and were sorted by a guy
wearing steel tipped work boots.

JG

"John Grossbohlin"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 6:53 PM


"Stuart" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> mac davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
>> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
>> and cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> On one occassion, a while ago, at work, we watched the TNT guy kick our
> packages off the back of his truck onto the ground.
>
> We had a secure compound, remotely operated electric gates to let him him.
> We watched on the security cameras as he drove round to the delivery door.
> He arrived before our member of staff cound walk through the building to
> the door and kicked the parcels off the truck.
>
> You need good packing!
>

You should post that on YouTube and post the URL for it here...

John

EP

"Ed Pawlowski"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 10:32 AM



"Leon" <[email protected]> wrote
> So yes the larger container does waist more packaging material and is not
> considered to some as being "green" but it is also not green to have to
> reship or track a lost order or use special handling on physically smaller
> items.

Not much waste if you recycle that box or, better is to re-use it if
possible.

EP

"Ed Pawlowski"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 6:02 AM



"mac davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..

The solution is to buy more stuff and fill the box.

Dd

"DGDevin"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 2:56 PM


"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Standardization young man.
>
> Minimizing the number of boxes reduces inventory needed, increases volume
> of a given size, thus reducing unit cost.

Yup. They might also have tried using padded envelopes or whatever for such
parts and had enough failures that they decided to use boxes instead.

Sk

Swingman

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 1:22 PM

On 3/12/2010 10:16 AM, Lee Michaels wrote:

> Most of my adult life, I never shied away from lifting or carrying anything
> heavy. I grew up that way and always did it that way.
>
> Not so much any more. And ANYTHING that can reduce the need to wrestle with
> large, unweildy and/or heavy objects is a good thing.
>
> Remember, old age and cunning will win over youth and enthusiasm. Although
> I have always tried to work smart, a strong body allows you to get away with
> things. That strength factor/edge just isn't there any more. I understand
> completely.

LOL, I intimately know the feeling of having an 18 year old view point
on getting something done, and a 67 year old body to get it done with! :)

And it kills my soul to _not_ grab one end of anything being moved
within my view, and feel a nagging sense of guilt for not pitching in,
like I am an old man or something.

I mean, who needs spinach when 375 mg of Naproxen can make you superman
for another ten hours or so ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Hh

"HeyBub"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 2:04 PM

mac davis wrote:
> I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable
> bladders.. Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be
> cheaper to buy and cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>

Mail goes (mainly) by weight, not size. If you mail a Helium-filled ballon,
the postal service will pay you.

JG

"John Grossbohlin"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 7:34 AM


"mac davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
> thick..
>
> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable bladders..
> Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be cheaper to buy
> and
> cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>
> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
> especially
> from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..

Being larger may make it harder for the USPS to loose... Over the past four
years the number of items that haven't made it to me numbers well into the
hundreds. The carrier brings something every day so they can obviously find
me. The automation is sending my stuff off into the ether... never makes it
to the regional distribution center. Bring back the mules... more reliable!

John

Uu

Upscale

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 10:26 AM

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:15:23 -0600, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:
>That should be good enough rationale to realistically consider one over
>a table saw, if it's one or the other.
>
>Also, you will notice that Tommy Silva and crew are hot onto Festool
>plunge saws on TOH and ATOH.

Well, certainly a tracksaw is extremely convenient for the contractor
going out to jobsites. I'd suggest that's its greatest benefit.

Guess I'd have to work with one for awhile before I might be able to
say that it mostly could replace a tablesaw. Considering that my
tablesaw experience is almost forty years worth, it would have to be
one hell of an effective tool though.

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 11:56 AM

On 3/12/10 8:34 AM, Upscale wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>>
>
> Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
> tracksaw?

All I saw was the nice amp. :-)


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply

Mm

-MIKE-

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 1:47 PM

On 3/12/10 1:27 PM, Swingman wrote:
> On 3/12/2010 11:56 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 3/12/10 8:34 AM, Upscale wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>>>>
>>>
>>> Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
>>> tracksaw?
>>
>> All I saw was the nice amp. :-)
>
> That's my rehearsal rig ... although lately it's slowly getting to be a
> "bring what's easy to carry and let the sound guys do the rest" kind of
> lifestyle. :)
>

Preachin to the choir, my friend. :-)

That's why I have this... for rehearsals... although I used it on a gig
and like you said, "let the sound guys do the rest."
http://www.mikedrums.com/rehearsalkit/crapkit.html

The dolly/case has been upgraded to enclose the rear.


--

-MIKE-

"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply

Uu

Upscale

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

12/03/2010 9:34 AM

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:15:33 -0600, Swingman <[email protected]> wrote:

>http://www.e-woodshop.net/images/box2box.jpg
>

Noticed that it's a T-square for a tracksaw. How do you like the
tracksaw? The last woodworking show I went to, I specifically paid
attention to dealers with Festool and DeWalt tracksaws. They both
appeared to work quite well.

What I'm interested in most is the kind of cut you get when using the
tracksaw on veneered plywood. The show I went to appeared to crosscut
splinter free, but I couldn't get close enough to the demonstrations
to closely inspect or actually feel the edges for smoothness. With a
decent work table, would you say that the tracksaw could permanently
replace a decent tablesaw?

Thanks Karl.

Hh

"HeyBub"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 6:59 PM

[email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Mail goes (mainly) by weight, not size. If you mail a Helium-filled
>> ballon, the postal service will pay you.
>
> It is the government. They should like negative numbers.

Saw a wonderful TV segment once. The producers mailed all kinds of stuff
(much had to be left on the post office loading dock with no return
address). Everything had the appropriate postage and a valid address. The
things included:

* A set of deer antlers.
* A single snow ski.
* A bottle of water.
* A small clear plastic box containing a tooth.
* Can of beer.
* A John Deere gimmie cap.
* A single tennis shoe.
* A two-foot 2x4.
* A brick.
* A plastic trash-bag containing leaves.

Most of it got delivered. The bottle of water was drunk by the postman.

MH

"Martin H. Eastburn"

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 8:38 PM

Small boxes get lost in machines. The boxes used from various larger
shippers are standard sizes for the machines in the sorting center.

Odd stuff and small stuff gets hand sorted - someday.

Look at the express mail boxes - 12x12x and 11x17x and such.
Their general mass will respond to movers on the path - routing it
left or right from the main.

I send a 12x12 box that was 40#'s flat rate. It gets across the country
in 2 days and delivered in 2 or 3 days for a total of 2-3 days.


Martin

HeyBub wrote:
> mac davis wrote:
>> I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
>> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
>> thick..
>>
>> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable
>> bladders.. Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be
>> cheaper to buy and cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>>
>> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
>> especially from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>>
>
> Mail goes (mainly) by weight, not size. If you mail a Helium-filled ballon,
> the postal service will pay you.
>
>

kk

in reply to mac davis on 11/03/2010 11:12 PM

13/03/2010 2:13 PM

On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:04:17 -0600, "HeyBub" <[email protected]> wrote:

>mac davis wrote:
>> I ordered 2 carbide cutters for a turning tool from Crafts Supply..
>> Each cutter is in a plastic box about an inch square and maybe 3/4"
>> thick..
>>
>> They came today in a 7" x 7" x 4" box, filled with inflatable
>> bladders.. Seems like a padded envelope or MUCH smaller box would be
>> cheaper to buy and cost less to mail, besides killing less trees..
>>
>> I know.. picky, picky, picky... but I hate to see waste like this,
>> especially from a place that ships thousands of packages a month..
>>
>
>Mail goes (mainly) by weight, not size. If you mail a Helium-filled ballon,
>the postal service will pay you.

It is the government. They should like negative numbers.


You’ve reached the end of replies