CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

05/04/2007 8:56 AM

First Clock

This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......

http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm


This topic has 25 replies

nn

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 7:16 AM

On Apr 5, 9:08 am, "Stephen M" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I really like the use of the spalted maple in that application.
>
> Well done.
>
> -Steve
> "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected]...
>
> > This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> > wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> >http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I think the spalted wood adds a nice touch, and I'll bet in person it
looks even better. Nice job on the clock.

Robert

RN

"RayV"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 9:37 AM

On Apr 5, 9:56 am, "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm

The clock is very nice. As for the spalting can't say without seeing
it for real but I assume it will be going in your wife's house so...

I really like this project and I hope you don't have it copyrighted
because it just made it to my favorites under 'future project'
http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/toolcaddy.htm

Jj

"Jeff"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 12:50 PM

On Apr 5, 9:56 am, "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm


Include me in the spalted column. Good job.

Aa

"Andy"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 12:53 PM

> > Very nice and well done ... I really like the spalting, myself.
>
> Thanks, Swingman,

I really like the spalting also, but I'm not sure I like it with the
rest of the clock. The clock face and dark, evenly-colored solid wood
case and trim suggest a very nice classical style, and IMO the spalted
wood doesn't really fit in. I think if the clock face were simpler,
and maybe the top & bottom molding were simpler too, that I would
REALLY like it. As others have suggested, though, my opinion really
doesn't matter here, and you didn't even ask for it.
Out of curiousity, does your wife object to the spalting itself, or to
the use of spalted wood in that application?
Overall, the wood and workmanship look top-notch - keep up the good
work!
Andy

JJ

in reply to "Andy" on 05/04/2007 12:53 PM

06/04/2007 11:09 AM

Thu, Apr 5, 2007, 12:53pm (EDT-3) [email protected] (Andy) doth
sayeth:
I really like the spalting also, but I'm not sure I like it with the
rest of the clock. The clock face and dark, evenly-colored solid wood
case and trim suggest a very nice classical style, and IMO the spalted
wood doesn't really fit in. I think if the clock face were simpler, and
maybe the top & bottom molding were simpler too, that I would REALLY
like it. <snip>

I'd have to see it in person before I could decide if I'd change my
mind on the spaltted piece, but I doubt I would.

The clock itself I really like as is. To me looks like a now
antique clock would have looked like when it was new - and not something
someone tried to make look old by "distressing" it. The clock I have
has a similar style face, so I like that. I think your mom will like te
clock (even with the spalted piece), and should pat you on your head and
tell you you're a good boy. LOL



JOAT
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
immane mittam.
(I have a catapult. Give me all your money, or I will fling an enormous
rock at your head.)

Rd

"Robatoy"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 10:42 PM

On Apr 5, 9:56 am, "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm

I can see a lot of care went into making that clock.

Very well done.
Love the case.
Love the spalted maple.
Not too keen on the clock face, its busy-ness detracts from the focal
point...the maple... don't mind me, I tend to lean towards designs
with fewer points of interest.
In my head, I see a clock-face like a Movado watch and spalted
maple...together.

r

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 9:46 AM

J T wrote:
> Thu, Apr 5, 2007, 8:56am (EDT-1) [email protected]
> (Charlie M. 1958) doth posteth:
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> Yeah, it did. But I'll side with the wife on the spalted back, it
> makes it look like something in the top barfed, and it leaked down.
>
>
>
> JOAT
> Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
> immane mittam.
> (I have a catapult. Give me all your money, or I will fling an enormous
> rock at your head.)
>

Thanks, guys. My wife will be glad to hear she's not alone, J T.
From here and other sources I've gotten feedback from, most people
either find the spalted maple back the best feature of the clock, or
else they really don't like it at all.

JJ

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 9:46 AM

05/04/2007 11:11 AM

Thu, Apr 5, 2007, 9:46am (EDT-1) [email protected]
(Charlie=A0M.=A01958) doth sayeh:
<snip> people either find the spalted maple back the best feature of the
clock, or else they really don't like it at all.

Just remember, there's only two opinions that count; yours, and your
wife's. And yours probably won't count near as much as your wife's.
But, for what it's worth, I think that piece would look great as the top
of a jewelery chest ot some such.

Keep the cat out of the shop. LOL



JOAT
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
immane mittam.
(I have a catapult. Give me all your money, or I will fling an enormous
rock at your head.)

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 11:42 AM

RayV wrote:
> On Apr 5, 9:56 am, "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
>> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>>
>> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm
>
> The clock is very nice. As for the spalting can't say without seeing
> it for real but I assume it will be going in your wife's house so...
>
> I really like this project and I hope you don't have it copyrighted
> because it just made it to my favorites under 'future project'
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/toolcaddy.htm
>
Actually, it's going to my mom for Mother's Day, so SWMBO's opinion
doesn't matter this time. :-)

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 1:06 PM

Swingman wrote:
> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>
>> Actually, it's going to my mom for Mother's Day, so SWMBO's opinion
>> doesn't matter this time. :-)
>
> Now, just who the hell do you think you're fooling? We, you, and SWMBO know
> that is NOT the case!
>
> ;)
>
> Very nice and well done ... I really like the spalting, myself.
>
Thanks, Swingman,

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:28 PM

Swingman wrote:
> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>
>> The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
>> walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)
>
> If you do, send me the spalted back and I will dispose of it for you, just
> in the interest of marital harmony, you understand. I mean, I would hate for
> your SWMBO to think that thing was laying around and might show up in some
> future project.
>
Keep your crab-pickin' hands outta my gumbo pot.

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:48 PM

Swingman wrote:
> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>> Swingman wrote:
>>> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>>>
>>>> The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
>>>> walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)
>>> If you do, send me the spalted back and I will dispose of it for you,
> just
>>> in the interest of marital harmony, you understand. I mean, I would hate
> for
>>> your SWMBO to think that thing was laying around and might show up in
> some
>>> future project.
>>>
>> Keep your crab-pickin' hands outta my gumbo pot.
>
> Heheh ... gumbo pot?
>
> Mais cher, da rule #1 dat little coonass learn, him: "Take what you want,
> just make damn sure dat you eat what you take, cher ... comprenez, vous?"
>
Mais oui, cher!

Bi

Bill in Detroit

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

07/04/2007 7:34 PM

Robatoy wrote:

> Love the spalted maple.
> Not too keen on the clock face, its busy-ness detracts from the focal
> point...the maple... don't mind me, I tend to lean towards designs
> with fewer points of interest.
> In my head, I see a clock-face like a Movado watch and spalted
> maple...together.
>
> r

Good point ... with a simpler face, the design could better carry the
unpredictability of the spalt pattern. Right now the design has two
focal points ... yes ... SUPER nice clock with a simpler face. Put a
small faceted piece of amber at 12, 3 & 9.

Bill <--- instant art critic - just add coffee



--
http://nmwoodworks.com/cube


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000731-0, 04/06/2007
Tested on: 4/7/2007 7:34:08 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com


JJ

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 10:24 AM

Thu, Apr 5, 2007, 8:56am (EDT-1) [email protected]
(Charlie=A0M.=A01958) doth posteth:
This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......

Yeah, it did. But I'll side with the wife on the spalted back, it
makes it look like something in the top barfed, and it leaked down.



JOAT
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
immane mittam.
(I have a catapult. Give me all your money, or I will fling an enormous
rock at your head.)

SM

"Stephen M"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 10:08 AM

I really like the use of the spalted maple in that application.

Well done.


-Steve
"Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:02 PM

Andy wrote:
>>> Very nice and well done ... I really like the spalting, myself.
>> Thanks, Swingman,
>
> I really like the spalting also, but I'm not sure I like it with the
> rest of the clock. The clock face and dark, evenly-colored solid wood
> case and trim suggest a very nice classical style, and IMO the spalted
> wood doesn't really fit in. I think if the clock face were simpler,
> and maybe the top & bottom molding were simpler too, that I would
> REALLY like it. As others have suggested, though, my opinion really
> doesn't matter here, and you didn't even ask for it.
> Out of curiousity, does your wife object to the spalting itself, or to
> the use of spalted wood in that application?
> Overall, the wood and workmanship look top-notch - keep up the good
> work!
> Andy
>
Thanks Jeff and Andy.

The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)

CM

"Charlie M. 1958"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:09 PM

Andy wrote:
>>> Very nice and well done ... I really like the spalting, myself.
>> Thanks, Swingman,
>
> I really like the spalting also, but I'm not sure I like it with the
> rest of the clock. The clock face and dark, evenly-colored solid wood
> case and trim suggest a very nice classical style, and IMO the spalted
> wood doesn't really fit in. I think if the clock face were simpler,
> and maybe the top & bottom molding were simpler too, that I would
> REALLY like it. As others have suggested, though, my opinion really
> doesn't matter here, and you didn't even ask for it.
> Out of curiousity, does your wife object to the spalting itself, or to
> the use of spalted wood in that application?
> Overall, the wood and workmanship look top-notch - keep up the good
> work!
> Andy
>
Oh, to answer your question, Andy...I'm not sure. LOL! She is not the
designer type who can pinpoint her feelings. I THINK she just agrees
with your opinion that the spalting does not fit in with the overall design.

TT

Tanus

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 7:05 PM

Stephen M wrote:
> I really like the use of the spalted maple in that application.
>
> Well done.
>
>
> -Steve

Same here. Maybe it's a woman thing. My
wife doesn't like spalted maple either.
I love the look of it. Nice job, Charlie.

Tanus


> "Charlie M. 1958" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
>> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>>
>> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm
>
>
>


--
This is not really a sig.

http://users.compzone.ca/george/shop/

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 11:56 AM


"Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message

> Actually, it's going to my mom for Mother's Day, so SWMBO's opinion
> doesn't matter this time. :-)

Now, just who the hell do you think you're fooling? We, you, and SWMBO know
that is NOT the case!

;)

Very nice and well done ... I really like the spalting, myself.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07

sp

shawn

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 4:32 PM

Charlie M. 1958 wrote:
> This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
> wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
> http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm

That looks very nice.

Ji

"Joe"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:17 PM



>
> Thanks, guys. My wife will be glad to hear she's not alone, J T.
> From here and other sources I've gotten feedback from, most people either
> find the spalted maple back the best feature of the clock, or else they
> really don't like it at all.

listen to the ones who like it.

I'm one of 'em.

JC

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:14 PM

"Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message

> The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
> walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)

If you do, send me the spalted back and I will dispose of it for you, just
in the interest of marital harmony, you understand. I mean, I would hate for
your SWMBO to think that thing was laying around and might show up in some
future project.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07

LM

"Lee Michaels"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 4:45 PM


Charlie M. 1958" wrote
> Swingman wrote:
>> "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
>>
>>> The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
>>> walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)
>>
>> If you do, send me the spalted back and I will dispose of it for you,
>> just
>> in the interest of marital harmony, you understand. I mean, I would hate
>> for
>> your SWMBO to think that thing was laying around and might show up in
>> some
>> future project.
>>
> Keep your crab-pickin' hands outta my gumbo pot.

Swingman can't help it.

He is a gumbo man.


MJ

Mark & Juanita

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 10:12 PM

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:56:56 -0500, "Charlie M. 1958"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>This is my first attempt at a clock. Turned out pretty well, though the
>wife doesn't like the spalted maple back......
>
>http://www.loyno.edu/~cbmarsh/clock.htm

Sorry to hear your wife doesn't like it; it's a very nice piece of work



+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Sk

"Swingman"

in reply to "Charlie M. 1958" on 05/04/2007 8:56 AM

05/04/2007 3:45 PM

"Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
> Swingman wrote:
> > "Charlie M. 1958" wrote in message
> >
> >> The way it is designed, the back comes off very easy and I could make a
> >> walnut insert so, in essence, it would be convertible. :-)
> >
> > If you do, send me the spalted back and I will dispose of it for you,
just
> > in the interest of marital harmony, you understand. I mean, I would hate
for
> > your SWMBO to think that thing was laying around and might show up in
some
> > future project.
> >
> Keep your crab-pickin' hands outta my gumbo pot.

Heheh ... gumbo pot?

Mais cher, da rule #1 dat little coonass learn, him: "Take what you want,
just make damn sure dat you eat what you take, cher ... comprenez, vous?"

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 2/20/07


You’ve reached the end of replies