Writeup with pictures on my site:
http://krtwood.com/sander.html
Tried it with the vac hooked up for the first time and was very
pleased, it picked up 99% of the dust. The key to that I think is
getting the shroud close to the drum. The widest piece I've put
through so far was about 7", so I'm not sure yet how it will handle
the full 14". 7" was no different than 2" though, as long as you
don't take too much of a bite.
We'll see how it holds up...
-Leuf
Leuf wrote:
> Writeup with pictures on my site:
>
> http://krtwood.com/sander.html
>
> Tried it with the vac hooked up for the first time and was very
> pleased, it picked up 99% of the dust. The key to that I think is
> getting the shroud close to the drum. The widest piece I've put
> through so far was about 7", so I'm not sure yet how it will handle
> the full 14". 7" was no different than 2" though, as long as you
> don't take too much of a bite.
>
> We'll see how it holds up...
I can run 22" through mine with no problem. Like you said, it depends
on how much you take off.
Here's mine, FWIW, that I built about 18 months ago
http://www.areddy.net/wood/tools.html
Interesting way to do the paper, but you might want to check into
converting it to velcro backed. If you do this you can make sure the
drum is parallel to the table by putting the sand paper on a board, and
run it through sand paper UP, in effect sanding the drum as it turns.
It will be perfectly parallel to the table in the end.
Wed, Nov 1, 2006, 11:20pm [email protected] (Leuf) doeth sayeth:
Writeup with pictures on my site: <snip>
My first thought was how did y ou measure to know it got 99% of the
dust?
Then checked your site. The pictures look good. But when it came
to reading the text, with the white letters, and that background, I
didn't even try.
JOAT
If it can't kill you, it ain't a sport.
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:03:30 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:
>Wed, Nov 1, 2006, 11:20pm [email protected] (Leuf) doeth sayeth:
>Writeup with pictures on my site: <snip>
>
> My first thought was how did y ou measure to know it got 99% of the
>dust?
I measured the amount of time I spent cleaning up after, which was
zero. I figure nothing is perfect though. If I say 99.3 or something
then you can give me a hard time.
> Then checked your site. The pictures look good. But when it came
>to reading the text, with the white letters, and that background, I
>didn't even try.
Yeah, black (almost) and white is a real strange combination... unless
your browser is doing something weird. There's a background at the
top that fades out, the only text over which should be the title.
-Leuf
Thu, Nov 2, 2006, 9:49pm [email protected] (Leuf) doth sayeth:
<snip> There's a background at the top that fades out, the only text
over which should be the title.
For me anyway the background kept repeating - all the way down.
JOAT
If it can't kill you, it ain't a sport.
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:17:14 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:
>Thu, Nov 2, 2006, 9:49pm [email protected] (Leuf) doth sayeth:
><snip> There's a background at the top that fades out, the only text
>over which should be the title.
>
> For me anyway the background kept repeating - all the way down.
Weird, webtv supposedly supports the no-repeat atrribute, but I have
no way of testing for webtv. Try it again should look right for you
now. I'll have to go through the rest of the site later, thanks for
the heads up.
-Leuf
Thu, Nov 2, 2006, 10:57pm [email protected] (Leuf) did nicely do:
Weird, webtv supposedly supports the no-repeat atrribute, but I have no
way of testing for webtv. Try it again should look right for you now.
I'll have to go through the rest of the site later, thanks for the heads
up.
Whatever you did you dood it right. Site looks finenow - and easy
to read. I like the sander, you done good. Doubt I'll ever make one,
but I've saved the link to go over in more detail later anyway. Thanks.
JOAT
If it can't kill you, it ain't a sport.
On 2 Nov 2006 15:25:23 -0800, "Larry Bud" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I can run 22" through mine with no problem. Like you said, it depends
>on how much you take off.
You've got twice as much hp as I do, but yeah. For the type of stuff
I mainly do I've just got more width to not have to change the paper
as often, or run multiple grits at once. Though I tried putting 150
on it and still had to go over it with 100 on the ROS to get out all
the scratches, so I don't know if I'll bother doing that.
>Here's mine, FWIW, that I built about 18 months ago
>
>http://www.areddy.net/wood/tools.html
They all kind of look the same, don't they? :) You didn't have any
problems with the table rocking? Mine was pretty bad until I added
the locking knob on the side, but you doubled up your table. I see
that same design everywhere so I don't know if it's just me or what.
You made yours stationary which I highly recommend for two reasons.
First it's just a darn useful thing, mine's only been operational a
short while but when it's not on the bench I keep finding myself
wishing I could run one little board through for something. And
second that sucker is heavy. I was aiming for 50 lbs and really tried
to keep things as light as possible it ended up about 60 lbs. Which
is still in the realm of portable, but not real fun, especially with
it being an awkward size.
>Interesting way to do the paper, but you might want to check into
>converting it to velcro backed.
I saw the wedge clamping method on the Byrnes sander I link to on the
page. I figured being able to use regular paper was great. It's a
bit of a pain messing with the screws, but then I don't have to spiral
wrap the paper so I figure it's a wash. Bit of a learning curve to
it, had it come loose at one end once and scratch the hell out of the
lexan. Had a screw on the opposite side that was under the paper that
I failed to tighten all the way come loose and put a big line down a
board. But I think I have the hang of it now. I figured worst case
scenario I fill in the grooves and spiral wrap over it.
>If you do this you can make sure the
>drum is parallel to the table by putting the sand paper on a board, and
>run it through sand paper UP, in effect sanding the drum as it turns.
>It will be perfectly parallel to the table in the end.
Yep, second to last picture shows this in progress.
-Leuf
How many hours did it take to make?
-- Mark
"Leuf" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Writeup with pictures on my site:
>
> http://krtwood.com/sander.html
>
> Tried it with the vac hooked up for the first time and was very
> pleased, it picked up 99% of the dust. The key to that I think is
> getting the shroud close to the drum. The widest piece I've put
> through so far was about 7", so I'm not sure yet how it will handle
> the full 14". 7" was no different than 2" though, as long as you
> don't take too much of a bite.
>
> We'll see how it holds up...
>
>
> -Leuf
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:27:32 GMT, "Mark Jerde"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>How many hours did it take to make?
It went together over a period of two weeks, but I was building it as
parts were coming in and figuring things out as I went along. If you
don't get fancy with the frame there isn't really that much to it. I
was a bit nervous messing around with bearings as I really didn't know
anything about that, but don't let that deter you.
-Leuf