Science is starting to understand "Dimensions!" -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Multidimensionalman/
.
Here are some profound, but very basic facts about our reality:
The first basic fact is about Aether.
Aether: Also called: Prana, Akasha, Chiaki, or Quantum Medium.
The existence of aether was proved by the creation of a Faraday cage.
This is an absolute vacuum, lead shielded from all known radiation, and
cooled down to absolute zero -273.
Despite all these precautions, the void was found to have a tremendous
amount of energy, and this was called ZPE zero point energy. A source
of almost impossibly grand power.
The 4 basic force fields, gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong
nuclear force are different forms of this same ZPE.
The second basic fact is about vibrationary levels and dimensions.
Vibratory Levels: Aether has different vibration levels. As an object
moves, its gravitational mass and electric charge start to decrease.
Until at the speed of light they reach zero.
In other words, if you travel at very high speeds your weight keeps
decreasing, until it finally reaches Zero!
Zero? So where does it go? It goes into different levels of aether
These different levels of aether correspond with what we also call
dimensions.
Transmutation: They get displaced to higher vibratory levels of
aether. Those which have been recognised so far are the following: And
the laws of physics are different in each level. The levels: Solid
State - Dense Superfluid - Gaseous with Molecular motion -
Stellar Plasma Energy -Galactic Processes.
You will notice that we have not yet reached the "Spiritual" level.
This has not yet been recognised "scientifically" grin!
Joe.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Multidimensionalman/
> Vibratory Levels: Aether has different vibration levels. As an object
> moves, its gravitational mass and electric charge start to decrease.
> Until at the speed of light they reach zero.
> In other words, if you travel at very high speeds your weight keeps
> decreasing, until it finally reaches Zero!
You got this backwards, non-Einstein. An object gets heavier the
faster it goes. Theory of Special Relativity. This has been *proven*
by experiment, as well as the fact that time slows down for that
object.
Not even going to read the rest since you have this basic fact wrong.
charlie b <[email protected]> wrote:
>mass at velocity V m(v)
>equals
>initial mass at rest m(i)
>times
>the speed of light squared C^2
>divided by
>1 mlnus the objects velocity squared
>( 1 - V^2)
>
>m(v) = m(i) x C^2
> --------
> (1 - V^2)
>
>As V approaches C, the denominator approaches zero
>with the resulting ration C^2/(1-V^2) approaching
>infinity and the mass at velocity V also approaching
>infinity. But that assumes an initial mass greater
>than zero
Units, please? Unless you are measuring velocity in units that assure
that -1<V<1, I think you have just invented negative mass! <g>
--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.
Enoch Root <[email protected]> wrote:
>alexy wrote:
>> charlie b <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>mass at velocity V m(v)
>>>equals
>>>initial mass at rest m(i)
>>>times
>>>the speed of light squared C^2
>>>divided by
>>>1 mlnus the objects velocity squared
>>>( 1 - V^2)
>>>
>>>m(v) = m(i) x C^2
>>> --------
>>> (1 - V^2)
>>>
>>>As V approaches C, the denominator approaches zero
>>>with the resulting ration C^2/(1-V^2) approaching
>>>infinity and the mass at velocity V also approaching
>>>infinity. But that assumes an initial mass greater
>>>than zero
>>
>>
>> Units, please? Unless you are measuring velocity in units that assure
>> that -1<V<1, I think you have just invented negative mass! <g>
>
>yeah, it's (IIRC) sqrt(1-V^2/C^2).
Which gives you a dimensionless denominator. If the numerator to go
with this denominator is 1, then your memory is the same as my guess.
--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.
Steve Peterson wrote:
>
> nonsense
>
Well, not exactly.
The development of human knowledge has taken us
from the "sophisticated, enlightened" view of the
universe made up of our flat earth, surrounded
by the Heavenly Orbs, the atom as the smallest,
undivisible particle, and humans as the pinnacle of
"God's" "creation" - to - the realization that Earth
is merely a sphericalesque little dot in an unemag-
inably huge universe made up of "things" that the
word "particles" is inadequate to describe and
matter and energy are merely different manifestatins
of the same thing - the Zen "Everything is Everything"
What that "thing" IS remains to be discovered.
Physicists and mathematicians go search for IT one
way and philosophers another. String Theory,
which requires 11 "dimensions" offers an
explanation of many currently unexplainable
"things".
Hindu mythology has one that describes what
sounds disturbingly like The Big Bang. So
much so that Oppenheimer quoted from it
upon seeing the first nuclear "detonation"
"I am Shiva, the come death, destroyer of
worlds . . ."
The recent images from Hubble (sp?)
show us the other end of this "thing" -
the creation of stars.
We've much to learn. It would be wise not
to rule out anything at this point.
charlie b
mass at velocity V m(v)
equals
initial mass at rest m(i)
times
the speed of light squared C^2
divided by
1 mlnus the objects velocity squared
( 1 - V^2)
m(v) = m(i) x C^2
--------
(1 - V^2)
As V approaches C, the denominator approaches zero
with the resulting ration C^2/(1-V^2) approaching
infinity and the mass at velocity V also approaching
infinity. But that assumes an initial mass greater
than zero
alexy wrote:
> And more seriously, Charlie, the units don't work on that equation. I
> wonder (but not enough to look it up<g>) if the denominator should be
> (C-V)^2. At least with that formula, the multiplier of m(i) is a pure
> number that approaches infinity as V approaches C from below.
> --
You're right - been a while since I played with this stuff.
But the point is that as an object with any initial mass at
all approaches the speed of light, it's mass approaches
infinity. To continue to accelerate it requires a force
approaching infinity.
With the exception of the light from the shop lights, nothing
in the shop travels at even 1/10th the speed of smell (Ron
White joke). Snail's Pace is more descriptive of how fast I
work.
BUT - come to think of it I've had parts approach the speed
of sound - or so it seemed. BIG router bit - climb cut -
catch - wood projectile @ Mach I. Table saw has also been
known to accelerate wooden objects to Mach I and perhaps
beyond.
(Possible research subject: The inverse relationship
between speed and bladder control - coincidence?)
At their extremes, physics and philosophy approach unity.
If a guy says something
and
there's no woman near enough to hear it
is he still
WRONG!?
chalrie b
Humanid wrote:
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Science is starting to understand "Dimensions!"
>
> What an amazing discovery. From my dimension I can see
> two identical posts at the same time!
It's a Quarks Thing. If you look carefully, you'll
see that their spins are opposite of each other.
Newbies!
charlie b
In article <[email protected]>, "Steve Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>nonsense
So why did you re-post the entire thing?
--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.
alexy wrote:
> charlie b <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>mass at velocity V m(v)
>>equals
>>initial mass at rest m(i)
>>times
>>the speed of light squared C^2
>>divided by
>>1 mlnus the objects velocity squared
>>( 1 - V^2)
>>
>>m(v) = m(i) x C^2
>> --------
>> (1 - V^2)
>>
>>As V approaches C, the denominator approaches zero
>>with the resulting ration C^2/(1-V^2) approaching
>>infinity and the mass at velocity V also approaching
>>infinity. But that assumes an initial mass greater
>>than zero
>
>
> Units, please? Unless you are measuring velocity in units that assure
> that -1<V<1, I think you have just invented negative mass! <g>
yeah, it's (IIRC) sqrt(1-V^2/C^2).
er
--
email not valid
[email protected] wrote:
> Science is starting to understand "Dimensions!"
What an amazing discovery. From my dimension I can see
two identical posts at the same time!
alexy <[email protected]> wrote:
>charlie b <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>mass at velocity V m(v)
>>equals
>>initial mass at rest m(i)
>>times
>>the speed of light squared C^2
>>divided by
>>1 mlnus the objects velocity squared
>>( 1 - V^2)
>>
>>m(v) = m(i) x C^2
>> --------
>> (1 - V^2)
>>
>>As V approaches C, the denominator approaches zero
>>with the resulting ration C^2/(1-V^2) approaching
>>infinity and the mass at velocity V also approaching
>>infinity. But that assumes an initial mass greater
>>than zero
>
>Units, please? Unless you are measuring velocity in units that assure
>that -1<V<1, I think you have just invented negative mass! <g>
And more seriously, Charlie, the units don't work on that equation. I
wonder (but not enough to look it up<g>) if the denominator should be
(C-V)^2. At least with that formula, the multiplier of m(i) is a pure
number that approaches infinity as V approaches C from below.
--
Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently.
nonsense
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Science is starting to understand "Dimensions!" -
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Multidimensionalman/
> .
> Here are some profound, but very basic facts about our reality:
>
> The first basic fact is about Aether.
>
> Aether: Also called: Prana, Akasha, Chiaki, or Quantum Medium.
> The existence of aether was proved by the creation of a Faraday cage.
> This is an absolute vacuum, lead shielded from all known radiation, and
> cooled down to absolute zero -273.
> Despite all these precautions, the void was found to have a tremendous
> amount of energy, and this was called ZPE zero point energy. A source
> of almost impossibly grand power.
> The 4 basic force fields, gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong
> nuclear force are different forms of this same ZPE.
>
> The second basic fact is about vibrationary levels and dimensions.
>
> Vibratory Levels: Aether has different vibration levels. As an object
> moves, its gravitational mass and electric charge start to decrease.
> Until at the speed of light they reach zero.
> In other words, if you travel at very high speeds your weight keeps
> decreasing, until it finally reaches Zero!
>
> Zero? So where does it go? It goes into different levels of aether
>
> These different levels of aether correspond with what we also call
> dimensions.
>
> Transmutation: They get displaced to higher vibratory levels of
> aether. Those which have been recognised so far are the following: And
> the laws of physics are different in each level. The levels: Solid
> State - Dense Superfluid - Gaseous with Molecular motion -
> Stellar Plasma Energy -Galactic Processes.
>
> You will notice that we have not yet reached the "Spiritual" level.
> This has not yet been recognised "scientifically" grin!
>
> Joe.
>
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Multidimensionalman/
>
On 5 Mar 2006 09:47:58 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>Science is starting to understand "Dimensions!" -
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Multidimensionalman/
>.
>Here are some profound, but very basic facts about our reality:
>
>The first basic fact is about Aether.
>
>Aether: Also called: Prana, Akasha, Chiaki, or Quantum Medium.
>The existence of aether was proved by the creation of a Faraday cage.
>This is an absolute vacuum, lead shielded from all known radiation, and
>cooled down to absolute zero -273.
bzzzt! Sorry, but thanks for playing "I'm a physicist for today". We have
some nice parting gifts, you might want to try the Mobius sidewalk to place
in front of your house. Science may be starting to understand dimensions,
but you obviously are having a hard time understanding science.
The existence of Aether, or, in less colloquial English, "ether" was
disproved in the early 20'th century by the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Absolute zero is a bit difficult to attain (can get close, but not equal),
and a Faraday cage has nothing to do with an absolute vacuum nor lead
shielding. As others have pointed out, mass approaches infinity as
velocity approaches the speed of light, thus requiring infinite force to
achieve the acceleration required to achieve the speed of light -- but,
that should be a piece o' cake if you've got something to achieve absolute
zero.
... snip. If you got that part wrong, the conclusions that follow are of
less worth than male bovine excrement.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+