Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:41:53 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>Sure, but the same thing goes for food. Ammo is easier to hide and
>lasts longer.
>...not that I'm counting on doing either.

Of course you are. Discussing the end of society as we know it. You're
the most negative person I've ever seen. It's truly a wonder you
haven't offed yourself by now.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 23:05:41 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:41:53 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
>>Sure, but the same thing goes for food. Ammo is easier to hide and
>>lasts longer.
>>...not that I'm counting on doing either.
>
>Of course you are. Discussing the end of society as we know it. You're
>the most negative person I've ever seen. It's truly a wonder you
>haven't offed yourself by now.

Once again you insist on proving that not only are you a liar AND the
dumbest person in the group, but you're proud of it.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
>>that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?
>It is a joke son

krw doesn't joke. He is completely bereft of any sense of humour.

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 9:11:36 AM UTC-5, woodchucker wrote:
> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civ=
ilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists -- Jeff

From the link:
It finds that according to the historical record even advanced, complex civ=
ilisations are susceptible to collapse, raising questions about the sustain=
ability of modern civilisation:=20

"The fall of the Roman Empire, and the equally (if not more) advanced Han, =
Mauryan, and Gupta Empires, as well as so many advanced Mesopotamian Empire=
s, are all testimony to the fact that advanced, sophisticated, complex, and=
creative civilizations can be both fragile and impermanent."

It wasn't the average people or industry, of those civilizations, that caus=
ed the demises, but the currupt and idiot leaders that was the root cause o=
f the direction the societies were led into, .... just as our idiot leaders=
are doing today? People, as a whole, can usually manage their own systems=
, in coordination with themselves. Ignorant (and greedy) leadership is wha=
t causes the problems.

But no worry. According to other armchair experts, a big-ass meteorite wil=
l do in today's civilization(s), before our esteemed leaders do.

Sonny

What is NASA doing studying "The Collapse of Civilization"? I thought
they were supposed to be concentrating on their "Muslim Outreach"
directive. Maybe the two are related?

On 03/20/2014 07:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>



--
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure,the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"
-Winston Churchill

[email protected] wrote:
> woodchucker wrote:
>>
>> Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
>> The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
>> void of civility and have lots of mayhem.
>>
>> Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
>> many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.
>
> Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
> gold.

If there was a collapse of that magnitude, and I had a supply of
ammunition large enough to use for currency, I don't think I'd want to
advertise that fact by using it for currency. If it became common
knowledge that I was sitting on a huge ammo dump, that might make me an
even bigger target for marauding gangs.

On 3/20/2014 5:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:31:37 -0600, Just Wondering
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> woodchucker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
>>>> The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
>>>> void of civility and have lots of mayhem.
>>>>
>>>> Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
>>>> many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.
>>>
>>> Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
>>> gold.
>>
>> If there was a collapse of that magnitude, and I had a supply of
>> ammunition large enough to use for currency, I don't think I'd want to
>> advertise that fact by using it for currency. If it became common
>> knowledge that I was sitting on a huge ammo dump, that might make me an
>> even bigger target for marauding gangs.
>
> Would you advertise that you had a few tons of gold in your basement,
> now?
>
> If there is a collapse large enough that you'd have to stockpile that
> much food, might just as well hang it up anyway. You *will* need the
> ammo in either case.
>
I don't dispute that under such a scenario a survivor would need a
substantial ammo supply. I'm just questioning the wisdom of advertising
that fact. You'd probably be better off gathering together a group of
like-minded people you could trust, pool your resources, and work
together for your mutual protection and survival. Maybe then the group
could use ammo for trade. But I thing an individual trying the same
thing would wind up screwing himself.

On 3/22/2014 10:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:06:00 -0400, woodchucker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2014 8:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:18:10 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:28:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>> Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>>>>> truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>>>>
>>>> Ha, Ha! You're such a fool. Lefty, righty, whatever. Obviously,
>>>> they're some type of societal label, but I don't use them so they mean
>>>> nothing to me. Go ahead, keep using them, you're such a moron you just
>>>> don't know any better.
>>>>
>>>> If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>>>> swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>>>> your senile mind.
>>>
>>> You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
>>> producing such a stupid child.
>>>
>>
>> Just take your meds.
>
> You've obviously already taken knownothing's.
>

Still don't have that Bipolar disorder under control?

"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> Hey Idiot - learn how to use a newsreader. The below post is not from
> me. For someone who is supposed to be such a renowned internet user,
> you fail to show it.
>

Interesting coincidence... this little flamewar errupted shortly after "101
ways to be obnoxious on Usenet" was posted on rec.humor.funny.reruns.
Messing up attributes was #4.

Puckdropper
--
Make it to fit, don't make it fit.

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:05:54 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:09:58 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>>If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>>>swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>>>your senile mind.
>>
>>You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
>>producing such a stupid child.
>
>Really?

Really! If you weren't so damned stupid you wouldn't waste your time
stalking me.

>Is that all you've got?

Apparently, I have you. You're like the dog who caught the car; too
damned stupid to let go.

>I'm disappointed.

So is your father. Obviously.


> I guess I can add 'wimp' to your description.

You can add anything you want. You're too stupid to tell the truth,
like all lefties.

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:06:00 -0400, woodchucker <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 3/22/2014 8:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:18:10 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:28:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>>>> truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>>>
>>> Ha, Ha! You're such a fool. Lefty, righty, whatever. Obviously,
>>> they're some type of societal label, but I don't use them so they mean
>>> nothing to me. Go ahead, keep using them, you're such a moron you just
>>> don't know any better.
>>>
>>> If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>>> swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>>> your senile mind.
>>
>> You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
>> producing such a stupid child.
>>
>
>Just take your meds.

You've obviously already taken knownothing's.

On 3/20/2014 2:08 PM, Markem wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:47:55 -0400, Keith Nuttle
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2014 10:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
>>> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>>>
>> This must be NASA's new role. At one time they were heavily involved in
>> Research projects that created jobs in this country and put Man on the
>> moon, and a Space Station in orbit.
>>
>> Today NASA is mouthing the administrations propaganda line, we no longer
>> have a space program, and the space station has been given to the Russians.
>
> If civilization is going to collapse more incentive to get on the
> first Mars mission.
>

In looking at referenced articles, KPMG predicts 15 years it will all
collapse. Funny how an accounting firm is pointing out the wealth
difference as an object to be rectified.

While I believe that all hell will break loose shortly, I wasn't
thinking the collapse of all civilisations, but, that might be the
result of the next collapse.

Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
void of civility and have lots of mayhem.

Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.

Well, enough of that, we all know that the current model is not working
and something big is coming. Those that think it will self correct are
not paying attention to all the markers. This country is in such debt
that it is not self sustaining. Greece , Spain are minor compared to our
collapse... And look at the riots that happened there.



--
Jeff

On 3/21/2014 12:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:30:25 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
>>>> that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?
>>> It is a joke son
>>
>> krw doesn't joke. He is completely bereft of any sense of humour.
>
> Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
> truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>

Off your meds again.

--
Jeff

On 3/20/2014 12:28 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Propaganda plus out of money.
>>
>> BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would
>> be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty
>> good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and
>> we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.
>
> Not an invalid point at all, but at least the topic made it very clear what
> it was about. Is there really a lot of difference between putting OT in the
> header at that point? We all know that off topic stuff is going to show up
> in a community like this, so we kinda just expect it to some degree. And...
> to some degree maybe get frustrated by some of it. Personally, (fwiw), I
> get a ton more frustrated by the guys that cross post to a zillion different
> groups of whacko's and then we're inundated with some really crazy thinking
> from fringe guys for a couple of weeks - but that's just my petty bitch.
> Now - back to work and make some sawdust damnit!
>

I agree with your take, but if it has OT in the subject line, I can
filter it out. As far as cross posting, I can drop anything cross
posted to more than 3 groups (an arbitrary number for sure).
Troglodyte(sp) that I am, I still use XP and Newsproxy still works on
XP. Pretty funny for a guy that spent 40 years in IT.

On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:09:58 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>>swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>>your senile mind.
>
>You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
>producing such a stupid child.

Really? Is that all you've got? I'm disappointed. I guess I can add
'wimp' to your description.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:28:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).

Ha, Ha! You're such a fool. Lefty, righty, whatever. Obviously,
they're some type of societal label, but I don't use them so they mean
nothing to me. Go ahead, keep using them, you're such a moron you just
don't know any better.

If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
your senile mind.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:06:01 -0600, Just Wondering
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/20/2014 5:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:31:37 -0600, Just Wondering
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>> woodchucker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
>>>>> The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
>>>>> void of civility and have lots of mayhem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
>>>>> many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.
>>>>
>>>> Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
>>>> gold.
>>>
>>> If there was a collapse of that magnitude, and I had a supply of
>>> ammunition large enough to use for currency, I don't think I'd want to
>>> advertise that fact by using it for currency. If it became common
>>> knowledge that I was sitting on a huge ammo dump, that might make me an
>>> even bigger target for marauding gangs.
>>
>> Would you advertise that you had a few tons of gold in your basement,
>> now?
>>
>> If there is a collapse large enough that you'd have to stockpile that
>> much food, might just as well hang it up anyway. You *will* need the
>> ammo in either case.
>>
>I don't dispute that under such a scenario a survivor would need a
>substantial ammo supply. I'm just questioning the wisdom of advertising
>that fact. You'd probably be better off gathering together a group of
>like-minded people you could trust, pool your resources, and work
>together for your mutual protection and survival. Maybe then the group
>could use ammo for trade. But I thing an individual trying the same
>thing would wind up screwing himself.

Sure, but the same thing goes for food. Ammo is easier to hide and
lasts longer.

...not that I'm counting on doing either.

Propaganda plus out of money.

BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:56:39 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
>gold.

You'll only need one bullet actually. ~ the one to blow your brains
out when you finally realize that you've got nothing left to live for.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:49:19 -0400, woodchucker <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 3/21/2014 12:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:30:25 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
>>>>> that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?
>>>> It is a joke son
>>>
>>> krw doesn't joke. He is completely bereft of any sense of humour.
>>
>> Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>> truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>>
>
>Off your meds again.

Of course not but apparently you've been sniffing some of
knownothing's stash.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:56:39 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:42:39 -0400, woodchucker <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>On 3/20/2014 2:08 PM, Markem wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:47:55 -0400, Keith Nuttle
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/20/2014 10:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>>>>>
>>>> This must be NASA's new role. At one time they were heavily involved in
>>>> Research projects that created jobs in this country and put Man on the
>>>> moon, and a Space Station in orbit.
>>>>
>>>> Today NASA is mouthing the administrations propaganda line, we no longer
>>>> have a space program, and the space station has been given to the Russians.
>>>
>>> If civilization is going to collapse more incentive to get on the
>>> first Mars mission.
>
>Why? Do you believe you'll be safer, cut off from Earth? Or perhaps
>that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?
>

It is a joke son

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:42:39 -0400, woodchucker <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 3/20/2014 2:08 PM, Markem wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:47:55 -0400, Keith Nuttle
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2014 10:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>>>>
>>> This must be NASA's new role. At one time they were heavily involved in
>>> Research projects that created jobs in this country and put Man on the
>>> moon, and a Space Station in orbit.
>>>
>>> Today NASA is mouthing the administrations propaganda line, we no longer
>>> have a space program, and the space station has been given to the Russians.
>>
>> If civilization is going to collapse more incentive to get on the
>> first Mars mission.

Why? Do you believe you'll be safer, cut off from Earth? Or perhaps
that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?

>In looking at referenced articles, KPMG predicts 15 years it will all
>collapse. Funny how an accounting firm is pointing out the wealth
>difference as an object to be rectified.
>
>While I believe that all hell will break loose shortly, I wasn't
>thinking the collapse of all civilisations, but, that might be the
>result of the next collapse.
>
>Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
>The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
>void of civility and have lots of mayhem.
>
>Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
>many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.

Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
gold.

>Well, enough of that, we all know that the current model is not working
>and something big is coming. Those that think it will self correct are
>not paying attention to all the markers. This country is in such debt
>that it is not self sustaining. Greece , Spain are minor compared to our
>collapse... And look at the riots that happened there.

On 3/20/2014 10:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>
This must be NASA's new role. At one time they were heavily involved in
Research projects that created jobs in this country and put Man on the
moon, and a Space Station in orbit.

Today NASA is mouthing the administrations propaganda line, we no longer
have a space program, and the space station has been given to the Russians.

>BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would be
>nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty good about
>keeping the group tidy. Too much >unlabeled off topic and we will start
>looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.

Or worse, the bizarre wackos that leak over onto rec.crafts.metalworking
from the political wacko groups.

Tom

[email protected] wrote:
> Propaganda plus out of money.
>
> BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would
> be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty
> good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and
> we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.

Not an invalid point at all, but at least the topic made it very clear what
it was about. Is there really a lot of difference between putting OT in the
header at that point? We all know that off topic stuff is going to show up
in a community like this, so we kinda just expect it to some degree. And...
to some degree maybe get frustrated by some of it. Personally, (fwiw), I
get a ton more frustrated by the guys that cross post to a zillion different
groups of whacko's and then we're inundated with some really crazy thinking
from fringe guys for a couple of weeks - but that's just my petty bitch.
Now - back to work and make some sawdust damnit!

--

-Mike-
[email protected]

The reason "OT" is placed first in the subject line of an
off-topic post is so that users can easily filter or simply bypass
such posts.

--
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
> Subject: Re: Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:28:05 -0400
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 24
> Message-ID: <lgf651$h8c$1 dont-email.me>
> References: <I-idnVwBSamGarfOnZ2dnUVZ_t8AAAAA ptd.net> <lgev2t$3sp$1 speranza.aioe.org> <ea477d7f-460f-4034-958d-68fe2310da30 googlegroups.com>
> Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:48:33 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f58c7bb097d525d037fb029dc707048a"; logging-data="17676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ANvGpTX85KzmrNohnONs+W4d78ZFUmyM="
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:j83F64tbMNO2rpFsZDkriVINe6Y=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.woodworking:157933
>
> sphs.class64 gmail.com wrote:
>> Propaganda plus out of money.
>>
>> BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would
>> be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty
>> good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and
>> we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.
>
> Not an invalid point at all, but at least the topic made it very clear what
> it was about. Is there really a lot of difference between putting OT in the
> header at that point? We all know that off topic stuff is going to show up
> in a community like this, so we kinda just expect it to some degree. And...
> to some degree maybe get frustrated by some of it. Personally, (fwiw), I
> get a ton more frustrated by the guys that cross post to a zillion different
> groups of whacko's and then we're inundated with some really crazy thinking
> from fringe guys for a couple of weeks - but that's just my petty bitch.
> Now - back to work and make some sawdust damnit!
>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net
>
>
>

John Doe wrote:
> The reason "OT" is placed first in the subject line of an
> off-topic post is so that users can easily filter or simply bypass
> such posts.
>


Hey Idiot - learn how to use a newsreader. The below post is not from me.
For someone who is supposed to be such a renowned internet user, you fail to
show it.


--

-Mike-
[email protected]



>
>> Path:
>> eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
>> From: "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net>
>> Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
>> Subject: Re: Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...
>> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:28:05 -0400
>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>> Lines: 24
>> Message-ID: <lgf651$h8c$1 dont-email.me>
>> References: <I-idnVwBSamGarfOnZ2dnUVZ_t8AAAAA ptd.net> <lgev2t$3sp$1
>> speranza.aioe.org> <ea477d7f-460f-4034-958d-68fe2310da30
>> googlegroups.com>
>> Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:48:33 +0000 (UTC)
>> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
>> posting-host="f58c7bb097d525d037fb029dc707048a";
>> logging-data="17676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse
>> eternal-september.org";
>> posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ANvGpTX85KzmrNohnONs+W4d78ZFUmyM="
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
>> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>> Cancel-Lock: sha1:j83F64tbMNO2rpFsZDkriVINe6Y=
>> X-Priority: 3
>> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>> Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.woodworking:157933
>>
>> sphs.class64 gmail.com wrote:
>>> Propaganda plus out of money.
>>>
>>> BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would
>>> be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty
>>> good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and
>>> we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.
>>
>> Not an invalid point at all, but at least the topic made it very
>> clear what
>> it was about. Is there really a lot of difference between putting
>> OT in the
>> header at that point? We all know that off topic stuff is going to
>> show up
>> in a community like this, so we kinda just expect it to some degree.
>> And...
>> to some degree maybe get frustrated by some of it. Personally,
>> (fwiw), I
>> get a ton more frustrated by the guys that cross post to a zillion
>> different
>> groups of whacko's and then we're inundated with some really crazy
>> thinking
>> from fringe guys for a couple of weeks - but that's just my petty
>> bitch.
>> Now - back to work and make some sawdust damnit!
>>
>> --
>>
>> -Mike-
>> mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net

No, in fact I responded to the post I felt like responding to.

Idiot...

--
"Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
> Subject: Re: Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...
> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 19:22:51 -0400
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 78
> Message-ID: <lpcln1$lg3$1 dont-email.me>
> References: <I-idnVwBSamGarfOnZ2dnUVZ_t8AAAAA ptd.net> <lgev2t$3sp$1 speranza.aioe.org> <ea477d7f-460f-4034-958d-68fe2310da30 googlegroups.com> <lgf651$h8c$1 dont-email.me> <lpclcv$h6f$4 dont-email.me>
> Injection-Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:22:09 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f58c7bb097d525d037fb029dc707048a"; logging-data="22019"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vYFT0eAEkaW5iHEE8l3WSy4TwdTRtDkc="
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:dHWLn616sXFHNCTH1geQiNhXiQg=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.woodworking:162849
>
> John Doe wrote:
>> The reason "OT" is placed first in the subject line of an
>> off-topic post is so that users can easily filter or simply bypass
>> such posts.
>>
>
>
> Hey Idiot - learn how to use a newsreader. The below post is not from me.
> For someone who is supposed to be such a renowned internet user, you fail to
> show it.
>
>
> --
>
> -Mike-
> mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net
>
>
>
>>
>>> Path:
>>> eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
>>> From: "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net>
>>> Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
>>> Subject: Re: Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...
>>> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:28:05 -0400
>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>> Lines: 24
>>> Message-ID: <lgf651$h8c$1 dont-email.me>
>>> References: <I-idnVwBSamGarfOnZ2dnUVZ_t8AAAAA ptd.net> <lgev2t$3sp$1
>>> speranza.aioe.org> <ea477d7f-460f-4034-958d-68fe2310da30
>>> googlegroups.com>
>>> Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:48:33 +0000 (UTC)
>>> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
>>> posting-host="f58c7bb097d525d037fb029dc707048a";
>>> logging-data="17676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse
>>> eternal-september.org";
>>> posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ANvGpTX85KzmrNohnONs+W4d78ZFUmyM="
>>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
>>> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
>>> Cancel-Lock: sha1:j83F64tbMNO2rpFsZDkriVINe6Y=
>>> X-Priority: 3
>>> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>> Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.woodworking:157933
>>>
>>> sphs.class64 gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Propaganda plus out of money.
>>>>
>>>> BTW - not to sound like the newsgroup police but "OT" on these would
>>>> be nice. When you look at other groups the woodworkers are pretty
>>>> good about keeping the group tidy. Too much unlabeled off topic and
>>>> we will start looking lit rec.outdoors-rv-travel.
>>>
>>> Not an invalid point at all, but at least the topic made it very
>>> clear what
>>> it was about. Is there really a lot of difference between putting
>>> OT in the
>>> header at that point? We all know that off topic stuff is going to
>>> show up
>>> in a community like this, so we kinda just expect it to some degree.
>>> And...
>>> to some degree maybe get frustrated by some of it. Personally,
>>> (fwiw), I
>>> get a ton more frustrated by the guys that cross post to a zillion
>>> different
>>> groups of whacko's and then we're inundated with some really crazy
>>> thinking
>>> from fringe guys for a couple of weeks - but that's just my petty
>>> bitch.
>>> Now - back to work and make some sawdust damnit!
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Mike-
>>> mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net
>
>
>

If it doesn't have the wits to recognize ordinary USENET quoting,
this thing can forget about proving its conspiracy theory...

--
Puckdropper <puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
> Subject: Re: Nasa Study the demise of civilisation...
> From: Puckdropper <puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> References: <I-idnVwBSamGarfOnZ2dnUVZ_t8AAAAA ptd.net> <lgev2t$3sp$1 speranza.aioe.org> <ea477d7f-460f-4034-958d-68fe2310da30 googlegroups.com> <lgf651$h8c$1 dont-email.me> <lpclcv$h6f$4 dont-email.me> <lpcln1$lg3$1 dont-email.me>
> User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
> Date: 07 Jul 2014 02:35:59 GMT
> Lines: 16
> Message-ID: <53ba078f$0$50686$c3e8da3$92d0a893 news.astraweb.com>
> Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 0db9e089.news.astraweb.com
> X-Trace: DXC=fgZ`k?QP\NkTSR1JO8jBlmL?0kYOcDh j^Jd;;iQCc=`OGZ0I60dSZkl9B_G1R=S=gTcm`49Z>ENkgJ>SNMAB0Y`MaH[7nK nXeNmcdj^0BQLa
> Xref: news.eternal-september.org rec.woodworking:162867
>
> "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREMOVE windstream.net> wrote in
> news:lpcln1$lg3$1 dont-email.me:
>
>>
>> Hey Idiot - learn how to use a newsreader. The below post is not from
>> me. For someone who is supposed to be such a renowned internet user,
>> you fail to show it.
>>
>
> Interesting coincidence... this little flamewar errupted shortly after "101
> ways to be obnoxious on Usenet" was posted on rec.humor.funny.reruns.
> Messing up attributes was #4.
>
> Puckdropper
> --
> Make it to fit, don't make it fit.
>
>

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 23:02:06 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:56:39 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
>>gold.
>
>You'll only need one bullet actually. ~ the one to blow your brains
>out when you finally realize that you've got nothing left to live for.

If you had even one brain cell, you would have already figured that
out, knownothing.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:31:37 -0600, Just Wondering
<[email protected]> wrote:

>[email protected] wrote:
>> woodchucker wrote:
>>>
>>> Arm yourselves, and start stocking food... lol...
>>> The reality is, I'm not sure I want to live in a world that will totally
>>> void of civility and have lots of mayhem.
>>>
>>> Living off the land might be an option, but I think there will be so
>>> many people that raid your crops, you won't have enough ammo.
>>
>> Stock ammo, instead of food. Trade it for food. It will be the new
>> gold.
>
>If there was a collapse of that magnitude, and I had a supply of
>ammunition large enough to use for currency, I don't think I'd want to
>advertise that fact by using it for currency. If it became common
>knowledge that I was sitting on a huge ammo dump, that might make me an
>even bigger target for marauding gangs.

Would you advertise that you had a few tons of gold in your basement,
now?

If there is a collapse large enough that you'd have to stockpile that
much food, might just as well hang it up anyway. You *will* need the
ammo in either case.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:47:55 -0400, Keith Nuttle
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3/20/2014 10:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
>> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>>
>This must be NASA's new role. At one time they were heavily involved in
>Research projects that created jobs in this country and put Man on the
>moon, and a Space Station in orbit.
>
>Today NASA is mouthing the administrations propaganda line, we no longer
>have a space program, and the space station has been given to the Russians.

If civilization is going to collapse more incentive to get on the
first Mars mission.

On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:33:00 -0700, Doug Winterburn
<[email protected]> wrote:

>What is NASA doing studying "The Collapse of Civilization"? I thought
>they were supposed to be concentrating on their "Muslim Outreach"
>directive. Maybe the two are related?

Time for NASA go away.

>On 03/20/2014 07:11 AM, woodchucker wrote:
>> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/nasa-civilisation-irreversible-collapse-study-scientists
>>

On 3/22/2014 8:09 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:18:10 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:28:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>>> truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>>
>> Ha, Ha! You're such a fool. Lefty, righty, whatever. Obviously,
>> they're some type of societal label, but I don't use them so they mean
>> nothing to me. Go ahead, keep using them, you're such a moron you just
>> don't know any better.
>>
>> If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>> swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>> your senile mind.
>
> You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
> producing such a stupid child.
>

Just take your meds.

--
Jeff

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 23:18:10 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:28:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
>>truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).
>
>Ha, Ha! You're such a fool. Lefty, righty, whatever. Obviously,
>they're some type of societal label, but I don't use them so they mean
>nothing to me. Go ahead, keep using them, you're such a moron you just
>don't know any better.
>
>If you were any kind of real man, you'd use some good old American
>swear words, but those days are long gone and buried somewhere deep in
>your senile mind.

You really are a stupid shit. Your father must be really proud
producing such a stupid child.

On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:30:25 -0400, [email protected] wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500, Markem <[email protected]>
>>>that the first Mars mission will somehow be self-sustaining?
>>It is a joke son
>
>krw doesn't joke. He is completely bereft of any sense of humour.

Again, you lefties just must demonstrate that you're incapable of the
truth. You really are a dumbass (but *ALL* lefties are).