Gj

GROVER

05/06/2011 11:12 AM

OT But Germane

This post was inspired by Robatoy's post re energy waste using single
lever faucet.

Some years ago I read the results of a study conducted by a local
power company. They installed a TV camera to record which members of a
household made what adjustments to the thermostat.

The results, as would be expected, showed the bill payer was able to
be comfortable at a higher temperature in the months requiring air
conditioning and a lower temperature in the months needing warming.
The remainder of the family needed more energy expenditures in both
the heating and cooling seasons.

No big surprise here, it all seems to depend on who's ox is gored.


This topic has 7 replies

EH

"Edward Hennessey"

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 9:18 PM


"Ed Pawlowski" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "DGDevin" <[email protected]> wrote
>>
>> For example, if there were no laws against littering would you toss a
>> burger wrapper on the sidewalk, or would you walk fifty feet to a trash
>> container because were you raised not to be a slob? I'd like to think
>> most of us will generally do the right thing because we know it's the
>> right thing, not because it puts (or leaves) a dollar in our pocket, but
>> not everybody feels that way.
>
> Most of us would today. Years ago it was common and acceptable to toss
> candy wrappers and cigarette butts out the car window.
>
> A few hundred years ago it was acceptable to toss the contents of you
> chamber pot out the window and onto the sidewalk too. Discover channel
> had a series called Filthy Cities a few weeks back. It is amazing how us
> civilized humans used to dump all sorts of filth in the streets.

EP:

A famous phrase out of European literature of those
times was "Yield the wall!". The safest position in a
multi-storey city was right alongside the wall as inhabitants
did not want to paint their own buildings with dumped garbage.

Accounts from the period show that violent encounters
were not unusual when oncoming parties were both
determined to maintain the favored position.

A sewage system is worth a lot of policemen and plenty
of epidemiologists.

Regards,

Edward Hennessey

EP

"Ed Pawlowski"

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 10:52 PM


"DGDevin" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> For example, if there were no laws against littering would you toss a
> burger wrapper on the sidewalk, or would you walk fifty feet to a trash
> container because were you raised not to be a slob? I'd like to think
> most of us will generally do the right thing because we know it's the
> right thing, not because it puts (or leaves) a dollar in our pocket, but
> not everybody feels that way.

Most of us would today. Years ago it was common and acceptable to toss
candy wrappers and cigarette butts out the car window.

A few hundred years ago it was acceptable to toss the contents of you
chamber pot out the window and onto the sidewalk too. Discover channel had
a series called Filthy Cities a few weeks back. It is amazing how us
civilized humans used to dump all sorts of filth in the streets.

ww

willshak

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 3:09 PM

Robatoy wrote the following:
> On Jun 5, 2:12 pm, GROVER <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This post was inspired by Robatoy's post re energy waste using single
>> lever faucet.
>>
>> Some years ago I read the results of a study conducted by a local
>> power company. They installed a TV camera to record which members of a
>> household made what adjustments to the thermostat.
>>
>> The results, as would be expected, showed the bill payer was able to
>> be comfortable at a higher temperature in the months requiring air
>> conditioning and a lower temperature in the months needing warming.
>> The remainder of the family needed more energy expenditures in both
>> the heating and cooling seasons.
>>
>> No big surprise here, it all seems to depend on who's ox is gored.
>>
>
> In the line at the store, the cashier was telling an elderly woman
> that
> she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't
> good
> for the environment.
>
> /The woman apologized to him and explained, 'We didn't have the green
> thing back in my day.'
> /
> The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. The former generation
> did not care enough to save our environment."
>
> /The elderly woman was right, that generation didn't have the green
> thing in its day./
>
> Back then, they returned their milk bottles, soda bottles and beer
> bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be
> washed
> and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and
> over. So they really were recycled.
>

Yep, 2 cents deposit on 10-12 oz.soda bottles, 5 cents on quart beer
bottles.
Milk was delivered in glass bottles, empties were picked up by the milkman.
> /But they didn't have the green thing back in that customer's day./
>
> In her day, they walked up stairs, because they didn't have an
> escalator
> in every store and office building. They walked to the grocery store
> and
> didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time they had to go
> two
> blocks.
>
>
> /But she was right. They didn't have the green thing in her day./
>
> Back then, they washed the baby's diapers because they didn't have the
> throw-away kind. They dried clothes on a line, not in an energy
> gobbling
> machine burning up 220 volts, wind and solar power really did dry the
> clothes. Kids often got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers,
> sisters, cousins ortheir mom's friends, not always brand-new clothing.
>
> /But that old lady is right, they didn't have the green thing back in
> her day./
>
> Back then, they had one TV, or radio, in the house not a TV in every
> room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief, not a
> screen the size of New Brunswick . In the kitchen, they blended and
> stirred by hand because they didn't have electric machines to do it
> for
> them.
>
>
> When they packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, they used a
> wadded up old newspaper to cushion it, not Styrofoam
>
> or plastic bubble wrap.
>
> Back then, they didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut
> the lawn. They used a push mower that ran on human power. They
> exercised
> by working so they didn't need to go to a health club to run on
> treadmills that operate on electricity.
>
> /But she's right, they didn't have the green thing back then../
>
> They drank from a fountain when they were thirsty instead of from
> plastic bottles every time they had a drink of water. They refilled
> their writing pens with ink instead of throwing them in the garbage
> and
> buying a new pen, and they replaced the razor blades in a razor
> instead
> of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.
>
> /But they didn't have the green thing back then.
> /
> Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their
> bikes
> to school or rode the school bus instead of turning their moms into a
> 24-hour taxi service. They had one electrical outlet in a room, not an
> entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And they didn't
> need
> a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites
> 20,000
> miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.
>
> /*But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful the old
> folks were just because they didn't have the green thing back then?*/
>

Back then, they (we!) didn't have plastic bags. Their (our!) bags were
made from renewable sources, namely trees.

--

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
In the original Orange County. Est. 1683
To email, remove the double zeroes after @

DD

"DGDevin"

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 11:56 AM



"GROVER" wrote in message
news:0f4f9010-a1b9-4797-9c71-999f05572690@u26g2000vby.googlegroups.com...

> No big surprise here, it all seems to depend on who's ox is gored.

Part of the trick is getting people to do the right thing even when they
don't have a direct financial interest. For example, if there were no laws
against littering would you toss a burger wrapper on the sidewalk, or would
you walk fifty feet to a trash container because were you raised not to be a
slob? I'd like to think most of us will generally do the right thing
because we know it's the right thing, not because it puts (or leaves) a
dollar in our pocket, but not everybody feels that way.

DD

"DGDevin"

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 8:00 PM



"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...


>> For example, if there were no laws against littering would you toss a
>> burger wrapper on the sidewalk, or would you walk fifty feet to a trash
>> container because were you raised not to be a slob? I'd like to think
>> most of us will generally do the right thing because we know it's the
>> right thing, not because it puts (or leaves) a dollar in our pocket, but
>> not everybody feels that way.

> Most of us would today. Years ago it was common and acceptable to toss
> candy wrappers and cigarette butts out the car window.

The question is did the public's view change first, followed by the law, or
did the law lead to changed views? I suspect it took the force of law with
unpleasant fines to bring that about. Ditto with drunk driving, that was
largely winked at too until the law gained some teeth on the issue. So it
appears that quite often we need unpleasant consequences to make doing the
right thing a cultural habit, until it becomes instinctive for most people.

Rc

Robatoy

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 11:29 AM

On Jun 5, 2:12=A0pm, GROVER <[email protected]> wrote:
> This post was inspired by Robatoy's post re energy waste using single
> lever faucet.
>
> Some years ago I read the results of a study conducted by a local
> power company. They installed a TV camera to record which members of a
> household made what adjustments to the thermostat.
>
> The results, as would be expected, showed the bill payer was able to
> be comfortable at a higher temperature in the months requiring air
> conditioning and a lower temperature in the months needing warming.
> The remainder of the family needed more energy expenditures in both
> the =A0heating and cooling seasons.
>
> No big surprise here, it all seems to depend on who's ox is gored.

In the line at the store, the cashier was telling an elderly woman
that
she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't
good
for the environment.

/The woman apologized to him and explained, 'We didn't have the green
thing back in my day.'
/
The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. The former generation
did not care enough to save our environment."

/The elderly woman was right, that generation didn't have the green
thing in its day./

Back then, they returned their milk bottles, soda bottles and beer
bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be
washed
and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and
over. So they really were recycled.

/But they didn't have the green thing back in that customer's day./

In her day, they walked up stairs, because they didn't have an
escalator
in every store and office building. They walked to the grocery store
and
didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time they had to go
two
blocks.


/But she was right. They didn't have the green thing in her day./

Back then, they washed the baby's diapers because they didn't have the
throw-away kind. They dried clothes on a line, not in an energy
gobbling
machine burning up 220 volts, wind and solar power really did dry the
clothes. Kids often got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers,
sisters, cousins ortheir mom's friends, not always brand-new clothing.

/But that old lady is right, they didn't have the green thing back in
her day./

Back then, they had one TV, or radio, in the house not a TV in every
room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief, not a
screen the size of New Brunswick . In the kitchen, they blended and
stirred by hand because they didn't have electric machines to do it
for
them.


When they packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, they used a
wadded up old newspaper to cushion it, not Styrofoam

or plastic bubble wrap.

Back then, they didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut
the lawn. They used a push mower that ran on human power. They
exercised
by working so they didn't need to go to a health club to run on
treadmills that operate on electricity.

/But she's right, they didn't have the green thing back then../

They drank from a fountain when they were thirsty instead of from
plastic bottles every time they had a drink of water. They refilled
their writing pens with ink instead of throwing them in the garbage
and
buying a new pen, and they replaced the razor blades in a razor
instead
of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.

/But they didn't have the green thing back then.
/
Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their
bikes
to school or rode the school bus instead of turning their moms into a
24-hour taxi service. They had one electrical outlet in a room, not an
entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And they didn't
need
a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites
20,000
miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.

/*But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful the old
folks were just because they didn't have the green thing back then?*/

ZY

Zz Yzx

in reply to GROVER on 05/06/2011 11:12 AM

05/06/2011 11:47 AM


>No big surprise here, it all seems to depend on who's ox is gored.

HEY! I resemble that remark.

-Zz


You’ve reached the end of replies