A troll was driving home after work, and got caught in a really bad
hailstorm. Its car was covered with dents, so the next day it took it to
the repair shop.
The shop owner saw that it was a troll, so he decided to have some
fun. He told it just to go home and blow into the tail pipe really hard,
and all the dents would pop out.
So, the troll went home, got down on its hands and knees and
started blowing into the car's tailpipe. Nothing happened. It blew a
little harder, and still nothing happened. Its roommate, another troll,
came home and said, "What are you doing?" The first troll told it how
the repairman had instructed it to blow into the tailpipe in order to
get all the dents to pop out. Its roommate rolled its eyes and said...
"HELLLLOWW .. You gotta roll up the windowwwws..."
JOAT
Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
- David Fasold
J T wrote:
> A troll was driving home after work, and got caught in a really bad
> hailstorm. Its car was covered with dents, so the next day it took it
to
> the repair shop.
>
> The shop owner saw that it was a troll, so he decided to have
some
> fun. He told it just to go home and blow into the tail pipe really
hard,
> and all the dents would pop out.
This MUST be a blonde joke.
Tue, Feb 8, 2005, 11:31am (EST-3) [email protected] (Larry=A0Bud)
claims:
This MUST be a blonde joke.
No. It USTA be a blonde joke. But since I've met some really
intelligent blondes, but never seen a troll that wasnt't a total dork,
it just seemed the right thing to do.
JOAT
Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
- David Fasold
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:21:18 -0500, [email protected] (J T) wrote:
>Tue, Feb 8, 2005, 11:31am (EST-3) [email protected] (Larry Bud)
>claims:
>This MUST be a blonde joke.
>
> No. It USTA be a blonde joke. But since I've met some really
>intelligent blondes, but never seen a troll that wasnt't a total dork,
>it just seemed the right thing to do.
>
Plus, you don't get a whole bunch of angry letters from tr...., wait a
minute, yes you do, but then you'd get a whole bunch of angry letters from
trolls regardless. You're right, net loss is zero.
>
>
>JOAT
>Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
>- David Fasold
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The absence of accidents does not mean the presence of safety
Army General Richard Cody
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:07:54 -0500, [email protected] (J T)
wrote:
> A troll was driving home after work, and got caught in a really bad
>hailstorm. Its car was covered with dents, so the next day it took it to
>the repair shop.
This kind of trollophobic behavior simply must stop!
Are you without any sensitivity whatsoever !?!
Think how poor Davey Eisan will fee when he reads this!
(watson - who has now used his monthly quota of quotation marks - and
it's only the eighth - sigh...)
tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)
Tue, Feb 8, 2005, 3:08pm [email protected] (Tom=A0Watson) asks:
<snip> Are you without any sensitivity whatsoever !?! <snip>
Hey, I am very sensitive. In fact, I have sensitivity I've never
even used, and probably never will.
JOAT
Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
- David Fasold
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:38:13 -0600, Knothead <[email protected]> wrote:
> JT Says
><snip>
>> I have sensitivity I've never even used, and probably never will.
>
> I wonder if that could be bottled up and sold on ebay....
We could maybe go in together? I've apparently got some of this "tact"
stuff that I'm not using.
Dave "Yeah? So what's your point?" Hinz
In article <[email protected]>,
J T <[email protected]> wrote:
>Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 3:58pm (EST+5) [email protected] (Dave Hinz)
>says:
>We could maybe go in together? I've apparently got some of this "tact"
>stuff that I'm not using.
>
> Hey, yeah. I've got a bunch of that I'll never use.
It doesn't sell well. Mostly because only partially-filled containers
are ever offered. It seems that sellers consistently respond incorrectly
to the caution that "it would not be tact-full" to do this thing.
As for the _original_ idea, the "packaging" is wrong there, too. You do
much better soaking long (say 8"-ish) thin sticks in it, and letting them
dry. Then the customers simply ignite said stick, and bask in the fumes
therefrom -- when they're feeling "in-sense-itive", that is.
Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 3:58pm (EST+5) [email protected] (Dave=A0Hinz)
says:
We could maybe go in together? I've apparently got some of this "tact"
stuff that I'm not using.
Hey, yeah. I've got a bunch of that I'll never use.
JOAT
Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
- David Fasold
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:22:41 -0000, Robert Bonomi <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> J T <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Wed, Feb 9, 2005, 3:58pm (EST+5) [email protected] (Dave Hinz)
>>says:
>>We could maybe go in together? I've apparently got some of this "tact"
>>stuff that I'm not using.
>
> It doesn't sell well. Mostly because only partially-filled containers
> are ever offered.
I assure you, mine is rarely if ever used. Ask around. The container
would definately be full of it.
> It seems that sellers consistently respond incorrectly
> to the caution that "it would not be tact-full" to do this thing.
Hm. Maybe some sort of disclaimer.
> As for the _original_ idea, the "packaging" is wrong there, too. You do
> much better soaking long (say 8"-ish) thin sticks in it, and letting them
> dry.
Yes, but what kind of (checks newsgroup) wood then?
> Then the customers simply ignite said stick, and bask in the fumes
> therefrom -- when they're feeling "in-sense-itive", that is.
AHA! Make it out of poison ivy, and that'll definately improve their
sensitivity. Might want another disclaimer, though.