I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find all the
nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my power tools.
I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For starters,
it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at the tip really
does anything. I also have to adjust the fine sensitivity a lot, a hassle
that requires a small screwdriver. On several occasions the thing just sits
there blinking the lights back and forth and no amount of adjustment has
any effect. I almost threw it away last time I used it because I thought it
was finally broken.
Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
easier to adjust when needed?
Thanks,
Anthony Watson
www.mountainsoftware.com
www.watsondiy.com
Ground base Radar.
Martin
On 8/7/2015 7:41 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 8/7/2015 6:20 PM, Electric Comet wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:20:01 -0500
>> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:
>>
>>> There are absolutely better ones on the market now, you just cant
>>> afford them.
>>
>> no kidding
>> i have not seen any that detect rocks
>> or ceramic insulators
>> but i will go look
>
> You might google x-ray.
>
HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find
> all the nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my
> power tools.
>
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky,
> so I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For
> starters, it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at
> the tip really does anything. I also have to adjust the fine
> sensitivity a lot, a hassle that requires a small screwdriver. On
> several occasions the thing just sits there blinking the lights back
> and forth and no amount of adjustment has any effect. I almost threw
> it away last time I used it because I thought it was finally broken.
>
> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> easier to adjust when needed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Watson
> www.mountainsoftware.com
> www.watsondiy.com
>
The little one I have (I think it's a Little Wizard II) works pretty
decently, within reason. It doesn't always pinpoint the exact location
of a screw or nail, and only penetrates down a short distance. To make
sure I don't hit any nails, it takes a combination of the detector and my
eyes to check everything.
If I was working with a lot of reclaimed wood, I'd probably be buying
cheap saw blades and looking at Shelix cutters for the jointer and
planer. Hit a nail, rotate/replace the piece of carbide that chipped.
It's still a pain, just not a big one in the wallet.
Puckdropper
--
Make it to fit, don't make it fit.
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
> I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. ..
Is that the same as the Wizard III?
I specifically bought a Wizard III for a project where the client wanted a table made from old, reclaimed lumber. I removed hundreds of pieces of metal with out a single mishap.
I've used occasionally since then, and it has always done the job.
On 8/7/2015 2:02 PM, Electric Comet wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 05:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
> HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
>> easier to adjust when needed?
>
> i think a better unit is needed and would be a welcome addition to the
> market
>
> maybe an ultrasound unit
> that would also detect rocks
There are absolutely better ones on the market now, you just cant afford
them.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
> >>> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> >>> easier to adjust when needed?
> >>
> >> i think a better unit is needed and would be a welcome addition to the
> >> market
>
> > There are absolutely better ones on the market now
>
> Recommendations? I have only heard one recommendation so far.
>
> I have the Lumber Wizard III. When it works, it's great. Unfortunately, it
> can be finicky to start up and I have to tweak the fine tune adjustment
> every time I turn it on. Sometimes it won't work at all and just sits there
> blinking the lights. Is this really the best the market has to offer right
> now?
Looking at metal detectors on Amazon, the Lumber Wizard III has a low
rating, the Garrett ProPointer has a very high one with over 700
reviews. The price is about the same.
There's nothing magic about nails in wood that require any kind of
special detector--it's metal in a nonconductor and any metal detector
that's worth a crap should find them.
>>> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
>>> easier to adjust when needed?
>>
>> i think a better unit is needed and would be a welcome addition to the
>> market
> There are absolutely better ones on the market now
Recommendations? I have only heard one recommendation so far.
I have the Lumber Wizard III. When it works, it's great. Unfortunately, it
can be finicky to start up and I have to tweak the fine tune adjustment
every time I turn it on. Sometimes it won't work at all and just sits there
blinking the lights. Is this really the best the market has to offer right
now?
Anthony Watson
www.mountainsoftware.com
www.watsondiy.com
On 8/5/2015 1:21 AM, HerHusband wrote:
> I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find all the
> nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my power tools.
>
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
> I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For starters,
> it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at the tip really
> does anything. I also have to adjust the fine sensitivity a lot, a hassle
> that requires a small screwdriver. On several occasions the thing just sits
> there blinking the lights back and forth and no amount of adjustment has
> any effect. I almost threw it away last time I used it because I thought it
> was finally broken.
>
> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> easier to adjust when needed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Watson
> www.mountainsoftware.com
> www.watsondiy.com
>
I too have it. It is finicky and a piece of junk.
I have seen pro detectors used in airports.
Pricey, but probably worth the price.
--
Jeff
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 12:22:44 AM UTC-5, HerHusband wrote:
> I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find all the
> nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my power tools.
>
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
> I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For starters,
> it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at the tip really
> does anything. I also have to adjust the fine sensitivity a lot, a hassle
> that requires a small screwdriver. On several occasions the thing just sits
> there blinking the lights back and forth and no amount of adjustment has
> any effect. I almost threw it away last time I used it because I thought it
> was finally broken.
>
> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> easier to adjust when needed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Watson
> www.mountainsoftware.com
> www.watsondiy.com
I have a Woodwizard III. As far as I know, it's found every brad, staple, and nail, even in thicker pieces. The on/off switch has gotten a little janky, but with a little messing around it seems to work ok. I've had it for quite a few years now.
One could always use a metal detector. Some small models are likely
well capable for wood. See what you have to buy what you can.
White is a good name and there are others.
Martin
On 8/5/2015 3:47 PM, woodchucker wrote:
> On 8/5/2015 1:21 AM, HerHusband wrote:
>> I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find
>> all the
>> nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my power
>> tools.
>>
>> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
>> I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For
>> starters,
>> it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at the tip really
>> does anything. I also have to adjust the fine sensitivity a lot, a hassle
>> that requires a small screwdriver. On several occasions the thing just
>> sits
>> there blinking the lights back and forth and no amount of adjustment has
>> any effect. I almost threw it away last time I used it because I
>> thought it
>> was finally broken.
>>
>> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
>> easier to adjust when needed?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Anthony Watson
>> www.mountainsoftware.com
>> www.watsondiy.com
>>
> I too have it. It is finicky and a piece of junk.
>
> I have seen pro detectors used in airports.
> Pricey, but probably worth the price.
>
On 8/5/2015 1:21 AM, HerHusband wrote:
> I use a fair amount of reclaimed lumber, so it is important to find all the
> nails, screws, staples, etc. before I run the wood through my power tools.
>
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky, so
> I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For starters,
> it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at the tip really
> does anything. I also have to adjust the fine sensitivity a lot, a hassle
> that requires a small screwdriver. On several occasions the thing just sits
> there blinking the lights back and forth and no amount of adjustment has
> any effect. I almost threw it away last time I used it because I thought it
> was finally broken.
>
> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> easier to adjust when needed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Watson
> www.mountainsoftware.com
> www.watsondiy.com
>
I have one of these:
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Zircon-Corporation-MetalliScanner-M40-Metal-Locator-62518/202184893?gclid=CjwKEAjw6IauBRCJ3KPXkNro1BoSJAAhXxpyvHzjNXdnOeqQz-TMhilHZaY57ENmQl9f7r23Ld0tlxoCUIPw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
I haven't tried it for your application, but it's easy to use and claims
to find metal 4" inside a solid surface. I have been able to trace
conduit and BX inside a sheetrock wall as well as find sheetrock screws
under compound. You set the sensitivity simply by pressing the button
nearer or further from a metal object. IOW, if you press the button in
the middle of the air, it will set the unit to be very sensitive. But
once you think you've found an object, you can press it again an inch or
so away from it. That will set the unit to be less sensitive, and will
pinpoint the object more precisely.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 05:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> I currently have a Lumber Wizard 3. It works but often seems finicky,
> so I'm never real confident it has found the metal in the wood. For
> starters, it has a large 12" wand, but it seems only the 3" or so at
> the tip really does anything. I also have to adjust the fine
> sensitivity a lot, a hassle that requires a small screwdriver. On
> several occasions the thing just sits there blinking the lights back
> and forth and no amount of adjustment has any effect. I almost threw
> it away last time I used it because I thought it was finally broken.
i have something like this but it has a thumbwheel to calibrate it
i calibrate each time i use it
it is very sensitive and it does find the metal but only if i calibrate
and test it
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 05:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are there better metal detectors available that are more accurate and
> easier to adjust when needed?
i think a better unit is needed and would be a welcome addition to the
market
maybe an ultrasound unit
that would also detect rocks
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:41:52 -0500
Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:
> You might google x-ray.
haha
ultrasound would be much safer
i did view a video recently where a guy got a used luggage scanner
he does electronics videos and is from the u.k.
he got it working and you are right that would work for wood and would
take a nice sized log
takes up a lot of space though
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
HerHusband <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have the Lumber Wizard III. When it works, it's great.
> Unfortunately, it can be finicky to start up and I have to tweak the
like others here mine works fine once you understand it is touchy
but maybe yours is broken
if you are a tinkerer why not take it apart and have a look
maybe something has come loose inside or the like
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:05:48 -0500
Martin Eastburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> One could always use a metal detector. Some small models are likely
> well capable for wood. See what you have to buy what you can.
not sure what they cost but they have evolved pretty far over the years
so might be a good choice
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 21:40:53 -0500
Martin Eastburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ground base Radar.
could be bulky and power hungry
and probably not even effective
On 8/7/2015 6:20 PM, Electric Comet wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:20:01 -0500
> Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet> wrote:
>
>> There are absolutely better ones on the market now, you just cant
>> afford them.
>
> no kidding
> i have not seen any that detect rocks
> or ceramic insulators
> but i will go look
You might google x-ray.