On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
Congrats Leon. ^5
Sonny
On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
>
>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>
> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
>
> Congrats Leon. ^5
>
> Sonny
>
Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe they
resurfaced. LOL
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
> >>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
> >>>> Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5
> >>>>> years ago.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
> >>>>
> >>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
> >>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those
> >>>> days, not sure which.
> >>>>
> >>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
> >>>>
> >>>> Sonny
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe
> >>> they resurfaced. LOL
> >>
> >> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
> >> advertising revenue.
> >>
> >> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such
> >> other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which
> >> expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the
> >> information I provided them. It short, they could publish the tip
> >> in their print magazine or any other publication for a period of 6
> >> months and I was to receive payment of $75 for publication over
> >> that time period. Any subsequent publication would require another
> >> payment and contract.
> >>
> >> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on
> >> one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their
> >> website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email
> >> telling them they are violating their contract and to cease or send
> >> me another check. So far all emails have been ignored.
> >>
> >> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
> >> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They
> >> are making money off content I provided them and using it without
> >> permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest
> >> business practice if you ask me. If I see it published again, I
> >> might just dig up the contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit
> >> in small claims court just to wake them up. :-)
> >>
> >
> > I'm not doubting you, just asking...
> >
> > How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images or
> > text that leads directly back to you should this actually end up in
> > court? Something that you can use to prove that it is yours?
> >
> > Here's why I ask:
> >
> > The following was stolen without permission from:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
> >
> > Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
> > science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
> > defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries
> > are made by scientists working independently of each other.
> >
>
> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their own
> illustrations.
> They're actually still using it and still in violation of our contract
> and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
>
> These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty simple
> one. :-)
>
Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal Radcliff and
by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's name.
If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are multiple
Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr. Radcliff's
could be the true author of the published tip.
Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee
9 Results - Find Michael Radcliff in Tennessee
I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood Magazine,
et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with threatening emails, he
has disparaged this fine magazine on the internet and he has now filed a
frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other hand, respect the fine work that both Your
Honor and this court does and I am disheartened by the waste of resources
caused by the plaintiff's actions.
I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also filing a
request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from coming within
1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that carries my client's
publications.
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 1:53:06 PM UTC-4, woodchucker wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 1:39 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> >>>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
> >>>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5
> >>>>>>> years ago.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
> >>>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those
> >>>>>> days, not sure which.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sonny
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe
> >>>>> they resurfaced. LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
> >>>> advertising revenue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such
> >>>> other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which
> >>>> expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the
> >>>> information I provided them. It short, they could publish the tip
> >>>> in their print magazine or any other publication for a period of 6
> >>>> months and I was to receive payment of $75 for publication over
> >>>> that time period. Any subsequent publication would require another
> >>>> payment and contract.
> >>>>
> >>>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on
> >>>> one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their
> >>>> website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email
> >>>> telling them they are violating their contract and to cease or send
> >>>> me another check. So far all emails have been ignored.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
> >>>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They
> >>>> are making money off content I provided them and using it without
> >>>> permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest
> >>>> business practice if you ask me. If I see it published again, I
> >>>> might just dig up the contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit
> >>>> in small claims court just to wake them up. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
> >>>
> >>> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images or
> >>> text that leads directly back to you should this actually end up in
> >>> court? Something that you can use to prove that it is yours?
> >>>
> >>> Here's why I ask:
> >>>
> >>> The following was stolen without permission from:
> >>>
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
> >>>
> >>> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
> >>> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
> >>> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries
> >>> are made by scientists working independently of each other.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their own
> >> illustrations.
> >> They're actually still using it and still in violation of our contract
> >> and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
> >> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
> >>
> >> These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
> >> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty simple
> >> one. :-)
> >>
> >
> > Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
> >
> > The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal Radcliff and
> > by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's name.
> >
> > If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are multiple
> > Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr. Radcliff's
> > could be the true author of the published tip.
> >
> > Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
> > www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee
> > 9 Results - Find Michael Radcliff in Tennessee
> >
> > I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood Magazine,
> > et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with threatening emails, he
> > has disparaged this fine magazine on the internet and he has now filed a
> > frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other hand, respect the fine work that both Your
> > Honor and this court does and I am disheartened by the waste of resources
> > caused by the plaintiff's actions.
> >
> > I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also filing a
> > request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from coming within
> > 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that carries my client's
> > publications.
> >
> >
> Yea BUTTTTT he has the contract proving he is THE Michael Radcliff!!
>
> --
> Jeff
Bailiff! Whack his pee-pee!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiaPI6u9j1g
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
> > On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
> >>
> >>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
> >>
> >> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe
> >> Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
> >>
> >> Congrats Leon. ^5
> >>
> >> Sonny
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe they
> > resurfaced. LOL
>
> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
> advertising revenue.
>
> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such other
> print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which expressly
> detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the information I
> provided them. It short, they could publish the tip in their print
> magazine or any other publication for a period of 6 months and I was to
> receive payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
> subsequent publication would require another payment and contract.
>
> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on one
> of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their website
> and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email telling them
> they are violating their contract and to cease or send me another check.
> So far all emails have been ignored.
>
> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are breaking
> the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They are making
> money off content I provided them and using it without permission.
> Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest business practice if
> you ask me. If I see it published again, I might just dig up the
> contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just
> to wake them up. :-)
>
I'm not doubting you, just asking...
How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images or
text that leads directly back to you should this actually end up in
court? Something that you can use to prove that it is yours?
Here's why I ask:
The following was stolen without permission from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries are made by scientists working independently of each other.
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 9:50:33 AM UTC-4, Leon wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 6:45 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > On 9/14/2016 2:51 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
> >> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
> >> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
> >> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > According to Wood Magazine they have been sending a check every week to
> > a Mike Radcliff but they always come back stamped "wrong spelling"
> > Return to Sender
>
>
> ROTFL
>
> And funny you should mention that. When I was in school I worked part
> time for Ameron Automotive Centers, about 2 years.
> Then my parents moved to Houston and I still lived with them and was
> asked to come to work again at one of Ameron's stores there.
> I had to be rehired and my first new pay check was made out to LLoyd
> Bridges. It took 6 weeks for them to straighten that out.
Different situation, but still about checks being sent to the "wrong
person"...
Someone opened a Verizon Wireless account in my daughter's name and we
began to get overdue bills to the tune of >$600. It took us 4 months to
clear her good name and have the bills (and collection notices) stop.
About a month later Verizon sent her a refund check for "overcharges on
her account." Some random amount like $46.37.
We never cashed it.
On 9/24/2016 11:09 PM, OFWW wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:49:41 -0500, Leon <lcb11211@swbelldotnet>
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.woodworkersjournal.com/country-style-pantry/
>
> Congratulations Leon, Saw your small drawers and lo and behold!
> Domino's Ka Ching!
> One reader even commented on it. Put a smile on my face.
Oddly I tried to respond to the latest post, and I can't seem to log in.
LOL Oh well.
>
> Lovely work.
>
Thank you!
On 9/14/2016 6:45 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 2:51 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>
>>
>> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
>> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
>> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
>> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
>>
>>
>
> According to Wood Magazine they have been sending a check every week to
> a Mike Radcliff but they always come back stamped "wrong spelling"
> Return to Sender
ROTFL
And funny you should mention that. When I was in school I worked part
time for Ameron Automotive Centers, about 2 years.
Then my parents moved to Houston and I still lived with them and was
asked to come to work again at one of Ameron's stores there.
I had to be rehired and my first new pay check was made out to LLoyd
Bridges. It took 6 weeks for them to straighten that out.
On 9/13/2016 2:57 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 9/13/2016 3:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>> http://www.woodworkersjournal.com/country-style-pantry/
>
>
> Even a mention of Festool. Another commission!
>
> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments. IIRC I submitted
this but I do not think it was that long ago, but may be..
The 4 large drawers did not have handles yet, I added the handles about
a year after these photos. Most recent photos have the handles.
On 9/14/2016 2:51 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>
> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
>
>
According to Wood Magazine they have been sending a check every week to
a Mike Radcliff but they always come back stamped "wrong spelling"
Return to Sender
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 2:51:27 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 9/14/16 12:39 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
> >> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE-
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
> >>>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
> >>>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say
> >>>>>>> 5 years ago.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old
> >>>>>>> comments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
> >>>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or
> >>>>>> those days, not sure which.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sonny
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago
> >>>>> maybe they resurfaced. LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to
> >>>> generate advertising revenue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some
> >>>> such other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign
> >>>> which expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they
> >>>> could use the information I provided them. It short, they
> >>>> could publish the tip in their print magazine or any other
> >>>> publication for a period of 6 months and I was to receive
> >>>> payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
> >>>> subsequent publication would require another payment and
> >>>> contract.
> >>>>
> >>>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip
> >>>> on one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on
> >>>> their website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an
> >>>> email telling them they are violating their contract and to
> >>>> cease or send me another check. So far all emails have been
> >>>> ignored.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
> >>>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it.
> >>>> They are making money off content I provided them and using it
> >>>> without permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright
> >>>> dishonest business practice if you ask me. If I see it
> >>>> published again, I might just dig up the contract and spend
> >>>> fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just to wake
> >>>> them up. :-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
> >>>
> >>> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images
> >>> or text that leads directly back to you should this actually end
> >>> up in court? Something that you can use to prove that it is
> >>> yours?
> >>>
> >>> Here's why I ask:
> >>>
> >>> The following was stolen without permission from:
> >>>
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
> >>>
> >>> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
> >>> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
> >>> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar
> >>> discoveries are made by scientists working independently of each
> >>> other.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their
> >> own illustrations. They're actually still using it and still in
> >> violation of our contract and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
> >> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
> >> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty
> >> simple one. :-)
> >>
> >
> > Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
> >
> > The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal
> > Radcliff and by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's
> > name.
> >
> > If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are
> > multiple Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr.
> > Radcliff's could be the true author of the published tip.
> >
> > Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
> > www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee 9 Results - Find Michael
> > Radcliff in Tennessee
> >
> > I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood
> > Magazine, et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with
> > threatening emails, he has disparaged this fine magazine on the
> > internet and he has now filed a frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other
> > hand, respect the fine work that both Your Honor and this court does
> > and I am disheartened by the waste of resources caused by the
> > plaintiff's actions.
> >
> > I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also
> > filing a request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from
> > coming within 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that
> > carries my client's publications.
> >
>
> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
>
"Cute" was all that I was going for. ;-)
On 9/14/2016 1:39 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
>>>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5
>>>>>>> years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
>>>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those
>>>>>> days, not sure which.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sonny
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe
>>>>> they resurfaced. LOL
>>>>
>>>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
>>>> advertising revenue.
>>>>
>>>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such
>>>> other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which
>>>> expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the
>>>> information I provided them. It short, they could publish the tip
>>>> in their print magazine or any other publication for a period of 6
>>>> months and I was to receive payment of $75 for publication over
>>>> that time period. Any subsequent publication would require another
>>>> payment and contract.
>>>>
>>>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on
>>>> one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their
>>>> website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email
>>>> telling them they are violating their contract and to cease or send
>>>> me another check. So far all emails have been ignored.
>>>>
>>>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
>>>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They
>>>> are making money off content I provided them and using it without
>>>> permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest
>>>> business practice if you ask me. If I see it published again, I
>>>> might just dig up the contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit
>>>> in small claims court just to wake them up. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
>>>
>>> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images or
>>> text that leads directly back to you should this actually end up in
>>> court? Something that you can use to prove that it is yours?
>>>
>>> Here's why I ask:
>>>
>>> The following was stolen without permission from:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
>>>
>>> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
>>> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
>>> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries
>>> are made by scientists working independently of each other.
>>>
>>
>> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their own
>> illustrations.
>> They're actually still using it and still in violation of our contract
>> and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
>> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
>>
>> These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
>> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty simple
>> one. :-)
>>
>
> Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
>
> The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal Radcliff and
> by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's name.
>
> If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are multiple
> Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr. Radcliff's
> could be the true author of the published tip.
>
> Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
> www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee
> 9 Results - Find Michael Radcliff in Tennessee
>
> I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood Magazine,
> et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with threatening emails, he
> has disparaged this fine magazine on the internet and he has now filed a
> frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other hand, respect the fine work that both Your
> Honor and this court does and I am disheartened by the waste of resources
> caused by the plaintiff's actions.
>
> I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also filing a
> request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from coming within
> 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that carries my client's
> publications.
>
>
Yea BUTTTTT he has the contract proving he is THE Michael Radcliff!!
--
Jeff
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:50:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
>>>
>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>>
>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe
>>> Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
>>>
>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>
>>> Sonny
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe they
>> resurfaced. LOL
>
>They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
>advertising revenue.
>
>Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such other
>print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which expressly
>detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the information I
>provided them. It short, they could publish the tip in their print
>magazine or any other publication for a period of 6 months and I was to
>receive payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
>subsequent publication would require another payment and contract.
>
>One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on one
>of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their website
>and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email telling them
>they are violating their contract and to cease or send me another check.
> So far all emails have been ignored.
>
>It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are breaking
>the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They are making
>money off content I provided them and using it without permission.
>Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest business practice if
>you ask me. If I see it published again, I might just dig up the
>contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just
>to wake them up. :-)
Better yet, check out the other tips and see if other people were
likewise stiffed, the file a class action lawsuit. Original filers get
the biggest rewards.
Leon wrote:
> http://www.woodworkersjournal.com/country-style-pantry/
Had a lot of trouble with the web site Leon, but what I would see looked
great!
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
>>
>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>
>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe
>> Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
>>
>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>
>> Sonny
>>
>
>
> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe they
> resurfaced. LOL
They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
advertising revenue.
Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such other
print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which expressly
detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the information I
provided them. It short, they could publish the tip in their print
magazine or any other publication for a period of 6 months and I was to
receive payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
subsequent publication would require another payment and contract.
One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on one
of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their website
and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email telling them
they are violating their contract and to cease or send me another check.
So far all emails have been ignored.
It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are breaking
the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They are making
money off content I provided them and using it without permission.
Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest business practice if
you ask me. If I see it published again, I might just dig up the
contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just
to wake them up. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5
>>>>> years ago.
>>>>
>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>>>
>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those
>>>> days, not sure which.
>>>>
>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>>
>>>> Sonny
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe
>>> they resurfaced. LOL
>>
>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
>> advertising revenue.
>>
>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some such
>> other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign which
>> expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they could use the
>> information I provided them. It short, they could publish the tip
>> in their print magazine or any other publication for a period of 6
>> months and I was to receive payment of $75 for publication over
>> that time period. Any subsequent publication would require another
>> payment and contract.
>>
>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip on
>> one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on their
>> website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an email
>> telling them they are violating their contract and to cease or send
>> me another check. So far all emails have been ignored.
>>
>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it. They
>> are making money off content I provided them and using it without
>> permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright dishonest
>> business practice if you ask me. If I see it published again, I
>> might just dig up the contract and spend fifty bucks to file suit
>> in small claims court just to wake them up. :-)
>>
>
> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
>
> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images or
> text that leads directly back to you should this actually end up in
> court? Something that you can use to prove that it is yours?
>
> Here's why I ask:
>
> The following was stolen without permission from:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
>
> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries
> are made by scientists working independently of each other.
>
I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their own
illustrations.
They're actually still using it and still in violation of our contract
and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty simple
one. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
DerbyDad03 wrote:
>
> Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
>
> The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal Radcliff and
> by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's name.
>
> If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are multiple
> Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr. Radcliff's
> could be the true author of the published tip.
>
> Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
> www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee
> 9 Results - Find Michael Radcliff in Tennessee
>
> I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood Magazine,
> et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with threatening emails, he
> has disparaged this fine magazine on the internet and he has now filed a
> frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other hand, respect the fine work that both Your
> Honor and this court does and I am disheartened by the waste of resources
> caused by the plaintiff's actions.
>
> I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also filing a
> request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from coming within
> 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that carries my client's
> publications.
>
>
Entertaining, but don't give up your day job.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 9/14/16 12:39 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE-
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
>>>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say
>>>>>>> 5 years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old
>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
>>>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or
>>>>>> those days, not sure which.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sonny
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago
>>>>> maybe they resurfaced. LOL
>>>>
>>>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to
>>>> generate advertising revenue.
>>>>
>>>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some
>>>> such other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign
>>>> which expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they
>>>> could use the information I provided them. It short, they
>>>> could publish the tip in their print magazine or any other
>>>> publication for a period of 6 months and I was to receive
>>>> payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
>>>> subsequent publication would require another payment and
>>>> contract.
>>>>
>>>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip
>>>> on one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on
>>>> their website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an
>>>> email telling them they are violating their contract and to
>>>> cease or send me another check. So far all emails have been
>>>> ignored.
>>>>
>>>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
>>>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it.
>>>> They are making money off content I provided them and using it
>>>> without permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright
>>>> dishonest business practice if you ask me. If I see it
>>>> published again, I might just dig up the contract and spend
>>>> fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just to wake
>>>> them up. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
>>>
>>> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images
>>> or text that leads directly back to you should this actually end
>>> up in court? Something that you can use to prove that it is
>>> yours?
>>>
>>> Here's why I ask:
>>>
>>> The following was stolen without permission from:
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
>>>
>>> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
>>> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
>>> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar
>>> discoveries are made by scientists working independently of each
>>> other.
>>>
>>
>> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their
>> own illustrations. They're actually still using it and still in
>> violation of our contract and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
>> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
>>
>>
>>
These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
>> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty
>> simple one. :-)
>>
>
> Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
>
> The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal
> Radcliff and by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's
> name.
>
> If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are
> multiple Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr.
> Radcliff's could be the true author of the published tip.
>
> Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
> www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee 9 Results - Find Michael
> Radcliff in Tennessee
>
> I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood
> Magazine, et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with
> threatening emails, he has disparaged this fine magazine on the
> internet and he has now filed a frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other
> hand, respect the fine work that both Your Honor and this court does
> and I am disheartened by the waste of resources caused by the
> plaintiff's actions.
>
> I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also
> filing a request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from
> coming within 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that
> carries my client's publications.
>
That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 9/14/16 2:00 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 2:51:27 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 9/14/16 12:39 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:51:31 PM UTC-4, -MIKE- wrote:
>>>> On 9/14/16 11:32 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 11:50:29 AM UTC-4, -MIKE-
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
>>>>>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say
>>>>>>>>> 5 years ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old
>>>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
>>>>>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or
>>>>>>>> those days, not sure which.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sonny
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago
>>>>>>> maybe they resurfaced. LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to
>>>>>> generate advertising revenue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reminds me of when I sent in a tip to Wood magazine or some
>>>>>> such other print magazine. They sent me a contract to sign
>>>>>> which expressly detailed how, where, and for how long they
>>>>>> could use the information I provided them. It short, they
>>>>>> could publish the tip in their print magazine or any other
>>>>>> publication for a period of 6 months and I was to receive
>>>>>> payment of $75 for publication over that time period. Any
>>>>>> subsequent publication would require another payment and
>>>>>> contract.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One day, I'm on their website and I see a web version of my tip
>>>>>> on one of their pages and I see it pop up again now and then on
>>>>>> their website and facebook page. Whenever it happens I send an
>>>>>> email telling them they are violating their contract and to
>>>>>> cease or send me another check. So far all emails have been
>>>>>> ignored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not that I really care about the 75 bucks, but they are
>>>>>> breaking the law and ripping me off every time they use it.
>>>>>> They are making money off content I provided them and using it
>>>>>> without permission. Unethical, unlawful, and just downright
>>>>>> dishonest business practice if you ask me. If I see it
>>>>>> published again, I might just dig up the contract and spend
>>>>>> fifty bucks to file suit in small claims court just to wake
>>>>>> them up. :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not doubting you, just asking...
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you know it's *your* tip? Is there something in the images
>>>>> or text that leads directly back to you should this actually end
>>>>> up in court? Something that you can use to prove that it is
>>>>> yours?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's why I ask:
>>>>>
>>>>> The following was stolen without permission from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery
>>>>>
>>>>> Historians and sociologists have remarked on the occurrence, in
>>>>> science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton
>>>>> defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar
>>>>> discoveries are made by scientists working independently of each
>>>>> other.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I sent in pictures and they had their artist draw images for their
>>>> own illustrations. They're actually still using it and still in
>>>> violation of our contract and still spelling my name wrong. :-)
>>>> http://www.woodmagazine.com/glues/how-to-hook-up-a-humongous-handrail-2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> These are the same exact images as in the original. And the fact that
>>>> they are still crediting me would make the judgement a pretty
>>>> simple one. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your Honor, the plaintiff has no case.
>>>
>>> The tip in question was simultaneously submitted by a Micheal
>>> Radcliff and by his own admission, that is not even the plaintiff's
>>> name.
>>>
>>> If it pleases the court, our office has proof that there are
>>> multiple Micheal Radcliff's living in Tennessee. Any one of these Mr.
>>> Radcliff's could be the true author of the published tip.
>>>
>>> Michael Radcliff in Tennessee - 9 Records Found!
>>> www.spokeo.com/Michael-Radcliff/Tennessee 9 Results - Find Michael
>>> Radcliff in Tennessee
>>>
>>> I don't know why the plaintiff continues to harass my client, Wood
>>> Magazine, et al. He has been overloading my client's Inbox with
>>> threatening emails, he has disparaged this fine magazine on the
>>> internet and he has now filed a frivolous lawsuit. I, on the other
>>> hand, respect the fine work that both Your Honor and this court does
>>> and I am disheartened by the waste of resources caused by the
>>> plaintiff's actions.
>>>
>>> I am hereby filing a motion to have this case dismissed. I am also
>>> filing a request for a restraining order barring the plaintiff from
>>> coming within 1000 feet of any news stand or retail outlet that
>>> carries my client's publications.
>>>
>>
>> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
>> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
>> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
>> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
>>
>
> "Cute" was all that I was going for. ;-)
>
Duly noted by the court!
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 9/14/16 2:13 PM, Leon wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 10:50 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed
>>>> Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5
>>>>> years ago.
>>>>
>>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>>>
>>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era,
>>>> besides, maybe Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those
>>>> days, not sure which.
>>>>
>>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>>
>>>> Sonny
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe
>>> they resurfaced. LOL
>>
>> They should pay you for the content with which they use to
>> generate advertising revenue.
>
> IIRC WoodSmith paid me for a tip, a very simple but useful tip. The
> tip was how to return a rip fence to its exact position after moving
> it.
>
> There is no end to how long they can publish it past the first time
> and I do not really care, I got $50 out of it.
>
> The tip, place a clamp next to the fence on the front fence rail
> before moving the fence. Return the fence back against the clamp
> when you want to go back to that exact same position. This is handy
> if you find that you need to cross cut another piece before ripping
> it to the exact same width as the previous pieces.
>
Cool! Where do I send my money? :-p
I didn't care much either, especially since I'd since grown callused to
having my intellectual property freely bootlegged all over the interweps
in other ways. My intent was only to show how shady they are for
continuing to use the stuff in violation of their own contractual
agreements.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 9/14/16 6:45 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 9/14/2016 2:51 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>
>>
>> That's cute but wrong in too many ways to count.
>> Three of my lawyer friends tell me it would be a slam dunk case. One
>> said he'd even represent me pro bono, however, if I hadn't made it
>> clear, it's all hypothetical since I don't really give a $h!t.
>>
>>
>
> According to Wood Magazine they have been sending a check every week to
> a Mike Radcliff but they always come back stamped "wrong spelling"
> Return to Sender
Nice! :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 9/14/2016 10:50 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 9/13/16 6:49 PM, Leon wrote:
>> On 9/13/2016 5:21 PM, Sonny wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:57:42 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this a rerun? It has a 2016 date but the comments say 5 years ago.
>>>
>>>> Leon - I do not quite understand the 5 year old comments.
>>>
>>> Projects as that are timeless, perfect for any age/era, besides, maybe
>>> Leon is in a time warp.... these days or those days, not sure which.
>>>
>>> Congrats Leon. ^5
>>>
>>> Sonny
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Sonny. I probably sent pictures in 5 years ago maybe they
>> resurfaced. LOL
>
> They should pay you for the content with which they use to generate
> advertising revenue.
IIRC WoodSmith paid me for a tip, a very simple but useful tip. The tip
was how to return a rip fence to its exact position after moving it.
There is no end to how long they can publish it past the first time and
I do not really care, I got $50 out of it.
The tip, place a clamp next to the fence on the front fence rail before
moving the fence. Return the fence back against the clamp when you want
to go back to that exact same position. This is handy if you find that
you need to cross cut another piece before ripping it to the exact same
width as the previous pieces.