OT

"Orion T."

19/04/2005 8:28 AM

Timberjig vs. Alaskan MkIII

The entry level chain saw jig market seems to be dominated by the
Alaskan MkIII but Logosols Timberjig looks like a good quality product
and in some ways superior to the MkIII. I would like people that have
used either or both to critique these attachments in trying to saw
lumber from felled trees. I do know they are much slower in comparison
to larger mills and also that the more powerfull the saw the better. I
am looking for positives and negatives between the two.


This topic has 1 replies

DJ

"Dave Jackson"

in reply to "Orion T." on 19/04/2005 8:28 AM

19/04/2005 7:59 PM

I have no experience with either, but I did learn a great deal about milling
my own lumber on this group.
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/milling/messages/1?viscount=100
I opted to build my own jigamathing and, though it's rather primitive, it
works for small jobs. --dave


"Orion T." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The entry level chain saw jig market seems to be dominated by the
> Alaskan MkIII but Logosols Timberjig looks like a good quality product
> and in some ways superior to the MkIII. I would like people that have
> used either or both to critique these attachments in trying to saw
> lumber from felled trees. I do know they are much slower in comparison
> to larger mills and also that the more powerfull the saw the better. I
> am looking for positives and negatives between the two.
>


You’ve reached the end of replies