Po

"Paul"

16/11/2003 8:43 AM

Dimensional question for Blanket Chest

I've found a design and plans for the chest I want to make. It's 47" long X
20" X 20". I have room for 37" long between the valets I made. Maybe without
actually seeing the chest I want to make you can't say, but if I make it 37"
long instead of 47" I'm wondering if it won't ruin the looks by not scaling
back the heighth and width also. Not sure where else I can put the valets
but that is an option, altho I would like to have the chest between them.
Thanks again for any advice.
--
Paul
[email protected]
"You can make it foolproof, but you can't make it Damned foolproof."





This topic has 4 replies

MS

Mo' Sawdust

in reply to "Paul" on 16/11/2003 8:43 AM

16/11/2003 2:28 PM

To keep the proportions the same, with a 37" width, the height/depth would be
about 15-3/4".

(37*20)/47 = 15.74


As per the other response, a 37" wide to 20" high chest would be closer to
the golden ratio (1.618 rounded off):
47/20 = 2.35
37/20 = 1.85

At the end of the day, go with what looks best to you if you are making
something for yourself. Otherwise go with what the buyer
(client/swmbo/hwmbo) wants.



On 2003-11-16, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've found a design and plans for the chest I want to make. It's 47" long X
> 20" X 20". I have room for 37" long between the valets I made. Maybe without
> actually seeing the chest I want to make you can't say, but if I make it 37"
> long instead of 47" I'm wondering if it won't ruin the looks by not scaling
> back the heighth and width also. Not sure where else I can put the valets
> but that is an option, altho I would like to have the chest between them.
> Thanks again for any advice.


--
Think thrice, measure twice and cut once.

There is only one period and no underscores in the real email address.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

JH

Juergen Hannappel

in reply to "Paul" on 16/11/2003 8:43 AM

16/11/2003 6:34 PM

"Bob S." <[email protected]> writes:

> Paul,
>
> Actually 37" is a better fit for the Golden Ratio than 47" is.
>
> If you take the length 37" and divide by 1.618 you get 22.87, call it
> 22-7/8" for the Golden Ratio which, according to theory is the ratio that
> "looks right".

Right. But 1.618 is NOT really the Golden Ratio, that is (sqrt(5)+1)/2
and a "very" irrational number.

--
Dr. Juergen Hannappel http://lisa2.physik.uni-bonn.de/~hannappe
mailto:[email protected] Phone: +49 228 73 2447 FAX ... 7869
Physikalisches Institut der Uni Bonn Nussallee 12, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
CERN: Phone: +412276 76461 Fax: ..77930 Bat. 892-R-A13 CH-1211 Geneve 23

BS

"Bob S."

in reply to "Paul" on 16/11/2003 8:43 AM

16/11/2003 5:27 PM

Paul,

Actually 37" is a better fit for the Golden Ratio than 47" is.

If you take the length 37" and divide by 1.618 you get 22.87, call it
22-7/8" for the Golden Ratio which, according to theory is the ratio that
"looks right".

Bob S.


"Paul" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I've found a design and plans for the chest I want to make. It's 47" long
X
> 20" X 20". I have room for 37" long between the valets I made. Maybe
without
> actually seeing the chest I want to make you can't say, but if I make it
37"
> long instead of 47" I'm wondering if it won't ruin the looks by not
scaling
> back the heighth and width also. Not sure where else I can put the valets
> but that is an option, altho I would like to have the chest between them.
> Thanks again for any advice.
> --
> Paul
> [email protected]
> "You can make it foolproof, but you can't make it Damned foolproof."
>
>
>
>
>

BS

"Bob S."

in reply to "Paul" on 16/11/2003 8:43 AM

17/11/2003 12:19 AM

You're right but 1.618 works for us laymen......;-)

Bob S.

"Juergen Hannappel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Bob S." <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Paul,
> >
> > Actually 37" is a better fit for the Golden Ratio than 47" is.
> >
> > If you take the length 37" and divide by 1.618 you get 22.87, call it
> > 22-7/8" for the Golden Ratio which, according to theory is the ratio
that
> > "looks right".
>
> Right. But 1.618 is NOT really the Golden Ratio, that is (sqrt(5)+1)/2
> and a "very" irrational number.
>
> --
> Dr. Juergen Hannappel http://lisa2.physik.uni-bonn.de/~hannappe
> mailto:[email protected] Phone: +49 228 73 2447 FAX ... 7869
> Physikalisches Institut der Uni Bonn Nussallee 12, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
> CERN: Phone: +412276 76461 Fax: ..77930 Bat. 892-R-A13 CH-1211 Geneve 23


You’ve reached the end of replies