SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
recharge them.
So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
I have built many decks with battery operated drills. Two units comes in
handy with several fast charge batteries for each.
Oh yeah! Those were the drills with the old ni-cad batteries that were 9V
units then.
Torque clutches do **NOT*** set screw depth. Torque sets the torque. When
you hit hard wood spots you will be adjusting the torque setting. When you
hit soft wood spots you will over sink them.
Just get used to the sound of the right screw depth or use a dimpler
attachment.
"Ignoramus16466" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
used)
If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
or gun shaped).
i
On May 24, 6:45=A0am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
wrote:
> Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requ=
ires a
> > new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age =
a bit,
> > or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building =
a deck,
> > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> > recharge them.
>
> > So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. =
saw one
> > at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almo=
st
> > every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtighten=
ing, or
> > sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clu=
tch?
>
> Despite what others have been saying I have recently bought an air
> impact driver. Of course as with any tool you get the quality you pay
> for. Although as far as I know there are few really cheep quality air
> tools yet.
>
> For me the advantages are clear
>
> 1) there are no batteries that will die if not used for a months and any
> way in about 3 years.
> 2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
Nonsense. Have you looked at a Bosch Impactor? Any smaller and it
would be useless.
> 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
Again, nonsense. How long is a string?
> 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
More crap.
> 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
Only because it needs it.
Wondered about the wood components in it. I have some Veranda on my
weather station. Hope it stands up to weather.
Seems to be a lot of plastic in it. Saw had long stringers on it.
They might have cut back on plastic from R&D to save money and now find
the facts.
Thanks Guys - great info.
Martin
Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
"Our Republic and the Press will Rise or Fall Together": Joseph Pulitzer
TSRA: Endowed; NRA LOH & Patron Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot's Medal.
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member. http://lufkinced.com/
On 5/26/2010 7:00 AM, Josepi wrote:
> We have a few hundred square feet of deck to do and always figured we would
> go the Trex route.
>
> Lately I have been reading a lot of bad stuff about these brands with
> molding and rot. Apparently the answer is to use a mold prevention wash a
> few times a year on the maintenance free surface....LOL
>
>
>
> "Califbill"<[email protected]> wrote in message My 18v DeWalt drove
> all the Torx head screws in my Trex deck. Works
> fine. Unfortunately I am going to have to do it again as the Trex is
> decomposing. They replaced all the Trex in my buddies deck, but do not
> supply the screws. And I had about $230 in stainless deck screws in my
> deck.
>
>
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
> requires a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
> bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
> deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw
> one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
> overtightening, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
> clutch?
Most all the air drills I have seen tend to be high RPM drills and are quite
loud. IIRC they use quite a bit of air also. You may be waiting as much
for the compressor to recharge as you would for the batteries to recharge.
I would go for a cordless impact driver, faster and more torque than a
cordless drill.
Cheaper still, a corded variable speed drill, they don't give up and have
the required torque. A clutched variety would be ideal IMHO.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 17:00:47 -0400, "J. Clarke" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5/23/2010 1:24 PM, Josepi wrote:
>> Do you think the batteries will be good enough when you resurrect those old
>> drills to get those screws out again?
>
>If they aren't I'm sure that Makita will be happy to sell him a
>replacement set, or he can get the old ones rebuilt.
Driver bits are pretty standard these days. A new drill will usually work,
too. ;-)
Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
Despite what others have been saying I have recently bought an air
impact driver. Of course as with any tool you get the quality you pay
for. Although as far as I know there are few really cheep quality air
tools yet.
For me the advantages are clear
1) there are no batteries that will die if not used for a months and any
way in about 3 years.
2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
--
>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
>Pics at http://www.meekings.net/diving/index.shtml
>and http://www.meekings.net/photo-groups/nui/index.shtml
[email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 24, 6:45 am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
> wrote: > Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > SWMBO wants me to
> build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a > > new tool,
> right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit, > > or
> to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
> deck, > > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it
> takes to > > recharge them. > > > So I'm looking at other options,
> including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one > > at the Borg this evening
> for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost > > every cordless drill
> has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or > > sinking
> screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch? > >
> Despite what others have been saying I have recently bought an air >
> impact driver. Of course as with any tool you get the quality you pay >
> for. Although as far as I know there are few really cheep quality air >
> tools yet. > > For me the advantages are clear > > 1) there are no
> batteries that will die if not used for a months and any > way in about 3
> years. > 2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
>
> Nonsense. Have you looked at a Bosch Impactor? Any smaller and it would
> be useless.
Of course it it small however it is also low powered. Size for power air
wins every time.
>
> > 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
>
> Again, nonsense. How long is a string?
>
nonsense? Not at all.
cables for a corded driver are almost never over 3M however since all my
air tools have a QR on the tool. Any length (in my case) up to 50M
without junctions is usable.
> > 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
>
> More crap.
In your opinion.
If electric impact drivers were so good then tyre shops and garages
would use them.
With sanders exactly the same is true though they need a high airflow,
so few non professional workshops have the compressor power to use them
>
> > 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
>
> Only because it needs it.
Which part of the word "eventually" did you miss?
by the time an air impact can use an overhaul it will have outlasted 2
or 3 equivelent electric impact drivers
-- >replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me >Pics at
http://www.meekings.net/diving/index.shtml >and
http://www.meekings.net/photo-groups/nui/index.shtml
allen476 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 22, 11:26 pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> > SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
> > requires a new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is
> > showing its age a bit, or to be more precise, the batteries are showing
> > their age -- building a deck, I'll definitely drain the batteries in
> > much less time than it takes to recharge them.
> >
> > So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g.
> > saw one at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to
> > wondering... almost every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to
> > prevent overtightening, or sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an
> > air drill with such a clutch?
>
> We are getting away from what the original question is. I have not
> seen an air drill with a clutch only because they wouldn't be of much
> use. Air tools are specific in use not like electric which tries to
> cover many uses. So hence why they don't have a clutch because there
> are air impact drivers and air screwdrivers.
There are also air impact screwdrivers.
and there are air Clutch Screwdrivers
http://www.airtekltd.com/gison_9.htm
> I do agree that if air
> powered was better that you would see many more contractors using them
> (except nailers).
>
> I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
> torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
>
> Allen
--
>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
>Pics at http://www.meekings.net/diving/index.shtml
>and http://www.meekings.net/photo-groups/nui/index.shtml
>
> Well, you can, but a battery powered impact driver works a lot better.
Good point I missed in my previous post because I was using a drill
and driver for the the deck I just finished. You have to be careful
not to bury the screw, but my impact driver is actually easier to
control than either my corded or battery drill motors, and is less
likely to twist your wrist as you get fatigued. It runs quite a while
on a charge too. All of my cordless are 14.4V Makita's
BTW, and MOST IMPORTANT - an impact driver does qualify as a NEW TOOL.
Basic criteria of your OP
RonB
Josepi wrote:
> It definitely varies from crew to crew.
>
> Many of the newbies are given nailers and the cordless ones are
> getting popular. I framed my house with a nailer and barbed nails.
> that was a mistake when changes need to be made though. Other jobs I
> have been in, almost all the seasoned framers used hammers as the
> climbing was a pain with a nailer and the hammer was faster, overall.
> For sheeting a nailer was used almost exclusively but not for
> structural lumber.
>
I have to respectfully disagree with the ease and speed of use, as well as
what I see seasoned framers actually doing. I see plenty of structural
work - perhaps even most of the structural work being done with nailers.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
In article <[email protected]>,
Ignoramus16466 <[email protected]> wrote:
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
I'll have to be careful stepping out the garden door onto my 16 x 12
cedar deck that doesn't exist, then.
What utter nonsense...
--
âThe problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peopleâs
money.â - Margaret Thatcher
In article <[email protected]>, Gunner Asch
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree on all of Iggys points about tools, though some of the newest
> cordless drills come pretty close to being suitable.
I drove over 2000 screws with a cheap off-brand cordless 14.4 v drill
when I built my deck.
--
âThe problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peopleâs
money.â - Margaret Thatcher
In article <[email protected]>,
Ignoramus32683 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
> > twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
> > was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
> > if
> > you don't stop on time!).
>
> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>
> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
> retract my comment about cordless drills.
Batteries, like tires on a car, have to be considered as a consumable.
In some cases, the entire drill is a consumable.
Doesn't mean it won't do the job.
--
âThe problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peopleâs
money.â - Margaret Thatcher
On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:35:34 -0500, Ignoramus16466
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
>You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
>Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
>I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
>used)
>
>If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
>drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
>or gun shaped).
>
>i
I agree on all of Iggys points about tools, though some of the newest
cordless drills come pretty close to being suitable.
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
Ignoramus32683 wrote:
>
> Dewalt 18XRP is the drill that I have, I love it and use it a lot. I
> have two batteries for it, but for continuous use I get out my
> electric drill.
>
For continuous work, I keep one of my batteries in the charger, while I'm
using the other one. I've never had my cordless fail me for the type of
work we've been speaking of.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:53:03 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/23/10 3:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> adding bricks to their cart, imo.
>>
>> Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
>
>Who swings a hammer? :-)
>A gas framing nailer is faster, lighter, and more convenient than any of
>those.
Never used one. I generally don't move much once set up, so there isn't much
dragging anyway. The big advantage of an air nailer for me is no smiles in
awkward-to-nail places. My thumbs feel better after, too. ;-)
>FWIW, last deck I did, I was much faster laying down the decking with my
>22 oz Estwing and galvanized spirals than with a drill and screws.
Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are the only
way to fly.
>I can definitely see where I could be faster with one of those screw
>self-feeders with the long extension and the depth stop driver. But I'm
>one of those "one tap to set, 2-3 swings to drive it home" hammer guys,
>so I can get a pretty fast rhythm going.
Saving time isn't high on my list. ;-) Saving aggravation later, is.
Josepi wrote:
> Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
> hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly
> while hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at
> the next piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb
> and the nials are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set
> into the wood.
>
It's a mix. The hammer still has its place but to say that most pro framers
aren't using nailers is, well... bull. You need to look more closely.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Thu, 27 May 2010 01:10:44 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, Joseph Gwinn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>In article <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
>>> [email protected].> wrote:
>>>
>>> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>>>
>>> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
>>> can
>>> see them, however, is certainly not.
>>>
>>> > One can
>>> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>>> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
>>
>>> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>>>
>>> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500 meters,
>>> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you measure
>>> the distance, anyway?
>>>
>>> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
>>> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
>>> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
>>
>>Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22
>> caliber rifles.
>>
>>When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could easily
>>see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
>>sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't move
>>too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much visual
>>clutter). And young eyes, of course.
>>
>>One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and indistinct
>>black spot.
>
>For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
>about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
>and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at best
>wishful thinking.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
>
>Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
>resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds to
>about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
>example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
With some bullets..one is seeing the shock wave traveling.
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:10:14 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>It definitely varies from crew to crew.
>
>Many of the newbies are given nailers and the cordless ones are getting
>popular. I framed my house with a nailer and barbed nails. that was a
>mistake when changes need to be made though. Other jobs I have been in,
>almost all the seasoned framers used hammers as the climbing was a pain with
>a nailer and the hammer was faster, overall. For sheeting a nailer was used
>almost exclusively but not for structural lumber.
Not a chance in hell that a hammer is faster. Watch them do shingles some
time. Wait, does *anyone* hammer down shingles anymore?
On May 22, 11:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requir=
es a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a =
bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a =
deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. sa=
w one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightenin=
g, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutc=
h?
We are getting away from what the original question is. I have not
seen an air drill with a clutch only because they wouldn't be of much
use. Air tools are specific in use not like electric which tries to
cover many uses. So hence why they don't have a clutch because there
are air impact drivers and air screwdrivers. I do agree that if air
powered was better that you would see many more contractors using them
(except nailers).
The question you have to ask yourself, is "Am I going to use it after
the job is done?". If you don't have much other use for it beyond the
scope of the deck, I wouldn't go that route. Then think about
compressor capacity. Is your compressor capable of the scfm needed for
the drill? Since it would be in use for longer durations, you need a
compressor that is at least a 30 gallon or higher and able to deliver
at least 8-9 scfm at 90 psi. Then if your compressor is smaller, it
constantly has to play catch up and then it is running nonstop. It
would be about the same as if you left your table saw running the
entire time you were building the deck. Not very good on the electric
bill.
I myself would go the cordless impact driver way since you said it is
about 140 square feet. You said that your drill is about 7 years old.
I would look at a drill/impact driver kit and keep your old one for
the times you could use 2 drills. I doubt that you would find an
impact driver kit that you could use the batteries on your old drill.
I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
Allen
On May 22, 10:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requir=
es a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a =
bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a =
deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. sa=
w one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightenin=
g, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutc=
h?
I just finished building a deck this weekend. My cordless batteries
did poop out, without available charge, a couple of times but no big
deal. However, during those periods I had to dig out my old faithful
Bosch corded drill. It did fine but awfully torquey and I had to be
careful not to bury the screws. The biggest problem was dragging that
^%&%# cord around. The cordless tools have spoiled me and dragging an
air hose around is worse. As I was completing the project, I jumped
on Amazon and ordered a couple more cordless batteries. In my
opinion, updating your cordless capability is a better solution.
BTW, I have a couple of air powered drills and both have fairly good
speed control but no clutch. They too have a lot of torque with the
trigger at full speed. Also keep in mind your compressor capacity.
Once I got underway installing screws, I had the drills running quite
a bit.
RonB
On May 24, 4:22=A0am, Gunner Asch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 04:38:50 -0700 (PDT), Jim Wilkins <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >It will barely drive a #10 x 3" screw without predrilling,
>
> Predrilling
Yep. I use a lot of oak for framing temporary sheds like in the
photos. If I don't predrill the lag screws break off when I remove
them later. I salvaged the oak beams from pallets for kitchen counter
sheets and use them for rafters. The wood is almost as hard as 1980's
Chinese cast iron.
jsw
Ignoramus16466 wrote:
>
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
> > new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
> > or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
> > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> > recharge them.
> >
> > So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
> > at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> > every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
> > sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
Well, you can, but a battery powered impact driver works a lot better.
On 2010-05-27 07:24:18 -0400, [email protected] (Doug Miller) said:
> I've used nail guns extensively for their intended purpose: nailing
> pieces of wood together. I'll admit that I've never used one for
> launching nails into the air.
You'll never do it any younger, son.
On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:32:14 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>In article <480455e0-8484-4645-bc6e-bfc52fd4e83a@q13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, allen476 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>On May 22, 11:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>>> recharge them.
>>>
>>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>>
>>We are getting away from what the original question is. I have not
>>seen an air drill with a clutch only because they wouldn't be of much
>>use. Air tools are specific in use not like electric which tries to
>>cover many uses. So hence why they don't have a clutch because there
>>are air impact drivers and air screwdrivers. I do agree that if air
>>powered was better that you would see many more contractors using them
>>(except nailers).
>>
>>The question you have to ask yourself, is "Am I going to use it after
>>the job is done?". If you don't have much other use for it beyond the
>>scope of the deck, I wouldn't go that route. Then think about
>>compressor capacity. Is your compressor capable of the scfm needed for
>>the drill? Since it would be in use for longer durations, you need a
>>compressor that is at least a 30 gallon or higher and able to deliver
>>at least 8-9 scfm at 90 psi. Then if your compressor is smaller, it
>>constantly has to play catch up and then it is running nonstop. It
>>would be about the same as if you left your table saw running the
>>entire time you were building the deck. Not very good on the electric
>>bill.
>>
>>I myself would go the cordless impact driver way since you said it is
>>about 140 square feet. You said that your drill is about 7 years old.
>>I would look at a drill/impact driver kit and keep your old one for
>>the times you could use 2 drills. I doubt that you would find an
>>impact driver kit that you could use the batteries on your old drill.
>>
>>I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
>>torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
>>
>>Allen
>
>Thanks for the thoughtful response, Allen. I believe that you and a few others
>have talked me into looking at a new cordless drill instead...
Doug,
depending on location I happen to have some new in box metabo cordless
drill drivers and electric screw guns. 15.6V for 175.00 18V for200.00
and electric screw gun 125.00 plus shipping. this is about half price
for these tools. I found several at a good deal and am passing along
the savings to fellow woodworkers. They are NOT hot! leave a message
here if you are interested or e-mail me at fcpreston at nc dot rr dot
com. I do not sell tools for a living.... :-]
skeez
Given that most Auto shops use air tools, and they have torque settings on
the air wrenches, I would say that it is common, and you should look for
that feature on when looking for tools. I am sure if you checked their web
site out you would get the details on the specific tools get your answers
first hand.
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
> requires a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
> bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
> deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw
> one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
> overtightening, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
> clutch?
On Sun, 23 May 2010 17:20:54 -0500, the renowned
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:53:03 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On 5/23/10 3:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> adding bricks to their cart, imo.
>>>
>>> Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
>>
>>Who swings a hammer? :-)
>>A gas framing nailer is faster, lighter, and more convenient than any of
>>those.
>
>Never used one. I generally don't move much once set up, so there isn't much
>dragging anyway. The big advantage of an air nailer for me is no smiles in
>awkward-to-nail places. My thumbs feel better after, too. ;-)
>
>>FWIW, last deck I did, I was much faster laying down the decking with my
>>22 oz Estwing and galvanized spirals than with a drill and screws.
>
>Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are the only
>way to fly.
>
>>I can definitely see where I could be faster with one of those screw
>>self-feeders with the long extension and the depth stop driver. But I'm
>>one of those "one tap to set, 2-3 swings to drive it home" hammer guys,
>>so I can get a pretty fast rhythm going.
>
>Saving time isn't high on my list. ;-) Saving aggravation later, is.
I see the Cadillac way of making a deck...
- Autofeed stand up Screw gun
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B0012RI9Q2/sr=8-1/qid=1274654692/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=16310091&s=industrial&qid=1274654692&sr=8-1
- collated 316 (!) stainless steel deck screw$$$
http://www.stainless-fasteners.com/collated_deck_screws_strips.htm
-Bluwood (tm) treated wood
http://www.lowes.ca/products/bluwood.aspx
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
[email protected] Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Ignoramus16466 wrote:
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
>> requires a new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is
>> showing its age a bit, or to be more precise, the batteries are
>> showing their age -- building a deck, I'll definitely drain the
>> batteries in much less time than it takes to recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills
>> (e.g. saw one at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to
>> wondering... almost every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch
>> to prevent overtightening, or sinking screws too deep. Does anybody
>> make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
Sure you can. Why do you say that?
>
> Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
Agreed - wrong tool for the job.
>
> I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
> used)
>
> If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
> drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
> or gun shaped).
>
VSR drill (corded) is certainly a great choice. A decent cordless with 2
batteries is another good choice.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
Bill Noble wrote:
>
> 3. pneumatic tools don't get hot when they run, that's a real plus if
> you are using them a lot
No kidding - just hold the tool so that your hand is near the exhaust port -
a quick way to realize how cold expanding compressed air can really get...
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On Wed, 26 May 2010 02:20:48 GMT, notbob <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2010-05-26, Josepi <J.R.M> wrote:
>> Some, here, report the usage of stainess steel screws not working well.
>> Apparently it sounds like they are too brittle and break frequently with
>> battery drills.
>
>That doesn't sound right. SS is much more ductile than carbon steel.
>Must be cheap low grade SS.
The only problems I've had with SS is the heads stripping easily. An impact
driver should fix that problem.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 03:26:39 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>recharge them.
>
>So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
Get a quality corded drill, maybe a Milwaulkee. You'll get more power
and control. Save the cordless for weenie projects. Take a look at
stainless square-hole screws--they cost more but will outlast the
others.
On May 23, 10:12=A0am, "WW" <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> I used 2 Makita battery drills. One 9.6 volt and one 12 volt. Used one fo=
r
> pilot holes and other to set screws. 700 square foot deck with railings a=
nd
> is 12 feet above ground. 3500 deck screws. 2 batteries for each drill. Th=
is
> was done 10 years ago. Did not know about stainless deck screws at that t=
ime
> ( or if they were available) Going to replace all now with SS screws as t=
he
> origanal ones have rusted. Composite deck material. Will cost about $300 =
for
> screws. WW
I was given a dead 12V Makita to fix, and agree that the two make a
decent combination like that.
So far the ceramic-coated deck screws that I've removed after a year
or two in pressure-treated wood have been in good condition. Friday I
pulled out some electro-galvanized screws and lags that had been in
dry, untreated wood for about 10 years, outdoors protected from rain.
Most were rusty but not enough to weaken them.
The stainless deck screws I bought a few years ago stripped or broke
more easily than regular steel screws.
jsw
We have a few hundred square feet of deck to do and always figured we would
go the Trex route.
Lately I have been reading a lot of bad stuff about these brands with
molding and rot. Apparently the answer is to use a mold prevention wash a
few times a year on the maintenance free surface....LOL
"Califbill" <[email protected]> wrote in message My 18v DeWalt drove
all the Torx head screws in my Trex deck. Works
fine. Unfortunately I am going to have to do it again as the Trex is
decomposing. They replaced all the Trex in my buddies deck, but do not
supply the screws. And I had about $230 in stainless deck screws in my
deck.
"Ignoramus16466" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
>> requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
>> bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
>> deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g.
>> saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
>> overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
>> clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
> I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
> used)
>
> If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
> drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
> or gun shaped).
>
> i
Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws if
you don't stop on time!).
RogerN
Apparently you have some miscontrued notions about air powered nailguns. Did
you think a device that can fire a 3.5 inch nail with barbs through 3.5
inches of spruce or pine couldn't hurt your body or fire right through your
hand?
The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky. One can
only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
Perhaps you are thinking staple guns are framing nailers. Perhap you are you
just trolling or actually never used a compressed air nailgun? You know
Paslode, Hatachi, or other **FRAMING** nailgun. Newer styles are doing
multiple impacts to eliminate some of these nasties. Pretty hard to believe
you have ever used one.
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Maybe it's lost in translation, but are you saying you were 10 feet (3m)
away and it dented a steel toed boot? I don't believe that for a second.
Did I say there were no injuries due to nail guns?
I was referring to quantity, not quality.
Again, I just want to make sure.
Is that one half a kilometer? 500 meters?
That's over 1/4 mile... 1600 feet.
If that's not a typo and you honestly are trying to tell me that you
have shot a pneumatic nail gun 500 meters, then you are..... well I
don't know what the British phrase is for "full of sh!t." I believe the
term Bullocks! comes to mind.
I honestly hope that's a typo, otherwise it pretty much discredits
everything you've written in this thread.
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Do you think the batteries will be good enough when you resurrect those old
drills to get those screws out again?
LOL
"WW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I used 2 Makita battery drills. One 9.6 volt and one 12 volt. Used one for
pilot holes and other to set screws. 700 square foot deck with railings and
is 12 feet above ground. 3500 deck screws. 2 batteries for each drill. This
was done 10 years ago. Did not know about stainless deck screws at that time
( or if they were available) Going to replace all now with SS screws as the
origanal ones have rusted. Composite deck material. Will cost about $300 for
screws. WW
You can buy a special chuck with a release for screws, but
if it were me, I would go buy myself a impact driver. I have
a Makita and it will drive a LOT of screws completely through
a decking board.
A corded drill is still the best tool for continuous operations.
If you "really" want a clutched corded drill, these folks
sell one:
http://www.metabo.us/Product-catalog-handheld-powertools.23980+M54bda9ca94a.0.html
http://www.contractorstoolsupply.com/metabo-710-watt-twospeed-drill-model-be710-p-1907.html
Doug Miller wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's Plan B -- I have a good one already (Makita 1/2" VSR corded), but
> it doesn't have a clutch...
Some, here, report the usage of stainess steel screws not working well.
Apparently it sounds like they are too brittle and break frequently with
battery drills.
I have not experienced them. YMMV
"Phisherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Get a quality corded drill, maybe a Milwaulkee. You'll get more power
and control. Save the cordless for weenie projects. Take a look at
stainless square-hole screws--they cost more but will outlast the
others
On Sun, 23 May 2010 03:26:39 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires
>a
>new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
>bit,
>or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
>deck,
>I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>recharge them.
>
>So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw
>one
>at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening,
>or
>sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
.
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
> requires a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
> bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
> deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw
> one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
> overtightening, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
> clutch?
I used 2 Makita battery drills. One 9.6 volt and one 12 volt. Used one for
pilot holes and other to set screws. 700 square foot deck with railings and
is 12 feet above ground. 3500 deck screws. 2 batteries for each drill. This
was done 10 years ago. Did not know about stainless deck screws at that time
( or if they were available) Going to replace all now with SS screws as the
origanal ones have rusted. Composite deck material. Will cost about $300 for
screws. WW
I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
power.
Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
one step either.
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
--
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
"Ignoramus32683" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if
>> it
>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
>> if
>> you don't stop on time!).
>
> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>
> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>
> i
OK, that makes sense, maybe that's why I bought 2 drills, 6 batteries and 4
chargers. :-) Too bad my energy level doesn't keep up!
Actually I saw DeWalt had a lot of cordless tools available for their 18V
XPR and I bought various sets to have all my cordless tools battery and
charger compatible, the 2nd xrp drill came in a kit with 2 batteries, a
charger, and an impact driver.
RogerN
Not many frame with shingles.
Shingle warranties are usually voided with use of power nailers. Most
roofers here, use them anyway.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Not a chance in hell that a hammer is faster. Watch them do shingles some
time. Wait, does *anyone* hammer down shingles anymore?
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:10:14 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>It definitely varies from crew to crew.
>
>Many of the newbies are given nailers and the cordless ones are getting
>popular. I framed my house with a nailer and barbed nails. that was a
>mistake when changes need to be made though. Other jobs I have been in,
>almost all the seasoned framers used hammers as the climbing was a pain
>with
>a nailer and the hammer was faster, overall. For sheeting a nailer was used
>almost exclusively but not for structural lumber.
On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
used)
If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
or gun shaped).
i
On 5/24/10 10:56 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:07 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
>> gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
>> with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
>> edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
>> partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
>> screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
>> the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
>> down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
>> sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>>
>> A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
>> person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>>
>> I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
>> power.
>>
>> Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
>> down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
>> one step either.
>>
>>
>> "-MIKE-"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
>> tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
>> hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
>
>
> http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1016545/Body-in-marsh-killed-with-nailgun
>
What does that have to do with the discussion?
I stand corrected... it's muuuuuch more common to be shot 30 times in
the head with a nail gun than hitting one's thumb with a hammer.
> I recall some years ago, a fellow was doing some work at..IRRC a
> McDonalds..and fired a nailgun into what he thought was a stud in the
> wall. It unfortunately was only sheetrock, and the nail killed one of
> the girls working there, some distance away.
>
> I cant find it on the net..anyone?
>
There's probably a reason you can't find it.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:07 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
>gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
>with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
>edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
>partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
>screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
>the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
>down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
>sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>
>A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
>person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>
>I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
>power.
>
>Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
>down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
>one step either.
>
>
>"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
>tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
>hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1016545/Body-in-marsh-killed-with-nailgun
I recall some years ago, a fellow was doing some work at..IRRC a
McDonalds..and fired a nailgun into what he thought was a stud in the
wall. It unfortunately was only sheetrock, and the nail killed one of
the girls working there, some distance away.
I cant find it on the net..anyone?
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
Air pressure regulation will still give you high speed but low torque
capabilities. This will tend to make deck screwing uncontrollable and you
will need to follow up the heads with a battry drill afterwards (tripping on
a few) to set the head depths.
"Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
That's one of the reasons pressure regulators exist.
Buy the time you buy a regulator, lubricator, filter package, 100 ft
of 1/2" hose and quick connect couplings, the cost of a couple of
batteries starts looking pretty good.
Lew
"Doug Miller" wrote:
> Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
Doug Miller wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
> requires a new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is
> showing its age a bit, or to be more precise, the batteries are
> showing their age -- building a deck, I'll definitely drain the
> batteries in much less time than it takes to recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills
> (e.g. saw one at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to
> wondering... almost every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch
> to prevent overtightening, or sinking screws too deep. Does anybody
> make an air drill with such a clutch?
Go to HF and buy two of the 18v battery drills . Batteries cost almost as
much as the drill so ... that'll give you more battery capacity , might be
able to eke thru with those and what you already have .
--
Snag
"90 FLHTCU "Strider"
'39 WLDD "PopCycle"
BS 132/SENS/DOF
On 5/23/2010 9:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:28:16 -0500, Ignoramus32683
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Ignoramus32683"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>>>>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if
>>>>> it
>>>>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
>>>>> if
>>>>> you don't stop on time!).
>>>>
>>>> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
>>>> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
>>>> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>>>>
>>>> i
>>>
>>> OK, that makes sense, maybe that's why I bought 2 drills, 6 batteries and 4
>>> chargers. :-) Too bad my energy level doesn't keep up!
>>>
>>> Actually I saw DeWalt had a lot of cordless tools available for their 18V
>>> XPR and I bought various sets to have all my cordless tools battery and
>>> charger compatible, the 2nd xrp drill came in a kit with 2 batteries, a
>>> charger, and an impact driver.
>>
>> Dewalt 18XRP is the drill that I have, I love it and use it a lot. I
>> have two batteries for it, but for continuous use I get out my electric
>> drill.
>
> I have two 18V XRP drills, one a "compact" model (which isn't compact). I
> found one for less than $100 (less than the price of two batteries) on the
> get-it-outta-here table at HomeDespot. I also have the 6-1/2" circular saw,
> so six batteries. I don't use the drills often, though. I would much rather
> use the 12V Bosch and the Impactor. I'd break them out if I built a deck,
> though. ;-)
>
And the DeWalt battery skilsaw is fantastic when doing the deck. At
least on Trex. No cord to pull around when you need a little trimming.
I used the gear drive Skilsaw for major cutting, but if you needed to
square an end, reach for the battery saw.
On 5/22/2010 8:35 PM, Ignoramus16466 wrote:
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller<[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
> I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
> used)
>
> If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
> drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
> or gun shaped).
>
> i
My 18v DeWalt drove all the Torx head screws in my Trex deck. Works
fine. Unfortunately I am going to have to do it again as the Trex is
decomposing. They replaced all the Trex in my buddies deck, but do not
supply the screws. And I had about $230 in stainless deck screws in my
deck.
Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly while
hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at the next
piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb and the nials
are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set into the wood.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:52:32 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/23/10 11:44 AM, Dave Balderstone wrote:
>> In article<[email protected]>,
>> Ignoramus16466<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>>
>> I'll have to be careful stepping out the garden door onto my 16 x 12
>> cedar deck that doesn't exist, then.
>>
>> What utter nonsense...
>>
>
>Yeah, I think someone hasn't kept up with technology. :-)
For 15 years?
>I have cheap (what I consider to be disposable) B&D 18volters that would
>do the job just fine. Like another guys posted, all you need is 3
>batteries per drill, which is the minimum for me, anyway.
>
>I never go to a site without a corded electric, as a back-up, but that
>cord is a PITA. And whoever wants to trade an AC cord for an air hose is
>adding bricks to their cart, imo.
Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
I would have to invite you up, sign the papers, and stand 100 metres away
and let me fire a few nails at you. They are too small to see in the air and
wouldn't cause any damage to the flesh, being so small and wouldn't reach
you anyway.
After the game and hospital visit, we can have a beer together, if you can
still hold liquids....LOL
Game on?
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 5/25/10 11:21 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
Still bullshit.
On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:03:47 -0400, Joseph Gwinn <[email protected]>
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>
>> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
>> [email protected].> wrote:
>>
>> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>>
>> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
>> can
>> see them, however, is certainly not.
>>
>> > One can
>> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
>> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>>
>> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500 meters,
>> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you measure
>> the distance, anyway?
>>
>> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
>> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
>> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
>
>Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22 caliber
>rifles.
>
>When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could easily
>see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
>sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't move
>too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much visual
>clutter). And young eyes, of course.
>
>One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and indistinct
>black spot.
>
>Joe Gwinn
Ive watched both 30 cal and larger rounds for at least 200 yrds, as they
sped down range.
22-250s are a treat to watch if the weather is cool and the sun is just
right.
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:01:30 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>
>http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>
>
>
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
>dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>
>BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
>than a pneumatic nailer.
>
Here is a link to a similar case, involving a ramset
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1356&dat=19730410&id=KeUTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bgUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5220,2123430
Florida, 1973.
3" nail was fired through a wall, traveled across the room, hit her in
the chest and exited out her back...after traveling through a 2x4 (deep
width) and then bounced around the room finally coming to a rest.
Another one from 1967,,,,
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/5582/784
Killing of an attacking pit bull dog, using a nail gun.
http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=68664
>
>
>On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>
>
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On 5/25/10 2:03 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:01:30 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>>
>> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>>
>>
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
>> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>>
>> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
>> than a pneumatic nailer.
>>
>
> Here is a link to a similar case, involving a ramset
>
> http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1356&dat=19730410&id=KeUTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bgUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5220,2123430
>
> Florida, 1973.
>
> 3" nail was fired through a wall, traveled across the room, hit her in
> the chest and exited out her back...after traveling through a 2x4 (deep
> width) and then bounced around the room finally coming to a rest.
>
> Another one from 1967,,,,
>
> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/5582/784
>
> Killing of an attacking pit bull dog, using a nail gun.
>
> http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=68664
>
>
NONE of those involve AIR nailers.
They are ALL gunpowder actuated devices, which are essentially handguns
with nails.
We are talking about AIR nailers. Apple to orange.
After reading your last reply to me in which you call me a wanker
buffoonish, and then reading your sig file... well, let's just say, I'm
tripping over the blatant irony.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 11:21 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 5/25/10 2:03 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:01:30 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>>>
>>> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they
>>> must be
>>> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>>>
>>> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
>>> beast
>>> than a pneumatic nailer.
>>>
>>
>> Here is a link to a similar case, involving a ramset
>>
>> http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1356&dat=19730410&id=KeUTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bgUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5220,2123430
>>
>>
>> Florida, 1973.
>>
>> 3" nail was fired through a wall, traveled across the room, hit her in
>> the chest and exited out her back...after traveling through a 2x4 (deep
>> width) and then bounced around the room finally coming to a rest.
>>
>> Another one from 1967,,,,
>>
>> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/5582/784
>>
>> Killing of an attacking pit bull dog, using a nail gun.
>>
>> http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=68664
>>
>>
>
> NONE of those involve AIR nailers.
> They are ALL gunpowder actuated devices, which are essentially handguns
> with nails.
>
> We are talking about AIR nailers. Apple to orange.
>
> After reading your last reply to me in which you call me a wanker
> buffoonish, and then reading your sig file... well, let's just say, I'm
> tripping over the blatant irony.
>
I'll catch my own mistake on the pitbull killing.
Air gun, yes. Fired across the room, no.
Still bullshit.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 12:50 PM, Josepi wrote:
> I would have to invite you up, sign the papers, and stand 100 metres away
> and let me fire a few nails at you. They are too small to see in the air and
> wouldn't cause any damage to the flesh, being so small and wouldn't reach
> you anyway.
>
I would do that, without eye protection. Not only would your aiming
skills have to be better than an marine sniper, but the nail would never
reach me.
In any case and whatever the outcome of this hypothetical experiment, or
this little internet debate... I would always welcome a pint in person.
Cheers! :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Here is the perfect tool for what you are doing. I have used these for 22
years in
carpentry and cabinetmaking:
http://www.cpopowertools.com/products/dw268.html?ref=googaw&kw={keyword}&gcl
id=COC8reW856ECFWI65wodJ0XQIw&keyword=dewaltdw268&sissr=1
woodstuff
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
requires a
| new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
bit,
| or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
deck,
| I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
| recharge them.
|
| So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw
one
| at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
| every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
overtightening, or
| sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
clutch?
On Mon, 24 May 2010 08:17:53 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Not many frame with shingles.
Yeah, itches too much.
>Shingle warranties are usually voided with use of power nailers. Most
>roofers here, use them anyway.
Shingle warranties are useless anyway.
My response to that is in many cases the batteries last longer than the
human.
For indoor flooring double-upping a screw gun made for the job while
standing up is in order. I have done rooms with battery drills and it's
rough on the back, knees and wrists. Due the the inaccuracy of screw
placement the above device is typically not usable.
Use the excuse to get a second battery drill, use both (four batteries) and
wear the old one out. It may be good for the old ni-cad to get a good
cycling too.
"Ignoramus32683" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
retract my comment about cordless drills.
i
On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
> if
> you don't stop on time!).
On May 26, 12:27=A0am, Califbill <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/23/2010 9:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:28:16 -0500, Ignoramus32683
> > <[email protected]> =A0wrote:
>
> >> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> =A0wrote:
>
> >>> "Ignoramus32683"<[email protected]> =A0wrote in mes=
sage
> >>>news:[email protected]...
> >>>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> =A0wrote:
> >>>>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered dri=
ll? =A0I
> >>>>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remembe=
r if
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking =
screws
> >>>>> if
> >>>>> you don't stop on time!).
>
> >>>> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
> >>>> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>
> >>>> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
> >>>> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>
> >>>> i
>
> >>> OK, that makes sense, maybe that's why I bought 2 drills, 6 batteries=
and 4
> >>> chargers. =A0:-) =A0Too bad my energy level doesn't keep up!
>
> >>> Actually I saw DeWalt had a lot of cordless tools available for their=
18V
> >>> XPR and I bought various sets to have all my cordless tools battery a=
nd
> >>> charger compatible, the 2nd xrp drill came in a kit with 2 batteries,=
a
> >>> charger, and an impact driver.
>
> >> Dewalt 18XRP is the drill that I have, I love it and use it a lot. I
> >> have two batteries for it, but for continuous use I get out my electri=
c
> >> drill.
>
> > I have two 18V XRP drills, one a "compact" model (which isn't compact).=
=A0I
> > found one for less than $100 (less than the price of two batteries) on =
the
> > get-it-outta-here table at HomeDespot. =A0I also have the 6-1/2" circul=
ar saw,
> > so six batteries. =A0I don't use the drills often, though. =A0I would m=
uch rather
> > use the 12V Bosch and the Impactor. =A0I'd break them out if I built a =
deck,
> > though. =A0;-)
>
> And the DeWalt battery skilsaw is fantastic when doing the deck. =A0At
> least on Trex. =A0No cord to pull around when you need a little trimming.
> =A0 I used the gear drive Skilsaw for major cutting, but if you needed to
> square an end, reach for the battery saw.
Yeah, the 18V Dewalt circular saw is really handy. Unlike the Makita
9.6V it's useful on far more than clapboards. For heavier work I have
the Dewalt rear swivel circular saw. The rear swivel makes depth and
angle adjustment a snap.
On May 24, 12:48=A0pm, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
wrote:
> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 24, 6:45 am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
> > wrote: > Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > SWMBO wants me to
> > build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a > > new too=
l,
> > right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit, > >=
or
> > to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
> > deck, > > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it
> > takes to > > recharge them. > > > So I'm looking at other options,
> > including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one > > at the Borg this even=
ing
> > for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost > > every cordless dri=
ll
> > has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or > > sinking
> > screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch? > >
> > Despite what others have been saying I have recently bought an air >
> > impact driver. Of course as with any tool you get the quality you pay >
> > for. Although as far as I know there are few really cheep quality air >
> > tools yet. > > For me the advantages are clear > > 1) there are no
> > batteries that will die if not used for a months and any > way in about=
3
> > years. > 2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
>
> > Nonsense. =A0Have you looked at a Bosch Impactor? =A0Any smaller and it=
would
> > be useless.
>
> Of course it it small however it is also low powered. Size for power air
> wins every time.
>
>
>
> > > 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded drive=
r.
>
> > Again, nonsense. =A0How long is a string?
>
> nonsense? Not at all.
Absolute nonsense.
> cables for a corded driver are almost never over 3M however since all my
> air tools have a QR on the tool. Any length (in my case) up to 50M
> without junctions is usable.
More flexible? What drugs are you on? Yes the corded screwdrive is
6' or so, but the cord on an air screwdriver is zero length. You have
to use an extension to use the bloody thing at all!
> > > 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
>
> > More crap.
>
> In your opinion.
I bet several here have drills that are fifty years old. Got an air
nailer that's 50?
> If electric impact drivers were so good then tyre shops and garages
> would use them.
Idiot. This is rec.woodworking.
> With sanders exactly the same is true though they need a high airflow,
> so few non professional workshops have the compressor power to use them
>
>
>
> > > 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
>
> > Only because it needs it.
>
> Which part of the word "eventually" did you miss?
Eventually it will need it. What is so hard about that to understand?
> by the time an air impact can use an overhaul it will have outlasted 2
> or 3 equivelent electric impact drivers
Nonsense.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:12:12 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Maybe the USanians have standardized on Roberts head sizes, since the patent
>timed out?...LOL
I'm certainly not a pro, but I use Phillips, Robertson, and TORX/Star screws,
in about the same numbers (prefer TORX, if I can find them). Bits for all of
them are pretty common, even in the junk stores.
>I don't think the old screws are going to like the chamge of technique
>though.
You don't change the technique, you change the DIRECTION. ;-)
Can you show us where you read I could see a nail at 500 metres?
To tell the trajectory of an object only the initial flight needs to be
observed. Any person, with half a brain, can tell where and how far it will
travel based on normal acceleration and deceleration curves in air.
Resolving power is not the only factor in site. Research some more.
In view of the demonstrated lack of credibility I would have to conclude you
and the other trolls have never used a nail gun at all.
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at
best
wishful thinking.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds
to
about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
It definitely varies from crew to crew.
Many of the newbies are given nailers and the cordless ones are getting
popular. I framed my house with a nailer and barbed nails. that was a
mistake when changes need to be made though. Other jobs I have been in,
almost all the seasoned framers used hammers as the climbing was a pain with
a nailer and the hammer was faster, overall. For sheeting a nailer was used
almost exclusively but not for structural lumber.
"Mike Marlow" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
It's a mix. The hammer still has its place but to say that most pro framers
aren't using nailers is, well... bull. You need to look more closely.
Josepi wrote:
> Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
> hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly
> while hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at
> the next piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb
> and the nials are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set
> into the wood.
>
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:07:15 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5/25/10 1:03 PM, Josepi wrote:
>> The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
>> have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air rifles
>> have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
>>
>> Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
>>
>
>When they start using military air rifles to pound nails on the job
>site, then you can start lecturing me on research.
>
>Keep digging that hole.
Yawn.
<plink>
Time for you to go away.
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
This is when that signature paragraph of yours really demos
"Gunner Asch" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<response to troll snipped>
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:21:31 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5/25/10 2:03 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:01:30 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>>>
>>> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
>>> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>>>
>>> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
>>> than a pneumatic nailer.
>>>
>>
>> Here is a link to a similar case, involving a ramset
>>
>> http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1356&dat=19730410&id=KeUTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bgUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5220,2123430
>>
>> Florida, 1973.
>>
>> 3" nail was fired through a wall, traveled across the room, hit her in
>> the chest and exited out her back...after traveling through a 2x4 (deep
>> width) and then bounced around the room finally coming to a rest.
>>
>> Another one from 1967,,,,
>>
>> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/5582/784
>>
>> Killing of an attacking pit bull dog, using a nail gun.
>>
>> http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=68664
>>
>>
>
>NONE of those involve AIR nailers.
>They are ALL gunpowder actuated devices, which are essentially handguns
>with nails.
>
>We are talking about AIR nailers. Apple to orange.
>
>After reading your last reply to me in which you call me a wanker
>buffoonish, and then reading your sig file... well, let's just say, I'm
>tripping over the blatant irony.
Tradesman Saves Women from Attacking Pit Bull With Nail Gun
A tradesman has killed a pit bull which was savaging two women aged 17
and 43 by shooting it in the head with a nail gun. He and his partner
intervened when the women called for help. When they got there the dog
had torn half the calf off one victim.
His parter hit the dog with a piece of wood until it let go and the
victim was pulled to safety. When the dog refused to be subdued it was
shot. The tradesman says he regrets having to shoot someone's pet but
thinks he made the right call.
"My partner and another woman pinned it up against a brick wall and it
was still trying to eat anything... It wasn't premeditated - it had
finished having a go at her and it was trying to bite everyone... Some
family members thanked us," he said.
Which brand was it?
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:37:55 -0400, Joseph Gwinn
<[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>, Joseph Gwinn
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> > [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
>> >> [email protected].> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>> >>
>> >> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
>> >> can
>> >> see them, however, is certainly not.
>> >>
>> >> > One can
>> >> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>> >> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye
>> >> >at
>> >
>> >> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>> >>
>> >> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500
>> >> meters,
>> >> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you
>> >> measure
>> >> the distance, anyway?
>> >>
>> >> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
>> >> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
>> >> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
>> >
>> >Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22
>> > caliber rifles.
>> >
>> >When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could
>> >easily
>> >see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
>> >sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't
>> >move
>> >too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much
>> >visual
>> >clutter). And young eyes, of course.
>> >
>> >One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and
>> >indistinct
>> >black spot.
>>
>> For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
>> about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
>> and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at
>> best
>> wishful thinking.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
>>
>> Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
>> resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds
>> to about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
>> example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
>
>It's not quite that cut and dried.
>
>One can see things that one cannot resolve. This happens all the time. A
>classic example is an insect in a spotlight beam at night. One sees a bright
>spot one pixel in size, even though the insect is far smaller than a pixel.
>
>One can see subpixel absorbers as well, by the darkening of the pixel containing
>the object. This is one way astronomers detect planets around distant stars.
>
>Joe Gwinn
Father and I used to determine whether it was a clear day or not by
the fact that we could see 1/2" steel guy wires on the fire tower1500
yards away and 250 feet higher. The first 25% of this distance over a
frozen lake may have helped somewhat.
Gerry :-)}
London, Canada
On 5/26/10 2:58 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:07:15 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/10 1:03 PM, Josepi wrote:
>>> The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
>>> have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air rifles
>>> have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
>>>
>>> Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
>>>
>>
>> When they start using military air rifles to pound nails on the job
>> site, then you can start lecturing me on research.
>>
>> Keep digging that hole.
>
>
> Yawn.
>
> <plink>
>
> Time for you to go away.
>
> Gunner
>
I'll ask what grade you're in, again.
What a completely transparent and juvenile response.
Losing the argument? Pretend you're tired of it all and walk away.
Maybe you can stick your fingers in your ears and start singing, too.
Go away, indeed.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/26/10 2:54 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:21:31 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/25/10 2:03 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 May 2010 01:01:30 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
>>>> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
>>>> than a pneumatic nailer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a link to a similar case, involving a ramset
>>>
>>> http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1356&dat=19730410&id=KeUTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bgUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5220,2123430
>>>
>>> Florida, 1973.
>>>
>>> 3" nail was fired through a wall, traveled across the room, hit her in
>>> the chest and exited out her back...after traveling through a 2x4 (deep
>>> width) and then bounced around the room finally coming to a rest.
>>>
>>> Another one from 1967,,,,
>>>
>>> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/pdf_extract/4/5582/784
>>>
>>> Killing of an attacking pit bull dog, using a nail gun.
>>>
>>> http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=68664
>>>
>>>
>>
>> NONE of those involve AIR nailers.
>> They are ALL gunpowder actuated devices, which are essentially handguns
>> with nails.
>>
>> We are talking about AIR nailers. Apple to orange.
>>
>> After reading your last reply to me in which you call me a wanker
>> buffoonish, and then reading your sig file... well, let's just say, I'm
>> tripping over the blatant irony.
>
> Tradesman Saves Women from Attacking Pit Bull With Nail Gun
>
>
> A tradesman has killed a pit bull which was savaging two women aged 17
> and 43 by shooting it in the head with a nail gun. He and his partner
> intervened when the women called for help. When they got there the dog
> had torn half the calf off one victim.
>
> His parter hit the dog with a piece of wood until it let go and the
> victim was pulled to safety. When the dog refused to be subdued it was
> shot. The tradesman says he regrets having to shoot someone's pet but
> thinks he made the right call.
>
> "My partner and another woman pinned it up against a brick wall and it
> was still trying to eat anything... It wasn't premeditated - it had
> finished having a go at her and it was trying to bite everyone... Some
> family members thanked us," he said.
>
>
> Which brand was it?
>
> Gunner
>
Keep reading, I said I caught that.
Did they shoot the dog from 3 meters? Well?
Oh, that's right... you "plink'd" me so you won't read this. Uh-huh,
sure you won't.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/26/10 10:55 AM, Josepi wrote:
> This is when that signature paragraph of yours really demos
>
>
> "Gunner Asch"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> <response to troll snipped>
>
> Gunner
>
Trying to take over the asylum, are you? :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On Sun, 23 May 2010 10:47:22 -0600, Dave Balderstone
<dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, Gunner Asch
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> I agree on all of Iggys points about tools, though some of the newest
>> cordless drills come pretty close to being suitable.
>
>I drove over 2000 screws with a cheap off-brand cordless 14.4 v drill
>when I built my deck.
Good on you lad!
I managed to drive 10 with a brand new one 4 weeks ago.
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:04:10 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/23/10 5:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are the only
>> way to fly.
>>
>
>Not arguing here, but in my experience nails popping out is generally
>due to under-engineering in the manners of: movement caused by too much
>space between joists, and nails too short.
Maybe, but mine were 16" OC. The nails? For me, screws are easier in the long
run.
>I know there are other causes, but I've seen nails pop due to those
>causes.
Screws don't wreck the wood coming out, either.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:52:32 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/23/10 11:44 AM, Dave Balderstone wrote:
>> In article<[email protected]>,
>> Ignoramus16466<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>>
>> I'll have to be careful stepping out the garden door onto my 16 x 12
>> cedar deck that doesn't exist, then.
>>
>> What utter nonsense...
>>
>
>Yeah, I think someone hasn't kept up with technology. :-)
For 15 years?
>I have cheap (what I consider to be disposable) B&D 18volters that would
>do the job just fine. Like another guys posted, all you need is 3
>batteries per drill, which is the minimum for me, anyway.
>
>I never go to a site without a corded electric, as a back-up, but that
>cord is a PITA. And whoever wants to trade an AC cord for an air hose is
>adding bricks to their cart, imo.
Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
On May 22, 11:35=A0pm, Ignoramus16466 <ignoramus16...@NOSPAM.
16466.invalid> wrote:
> ...
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
...
> i
I built these with an old 9.6V Makita:
http://picasaweb.google.com/KB1DAL/Firewood#5287788504883032706
It will barely drive a #10 x 3" screw without predrilling, but it
drills up to 3/8" holes in dry oak nicely, for the lag screws or
Timberlocks. I needed a corded Milwaukee only for the 1/2" lags that
fasten the cross beams onto the oak log posts.
Last year I helped a contractor with a volunteer deck project. He used
an 18V DeWalt to drive the Timberlocks.
jsw
Josepi wrote:
> Apparently you have some miscontrued notions about air powered
> nailguns. Did you think a device that can fire a 3.5 inch nail with
> barbs through 3.5 inches of spruce or pine couldn't hurt your body or
> fire right through your hand?
>
>
> The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
> One can only track them, depending on the sky and background, about
> three to four farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small
> for the human eye at about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>
Well, I'll say this for your eyesight - if you can see or track a 3.5" nail
at nearly 500 meters with the naked eye, you've got some fabulous vision
there. Not to mention quite an air nailer.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
As I stated this varies from crew to crew. Sheeting, follow up, is
typically, always done, with nailguns by the junior apprentice.
Some crews, here, will not allow powered nailguns on the job due to safety
concerns.
No Building Code or Electrical Inspectors, here, will will enter the
buiding if one is in operation. There are many reasons.
I have used both. Guns are faster for me but then I can't drive a 3.1/2"
ardox nail in with one crack like the framers I know...LOL
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I'm sorry, but there's no way on earth a hammer is faster than a nail gun.
I've used both, I'm good at both. Not buying it.
--
-MIKE-
On Sat, 22 May 2010 22:35:34 -0500, Ignoramus16466
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
>You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
Why? I've done it (well, I used a hammer too). A decent cordless drill will
easily sink any screw you're likely to use in a deck. An Impactor will do it
without stripping the heads. ;-) An extra set of batteries makes things
easier, but I did it with two sets of two, with my older 9.6V Makita as the
drill and a 14.4V PC to sink the screws.
>Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
>I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
>used)
>
>If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
>drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
>or gun shaped).
Pete C. wrote:
> Ignoramus16466 wrote:
>>
>> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
>>> requires a new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is
>>> showing its age a bit, or to be more precise, the batteries are
>>> showing their age -- building a deck, I'll definitely drain the
>>> batteries in much less time than it takes to recharge them.
>>>
>>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills
>>> (e.g. saw one at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to
>>> wondering... almost every cordless drill has a multi-position
>>> clutch to prevent overtightening, or sinking screws too deep. Does
>>> anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>>
>> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> Well, you can, but a battery powered impact driver works a lot better.
Agreed. Air tools have their place but building a deck is not necessarily
one of them. I wouldn't use my air drill to build a deck.
--
-Mike-
[email protected]
On May 22, 9:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requir=
es a
> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a =
bit,
> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a =
deck,
> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> recharge them.
>
> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. sa=
w one
> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightenin=
g, or
> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutc=
h?
For that you'd need a pneumatic screw driver, not a drill. Used in
production, mostly. Probably not going to find one on the peg at HF.
I have seen hex chucks with clutches for driving screws using a drill,
might be one of those would do you. One of my favorite pneumatic
drills would probably work pretty well with such a rig, it's a right
angle jobbie and a whole lot smaller than any battery drill. Geared
down, so should have enough torque. If you go that route, get one of
the throttle swivels, good as a variable speed trigger. One of my
favorite tools for working around gas tanks, no sparks.
Stan
On Sun, 23 May 2010 10:47:22 -0600, Dave Balderstone
<dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, Gunner Asch
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> I agree on all of Iggys points about tools, though some of the newest
>> cordless drills come pretty close to being suitable.
>
>I drove over 2000 screws with a cheap off-brand cordless 14.4 v drill
>when I built my deck.
I drove 700 or so in the deck then another 2000 in the floor of my house, with
my 14.4V PC. I did have one of the packs rebuilt ($35) after the 2000.
Had the second lock out disabled ? - Typical production trick.
Mine has to pull the trigger and that is an AND push the nose in.
One or the other won't fire. Those in a hurry disable the double
and have it nose only. Pull trigger and dance the gun. But dancing
is dangerous as you pointed out.
Martin
Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
"Our Republic and the Press will Rise or Fall Together": Joseph Pulitzer
TSRA: Endowed; NRA LOH & Patron Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot's Medal.
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member. http://lufkinced.com/
On 5/24/2010 8:42 PM, Josepi wrote:
> I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
> gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
> with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
> edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
> partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
> screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
> the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
> down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
> sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>
> A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
> person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>
> I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
> power.
>
> Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
> down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
> one step either.
>
>
> "-MIKE-"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
> tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
> hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
> --
> "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
> --Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
>
>
>
On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:34:43 -0400, skeez <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:32:14 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <480455e0-8484-4645-bc6e-bfc52fd4e83a@q13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, allen476 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>On May 22, 11:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>>>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>>>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>>>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>>>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>>>> recharge them.
>>>>
>>>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>>>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>>>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>>>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>>>
>>>We are getting away from what the original question is. I have not
>>>seen an air drill with a clutch only because they wouldn't be of much
>>>use. Air tools are specific in use not like electric which tries to
>>>cover many uses. So hence why they don't have a clutch because there
>>>are air impact drivers and air screwdrivers. I do agree that if air
>>>powered was better that you would see many more contractors using them
>>>(except nailers).
>>>
>>>The question you have to ask yourself, is "Am I going to use it after
>>>the job is done?". If you don't have much other use for it beyond the
>>>scope of the deck, I wouldn't go that route. Then think about
>>>compressor capacity. Is your compressor capable of the scfm needed for
>>>the drill? Since it would be in use for longer durations, you need a
>>>compressor that is at least a 30 gallon or higher and able to deliver
>>>at least 8-9 scfm at 90 psi. Then if your compressor is smaller, it
>>>constantly has to play catch up and then it is running nonstop. It
>>>would be about the same as if you left your table saw running the
>>>entire time you were building the deck. Not very good on the electric
>>>bill.
>>>
>>>I myself would go the cordless impact driver way since you said it is
>>>about 140 square feet. You said that your drill is about 7 years old.
>>>I would look at a drill/impact driver kit and keep your old one for
>>>the times you could use 2 drills. I doubt that you would find an
>>>impact driver kit that you could use the batteries on your old drill.
>>>
>>>I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
>>>torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
>>>
>>>Allen
>>
>>Thanks for the thoughtful response, Allen. I believe that you and a few others
>>have talked me into looking at a new cordless drill instead...
>
>
>Doug,
>depending on location I happen to have some new in box metabo cordless
>drill drivers and electric screw guns. 15.6V for 175.00 18V for200.00
>and electric screw gun 125.00 plus shipping. this is about half price
>for these tools. I found several at a good deal and am passing along
>the savings to fellow woodworkers. They are NOT hot! leave a message
>here if you are interested or e-mail me at fcpreston at nc dot rr dot
>com. I do not sell tools for a living.... :-]
>
>skeez
PS I can e-mail pics and specs. just ask.
skeez
On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:06:36 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/24/10 9:04 PM, Steve Turner wrote:
>>
>> What the heck do you know about rhythm? :-)
>>
>
>Down beat and back beat.... that's about it. :-)
That's the sound of the men working on the chain ga-a-ang
That's the sound of the men working on the chain_gang
All day long they're singin'
(Hooh! aah!) (hooh! aah!)
(Hooh! aah!) (hooh! aah!)
On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws if
> you don't stop on time!).
Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
retract my comment about cordless drills.
i
When your eye is lined up with the trajectory a small object can be tracked
for a long distance. The actual full trajectory path is not required to be
seen for an intelligent person to know where it will go or land. Now that is
a long bullet which uses a lot more powder than a short Hilti gun cap
It's just a trolling argument anyway. Most that have used an air nailer
could think this simple logic out after using one for a few days. If it
wasn't for the poor accuracy a nailgun would work much better than any
pellet gun I have ever seen...yeah you can see pellets for a few hundred
feet too and they are even smaller. We never tried to aim a nailgun, in the
air. We were just worried about farm house windows within the nearest mile
after seeing it the first time...LOL
As an aside: We used to stand behind a corner of a brick wall (too elininate
accidental shootings) and somebody would shot a .22 calibre rifle within
inches past our ears! What a sound !...LOL
Here's one the gun backfired
http://www.breakmobile.com/index/actual-x-ray-of-nail-gun-accident68394.html
"Joseph Gwinn" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:joegwinn-Well,
I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22 caliber
rifles.
When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could
easily
see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't
move
too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much
visual
clutter). And young eyes, of course.
One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and
indistinct
black spot.
Joe Gwinn
In article <[email protected]>, Ignoramus16466 <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
>You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
It's a small deck, only about 140 square feet.
>
>Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
Thanks, that's useful to know.
>
>I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
>used)
>
>If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
>drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
>or gun shaped).
Yeah, that's Plan B -- I have a good one already (Makita 1/2" VSR corded), but
it doesn't have a clutch...
In article <[email protected]>, "Lew Hodgett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>"Doug Miller" wrote:
>
>> Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
>That's one of the reasons pressure regulators exist.
>
>Buy the time you buy a regulator, lubricator, filter package, 100 ft
>of 1/2" hose and quick connect couplings, the cost of a couple of
>batteries starts looking pretty good.
Have all of that already...
"Ignoramus16466" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
> > new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
> > or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
> > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
> > recharge them.
> >
> > So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
> > at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
> > every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
> > sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
The 700 sq-ft deck that I couldn't build with a cordless drill* is still looking
just fine after 9 years now.
Art
* 14.4V PC
"Ignoramus16466" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project
>> requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a
>> bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
>> deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g.
>> saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent
>> overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a
>> clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
> I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
> used)
>
> If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
> drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
> or gun shaped).
>
> i
1. - nonsense RE torque of pneumatic drills - there are more than one type,
some are geared, some are not - the high speed ones don't have a lot of
torque (and at 30,000 RPM, aren't too good as screwdrivers either), but the
ones that are suitably geared down have plenty of torque for drilling in any
wood I've encountered..
2. with a simple T, you can have a pneumatic drill and a pneumatic
screwdriver
3. pneumatic tools don't get hot when they run, that's a real plus if you
are using them a lot
Iggy,
I have at least 8 maybe more air drills and at least that many air screw drivers. Most I have bought surplus from Reliable tools
on eBay. It is very necessary to use the air drill that is correct for the job. There are vast speed differences between them,
some of which have wrist breaking torque. The biggest risk is to use a drill that is too fast for the job and burning up the bit.
In wood, this is not a concern. I really like the air drivers much better than electric.
Steve
"Ignoramus16466" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On 2010-05-23, Doug Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> Air drills do not have the torque. (in my experience).
>
> I do have some compressed air screwdrivers, however. (all name brands,
> used)
>
> If it was up to me, I would use a decent variable speed electric
> drill, but I would love to sell you a pneumatic screwdriver (straight
> or gun shaped).
>
> i
Ideally, with cordless. You can have two chargers, and two batteries
on charge, while you are using the third. It does take a couple
seconds to change batteries, but two on charge (at the edge of the
deck) helps out.
I remember from some where, that some deck screws have a narrow neck
below the heads, and tend to break off easily.
Compressed air drill is worse option than corded drill. The air hose
is more clumsy than a power cord, and the compressor is noisy.
Changing energy from electric, to air, to motion, is more lost power.
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
"RonB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:49165188-0fd1-479a-ba51-65696247143f@o39g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
careful not to bury the screws. The biggest problem was dragging that
^%&%# cord around. The cordless tools have spoiled me and dragging an
air hose around is worse. As I was completing the project, I jumped
on Amazon and ordered a couple more cordless batteries. In my
opinion, updating your cordless capability is a better solution.
RonB
On 5/23/10 11:44 AM, Dave Balderstone wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>,
> Ignoramus16466<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You cannot build a deck with a battery powered drill.
>
> I'll have to be careful stepping out the garden door onto my 16 x 12
> cedar deck that doesn't exist, then.
>
> What utter nonsense...
>
Yeah, I think someone hasn't kept up with technology. :-)
I have cheap (what I consider to be disposable) B&D 18volters that would
do the job just fine. Like another guys posted, all you need is 3
batteries per drill, which is the minimum for me, anyway.
I never go to a site without a corded electric, as a back-up, but that
cord is a PITA. And whoever wants to trade an AC cord for an air hose is
adding bricks to their cart, imo.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Pot, kettle, black.
Best of luck with the new medication
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 5/25/10 1:09 PM, Josepi wrote:
> I bet your mom could lick my dad with both his hands tied behind his back.
>
> One way to avoid losing face is to change the subject and be insulting.
>
You're right, so maybe tell that to that other guy who's doing it.
> Do your research and stop playing know-it-all.
I'm not the guy claiming his air nail gun can shoot a half mile.
> Many have tried to tell you
> the toy nailguns you played with are not a problem.
>
Many? I count you and the other guy who started throwing the ad hominems.
That was all off topic for this thread.
tit for tat?
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Wow. I can't tell if you're kidding or not.
Let's talk about embarrassing.... show me ONE nail gun on that wiki page.
Shall we go back and re-read the entire thread?
The debate is and was always about framing pneumatic nail guns.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail guns are
misfiring all over job sites, causing all kinds of injuring.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail gun fired some
ten feet away and dented a steel toed boot.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail gun can shoot
500 meters.
YOU are the one who keeps trying to change the object of discussion to
completely different devices. What's next, are you going to show me an
air powered cannon?
YOU... I repeat... YOU are the only one who should be worried about
embarrassment, my friend.
--
-MIKE-
On 5/25/10 1:13 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Here, I'll make it less embarrassing for you.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gun
>
I bet your mom could lick my dad with both his hands tied behind his back.
One way to avoid losing face is to change the subject and be insulting.
Do your research and stop playing know-it-all. Many have tried to tell you
the toy nailguns you played with are not a problem.
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Start to lose an argument, insult the other guy.
I bet your dad can beat up my dad, too.
Maybe re-read my posts.... slowly.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Here, I'll make it less embarrassing for you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gun
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 5/25/10 1:03 PM, Josepi wrote:
> The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
> have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air
> rifles
> have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
>
> Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
>
When they start using military air rifles to pound nails on the job
site, then you can start lecturing me on research.
Keep digging that hole.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Sound like it would be the first air nailer you will have seen.
Go for it. Tell us what angle, gauge and brand of nails it says on your nail
boxes.
BYW: I will win the bet I can get a mouthpiece to shoot himself in the
face....LOL
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I swear, I'm going to go rent the newest, most powerful air nailer,
videotape myself firing it from 100ft at the shed or something, just to
shut you up. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 9:52 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I don't know what nailguns these nay sayers have been told about but it
> starts to become clear, with all the statements, they aren't dealing with
> any air powered nailgun I have ever seen and probably not one they have
> ever
> seen either....LOL I doubt any have attended formal framing school lessons
> with those attitudes.
>
> The whole discussion starts to wreak of trollish, actually. These guys
> have
> a reputation in other groups for being bored. Next will come the history
> digging OCD demonstration.
>
Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
than a pneumatic nailer.
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
There's probably a reason you can't find it.
I don't know what nailguns these nay sayers have been told about but it
starts to become clear, with all the statements, they aren't dealing with
any air powered nailgun I have ever seen and probably not one they have ever
seen either....LOL I doubt any have attended formal framing school lessons
with those attitudes.
The whole discussion starts to wreak of trollish, actually. These guys have
a reputation in other groups for being bored. Next will come the history
digging OCD demonstration.
"Gunner Asch" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Something I found interesting, on the nail gun issue. Dont like it?
Tough shit. Deal with it, or kill file me. Your opinion means nothing
to me, given how wrong and utterly buffoonish you appear to be.
Ayup. It happened more than 10 yrs ago, and for that, Id need to be a
paid subscriber to use the various archives.
Oh..excuse me..you ARE the wanker who believes that nail guns are simply
a tiny little man inside the gun, who swings a very small hammer, really
really hard.
Pity about that, eh wot?
Gunner
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>What does that have to do with the discussion?
>
>I stand corrected... it's muuuuuch more common to be shot 30 times in
>the head with a nail gun than hitting one's thumb with a hammer.
I guess the jig was up on the old troll and the "posting style" troll will
now start?
You tried this "posting style" troll in other groups and it didn't get yyou
anything but in everybody's bozobin. Welcome to the 90s.
"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Perhaps if you fixed your quoting so that one could tell what part of
the message was your statement and what part was quoted?
On 5/25/2010 10:46 AM, Josepi wrote:
I didn't refer to any particular incident. Perhaps you were so excited to
prove something wrong you just responded to anybody.
"J. Clarke"<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
The old "bury 'em in bullshit" ploy. 238,000 hits on google indicates
something very infrequent--"moon landing" gets more than 2 million and
that has happened only six times in all of history.
Take out the references to scenes in movies, one incident in which
someone was shot in the head 34 times with one, and "CSI: Miami" and
that 238,000 goes to 54,000.
But it was your assertion that a specific incident occurred and now you
can't show any evidence that it did.
It took me less than a minute to find
<http://preview.tinyurl.com/24gzfsl>, which seems to be the incident you
have in mind. The device was a Ramset intended for sinking nails in
concrete, which uses gunpowder, and which shot the nail completely
through a 2x4. A framing nailer that shot nails completely through
studs wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
beast
than a pneumatic nailer.
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]> wrote:
There's probably a reason you can't find it.
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/24/10 10:56 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:07 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
>>> gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
>>> with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
>>> edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
>>> partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
>>> screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
>>> the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
>>> down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
>>> sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>>>
>>> A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
>>> person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>>>
>>> I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
>>> power.
>>>
>>> Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
>>> down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
>>> one step either.
>>>
>>>
>>> "-MIKE-"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
>>> tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
>>> hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
>>
>>
>> http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1016545/Body-in-marsh-killed-with-nailgun
>>
>
>What does that have to do with the discussion?
>
>I stand corrected... it's muuuuuch more common to be shot 30 times in
>the head with a nail gun than hitting one's thumb with a hammer.
>
>
>> I recall some years ago, a fellow was doing some work at..IRRC a
>> McDonalds..and fired a nailgun into what he thought was a stud in the
>> wall. It unfortunately was only sheetrock, and the nail killed one of
>> the girls working there, some distance away.
>>
>> I cant find it on the net..anyone?
>>
>
>There's probably a reason you can't find it.
If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
than a pneumatic nailer.
On May 25, 10:41=A0am, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/24/10 11:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
>
> > BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. =A0...a little different=
beast
> > than a pneumatic nailer.
>
> If you're talking about the ones that use .22 caliber shells, then yeah,
> basically a hand gun. =A0Apple to orange.
>
ISTR it was bigger than a .22, but yes.
The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air rifles
have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
"-MIKE-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 5/24/10 11:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
> beast
> than a pneumatic nailer.
If you're talking about the ones that use .22 caliber shells, then yeah,
basically a hand gun. Apple to orange.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>
> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
The old "bury 'em in bullshit" ploy. 238,000 hits on google indicates
something very infrequent--"moon landing" gets more than 2 million and
that has happened only six times in all of history.
Take out the references to scenes in movies, one incident in which
someone was shot in the head 34 times with one, and "CSI: Miami" and
that 238,000 goes to 54,000.
But it was your assertion that a specific incident occurred and now you
can't show any evidence that it did.
It took me less than a minute to find
<http://preview.tinyurl.com/24gzfsl>, which seems to be the incident you
have in mind. The device was a Ramset intended for sinking nails in
concrete, which uses gunpowder, and which shot the nail completely
through a 2x4. A framing nailer that shot nails completely through
studs wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>
> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
> than a pneumatic nailer.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]> wrote:
> There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>
>
>
On 5/25/2010 10:46 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I didn't refer to any particular incident. Perhaps you were so excited to
> prove something wrong you just responded to anybody.
Perhaps if you fixed your quoting so that one could tell what part of
the message was your statement and what part was quoted?
> "J. Clarke"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
>> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>>
>> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>
> The old "bury 'em in bullshit" ploy. 238,000 hits on google indicates
> something very infrequent--"moon landing" gets more than 2 million and
> that has happened only six times in all of history.
>
> Take out the references to scenes in movies, one incident in which
> someone was shot in the head 34 times with one, and "CSI: Miami" and
> that 238,000 goes to 54,000.
>
> But it was your assertion that a specific incident occurred and now you
> can't show any evidence that it did.
>
> It took me less than a minute to find
> <http://preview.tinyurl.com/24gzfsl>, which seems to be the incident you
> have in mind. The device was a Ramset intended for sinking nails in
> concrete, which uses gunpowder, and which shot the nail completely
> through a 2x4. A framing nailer that shot nails completely through
> studs wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
>
>
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
>> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>>
>> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
>> beast
>> than a pneumatic nailer.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]> wrote:
>> There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
On 5/24/10 11:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different beast
> than a pneumatic nailer.
If you're talking about the ones that use .22 caliber shells, then yeah,
basically a hand gun. Apple to orange.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 12:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>
> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>
Yeah, because a guy being shot, point blank, 30 times in the head is
such a common construction accident.
wow. this is pointless
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 1:43 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]>
>>> http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1016545/Body-in-marsh-killed-with-nailgun
>>>
>>
>> What does that have to do with the discussion?
>>
>> I stand corrected... it's muuuuuch more common to be shot 30 times in
>> the head with a nail gun than hitting one's thumb with a hammer.
>
> Something I found interesting, on the nail gun issue. Dont like it?
> Tough shit. Deal with it, or kill file me. Your opinion means nothing
> to me, given how wrong and utterly buffoonish you appear to be.
>
>>
>>> I recall some years ago, a fellow was doing some work at..IRRC a
>>> McDonalds..and fired a nailgun into what he thought was a stud in the
>>> wall. It unfortunately was only sheetrock, and the nail killed one of
>>> the girls working there, some distance away.
>>>
>>> I cant find it on the net..anyone?
>>>
>>
>> There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>
> Ayup. It happened more than 10 yrs ago, and for that, Id need to be a
> paid subscriber to use the various archives.
>
> Oh..excuse me..you ARE the wanker who believes that nail guns are simply
> a tiny little man inside the gun, who swings a very small hammer, really
> really hard.
>
> Pity about that, eh wot?
>
> Gunner
>
Start to lose an argument, insult the other guy.
I bet your dad can beat up my dad, too.
Maybe re-read my posts.... slowly.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 3:27 AM, J. Clarke wrote:
> On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
>> A framing nailer that shot nails completely through studs
> wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
>
<SNORT!> coffee through nose.
Thanks, J. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 9:52 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I don't know what nailguns these nay sayers have been told about but it
> starts to become clear, with all the statements, they aren't dealing with
> any air powered nailgun I have ever seen and probably not one they have ever
> seen either....LOL I doubt any have attended formal framing school lessons
> with those attitudes.
>
> The whole discussion starts to wreak of trollish, actually. These guys have
> a reputation in other groups for being bored. Next will come the history
> digging OCD demonstration.
>
I swear, I'm going to go rent the newest, most powerful air nailer,
videotape myself firing it from 100ft at the shed or something, just to
shut you up. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 1:03 PM, Josepi wrote:
> The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
> have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air rifles
> have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
>
> Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
>
When they start using military air rifles to pound nails on the job
site, then you can start lecturing me on research.
Keep digging that hole.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/2010 11:35 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I guess the jig was up on the old troll and the "posting style" troll will
> now start?
>
> You tried this "posting style" troll in other groups and it didn't get yyou
> anything but in everybody's bozobin. Welcome to the 90s.
<plonk>
>
>
>
> "J. Clarke"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> Perhaps if you fixed your quoting so that one could tell what part of
> the message was your statement and what part was quoted?
>
>
>
> On 5/25/2010 10:46 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I didn't refer to any particular incident. Perhaps you were so excited to
> prove something wrong you just responded to anybody.
>
>
>
> "J. Clarke"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> The old "bury 'em in bullshit" ploy. 238,000 hits on google indicates
> something very infrequent--"moon landing" gets more than 2 million and
> that has happened only six times in all of history.
>
> Take out the references to scenes in movies, one incident in which
> someone was shot in the head 34 times with one, and "CSI: Miami" and
> that 238,000 goes to 54,000.
>
> But it was your assertion that a specific incident occurred and now you
> can't show any evidence that it did.
>
> It took me less than a minute to find
> <http://preview.tinyurl.com/24gzfsl>, which seems to be the incident you
> have in mind. The device was a Ramset intended for sinking nails in
> concrete, which uses gunpowder, and which shot the nail completely
> through a 2x4. A framing nailer that shot nails completely through
> studs wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
>
>
>
>
> On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>
> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
> beast
> than a pneumatic nailer.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]> wrote:
> There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>
>
>
>
>
On 5/25/10 1:09 PM, Josepi wrote:
> I bet your mom could lick my dad with both his hands tied behind his back.
>
> One way to avoid losing face is to change the subject and be insulting.
>
You're right, so maybe tell that to that other guy who's doing it.
> Do your research and stop playing know-it-all.
I'm not the guy claiming his air nail gun can shoot a half mile.
> Many have tried to tell you
> the toy nailguns you played with are not a problem.
>
Many? I count you and the other guy who started throwing the ad hominems.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 1:13 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Here, I'll make it less embarrassing for you.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_gun
>
Wow. I can't tell if you're kidding or not.
Let's talk about embarrassing.... show me ONE nail gun on that wiki page.
Shall we go back and re-read the entire thread?
The debate is and was always about framing pneumatic nail guns.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail guns are
misfiring all over job sites, causing all kinds of injuring.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail gun fired some
ten feet away and dented a steel toed boot.
YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail gun can shoot
500 meters.
YOU are the one who keeps trying to change the object of discussion to
completely different devices. What's next, are you going to show me an
air powered cannon?
YOU... I repeat... YOU are the only one who should be worried about
embarrassment, my friend.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
In article <[email protected]>, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>YOU are the one who claimed that framing pneumatic nail gun can shoot
>500 meters.
You forgot to mention that he also claims he can see the nail at that
distance. <snort>
>
>YOU... I repeat... YOU are the only one who should be worried about
>embarrassment, my friend.
Indeed.
On 5/25/10 2:29 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Works every time!
>
What grade are you in? :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 2:32 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Pot, kettle, black.
>
Show me where I threw an ad hominem, before you and your country mate did.
In any case, it's obvious you're sneaking out the back door of this
debate.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/2010 2:07 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 5/25/10 1:03 PM, Josepi wrote:
>> The .22 calibre short charge Hilti gun example is moot. Many air rifles
>> have higher muzzle velocities than powder charged firearms. Many air
>> rifles
>> have been used in the miltary due to more power and other reasons.
>>
>> Time to do your research, again, or the first time.
>>
>
> When they start using military air rifles to pound nails on the job
> site, then you can start lecturing me on research.
>
> Keep digging that hole.
For a while in the 1700s and 1800s pneumatic weapons were tried by
various militaries and found to have some advantage over muzzle-loading
black powder firearms..
It's true that there is some overlap at the very low end of the
performance spectrum for firearms and the very high end for airguns,
however I know of no military that would go to war armed with CB caps.
And a nailgun with its hundred PSI or so and few inches of stroke is not
going to come anywhere near the velocity of a precharged pneumatic air
rifle with its 3000 PSI reservior and 20 or so inch barrel.
Works every time!
"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<plonk>
On 5/25/2010 11:35 AM, Josepi wrote:
> I guess the jig was up on the old troll and the "posting style" troll will
> now start?
>
> You tried this "posting style" troll in other groups and it didn't get
> yyou
> anything but in everybody's bozobin. Welcome to the 90s.
I didn't refer to any particular incident. Perhaps you were so excited to
prove something wrong you just responded to anybody.
"J. Clarke" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On 5/25/2010 1:01 AM, Josepi wrote:
> Here is 238,000 occurances to look through.
>
> http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=nail+gun+death&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=f&oq=&gs_rfai=
The old "bury 'em in bullshit" ploy. 238,000 hits on google indicates
something very infrequent--"moon landing" gets more than 2 million and
that has happened only six times in all of history.
Take out the references to scenes in movies, one incident in which
someone was shot in the head 34 times with one, and "CSI: Miami" and
that 238,000 goes to 54,000.
But it was your assertion that a specific incident occurred and now you
can't show any evidence that it did.
It took me less than a minute to find
<http://preview.tinyurl.com/24gzfsl>, which seems to be the incident you
have in mind. The device was a Ramset intended for sinking nails in
concrete, which uses gunpowder, and which shot the nail completely
through a 2x4. A framing nailer that shot nails completely through
studs wouldn't be very useful now, would it?
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> If the guy, from a few weeks ago, can paint with a nail gun, they must be
> dangerous projectiles. Video doesn't lie. You saw it! ;-)
>
> BTW, I think the case in question was a Hilti. ...a little different
> beast
> than a pneumatic nailer.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE-<[email protected]> wrote:
> There's probably a reason you can't find it.
>
>
>
On Mon, 24 May 2010 23:07:24 -0500, -MIKE- <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5/24/10 10:56 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:07 -0400, "Josepi"<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
>>> gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
>>> with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
>>> edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
>>> partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
>>> screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
>>> the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
>>> down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
>>> sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>>>
>>> A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
>>> person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>>>
>>> I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
>>> power.
>>>
>>> Anyway...our inspectors won't even enter a site until all nailguns are put
>>> down on the floor. Of coure the Electrical Inspector won't climb a ladder
>>> one step either.
>>>
>>>
>>> "-MIKE-"<[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>> I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
>>> tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
>>> hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
>>
>>
>> http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1016545/Body-in-marsh-killed-with-nailgun
>>
>
>What does that have to do with the discussion?
>
>I stand corrected... it's muuuuuch more common to be shot 30 times in
>the head with a nail gun than hitting one's thumb with a hammer.
Something I found interesting, on the nail gun issue. Dont like it?
Tough shit. Deal with it, or kill file me. Your opinion means nothing
to me, given how wrong and utterly buffoonish you appear to be.
>
>
>> I recall some years ago, a fellow was doing some work at..IRRC a
>> McDonalds..and fired a nailgun into what he thought was a stud in the
>> wall. It unfortunately was only sheetrock, and the nail killed one of
>> the girls working there, some distance away.
>>
>> I cant find it on the net..anyone?
>>
>
>There's probably a reason you can't find it.
Ayup. It happened more than 10 yrs ago, and for that, Id need to be a
paid subscriber to use the various archives.
Oh..excuse me..you ARE the wanker who believes that nail guns are simply
a tiny little man inside the gun, who swings a very small hammer, really
really hard.
Pity about that, eh wot?
Gunner
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On 5/23/10 3:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> adding bricks to their cart, imo.
>
> Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
Who swings a hammer? :-)
A gas framing nailer is faster, lighter, and more convenient than any of
those.
FWIW, last deck I did, I was much faster laying down the decking with my
22 oz Estwing and galvanized spirals than with a drill and screws.
I can definitely see where I could be faster with one of those screw
self-feeders with the long extension and the depth stop driver. But I'm
one of those "one tap to set, 2-3 swings to drive it home" hammer guys,
so I can get a pretty fast rhythm going.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/10 3:06 PM, Ignoramus32683 wrote:
> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws if
>> you don't stop on time!).
>
> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>
> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>
> i
The newer ones last pretty long.
I'm guessing cheap my 18v Ni-Cad B&D's last about 3X as long as my old
12v Dewalts did. The new Lithium Ions probably double that.
But like we've been saying, three batteries and a quick-charger makes it
a moot point.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/2010 1:24 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Do you think the batteries will be good enough when you resurrect those old
> drills to get those screws out again?
If they aren't I'm sure that Makita will be happy to sell him a
replacement set, or he can get the old ones rebuilt.
> LOL
> "WW"<[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> I used 2 Makita battery drills. One 9.6 volt and one 12 volt. Used one for
> pilot holes and other to set screws. 700 square foot deck with railings and
> is 12 feet above ground. 3500 deck screws. 2 batteries for each drill. This
> was done 10 years ago. Did not know about stainless deck screws at that time
> ( or if they were available) Going to replace all now with SS screws as the
> origanal ones have rusted. Composite deck material. Will cost about $300 for
> screws. WW
>
>
>
On 5/23/10 5:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are the only
> way to fly.
>
Not arguing here, but in my experience nails popping out is generally
due to under-engineering in the manners of: movement caused by too much
space between joists, and nails too short.
I know there are other causes, but I've seen nails pop due to those
causes.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/10 6:09 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
> hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly while
> hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at the next
> piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb and the nials
> are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set into the wood.
>
I'm not buying anything you wrote in this post.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/10 9:10 PM, Josepi wrote:
> It definitely varies from crew to crew.
>
> Many of the newbies are given nailers and the cordless ones are getting
> popular. I framed my house with a nailer and barbed nails. that was a
> mistake when changes need to be made though. Other jobs I have been in,
> almost all the seasoned framers used hammers as the climbing was a pain with
> a nailer and the hammer was faster, overall. For sheeting a nailer was used
> almost exclusively but not for structural lumber.
>
I'm sorry, but there's no way on earth a hammer is faster than a nail gun.
I've used both, I'm good at both. Not buying it.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
In article <155dd0cc-1e31-4cc1-8909-aa7c1ce8cd20@q33g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On May 24, 6:45=A0am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
>>
>> 1) there are no batteries that will die if not used for a months and any
>> way in about 3 years.
My Bosch drill is at least 7 years old, still on the original batteries. They
no longer hold a charge as long as they did when they were new, but they're
not dead yet either by any means. It's just in the last year that they've
reached the point where I can deplete one battery in less time than it takes
to recharge the spare.
[...]
>> 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
>
>Again, nonsense. How long is a string?
Agreed, that *is* nonsense. Electrical cords are *far* more flexible than any
air hose I've ever seen. As for length... Jerome, have you ever heard of an
extension cord?
RonB wrote:
>> Well, you can, but a battery powered impact driver works a lot better.
Yes, I just bought an impact driver and that would be my tool of choice.
It takes a lot less juice to pound in a screw than with traditional
drivers, so the batteries should last a good bit longer. No need to
pre-drill either as far as power goes, but I probably still would to
minimize splitting.
> Good point I missed in my previous post because I was using a drill
> and driver for the the deck I just finished. You have to be careful
> not to bury the screw, but my impact driver is actually easier to
> control than either my corded or battery drill motors, and is less
> likely to twist your wrist as you get fatigued. It runs quite a while
> on a charge too.
I haven't used mine yet other than to "test" it out and what really
amazed me is I used it on some old, large slotted screws that I had
laying around. I tossed most slotted screws I had because power drivers
don't work well with them, but these were fairly large, so I kept them.
The damned impact driver drove them in with no problem, no cam out
like always happens with slotted screws...
I also have an air screw driver that will twist your arm off if you let
it, but it is too slow for deck use. It was my favorite screw driver for
years, but with the nice small and compact cordless thing-ees of today,
the air driver lives in the bottom drawer...
--
Jack
Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
http://jbstein.com
On 5/24/10 6:45 AM, Jerome Meekings wrote:
>
> For me the advantages are clear
>
At least you added, "for me." :-)
> 1) there are no batteries that will die if not used for a months and any
> way in about 3 years.
Plus, that compressor is a lot more portable than those little battery
packs.
> 2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
Not true. The new ones are pretty small.
> 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
Really? Do you use yours when it's full of air? I have a 100'
extension cord that is waaaaay easier to use than a 100' air hose under
pressure. Of course, we're talking extension cords/hoses, which are
needed for both.
> 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
Again, really? I have a 20 year old hammer drill that's still cranking
it out. It was even half submerged in water overnight.
> 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
>
I'll give you that. Some rings and seals and you're good as new.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/24/10 7:12 AM, Josepi wrote:
> As I stated this varies from crew to crew. Sheeting, follow up, is
> typically, always done, with nailguns by the junior apprentice.
>
> Some crews, here, will not allow powered nailguns on the job due to safety
> concerns.
>
I guess I can't say what goes on in the UK, but if there were stats on
tool injuries, I'm guessing there would be more broken thumbs from
hammers than busted kneecaps from air nailers misfiring.
> No Building Code or Electrical Inspectors, here, will will enter the
> buiding if one is in operation. There are many reasons.
>
Again, I'd love to see these reasons. Those things are very powerful at
the tip. But the most damage you'll get from one being fired through
the air is a bit of a scratch, maybe a drop or two of blood. I suppose
you'd hurt your eye... but then again, I've been hit by more nails
ricocheting from bad hammer hits than anything else.
You can't shoot a guy full of holes, from across the room, like you see
in the movies.
> I have used both. Guns are faster for me but then I can't drive a 3.1/2"
> ardox nail in with one crack like the framers I know...LOL
>
Guns are faster for anyone.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/24/10 8:59 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> On May 24, 6:45 am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
> wrote:
>> 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
>
> Only because it needs it.
D'oh! Wish I'd thought of that. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
In article <480455e0-8484-4645-bc6e-bfc52fd4e83a@q13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>, allen476 <[email protected]> wrote:
>On May 22, 11:26=A0pm, [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>> SWMBO wants me to build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a
>> new tool, right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,
>> or to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a deck,
>> I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it takes to
>> recharge them.
>>
>> So I'm looking at other options, including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one
>> at the Borg this evening for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost
>> every cordless drill has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or
>> sinking screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?
>
>We are getting away from what the original question is. I have not
>seen an air drill with a clutch only because they wouldn't be of much
>use. Air tools are specific in use not like electric which tries to
>cover many uses. So hence why they don't have a clutch because there
>are air impact drivers and air screwdrivers. I do agree that if air
>powered was better that you would see many more contractors using them
>(except nailers).
>
>The question you have to ask yourself, is "Am I going to use it after
>the job is done?". If you don't have much other use for it beyond the
>scope of the deck, I wouldn't go that route. Then think about
>compressor capacity. Is your compressor capable of the scfm needed for
>the drill? Since it would be in use for longer durations, you need a
>compressor that is at least a 30 gallon or higher and able to deliver
>at least 8-9 scfm at 90 psi. Then if your compressor is smaller, it
>constantly has to play catch up and then it is running nonstop. It
>would be about the same as if you left your table saw running the
>entire time you were building the deck. Not very good on the electric
>bill.
>
>I myself would go the cordless impact driver way since you said it is
>about 140 square feet. You said that your drill is about 7 years old.
>I would look at a drill/impact driver kit and keep your old one for
>the times you could use 2 drills. I doubt that you would find an
>impact driver kit that you could use the batteries on your old drill.
>
>I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
>torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
>
>Allen
Thanks for the thoughtful response, Allen. I believe that you and a few others
have talked me into looking at a new cordless drill instead...
In article <[email protected]>, skeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>Doug,
>depending on location I happen to have some new in box metabo cordless
>drill drivers and electric screw guns. 15.6V for 175.00 18V for200.00
>and electric screw gun 125.00 plus shipping. this is about half price
>for these tools. I found several at a good deal and am passing along
>the savings to fellow woodworkers. They are NOT hot! leave a message
>here if you are interested or e-mail me at fcpreston at nc dot rr dot
>com. I do not sell tools for a living.... :-]
>
>skeez
Thanks for the offer, skeez -- and BTW, coming from you, it never even
occurred to me to wonder if they were hot -- but I think I'll see how I get
along with the aging Bosch and the nearly-new Ryobi that I'm sure I can borrow
from my Dad; I forgot he had one. And I should have remembered that: I gave it
to him for Christmas.
On 5/24/10 12:48 PM, Jerome Meekings wrote:
> If electric impact drivers were so good then tyre shops and garages
> would use them.
>
Apple and oranges.
And if I have to explain it, then it's not worth explaining. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/24/2010 1:48 PM, Jerome Meekings wrote:
> [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 6:45 am, [email protected] (Jerome Meekings)
>> wrote:> Doug Miller<[email protected]> wrote:> > SWMBO wants me to
>> build a small deck. Of course, every new project requires a> > new tool,
>> right? And my trusty Bosch cordless drill is showing its age a bit,> > or
>> to be more precise, the batteries are showing their age -- building a
>> deck,> > I'll definitely drain the batteries in much less time than it
>> takes to> > recharge them.> > > So I'm looking at other options,
>> including compressed air drills (e.g. saw one> > at the Borg this evening
>> for $45 or so). But I got to wondering... almost> > every cordless drill
>> has a multi-position clutch to prevent overtightening, or> > sinking
>> screws too deep. Does anybody make an air drill with such a clutch?> >
>> Despite what others have been saying I have recently bought an air>
>> impact driver. Of course as with any tool you get the quality you pay>
>> for. Although as far as I know there are few really cheep quality air>
>> tools yet.> > For me the advantages are clear> > 1) there are no
>> batteries that will die if not used for a months and any> way in about 3
>> years.> 2) Smaller than any battery impact driver.
>>
>> Nonsense. Have you looked at a Bosch Impactor? Any smaller and it would
>> be useless.
>
> Of course it it small however it is also low powered. Size for power air
> wins every time.
So you're saying that an air impact driver with a power level
appropriate to driving deck screws is necessarily too small to be
usable? Because that's what it sounds like.
>>> 3) The air hose is far more flexible and longer than any corded driver.
>>
>> Again, nonsense. How long is a string?
>>
>
> nonsense? Not at all.
>
> cables for a corded driver are almost never over 3M however since all my
> air tools have a QR on the tool. Any length (in my case) up to 50M
> without junctions is usable.
Don't they have extension cords in your universe?
>>> 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
>>
>> More crap.
>
> In your opinion.
>
> If electric impact drivers were so good then tyre shops and garages
> would use them.
Tyre shops and garages have to remove stuck or rusted on fasteners, not
drive deck screws.
Try driving deck screws with one of the impact wrenches that a garage
uses and get back to us on how you make out.
> With sanders exactly the same is true though they need a high airflow,
> so few non professional workshops have the compressor power to use them
>
>>
>>> 5) Over haul when eventually needed is it is easy and fast
>>
>> Only because it needs it.
>
> Which part of the word "eventually" did you miss?
>
> by the time an air impact can use an overhaul it will have outlasted 2
> or 3 equivelent electric impact drivers
By the time my electric impact driver wears out in the use I give it my
grandchildren will have inherited it.
You seem to have some kind of religious devotion to pneumatic tools.
If you can find a pneumatic tool purpose-designed for driving wood
screws please do provide a link to it.
On 5/24/10 6:22 PM, Larry W wrote:
> Just to add my $.02 worth, try to run an impact wrench or pneumatic drill
> for more than a minute or 2 with the typical portable compressor used by
> carpenters or in a woodshop.
>
Awwww, c'mon Larry, any carpenter who knows what he's doing keeps an 80
gallon compressor in the bed of his pick-up, silly.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/2010 3:53 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 5/23/10 3:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> adding bricks to their cart, imo.
>>
>> Dragging an air hose beats swinging a hammer, though.
>
> Who swings a hammer? :-)
> A gas framing nailer is faster, lighter, and more convenient than any of
> those.
>
> FWIW, last deck I did, I was much faster laying down the decking with my
> 22 oz Estwing and galvanized spirals than with a drill and screws.
>
> I can definitely see where I could be faster with one of those screw
> self-feeders with the long extension and the depth stop driver. But I'm
> one of those "one tap to set, 2-3 swings to drive it home" hammer guys,
> so I can get a pretty fast rhythm going.
What the heck do you know about rhythm? :-)
--
"Even if your wife is happy but you're unhappy, you're still happier
than you'd be if you were happy and your wife was unhappy." - Red Green
To reply, eat the taco.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/
On 5/24/10 8:42 PM, Josepi wrote:
> I was doing a section of a walkout basement wall (pony), laying on the
> gravel inside of an fresh poured foundation. I raised the stud up a bit
> with a spare 2x4 to nail a plate on. The gun must have caught the bottom
> edge of the plate and enabled firing the nail. When I pulled the trigger my
> partner, holding the other ned plate on a 10' ceiling wall, jumped and
> screamed and was shot in the foot. I thought it was a joke but on removal of
> the safety-toed workboot, was a bruise just above the toe cap and a bent
> down toe cap, This nail went between both plates and the gravel they were
> sitting, almost ten feet and damaged the boot at the other end.
>
Maybe it's lost in translation, but are you saying you were 10 feet (3m)
away and it dented a steel toed boot? I don't believe that for a second.
> A busted thumb is nothing compared to the nail I have seen stuck in a
> person's breastbones and one through a guy's hand..yummm...LOL
>
Did I say there were no injuries due to nail guns?
I was referring to quantity, not quality.
> I have shot things with them over half a km away. They definitely pack some
> power.
>
Again, I just want to make sure.
Is that one half a kilometer? 500 meters?
That's over 1/4 mile... 1600 feet.
If that's not a typo and you honestly are trying to tell me that you
have shot a pneumatic nail gun 500 meters, then you are..... well I
don't know what the British phrase is for "full of sh!t." I believe the
term Bullocks! comes to mind.
I honestly hope that's a typo, otherwise it pretty much discredits
everything you've written in this thread.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/24/10 9:04 PM, Steve Turner wrote:
>
> What the heck do you know about rhythm? :-)
>
Down beat and back beat.... that's about it. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/23/2010 10:04 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
> On 5/23/10 5:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are
>> the only
>> way to fly.
>>
>
> Not arguing here, but in my experience nails popping out is generally
> due to under-engineering in the manners of: movement caused by too much
> space between joists, and nails too short.
>
> I know there are other causes, but I've seen nails pop due to those causes.
Driving nails at creative angles can do wonders towards preventing them from
popping out.
--
Free bad advice available here.
To reply, eat the taco.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/
On 5/24/10 9:09 PM, Steve Turner wrote:
> On 5/23/2010 10:04 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
>> On 5/23/10 5:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> Sure, but I've seen even ring-shank nails pop. Stainless screws are
>>> the only
>>> way to fly.
>>>
>>
>> Not arguing here, but in my experience nails popping out is generally
>> due to under-engineering in the manners of: movement caused by too much
>> space between joists, and nails too short.
>>
>> I know there are other causes, but I've seen nails pop due to those
>> causes.
>
> Driving nails at creative angles can do wonders towards preventing them
> from popping out.
>
I was taught to drive opposing nails at a "V" which does wonders to
increase holding power. (tangent)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
Jerome Meekings wrote:
>> I have an air drill, It is nice for drilling wood because of the low
>> torque and high rpm, but I would not try to drive screws with it.
I have lots of air tools but don't like them much for wood because they
need oil, and I always end up with oil on my hands, and oil and wood
don't mix. My sanders use a ton of air and a big compressor
I like air for painting and blowing off dust mostly.
Speaking of which, I found a new use for air. When cleaning paint
nozzles from little cans of paint, you are supposed to turn the can
upside down and spray until clear air comes out. Well, I have a blowgun
with a rubber tip that I discovered you can insert the paint can spray
nozzle and blow air through the nozzle. Works really well, including on
clogged nozzles if you soak them in lacquer thinner a bit.
--
Jack
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream
media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a turd by the clean end."
http://jbstein.com
In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
[email protected].> wrote:
>The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you can
see them, however, is certainly not.
> One can
>only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
>about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500 meters,
then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you measure
the distance, anyway?
The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
On 5/24/10 11:41 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Apparently you have some miscontrued notions about air powered nailguns. Did
> you think a device that can fire a 3.5 inch nail with barbs through 3.5
> inches of spruce or pine couldn't hurt your body or fire right through your
> hand?
>
Show me where I wrote that?
>
> The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky. One can
> only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
> farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
> about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
Bullshit. You're caught in a massive exaggeration and you're trying to
save face.
> Perhaps you are thinking staple guns are framing nailers. Perhap you are you
> just trolling or actually never used a compressed air nailgun? You know
> Paslode, Hatachi, or other **FRAMING** nailgun. Newer styles are doing
> multiple impacts to eliminate some of these nasties. Pretty hard to believe
> you have ever used one.
>
I've used plenty of framing nailers, air and gas. And I've held back the
saftly tip and fired away. Best they'll do is about 50 yards and that's
probably a liberal estimate. Air nailers are about force over a short
distance, not velocity.
Even a nail shot from a powder actuated nailer, which is basically a .22
cal handgun, isn't going to travel 1/4 mile, simply due to the fact that
it'll tumble through the air and lose momentum.
For sake of argument, put a barrel with rifling on a framing air nailer,
stick a bullet (not a whole shell) in it and fire, so that you have a
spinning, aerodynamic object flying out.... and it's not going much
farther.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/25/10 7:22 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
> Josepi wrote:
> Well, I'll say this for your eyesight - if you can see or track a 3.5" nail
> at nearly 500 meters with the naked eye, you've got some fabulous vision
> there. Not to mention quite an air nailer.
>
He can't because it fell to the ground after a hundred feet. :-)
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
In article <[email protected]>, Joseph Gwinn <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>
>> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
>> [email protected].> wrote:
>>
>> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>>
>> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
>> can
>> see them, however, is certainly not.
>>
>> > One can
>> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
>
>> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>>
>> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500 meters,
>> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you measure
>> the distance, anyway?
>>
>> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
>> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
>> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
>
>Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22
> caliber rifles.
>
>When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could easily
>see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
>sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't move
>too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much visual
>clutter). And young eyes, of course.
>
>One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and indistinct
>black spot.
For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at best
wishful thinking.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds to
about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
On 5/26/10 7:20 PM, Josepi wrote:
> When your eye is lined up with the trajectory a small object can be tracked
> for a long distance. The actual full trajectory path is not required to be
> seen for an intelligent person to know where it will go or land. Now that is
> a long bullet which uses a lot more powder than a short Hilti gun cap
>
> It's just a trolling argument anyway. Most that have used an air nailer
> could think this simple logic out after using one for a few days. If it
> wasn't for the poor accuracy a nailgun would work much better than any
> pellet gun I have ever seen...yeah you can see pellets for a few hundred
> feet too and they are even smaller.
Someone else in this thread tried to explain to you (not that you would
listen) that a nail gun is in the neighborhood of 100psi and a pellet
gun runs well past 10 times that.
They also tried to explain about how the barrel allows allow the
expanding gas to accelerate the projectile, and the piston of a nail gun
has a limited travel and allows no acceleration.
Even if you were to fire a 12-16 penny nail out of a pellet gun, it
would probably only travel 1/3 the distance of a pellet due to its
tumbling through the air causing rapid deceleration from the friction
against the air.
Yet, you continue to elude to them as valid comparisons. Trying to
support your mythical claim of an air nailer shooting a nail 1/4 mile by
using facts associated with pneumatic pellet guns is embarrassingly absurd.
That's like claiming your lawn mower can run the quarter mile in four
seconds
because a Porche, which also has an internal combustion engine, can do it.
> We never tried to aim a nailgun, in the
> air. We were just worried about farm house windows within the nearest mile
> after seeing it the first time...LOL
>
No need to worry.
>
> Here's one the gun backfired
> http://www.breakmobile.com/index/actual-x-ray-of-nail-gun-accident68394.html
>
It doesn't matter how many google searches you do looking for evidence
to support fish tail, you're not going to find it.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/26/2010 11:37 PM, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> In article<[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>
>> In article<[email protected]>, Joseph Gwinn
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> In article<[email protected]>,
>>> [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article<HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi"<X-Complaints-to:
>>>> [email protected].> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>>>>
>>>> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
>>>> can
>>>> see them, however, is certainly not.
>>>>
>>>>> One can
>>>>> only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
>>>>> farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye
>>>>> at
>>>
>>>>> about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>>>>
>>>> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500
>>>> meters,
>>>> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you
>>>> measure
>>>> the distance, anyway?
>>>>
>>>> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
>>>> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
>>>> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
>>>
>>> Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22
>>> caliber rifles.
>>>
>>> When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could
>>> easily
>>> see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
>>> sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't
>>> move
>>> too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much
>>> visual
>>> clutter). And young eyes, of course.
>>>
>>> One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and
>>> indistinct
>>> black spot.
>>
>> For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
>> about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
>> and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at
>> best
>> wishful thinking.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
>>
>> Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
>> resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds
>> to about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
>> example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
>
> It's not quite that cut and dried.
>
> One can see things that one cannot resolve. This happens all the time. A
> classic example is an insect in a spotlight beam at night. One sees a bright
> spot one pixel in size, even though the insect is far smaller than a pixel.
>
> One can see subpixel absorbers as well, by the darkening of the pixel containing
> the object. This is one way astronomers detect planets around distant stars.
Most of us can see stars, which are from the viewpoint of human vision
point sources--it wasn't until recently that any telescope in the world
could resolve one beyond that. Resolving power is only an issue for
separating two things close together, not for seeing an object with high
contrast.
>
> Joe Gwinn
In article <[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to: [email protected].> wrote:
>Can you show us where you read I could see a nail at 500 metres?
Yes, I can -- or, more precisely, where you claimed you could see a nail up
to, but not *at*, 500 meters.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.woodworking/msg/8018e13522d6fa8a
"The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky. One can
only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile."
>To tell the trajectory of an object only the initial flight needs to be
>observed. Any person, with half a brain, can tell where and how far it will
>travel based on normal acceleration and deceleration curves in air.
Obviously. But that doesn't mean you can actually *see* it.
>Resolving power is not the only factor in site. Research some more.
>
>In view of the demonstrated lack of credibility I would have to conclude you
>and the other trolls have never used a nail gun at all.
I've used nail guns extensively for their intended purpose: nailing pieces of
wood together. I'll admit that I've never used one for launching nails into
the air.
On 5/26/10 11:57 PM, Josepi wrote:
> Can you show us where you read I could see a nail at 500 metres?
>
> To tell the trajectory of an object only the initial flight needs to be
> observed. Any person, with half a brain, can tell where and how far it will
> travel based on normal acceleration and deceleration curves in air.
> Resolving power is not the only factor in site. Research some more.
>
Having half a brain might explains how one could think a nail gun shoots
a nail 500 meters.
> In view of the demonstrated lack of credibility I would have to conclude you
> and the other trolls have never used a nail gun at all.
>
In view of the fact that you've now shown your hand by letting it be
known that you didn't actually witness this 500 meter flight of a nail,
I think it's obvious on whom the lack of credibility should be placed.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
On 5/27/10 10:37 AM, Josepi wrote:
> That says it all. The next person that actually experiences shooting
> a air operated framing 3.5" clipped head nail gun into the air, can
> report what they see for distance.
>
[Raising hand] Umm, me. Nowhere near 1/4 mile, that's for darn sure.
What I do remember thinking was, "I can probably throw a ball farther
than that."
> I admit, about 1/2 of them I have shot could not be seen. You have to
> be looking in the right place when it leaves or it's gone.
>
You already admitted to not seeing how far they actually go, but "can
tell where and how far it will travel based on normal acceleration and
deceleration curves in air."
Have you ever seen this curve on a golf ball? A golf ball is pretty
aerodynamic and it has a very distinct and sudden deceleration curve. A
nail, tumbling through the air is closer to a parachute than a golf ball
in terms of being aerodynamic.
> The BS still remains from the group trolls that speak without real
> experience and nothing to back up their attacks.
>
When are you going to stop this nonsense and admit that you've never
witnessed it.
It's beyond embarrassing.
--
-MIKE-
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
--Elvin Jones (1927-2004)
--
http://mikedrums.com
[email protected]
---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply
In article <[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to: [email protected].> wrote:
>That says it all. The next person that actually experiences shooting a air
>operated framing 3.5" clipped head nail gun into the air, can report what
>they see for distance.
>
>I admit, about 1/2 of them I have shot could not be seen. You have to be
>looking in the right place when it leaves or it's gone.
>
>The BS still remains from the group trolls that speak without real
>experience and nothing to back up their attacks.
The BS is coming entirely from you. I don't have to launch a framing nail into
the air in order to know that it is physically impossible to see one at 500
meters with the unaided eye, your fantasies to the contrary notwithstanding.
Fifty meters is believable, barely; five hundred is not. You're either
self-deluded or a liar.
In article <[email protected]>, -MIKE- <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/26/10 11:57 PM, Josepi wrote:
>> Can you show us where you read I could see a nail at 500 metres?
>>
>> To tell the trajectory of an object only the initial flight needs to be
>> observed. Any person, with half a brain, can tell where and how far it will
>> travel based on normal acceleration and deceleration curves in air.
>> Resolving power is not the only factor in site. Research some more.
>>
>
>Having half a brain might explains how one could think a nail gun shoots
>a nail 500 meters.
Having only half a brain might also explain how one could think a framing nail
is visible at that distance.
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Joseph Gwinn
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> >
> >> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
> >> [email protected].> wrote:
> >>
> >> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
> >>
> >> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
> >> can
> >> see them, however, is certainly not.
> >>
> >> > One can
> >> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
> >> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye
> >> >at
> >
> >> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
> >>
> >> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500
> >> meters,
> >> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you
> >> measure
> >> the distance, anyway?
> >>
> >> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
> >> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
> >> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
> >
> >Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22
> > caliber rifles.
> >
> >When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could
> >easily
> >see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
> >sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't
> >move
> >too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much
> >visual
> >clutter). And young eyes, of course.
> >
> >One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and
> >indistinct
> >black spot.
>
> For part of the trajectory, sure -- a .22 bullet should be visible out to
> about 55 yards. But not all of it, unless that trajectory was fairly short,
> and Josepi's claim to be able to see a 3mm thick nail at 500 meters is at
> best
> wishful thinking.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity#Physiology_of_visual_acuity
>
> Regardless of how young your eyes are, there's still a lower limit to their
> resolving power: the size of a single cone in the retina, which corresponds
> to about 0.4 minutes of arc. That means it's simply impossible to see, for
> example, a .22 bullet at 200 yards, or a nail at 500 meters.
It's not quite that cut and dried.
One can see things that one cannot resolve. This happens all the time. A
classic example is an insect in a spotlight beam at night. One sees a bright
spot one pixel in size, even though the insect is far smaller than a pixel.
One can see subpixel absorbers as well, by the darkening of the pixel containing
the object. This is one way astronomers detect planets around distant stars.
Joe Gwinn
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Doug Miller) wrote:
> In article <HxIKn.10480$%[email protected]>, "Josepi" <X-Complaints-to:
> [email protected].> wrote:
>
> >The three I own shoot nails farther than the eye can see in the sky.
>
> That statement is plausible; your guesstimate of the distance at which you
> can
> see them, however, is certainly not.
>
> > One can
> >only track them, depending on the sky and background, about three to four
> >farmers fields and then they disappear, being too small for the human eye at
> >about 500 metres. Yes, that is over 1/4 mile.
>
> If you think that you can see an object 3mm x 10cm at a range of 500 meters,
> then you're full of ... well, you're deceiving yourself. How do you measure
> the distance, anyway?
>
> The theoretical limit of human visual acuity is 0.4 minutes of angle. It's
> completely impossible that you can see something only 3mm thick at *one*
> hundred meters (0.1 minutes), let alone *five* hundred (0.02 minutes).
Well, I've never used a nailgun of any kind, but I can tell you about 22 caliber
rifles.
When I was a teenager firing a 22 long rifle bullet over a lake, I could easily
see the bullet in flight for most of its trajectory. Now this required the
sightline to be close and parallel to the trajectory (so the image didn't move
too fast to be seen) and a distant background (so there wasn't too much visual
clutter). And young eyes, of course.
One could not resolve the bullet - it was seen as a fast-moving and indistinct
black spot.
Joe Gwinn
That says it all. The next person that actually experiences shooting a air
operated framing 3.5" clipped head nail gun into the air, can report what
they see for distance.
I admit, about 1/2 of them I have shot could not be seen. You have to be
looking in the right place when it leaves or it's gone.
The BS still remains from the group trolls that speak without real
experience and nothing to back up their attacks.
"Doug Miller" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I've used nail guns extensively for their intended purpose: nailing pieces
of
wood together. I'll admit that I've never used one for launching nails into
the air.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 21:11:15 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Bill Noble wrote:
>
>>
>> 3. pneumatic tools don't get hot when they run, that's a real plus if
>> you are using them a lot
>
>No kidding - just hold the tool so that your hand is near the exhaust port -
>a quick way to realize how cold expanding compressed air can really get...
The low torque is great when drilling with an pneumatic in thin metal,
at least my wrists think so when it binds.
Mark
On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:57:39 -0500, the renowned -MIKE-
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/23/10 3:06 PM, Ignoramus32683 wrote:
>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if it
>>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws if
>>> you don't stop on time!).
>>
>> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
>> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>>
>> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
>> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>>
>> i
>
>The newer ones last pretty long.
>I'm guessing cheap my 18v Ni-Cad B&D's last about 3X as long as my old
>12v Dewalts did. The new Lithium Ions probably double that.
>
>But like we've been saying, three batteries and a quick-charger makes it
>a moot point.
If you are not in good physical shape, two batteries might be more
than enough. ;-)
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
[email protected] Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Ignoramus32683" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if
>>> it
>>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
>>> if
>>> you don't stop on time!).
>>
>> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
>> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>>
>> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
>> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>>
>> i
>
> OK, that makes sense, maybe that's why I bought 2 drills, 6 batteries and 4
> chargers. :-) Too bad my energy level doesn't keep up!
>
> Actually I saw DeWalt had a lot of cordless tools available for their 18V
> XPR and I bought various sets to have all my cordless tools battery and
> charger compatible, the 2nd xrp drill came in a kit with 2 batteries, a
> charger, and an impact driver.
Dewalt 18XRP is the drill that I have, I love it and use it a lot. I
have two batteries for it, but for continuous use I get out my electric
drill.
i
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:59:19 GMT, [email protected] (Doug Miller)
wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>, skeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Doug,
>>depending on location I happen to have some new in box metabo cordless
>>drill drivers and electric screw guns. 15.6V for 175.00 18V for200.00
>>and electric screw gun 125.00 plus shipping. this is about half price
>>for these tools. I found several at a good deal and am passing along
>>the savings to fellow woodworkers. They are NOT hot! leave a message
>>here if you are interested or e-mail me at fcpreston at nc dot rr dot
>>com. I do not sell tools for a living.... :-]
>>
>>skeez
>
>Thanks for the offer, skeez -- and BTW, coming from you, it never even
>occurred to me to wonder if they were hot -- but I think I'll see how I get
>along with the aging Bosch and the nearly-new Ryobi that I'm sure I can borrow
>from my Dad; I forgot he had one. And I should have remembered that: I gave it
>to him for Christmas.
lol.... dont for get pics. :-]
Maybe the USanians have standardized on Roberts head sizes, since the patent
timed out?...LOL
I don't think the old screws are going to like the chamge of technique
though.
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Driver bits are pretty standard these days. A new drill will usually work,
too. ;-)
On Sun, 23 May 2010 17:00:47 -0400, "J. Clarke" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On 5/23/2010 1:24 PM, Josepi wrote:
>> Do you think the batteries will be good enough when you resurrect those
>> old
>> drills to get those screws out again?
>
>If they aren't I'm sure that Makita will be happy to sell him a
>replacement set, or he can get the old ones rebuilt.
"Jerome Meekings" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1jj0zg0.1ou9pqq10xdyy8N%[email protected]...
> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > 4) The service life is much longer than any electric powered drill.
>>
>> More crap.
>
> In your opinion.
>
> If electric impact drivers were so good then tyre shops and garages
> would use them.
Actually they do use them, I still have one from my old tire days.
That electric 1/2" impact wrench would take care of what air could not.
On 2010-05-26, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> The only problems I've had with SS is the heads stripping easily. An impact
> driver should fix that problem.
Yes. SS is softer.
I'm pretty new to the whole screw gun technology scene and now that
I've invested in a good one and used it, I wish I'd have known more
about it and gone with a screw/impact driver, instead. I can now see
why I'll eventually be buying one despite already having a good screw
gun.
nb
On Sun, 23 May 2010 19:09:50 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
>hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly while
>hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at the next
>piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb and the nials
>are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set into the wood.
They sure do around here. I think one house of six, built in the last year in
my neighborhood, had a hammer on the property. They aren't too bothered
scrambling around on the rafters.
Mike Marlow wrote:
>
> Josepi wrote:
> > Most pro framers, I have seen do not use compressed air, they swing a
> > hammer. Try carrying a nailgun up into a framed roof rafter assembly
> > while hanging on to the last truss member you hammered in to get at
> > the next piece. A hammer and puch full of nails makes an easier climb
> > and the nials are removable for a few eeks until they rust or set
> > into the wood.
> >
>
> It's a mix. The hammer still has its place but to say that most pro framers
> aren't using nailers is, well... bull. You need to look more closely.
No kidding. You heard almost nothing but air nailers around here,
before the housing bubble burst. Both conventional homes, and at all
the mobile home factories before they shut down.
--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
I found that out the hard way too...LOL
"Here is some more of the defective shingles you installed"
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Mon, 24 May 2010 08:17:53 -0400, "Josepi" <[email protected]> wrote:
Shingle warranties are useless anyway.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 04:38:50 -0700 (PDT), Jim Wilkins <[email protected]>
wrote:
>It will barely drive a #10 x 3" screw without predrilling,
Predrilling
--
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
On Sun, 23 May 2010 18:28:16 -0500, Ignoramus32683
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> "Ignoramus32683" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> On 2010-05-23, RogerN <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Just curious, why can't you build a deck with a battery powered drill? I
>>>> twisted lag bolts in two with my Dewalt 18V XRP but I can't remember if
>>>> it
>>>> was with the drill or the impact (the impact is bad about breaking screws
>>>> if
>>>> you don't stop on time!).
>>>
>>> Roger, my answer to you (and others) was that batteries do not last
>>> when the job is to just drive a screw after screw.
>>>
>>> Apparently, others' experience may be different, and, if so, I will
>>> retract my comment about cordless drills.
>>>
>>> i
>>
>> OK, that makes sense, maybe that's why I bought 2 drills, 6 batteries and 4
>> chargers. :-) Too bad my energy level doesn't keep up!
>>
>> Actually I saw DeWalt had a lot of cordless tools available for their 18V
>> XPR and I bought various sets to have all my cordless tools battery and
>> charger compatible, the 2nd xrp drill came in a kit with 2 batteries, a
>> charger, and an impact driver.
>
>Dewalt 18XRP is the drill that I have, I love it and use it a lot. I
>have two batteries for it, but for continuous use I get out my electric
>drill.
I have two 18V XRP drills, one a "compact" model (which isn't compact). I
found one for less than $100 (less than the price of two batteries) on the
get-it-outta-here table at HomeDespot. I also have the 6-1/2" circular saw,
so six batteries. I don't use the drills often, though. I would much rather
use the 12V Bosch and the Impactor. I'd break them out if I built a deck,
though. ;-)
I never liked to disable the second lock-out feature. Many of the framers
do. You have to hold the sleeve back and pull the trigger. Make sure there
are no houses within a mile of the shot though, and keep your fingers
clear...LOL
"Martin H. Eastburn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Had the second lock out disabled ? - Typical production trick.
Mine has to pull the trigger and that is an AND push the nose in.
One or the other won't fire. Those in a hurry disable the double
and have it nose only. Pull trigger and dance the gun. But dancing
is dangerous as you pointed out.
Martin